Which of 51 Plate Designs Can Most Stably Fixate the Fragments in a Fracture of the Mandibular Condyle Base?

Optimal Plate Choice for High-Neck Mandibular Condyle Fracture: A Mechanistic Analysis of 16 Options

(1) Background: Mandibular fractures are common, with the condylar process being a frequent site of injury, accounting for 25-45% of cases. This research aims to assess the mechanical suitability of various plates for high-neck condyle fractures. (2) Methods: Polyurethane models mimicking high-neck condyle fractures were utilized in this study. Sixteen distinct plate designs, constructed from titanium sheets, were tested. The figures underwent force assessments on a durability testing apparatus, and the relationship between used force and fracture movement was documented. (3) Results: For high-neck breaking, the two straight plates emerged as the most effective, aligning with established osteosynthesis standards. The second-best plate exhibited nearly half the strength of the gold standard. (4) Conclusions: In response to the aim of this study, considering the mechanical aspects, the double plain plate stands out as the optimal choice for osteosynthesis in cases of high-neck fractures of the mandibular condylar process. In addition, the authors propose the Mechanical Excellence Factor (MEF) as a superior metric for appraising a plate's mechanical force, surpassing the conventional Plate Design Factor (PDF).

Which of the 37 Plates Is the Most Mechanically Appropriate for a Low-Neck Fracture of the Mandibular Condyle? A Strength Testing

(1) Background: The mandible is the most frequently injured component of the facial skeleton, with 25-45% of mandibular fractures involving the condylar process. This study aims to mechanically compare which plates are most suitable for use in low-neck fractures of the condyle. (2) Methods: Polyurethane mandibular models with simulated low-neck fractures were tested using 37 distinct plate designs. These plates were fabricated from 1 mm thick, grade 23 titanium sheets. The models were then subjected to force tests on a strength machine, and the correlation between applied force and fracture displacement was recorded. (3) Results: For low-neck fractures, XCP side-dedicated 3+5 and ACP-T plates demonstrated strength comparable to that of two straight plates, the current gold standard in osteosynthesis. (4) Conclusions: The Mechanical Excellence Factor (MEF) introduced by the authors provides a more accurate metric for theoretically predicting a plate's mechanical strength compared to the Plate Design Factor (PDF). Eight plate characteristics were utilized to calculate the MEF. Employing the MEF allows for rapid, preliminary validation before undertaking strength tests. Furthermore, the findings of this study can guide the selection of the most durable plate designs for subsequent fatigue testing.