1
|
de Wilde MS, Devassy R, Krentel H, De Wilde RL, Torres-de la Roche LA. Self-Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Gel for Adhesion Prophylaxis in Laparoscopic Deep Endometriosis Removal: Safety Report of a Prospective Pilot Study. J Clin Med 2024; 13:6284. [PMID: 39458233 PMCID: PMC11508576 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 09/30/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Surgical removal of deep endometriosis lesions is an established method of reducing patient symptoms, but it often results in iatrogenic adhesions that lead to further problems. This pilot study presents the safety evaluation of a novel self-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel used to reduce adhesions after non-bowel deep endometriosis surgery. Methods: A single cohort, single-center, non-randomized pilot study was conducted in patients diagnosed with non-bowel deep endometriosis who underwent a three-stage treatment regimen consisting of first surgery, hormone therapy and second surgery. The present report is limited to an analysis of the inflammatory parameters, pain and complications occurring within a 72 h period following the initial laparoscopy (FLL) utilizing the anti-adhesion gel. Results: 60 patients (28.48 ± 5.9 years old) were included. 24 h after the intervention, a slight elevation in C-reactive protein levels was observed in 38.33% of cases (0.98 ± 1.46 mg/dL), with a statistically significant difference after FLL (0.98 ± 1.46 mg/dL before FLL vs. 1.03 ± 1.29 mg/dL after FLL; p =< 0.001); there were no patients with levels above 10 mg/dL before or after surgery. 24 h after FLL, 29.33% of patients had a leukocyte count greater than 11 Thous/μL, with a maximum observed value of 16.2 Thous/μL. The count was found to be statistically significantly higher after FLL (6.03 ± 1.91 Thous/μL before FLL vs. 9.15 ± 2.61 Thous/μL after FLL; p =< 0.001). At 72 h post-intervention, postoperative pain was reported in up to 63.33% of cases, and one urinary tract infection with fever occurred but was not considered to be related to the product. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: The results of this exploratory study showed a safe range of inflammatory response within a 24 h period following the application of the novel self-cross-linked hyaluronic acid antiadhesion gel (HyaRegen®) in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for non-bowel deep endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Sophie de Wilde
- University Hospital for Gynecology Pius Hospital, University Medicine Oldenburg, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany (R.L.D.W.)
| | - Rajesh Devassy
- Centre of Excellence in Gynecological Minimal Access Surgery and Oncology, Dubai London Clinic & Specialty Hospital, Dubai 337150, United Arab Emirates
| | - Harald Krentel
- Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Oncology and Senology, Bethesda Hospital, 47053 Duisburg, Germany;
| | - Rudy Leon De Wilde
- University Hospital for Gynecology Pius Hospital, University Medicine Oldenburg, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany (R.L.D.W.)
| | - Luz Angela Torres-de la Roche
- University Hospital for Gynecology Pius Hospital, University Medicine Oldenburg, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany (R.L.D.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Wilde RL, Adlan A, Aquino P, Becker S, Bigozzi M, Catena U, Clark J, Darmawan F, Dubuisson J, Habana MA, Khoo CK, Koninckx PR, Krentel H, Lam A, Lasmar R, Mansuria SM, Mukherjee S, Musigavong O, Ohri S, Pados G, Pinho de Oliveira MA, Puntambekar S, Rabischong B, Saridogan E, Sehouli J, Sendag F, Paz Tan R, Tanos V, Ten Broek R, Tica V, Torres-de la Roche LA, Wallwiener M, Zhu L, Devassy R. Global recommendations on adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2024; 16:291-293. [PMID: 39357859 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.16.3.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Adhesions are recognised as one of the most common complications of abdominal surgery; their diagnosis and prevention remains a significant unmet need in surgical therapy, affecting negatively a patient's quality of life and healthcare budgets. In addition, postoperative pelvic adhesions pose a high risk of reduced fertility in women of childbearing age. These 2023 Global Recommendations on Adhesion Prevention in Gynaecological Laparoscopic Surgery provide agreed-upon statements to guide clinical practice, with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
3
|
Schaefer SD, Alkatout I, Dornhoefer N, Herrmann J, Klapdor R, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Meszaros J, Mustea A, Oppelt P, Wallwiener M, Kraemer B. Prevention of peritoneal adhesions after gynecological surgery: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 310:655-672. [PMID: 38878233 PMCID: PMC11258159 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07584-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The formation of adhesions after gynecological surgery not only has detrimental impacts on those affected, including pain, obstruction, and infertility, but also imposes a high economic burden on healthcare systems worldwide. OBJECTIVE The aim of this review was to evaluate the adhesion prevention potential of all currently available adhesion barriers for gynecological surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We systematically searched MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of adhesion barriers as compared with peritoneal irrigation or no treatment in gynecological surgery. Only RCTs with second-look surgery to evaluate adhesions in the pelvic/abdominal (but not intrauterine) cavity were included. RESULTS We included 45 RCTs with a total of 4,120 patients examining a total of 10 unique types of barriers in second-look gynecological surgery. While RCTs on oxidized regenerated cellulose (significant improvement in 6 of 14 trials), polyethylene glycol with/without other agents (4/10), hyaluronic acid and hyaluronate + carboxymethylcellulose (7/10), icodextrin (1/3), dextran (0/3), fibrin-containing agents (1/2), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (1/1), N,O-carboxymethylchitosan (0/1), and modified starch (1/1) overall showed inconsistent findings, results for expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, hyaluronic acid, and modified starch yielded the greatest improvements regarding adhesion reduction at 75%, 0-67%, and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Best results for adhesion prevention were reported after applying Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane, hyaluronic acid, and 4DryField®. As Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane is nonabsorbable, it is associated with a greater risk of new adhesion formation due to second-look surgery to remove the product. 4DryField® yielded the greatest improvement in adhesion score compared to all other barrier agents (85%). For better comparability, future studies should use standardized scores and put more emphasis on patient-reported outcome measures, such as pain and infertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian D Schaefer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clemenshospital Muenster, Münster, Germany.
| | - Ibrahim Alkatout
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - Nadja Dornhoefer
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Joerg Herrmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Weimar Hospital, Weimar, Germany
| | - Ruediger Klapdor
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Albertinen Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Jozsef Meszaros
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Mustea
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Peter Oppelt
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Endocrinology, Johannes Kepler University, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Bernhard Kraemer
- Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Klinke M, Dietze N, Trautmann T, Jank M, Martel R, Elrod J, Boettcher M. Evaluation of 4DryField® as an Adhesion Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients: A Propensity-Score Matched Study. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2024. [PMID: 38848756 DOI: 10.1055/a-2340-9373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Abdominal adhesions following surgery can lead to complications like intestinal obstruction and pelvic pain. While no molecular therapies currently target the underlying adhesion formation process, various barrier agents exist. 4DryField® has shown promise in reducing bleeding and adhesions in adults. This study aimed to assess its effectiveness in children. METHODS The study examined all pediatric patients who underwent laparotomy between January 2018 and February 2022. It compared outcomes between those treated with 4DryField® and a control group. Key endpoints included surgical revision, adhesion recurrence, infections, insufficiencies, fever, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and time to gastrointestinal passage. RESULTS In total, 233 children had surgery for bowel adhesions. After propensity score matching, 82 patients were included in the analysis: 39 in the control and 43 in the 4DryField® group. 4DryField® did not affect the readhesion rate. Children in the treatment group had significantly more complications (47 vs. 15%, p = 0.002), more often fever, and higher CRP levels. CONCLUSIONS 4DryField® did not show potential in reducing adhesion formation, but it was associated with significantly more complications in pediatric patients. Thus, future prospective studies are needed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 4DryField® in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Klinke
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Nina Dietze
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Tina Trautmann
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Marietta Jank
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Richard Martel
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Julia Elrod
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Michael Boettcher
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shirafkan H, Moher D, Mirabi P. The reporting quality and spin of randomized controlled trials of endometriosis pain: Methodological study based on CONSORT extension on abstracts. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302108. [PMID: 38696383 PMCID: PMC11065215 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the reporting quality of published RCT abstracts regarding patients with endometriosis pelvic pain and investigate the prevalence and characteristics of spin in these abstracts. METHODS PubMed and Scopus were searched for RCT abstracts addressing endometriosis pelvic pain published from January 1st, 2010 to December 1st, 2023.The reporting quality of RCT abstracts was assessed using the CONSORT statement for abstracts. Additionally, spin was evaluated in the results and conclusions section of the abstracts, defined as the misleading reporting of study findings to emphasize the perceived benefits of an intervention or to confound readers from statistically non-significant results. Assessing factors affecting the reporting quality and spin existence, linear and logistic regression was used, respectively. RESULTS A total of 47 RCT abstracts were included. Out of 16 checklist items, only three items including objective, intervention and conclusions were sufficiently reported in the most abstracts (more than 95%), and none of the abstracts presented precise data as required by the CONSORT-A guidelines. In the reporting quality of material and method section, trial design, type of randomization, the generation of random allocation sequences, the allocation concealment and blinding were most items identified that were suboptimal. The total score for the quality varied between 5 and 15 (mean: 9.59, SD: 3.03, median: 9, IQR: 5). Word count (beta = 0.015, p-value = 0.005) and publishing in open-accessed journals (beta = 2.023, p-value = 0.023) were the significant factors that affecting the reporting quality. Evaluating spin within each included paper, we found that 18 (51.43%) papers had statistically non-significant results. From these studies, 12 (66.66%) had spin in both results and conclusion sections. Furthermore, the spin intensity increased during 2010-2023 and 38.29% of abstracts had spin in both results and conclusion sections. CONCLUSION Overall poor adherence to CONSORT-A was observed, with spin detected in several RCTs featuring non-significant primary endpoints in obstetrics and gynecology literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoda Shirafkan
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - David Moher
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Parvaneh Mirabi
- Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Krentel H, Naem A, Tannapfel A, Devassy R, Constantin AS, De Wilde RL. Postoperative Peritoneal Granulomatous Inflammation After the Application of Potato Starch-Based Anti-Adhesive Agent in Laparoscopic Endometriosis Surgery. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15:325-329. [PMID: 38128090 PMCID: PMC10832647 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.15.4.105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory oestrogen-dependent disease. It is characterised by elevated inflammatory markers in the peritoneal milieu with subsequent adhesiogenesis. Nowadays, excisional, and ablative surgeries are considered the main treatment of endometriosis, and adhesiolysis is being performed almost routinely during these procedures. Postoperative adhesion formation is a significant concern for many surgeons, especially as endometriosis patients are assumed to be predisposed to adhesiogenesis. In order to minimise adhesiogenesis after endometriosis surgery, the usage of different barrier methods have been discussed in the literature. Recent studies aim to investigate the effect of potato starch preparations on adhesion formation in endometriosis patients. Objectives We aim to describe the findings of a second-look laparoscopy on patients who received a starch-based anti-adhesive agent. Materials and Methods We present a retrospective case series that included the medical, surgical, and histopathologic data of three patients. Main outcome measures Intraperitoneal adhesion formation and peritoneal inflammation. Results All three patients had de-novo adhesions during the second-look laparoscopy. Pathological examination revealed noncaseating granulomatosis of the peritoneum in all patients. Conclusion The use of potato starch-based agents as a peritoneal adhesion prophylaxis in laparoscopic endometriosis surgery could lead to granulomatous peritoneal inflammation. Correct application by avoiding powder remnants through complete rinsing and transformation to gel seems to be an important factor to avoid this adverse effect. What is new? We aim to highlight that potato starch-based anti-adhesive agents similar to the one used in this study could be a cause of adhesiogenesis and peritoneal inflammation.
Collapse
|
7
|
Tan Z, Gong X, Wang CC, Zhang T, Huang J. Diminished Ovarian Reserve in Endometriosis: Insights from In Vitro, In Vivo, and Human Studies-A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:15967. [PMID: 37958954 PMCID: PMC10647261 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242115967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometriosis, a prevalent disorder in women of reproductive age, is often associated with undesired infertility. Ovarian reserve, an essential measure of ovarian function that is crucial for maintaining fecundity, is frequently diminished in women with endometriosis. Though the causative relationship between endometriosis and reduced ovarian reserve is not fully understood due to the lack of standardized and precise measurements of ovarian reserve, there is ongoing discussion regarding the impact of interventions for endometriosis on ovarian reserve. Therefore, in this review, we investigate articles that have related keywords and which were also published in recent years. Thereafter, we provide a comprehensive summary of evidence from in vitro, in vivo, and human studies, thereby shedding light on the decreased ovarian reserve in endometriosis. This research consolidates evidence from in vitro, in vivo, and human studies on the diminished ovarian reserve associated with endometriosis, as well as enhances our understanding of whether and how endometriosis, as well as its interventions, contribute to reductions in ovarian reserve. Furthermore, we explore potential strategies to modify existing therapy options that could help prevent diminished ovarian reserve in patients with endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhouyurong Tan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; (Z.T.); (X.G.); (C.C.W.)
| | - Xue Gong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; (Z.T.); (X.G.); (C.C.W.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China
| | - Chi Chiu Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; (Z.T.); (X.G.); (C.C.W.)
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Chinese University of Hong Kong-Sichuan University Joint Laboratory in Reproductive Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Reproduction and Development, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; (Z.T.); (X.G.); (C.C.W.)
| | - Jin Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; (Z.T.); (X.G.); (C.C.W.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China
| |
Collapse
|