Knowledge and Educational Needs about Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) among Oncology Nurses

Neurologists' understanding of reproductive medicine options for genetic forms of motor neuron disease

OBJECTIVES

To examine the knowledge, confidence and practice of motor neuron disease (MND) clinicians toward discussing reproductive options with people who carry a causal variant in an MND gene (both clinically affected and asymptomatic).

METHODS

An online cross-sectional survey was distributed nationwide to UK MND clinicians and clinical geneticists and genetic counselors. The survey assessed respondents' understanding on reproductive medicine techniques; their confidence in discussing reproductive medicine options and their access to information resources.

RESULTS

Seventy six clinicians responded to the online survey (45 neurology clinicians and 31 clinical geneticists). MND clinicians had limited knowledge and low confidence in discussing reproductive medicine options. Geneticists were more likely to carry out reproductive genetic counseling with very few MND clinicians reporting undertaking these discussions. Further, 57% of the 45 MND clinicians surveyed reported to have never made a referral for reproductive genetic counseling. Multiple barriers to offering reproductive counseling or referral were identified including a lack of knowledge, lack of awareness of the different options, lack of clinic time and uncertainty around issues such as funding for PGT and whose responsibility it comes under.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for training and education on reproductive options and referral for these options needs to be integrated within the health system. Developing more resources for both clinicians and patients is required as MND clinicians reported a lack of resources.

Development and assessment of a knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) questionnaire for genetic counselees with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) indications

Background

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) can reduce the risk of familial genetic diseases, chromosome abnormalities, and recurrent abortions. It is unclear whether genetic counselees with PGT indications understand and accept the implications of PGT. A well-developed and validated tool is needed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) levels of genetic counselees with PGT indications. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a PGT KAP questionnaire (PGT-KAP-Q) for genetic counselees with PGT indications.

Methods

First, we established an item pool based on a literature review and qualitative interviews. Second, we developed the PGT-KAP-Q using the Delphi method. Third, we evaluated the quality of the questionnaire using item analysis and psychometric evaluation. The item analysis included extreme value comparison, application of the correlation and Cronbach's alpha (α) coefficient methods, and factor analysis. We also evaluated the content and structural validity of the questionnaire, as well as the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and split-half reliability.

Findings

After the literature review and interviews, and based on three rounds of expert consultations, we formed a 43-item questionnaire. In the validity analysis, the item's content validity index (I-CVI) and the average scale level CVI (S-CVI/Ave) values (>0.78 and >0.95, respectively) confirmed the questionnaire's content validity. Exploratory factor analysis showed that all 43 items had strong factor loadings (>0.4), and the three factors of the PGT-KAP-Q explained 51.97 % of the total variance. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the questionnaire was 0.95 (p < 0.05), the split-half reliability was 0.76 (p < 0.05) and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.78 (p < 0.05).

Interpretation

The 43-item PGT-KAP-Q for genetic counselees with PGT indications is reliable and valid. It contains a moderate number of items, is easy for patients to understand and accept, and can be used for clinical research and applications.

Public Awareness and Acceptability of PGT-M in Cancer Predisposition Syndromes

Cancer Predisposition Syndromes (CPSs), also known as Hereditary Cancer Syndromes (HCSs), represent a group of genetic disorders associated with an increased lifetime risk of developing cancer. In this article, we provide an overview of the reproductive options for patients diagnosed with CPS, focusing on the emerging role of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic disorders (PGT-M). Specifically, we conducted a literature review about the awareness and acceptability of its application to CPSs. Based on the available data, the awareness of the applicability of PGT-M for CPSs appears to be limited among both patients and physicians, and a heterogeneous set of factors seems to influence the acceptability of the procedure. Our findings highlight the need for increasing education about the use of PGT-M for CPSs. In this context, guidelines developed by professional or institutional bodies would represent a useful reference tool to assist healthcare professionals in providing proper preconception counseling.

Current State of Genomics in Nursing: A Scoping Review of Healthcare Provider Oriented (Clinical and Educational) Outcomes (2012-2022)

In the 20 years since the initial sequencing of the human genome, genomics has become increasingly relevant to nursing. We sought to chart the current state of genomics in nursing by conducting a systematic scoping review of the literature in four databases (2012-2022). The included articles were categorized according to the Cochrane Collaboration outcome domains/sub-domains, and thematic analysis was employed to identify key topical areas to summarize the state of the science. Of 8532 retrieved articles, we identified 232 eligible articles. The articles primarily reported descriptive studies from the United States and other high-income countries (191/232, 82%). More than half (126/232, 54.3%) aligned with the "healthcare provider oriented outcomes" outcome domain. Three times as many articles related to the "knowledge and understanding" sub-domain compared to the "consultation process" subdomain (96 vs. 30). Five key areas of focus were identified, including "nursing practice" (50/126, 40%), "genetic counseling and screening" (29/126, 23%), "specialist nursing" (21/126, 17%), "nurse preparatory education" (17/126, 13%), and "pharmacogenomics" (9/126, 7%). Only 42/126 (33%) articles reported interventional studies. To further integrate genomics into nursing, study findings indicate there is a need to move beyond descriptive work on knowledge and understanding to focus on interventional studies and implementation of genomics into nursing practice.

Limitations, concerns and potential: attitudes of healthcare professionals toward preimplantation genetic testing using polygenic risk scores

Preimplantation genetic testing using polygenic risk scores (PGT-P) has recently been introduced. However, PGT-P has been met with many ethical concerns. It is therefore important to get insights into the perspectives of stakeholders regarding PGT-P. We performed a qualitative interview study on the views of healthcare professionals toward PGT-P. We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 31 healthcare professionals working in the field of preimplantation genetic testing. The interviews explored the attitudes of healthcare professionals toward the technology of PGT-P, e.g., the validity, utility, limitations and potential benefits of PGT-P. We found that most healthcare professionals were concerned about the prematurity of introducing PGT-P into clinical practice. They had various ethical considerations, such as concerns related to validity and utility of PGT-P, limited embryos and options, and difficulties for prospective parents regarding comprehension and informed decision-making. Positive aspects were also identified, e.g., regarding reproductive autonomy and potential health benefits. Overall, most healthcare professionals considered that clinical implementation of PGT-P is premature. More comprehensive, longitudinal and inclusive studies are needed first, though these might not improve PGT-P enough to responsibly implement it. Healthcare professionals were also concerned that PGT-P could cause anxiety and create difficult choices for prospective parents. These perspectives and ethical considerations are crucial to consider for future guidelines and recommendations regarding PGT-P.

Professionals' knowledge, attitude and referral behaviour of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer caused by a BRCA1/2 mutation is the most frequent indication for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in the Netherlands. The extent to which involved professionals are informed about this option, however, is unclear. The few available international studies mostly represent a limited range of professionals, and suggest that their knowledge about PGD for hereditary cancer syndromes is sparse and referral for PGD is based on limited understanding. A cross-sectional survey assessing awareness, knowledge, acceptability and PGD-referral for BRCA was completed by 188 professionals involved in the field of breast and ovarian cancer or reproduction. One-half of professionals were aware of PGD for BRCA, and most had a low to moderate level of knowledge. A total of 86% considered PGD for BRCA acceptable and 48% had referred patients with BRCA for PGD. Awareness and knowledge was higher among professionals who worked at a university hospital (compared with a general hospital). Knowledge of PGD was positively associated with discussing and referring for PGD, and PGD acceptability was associated with previous awareness. Although PGD counselling is the primary responsibility of the geneticist, other involved professionals may be gatekeepers as patients rely on them for raising awareness and referral.

CRISPR, a Crossroads in Genetic Intervention: Pitting the Right to Health against the Right to Disability

Reproductive genetic technologies (RGTs), including gene-editing technology, are being discovered and refined at an exponential pace. One gene-editing innovation that demands our swift attention is CRISPR/Cas9, a system of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and a protein called Cas9. As CRISPR and other RGTs continue being developed, we must remain vigilant concerning the potential implications of genetic-engineering technology on our interpersonal and legal relationships. In the face of increasingly numerous and refined RGTs, we must maintain the rights of everyone: potential parents, prospective children, and individuals (both living and prospective) with disabilities. For those who wish to become parents, how should procreation be regulated in light of developing RGTs, especially gene-editing technology? What duties do parents owe their children, and when does such a duty attach? What role should RGTs play in parents' fulfillment of their duties to their children? This article will contextualize the right to health and what I will term the "right to disability" in the CRISPR/Cas9 landscape. The article will then explore these rights in reference to the "subjunctive-threshold" interpretation of harm. Finally, I will argue that RGTs must be thoughtfully regulated, with such regulations taking into account the opinions of geneticists, bioethicists, and lay people concerning both the right to health and the right to disability.

Oncofertility in adolescent and young adult hereditary cancer: Considerations for genetics professionals

Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with a cancer diagnosis or those at risk for cancer due to hereditary cancer syndromes may benefit from genetic counseling and testing not only to manage personal risk but also to address reproductive concerns, especially fertility. The opportunity for genetic counselors to provide important risk information is relevant to both the newly diagnosed as well as to unaffected carriers and survivors. However, genetic counselors may need additional training in reproductive options related to AYA cancer to provide this valuable counsel. This commentary uses hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome as a model to highlight important considerations when discussing preimplanatation genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis, particularly in the context of expanded testing for hereditary cancer risk including multigene panels or whole exome or whole genome sequencing. Other hereditary cancers are also addressed; however, less is known about the psychosocial and fertility concerns in these AYA populations. Additionally, we provide an overview of the concept of “oncofertility” - the linkage between cancer care and reproductive medicine that aims to expand the reproductive opportunities of cancer patients - and offer support for the expansion of guidelines to include genetic counselors in AYA cancer patients’ treatment planning related to reproductive health and fertility.