1
|
Stefańczyk P, Jacheć W, Kutarski A, Dąbrowski P, Głowniak A, Nowosielecka D. Extraction of His Bundle Pacing Lead: More Difficult than Coronary Sinus Lead Extraction: An Analysis of 3897 Lead Extraction Procedures Including 27 His and 253 Coronary Sinus Lead Removals. Biomedicines 2024; 12:1154. [PMID: 38927361 PMCID: PMC11200661 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12061154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Experience with the transvenous extraction of leads used for His bundle pacing (HBP) is limited. METHODS Analysis of 3897 extractions including 27 HBP and 253 LVP (left ventricular pacing) leads. RESULTS The main reason for HBP lead extraction was lead failure (59.26%). The age of HBP and LVP leads (54.52 vs. 50.20 months) was comparable, whereas procedure difficulties were related to the LVP lead dwell time. The extraction of HBP leads > 40 months old was longer than the removal of younger leads (8.57 vs. 3.87 min), procedure difficulties occurred in 14.29%, and advanced tools were required in 28.57%. There were no major complications. The extraction time of dysfunctional or infected leads was similar in the HBP and LVP groups (log-rank p = 0.868) but shorter when compared to groups with other leads. Survival after the procedure did not differ between HBP and LVP groups but was shorter than in the remaining patients. CONCLUSIONS 1. HBP is used in CRT-D systems for resynchronisation of the failing heart in 33.33%. 2. Extraction of HBP leads is most frequently performed for non-infectious indications (59.26%) and most often because of lead dysfunction (33.33%). 3. The extraction of "old" (>40 months) HBP leads is longer (8.57 vs. 3.87 min) and more difficult than the removal of "young" leads due to unexpected procedure difficulties (14.29%) and the use of second line/advanced tools (28.57%), but it does not entail the risk of major complications and procedure-related death and is comparable to those encountered in the extraction of LVP leads of a similar age. 4. Survival after lead extraction was comparable between HBP and LVP groups but shorter compared to patients who underwent the removal of other leads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paweł Stefańczyk
- Department of Cardiology, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital of Zamość, 22-400 Zamość, Poland; (P.S.); (P.D.)
| | - Wojciech Jacheć
- 2nd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Andrzej Kutarski
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (A.K.); (A.G.)
| | - Paweł Dąbrowski
- Department of Cardiology, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital of Zamość, 22-400 Zamość, Poland; (P.S.); (P.D.)
| | - Andrzej Głowniak
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (A.K.); (A.G.)
| | - Dorota Nowosielecka
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital of Zamość, 22-400 Zamość, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kutarski A, Jacheć W, Czajkowski M, Stefańczyk P, Kosior J, Tułecki Ł, Nowosielecka D. Lead Break during Extraction: Predisposing Factors and Impact on Procedure Complexity and Outcome: Analysis of 3825 Procedures. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2349. [PMID: 38673622 PMCID: PMC11051408 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Currently, there are no reports describing lead break (LB) during transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Methods: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 3825 consecutive TLEs using mechanical sheaths. Results: Fracture of the lead, defined as LB, with a long lead fragment (LF) occurred in 2.48%, LB with a short LF in 1.20%, LB with the tip of the lead in 1.78%, and LB with loss of a free-floating LF in 0.57% of cases. In total, extractions with LB occurred in 6.04% of the cases studied. In cases in which the lead remnant comprises more than the tip only, there was a 50.31% chance of removing the lead fragment in its entirety and an 18.41% chance of significantly reducing its length (to less than 4 cm). Risk factors for LB are similar to those for major complications and increased procedure complexity, including long lead dwell time [OR = 1.018], a higher LV ejection fraction, multiple previous CIED-related procedures, and the extraction of passive fixation leads. The LECOM and LED scores also exhibit a high predictive value. All forms of LB were associated with increased procedure complexity and major complications (9.96 vs. 1.53%). There was no incidence of procedure-related death among such patients, and LB did not affect the survival statistics after TLE. Conclusions: LB during TLE occurs in 6.04% of procedures, and this predictable difficulty increases procedure complexity and the risk of major complications. Thus, the possibility of LB should be taken into account when planning the lead extraction strategy and its associated training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Kutarski
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Wojciech Jacheć
- 2nd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland
| | - Marek Czajkowski
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland
| | - Paweł Stefańczyk
- Department of Cardiology, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital of Zamosc, 22-400 Zamosc, Poland
| | - Jarosław Kosior
- Department of Cardiology, Masovian Specialistic Hospital of Radom, 26-617 Radom, Poland
| | - Łukasz Tułecki
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital of Zamosc, 22-400 Zamosc, Poland
| | - Dorota Nowosielecka
- Department of Cardiology, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital of Zamosc, 22-400 Zamosc, Poland
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital of Zamosc, 22-400 Zamosc, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kutarski A, Jacheć W, Stefańczyk P, Brzozowski W, Głowniak A, Nowosielecka D. Analysis of 1051 ICD Leads Extractions in Search of Factors Affecting Procedure Difficulty and Complications: Number of Coils, Tip Fixation and Position-Does It Matter? J Clin Med 2024; 13:1261. [PMID: 38592112 PMCID: PMC10931966 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads are considered a risk factor for major complications (MC) during transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Methods: We analyzed 3878 TLE procedures (including 1051 ICD lead extractions). Results: In patients with ICD lead removal, implant duration was almost half as long (69.69 vs. 114.0 months; p < 0.001), procedure complexity (duration of dilatation of all extracted leads, use of more advanced tools or additional venous access) (15.13% vs. 20.78%; p < 0.001) and MC (0.67% vs. 2.62%; p < 0.001) were significantly lower as compared to patients with pacing lead extraction. The procedural success rate was higher in these patients (98.29% vs. 94.04%; p < 0.001). Extraction of two or more ICD leads or additional superior vena cava (SVC) coil significantly prolonged procedure time, increased procedure complexity and use of auxiliary or advanced tools but did not influence the rate of MC. The type of ICD lead fixation and tip position did not affect TLE complexity, complications and clinical success although passive fixation reduces the likelihood of procedural success (OR = 0.297; p = 0.011). Multivariable regression analysis showed that ICD lead implant duration ≥120 months (OR = 2.956; p < 0.001) and the number of coils in targeted ICD lead(s) (OR = 2.123; p = 0.003) but not passive-fixation ICD leads (1.361; p = 0.149) or single coil ICD leads (OR = 1.540; p = 0.177) were predictors of higher procedure complexity, but had no influence on MC or clinical and procedural success. ICD lead implant duration was of crucial importance, similar to the number of leads. Lead dwell time >10 years is associated with a high level of procedure difficulty and complexity but not with MC and procedure-related deaths. Conclusions: The main factors affecting the transvenous removal of ICD leads are implant duration and the number of targeted ICD leads. Dual coil and passive fixation ICD leads are a bit more difficult to extract whereas fixation mechanism and tip position play a much less dominant role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Kutarski
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland; (A.K.)
| | - Wojciech Jacheć
- 2nd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Paweł Stefańczyk
- Department of Cardiology, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital of Zamość, 22-400 Zamość, Poland
| | - Wojciech Brzozowski
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland; (A.K.)
| | - Andrzej Głowniak
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland; (A.K.)
| | - Dorota Nowosielecka
- Department of Cardiology, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital of Zamość, 22-400 Zamość, Poland
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital of Zamość, 22-400 Zamość, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kutarski A, Jacheć W, Stefańczyk P, Polewczyk A, Kosior J, Nowosielecka D. VDD Lead Extraction-Differences with Other Leads and Practical Tips in Management. J Clin Med 2024; 13:800. [PMID: 38337494 PMCID: PMC10856487 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: VDD (atrial sensing, ventricular sensing/pacing) leads are relatively rarely implanted; therefore, experience in their extraction is very limited. We aimed to investigate whether VDD lead removal may be a risk factor for the increased complexity of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) or major complications. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 3808 TLE procedures (including 103 patients with VDD leads). Results: If TLE included VDD lead removal, procedure duration (lead dilation time) was prolonged, complicated extractions were slightly more common, and more advanced tools were required. This is partly due to longer implant duration (in patients with VDD systems-135.2 months; systems without VDD leads-109.3 months; p < 0.001), more frequent presence of abandoned leads (all systems containing VDD leads-22.33% and all systems without VDD leads-10.77%), and partly to the younger age of patients with VDD leads (51.74 vs. 57.72 years; p < 0.001, in the remaining patients) at the time of system implantation. VDD lead extraction does not increase the risk of major complications (1.94 vs. 2.34%; p = 0.905). Conclusions: The extraction of VDD leads may be considered a risk factor for increased procedure complexity, but not for major complications. However, this is not a direct result of VDD lead extraction but specific characteristics of the patients with VDD leads. Operator skill and team experience combined with special custom maneuvers can enable favorable results to be achieved despite the specific design of VDD leads, even with older VDD lead models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Kutarski
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Wojciech Jacheć
- 2nd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland
| | - Paweł Stefańczyk
- Department of Cardiology, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital of Zamosc, 22-400 Zamosc, Poland
| | - Anna Polewczyk
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, The John Kochanowski University, 25-369 Kielce, Poland
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Świętokrzyskie Center of Cardiology, 25-736 Kielce, Poland
| | - Jarosław Kosior
- Department of Cardiology, Masovian Specialistic Hospital of Radom, 26-617 Radom, Poland
| | - Dorota Nowosielecka
- Department of Cardiology, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital of Zamosc, 22-400 Zamosc, Poland
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital of Zamosc, 22-400 Zamosc, Poland
| |
Collapse
|