All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique: Tips and Tricks

Notchplasty in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of clinical outcomes

Introduction

Notchplasty is an adjuvant procedure performed during Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with the purpose of widening the intercondylar notch of the femur. Its use is controversial due to its biomechanical influence on the knee and the potential for increased complications. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent ACLR with notchplasty.

Materials and methods

A systematic search of Cochrane, Embase, and Medline was conducted to identify papers evaluating clinical outcomes of patients who underwent ACLR with notchplasty. Inclusion criteria encompassed human studies with a control group, reporting clinical outcomes such as graft failure, graft rupture, range of motion values, and patient-reported outcomes.

Results

A total of 4 studies were included comprising 396 patients (129 with notchplasty, 235 without). No significant differences were reported regarding graft survivability or Lysholm score between those with notchplasty and those without. One study reported significantly reduced rates of revision surgery after ACLR with notchplasty. There were conflicting complication rates between studies regarding chronic synovitis and arthrofibrosis.

Conclusion

Patients who undergo notchplasty during primary ACLR have similar outcome scores and risk of graft failure compared to those who do not undergo notchplasty. Notchplasty patients may also be at a higher risk for loss of extension and chronic synovitis.

A Simplified Technique for All-Inside Tibial Socket Retrograde Drill Guiding Using a 2- to 3.5-mm Concentric Cannula Without the All-Inside Tibial Guide Ring

The all-inside anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) technique is a minimally invasive surgical procedure that has gained popularity due to its reduced invasiveness and improved patient outcomes. The establishment of tibial sockets remains a crucial step in ACL reconstruction, which has always been difficult in ACL reconstruction research. For doctors who are not very experienced, this technique of positioning and making sockets requires a special guide ring, and the tunnel entrance is prone to be anterior. Herein, we report a simplified technique using a self-made 2- to 3.5-mm concentric cannula to help surgeons easily master the all-inside technique. Our technique for tibial socket construction does not require the specific tibial guiding ring but uses a traditional tibial guiding ring for full-length tibial tunnel construction. With a 2-mm Kirschner wire and the traditional tibial guiding ring initially locating the tunnel position, the self-made concentric cannula helps combine the Kirschner wire with the guide pin sleeve, thereby impacting the guide pin sleeve into the tibial cortex at a controlled depth. Then, retrograde drilling is performed to create the socket. This technique provides feasible approaches for surgeons to transition from traditional full-long tunnel creation to the semi-long socket construction for the all-inside ACL technique.

Outcomes from different aspects indicate the all-inside technique may serve as an ideal option for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the postoperative outcomes of the all-inside technique in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

Patients who underwent ACLR using the all-inside technique between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively assessed. All patients were followed up for at least 2 years. Functional recovery and pain relief were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Instrumented laxity was assessed via side-to-side difference using the Kneelax3 arthrometer. Graft maturity was estimated using the signal-to-noise quotient value based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Adverse events during and after the surgery were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 28.1 ± 7.6 years. The IKDC (p < 0.001), Lysholm (p < 0.001) and KOOS (p < 0.001 for all subgroups) scores at the final follow-up were significantly higher than those before the surgery. The VAS scores (p < 0.05) were significantly lower than those before surgery. The side-to-side difference results indicated that 50 patients had a difference of less than 3 mm, indicating a tight graft, whereas only 1 patient had a difference of >5 mm, indicating a loose graft. The median signal-to-noise quotient of the graft on MRI was 1.4 (P25, P75: 1.0, 2.0). No intraoperative adverse events were observed. Postoperative adverse events included three cases of infection, three cases of graft rerupture, two cases of cyclops lesion and one case of surgical intervention for a meniscal tear.

CONCLUSION

ACLR using the all-inside technique offers promising results in patients with ACL rupture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Is Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction "Silva Technique" Equal to All-Inside Techniques? A Prospective Single-Center Study: An Alternative ACL All-Inside Reconstruction Technique Using a Tibial Tunnel and Bone Graft

Background: The development of less invasive all-inside techniques regarding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery has been associated with various advantages, including fewer complications and reduced postoperative pain. Silva et al. described a quadruple semitendinosus graft construct and suspensory button fixation for ACL reconstruction as an alternative technique. At the end of this technique, the tibial tunnel is filled with a bone autograft plug. This paper aims to examine the incorporation of the autograft and thus evaluate whether the "Silva technique" provides the same benefits as all-inside techniques. Methods: A prospective study assessed 31 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery using the "Silva technique." The cases involved in the study were skeletally mature patients with no previous history of ACL surgery or multiligamentous instability. All patients followed the same rehabilitation program and were examined at three standardized follow-up visits: 4 months, 8 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Tegner-Lysholm knee score (TLKS), visual analog score (VAS) for pain, and the IKDC subjective knee score were completed at every visit. A knee MRI scan was performed at every scheduled visit to assess bone graft incorporation and remodeling. Results: TLKS scores revealed a considerable improvement compared to preoperative figures, from 57.2 points preoperatively to an average of 99.4 at the 12-month follow-up (p < 0.0001). VAS scores were substantially ameliorated after the operation and until the second follow-up visit, from 5 before surgery to zero 8 months after the operation, with no noteworthy alterations afterward (p < 0.0001). IKDC subjective knee score outcomes were found to have increased at the last follow-up, from 59.3 prior to surgery to 99.8 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Regarding the MRI features of the bone autograft, the tibial tunnel was entirely filled by bone formation at the last MRI scan, suggesting complete integration of the autograft in all patients. Conclusions: Bone autograft employed to seal the tibial tunnel was completely incorporated in all cases 1 year postoperatively. The "Silva technique" appears to feature all the avails of all-inside techniques, whilst it seems to be simpler and easier than them after the surgeon is familiarized with its particular aspects. It is a robust option in orthopedic surgeons' arsenal. However, further large-scale pertinent research is requisite to confirm the findings of this study.

Knee Arthroscopy in the Era of Precision Medicine: A Comprehensive Review of Tailored Approaches and Emerging Technologies

Knee arthroscopy, a minimally invasive procedure, has transformed the treatment of knee pathologies by enabling direct visualization and management with minimal tissue disruption. Recent advances in precision medicine have introduced a new dimension to this field, allowing for highly individualized surgical approaches considering each patient's unique genetic, environmental, and biomechanical characteristics. This review explores the integration of precision medicine into knee arthroscopy, focusing on tailored approaches and emerging technologies. Key innovations such as robotic-assisted surgery, advanced imaging, and patient-specific instrumentation have enhanced surgical accuracy and patient outcomes, reduced recovery times, and minimized postoperative complications. The review also examines the role of biomarkers in guiding personalized treatment strategies, including ligament reconstructions, meniscal repairs, and cartilage restoration, which are now being refined to cater to the specific needs of individual patients. While the benefits of these innovations are clear, there are challenges to widespread adoption, including cost, resource allocation, and the need for further research to validate the efficacy of precision-driven approaches in knee arthroscopy. Moreover, the ethical considerations surrounding personalized medicine, such as patient privacy and genetic data usage, must also be addressed. Despite these barriers, the future of knee arthroscopy in the era of precision medicine holds great promise, with ongoing developments in artificial intelligence, genomics, and biomarker discovery poised to further refine patient-centered care. This comprehensive review provides valuable insights into how precision medicine reshapes knee arthroscopy, offering a glimpse into the future of more targeted and effective orthopedic interventions. By embracing these advancements, surgeons and healthcare providers can ensure optimal outcomes for patients undergoing knee arthroscopy.

A Comprehensive Review of Graft Choices and Surgical Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Outcome Analysis

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are among the most prevalent knee injuries, particularly in athletes engaged in high-impact sports. ACL reconstruction is a widely performed surgical procedure to restore knee stability, prevent further knee damage, and enable patients to return to their previous physical activity levels. However, the success of ACL reconstruction is influenced by various factors, including the choice of graft and the surgical technique employed. This comprehensive review explores the outcomes of different graft options - autografts, allografts, and synthetic grafts - and various surgical techniques such as single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction and anatomic versus non-anatomic tunnel placement. The review analyzes the short- and long-term outcomes, including functional recovery, return to sports, complication rates, and the impact of patient-specific factors such as age, activity level, and comorbidities. Additionally, the review discusses the role of rehabilitation protocols in optimizing surgical outcomes. By synthesizing current evidence, this review aims to provide clinicians with insights into the most effective graft choices and surgical techniques for primary ACL reconstruction, ultimately guiding the optimization of patient outcomes and highlighting areas for future research.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Athletes: A Comprehensive Review of Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are prevalent among young athletes and pose significant challenges due to their impact on immediate and long-term knee function. Traditional ACL reconstruction techniques, while effective, may not always meet the unique needs of this population, particularly given their high physical demands and the risk of future complications. This review evaluates two advanced surgical techniques - lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LEAT) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction - as potential enhancements to conventional ACL reconstruction. LEAT involves augmenting knee stability by addressing lateral compartment issues, while ALL reconstruction focuses on reconstructing the ALL to improve overall knee function. The review compares these techniques regarding surgical procedures, clinical outcomes, biomechanical effectiveness, and complications. LEAT and ALL reconstruction are examined for their impact on recovery, return-to-sport rates, and long-term knee health, highlighting their advantages and limitations. Findings suggest that both techniques offer promising benefits, with the potential for improved outcomes compared to traditional methods. However, the effectiveness of each technique can vary based on individual factors and the specific demands of different sports. Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term implications and refine these approaches. This review aims to guide clinical decision-making and optimize treatment strategies for young athletes with ACL injuries, enhancing their prospects for a successful return to athletic activity.

Finite element analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: A comparison of the mechanical properties of all-inside fixation and traditional fixation

Objective

The main purpose of this study was to explore the mechanical properties of the anterior cruciate ligament and its attachments following reconstruction with the all-inside technique after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Methods

Knee joint computed tomography data were collected from healthy volunteers, and knee joint models were created using Mimics software. A normal knee joint model, an all-inside reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament model, and a traditional reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament model were established. A tensile force of 134 N and a bending moment of 5 N/m were applied at the anterior aspect of the proximal tibia in these three models. The knee joint was subjected to external rotation, internal rotation, varus, valgus, flexion, and extension under this bending moment. The magnitude and distribution of stress on the ligament or graft and the magnitude and distribution of stress on the graft attachments were observed under different loading conditions.

Results

Under different external forces, the maximum stress on the ligament in the normal model fluctuated from 1.949 to 18.302 MPa, with an uncertain distribution of maximum stress. The maximum stress on the graft in the all-inside reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament model fluctuated from 0.705 to 3.465 MPa and was mainly distributed at the junction of the graft and the tibial footprint. In the traditional reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament model, the maximum stress on the graft fluctuated from 5.012 to 59.269 MPa and was primarily distributed at the junction of the interference screw and the graft. The concentration of stress on the loop and plate in the all-inside reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament model fluctuated from 70.461 to 346.363 MPa, with maximum stress distributed at the junction of the loop and the tibial surface. The maximum stress on the interference screw in the traditional reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament model fluctuated from 10.184 to 92.298 MPa, with maximum stress primarily distributed at the end of the interference screw.

Conclusion

Under different external forces, the graft used in all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is subjected to fewer external forces than that used in traditional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, which may indicate a relatively stable mechanical environment. The strength of the loop and plate can theoretically tolerate daily knee joint movements of patients without injury.

Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis With Cortical Suspensory Femoral Fixation and Suture Tape Augmentation

This article aims to provide a new surgical technique for rotational instability in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Two main groups of surgical procedures can be identified in the treatment of anterolateral knee instability: lateral extra-articular tenodesis and anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Although the importance of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in anterolateral complex injuries is well known, the superiority of lateral extra-articular tenodesis over anterolateral ligament reconstruction or vice versa has not yet been shown. Both techniques show improved outcomes and reduced graft failure rates. The presented procedure can be considered a modification of the technique first described by Lemaire. Better tensioning can be achieved through cortical suspension by identifying the anisometric point on the lateral femur and performing a medial pullout on the femoral side. The advantages of this technique are better fine-tuning and tensioning, less invasiveness, and adjustable cortical fixation, which allows for a precise, incremental tensioning of the graft, ensuring circumferential healing of the graft within the socket and reducing the risk of graft laceration, which may happen with interference screws. Internal bracing provides excellent contact pressure between the femoral button and femoral cortex, ensuring that adequate tensioning is applied to the graft.

Epidural administration of ropivacaine and midazolam is superior to intra-articular administration as postoperative analgesia after isolated arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings autograft: a randomized controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Reconstructive surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is quite common, previous studies have documented that adequate pain control in the early phases of the postoperative period translates into early mobility and a rapid start of rehabilitation. Therefore, the search for new strategies for postoperative pain control is justified. The aim of this study was to compare intra-articular to the epidural administration of ropivacaine and midazolam as postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft (HA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Double-blinded, prospective randomized clinical trial included 108 consecutive patients aged from 18 to 50 years that had undergone arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with HA. The patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The first group received intraarticular ropivacaine and midazolam. The second group received epidural ropivacaine and midazolam. The need for rescue analgesia, the postoperative pain experienced, side effects and complications of the analgesic drugs were evaluated.

RESULTS

The intra-articular group received statistically significantly higher mean doses of rescue analgesia on the first two days (2.8 ​± ​1.0 vs. 1.3 ​± ​0.6 in the epidural group; p ​= ​0.001). Visual Analogue Scale scores at flexion were statistically significantly higher in the intra-articular group over the entire study period. The intra-articular group also reported a statistically significantly lower range-of-motion 87 ​± ​15 vs. 102 ​± ​11 in the epidural group (p ​= ​0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Epidural administration of ropivacaine combined with midazolam in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with HA was clinically and significantly better relative to rescue analgesia and the intensity of pain in the first 48 postoperative hours when compared to intraarticular administration. There was no difference in terms of adverse effects and complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Rehabilitation of Soccer Players' Knee Injuries: Cartilage Reconstruction, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery, and Intensive Recovery-A Pilot Study

Knee injuries, particularly anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) damage and cartilage defects, are highly prevalent among athletes and affect their sports performance and long-term joint function. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive combination therapy approach for individuals with ACL and cartilage injuries. Twelve professional soccer players aged 18 to 30 years underwent bone-tendon-bone ACL reconstruction, microfracture cartilage repair surgery, and hyaluronic acid scaffold treatment. Early postoperative rehabilitation included immediate supervised physiotherapy and complete weight bearing. Follow-up assessments involved clinical evaluations, functional joint assessments, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to measure cartilage defect repair and symptom alleviation. The results showed that patients resumed pain-free activities within 3-4 weeks and returned to their pre-injury level within 4.5 months. MRI demonstrated the absence of inflammatory reactions, repair of marrow edema, and the emergence of new cartilage. Six months and one year after surgery, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire results demonstrated considerable improvement in patients' health condition and quality of life. Overall, the study suggests that the combination of Hyalofast membranes, microfracture surgery, tissue adhesive, and intensive postoperative physical therapy may be a potential alternative to commonly used treatments for patients with ACL rupture, allowing them to recover efficiently and return to sports activities.