Screening and Invasive Testing in Twins

Genetic evaluation for twin pregnancies using karyotyping and single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis

The study aimed to assess chromosomal abnormalities in twin pregnancies using karyotyping and SNP array analysis. The research involved 530 twin pregnancies from two prenatal diagnosis centers between October 2012 and October 2022. Two types of twin pregnancies were considered: monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) and dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA), with a total of 177 MCDA and 353 DCDA cases. Chromosomal abnormalities were examined based on chorionic and amniotic sac properties and clinical indications. Among 42 twin pregnancies, 50 fetuses showed chromosomal abnormalities by karyotyping, with 35 cases of aneuploidy in DCDA and 10 in MCDA. Trisomy 21 was the most common aberration, affecting 15 fetuses in DCDA and 4 in MCDA. The rate of discordant karyotypes in MCDA and DCDA groups was 1.1% and 8.8%, respectively. Ultrasound abnormalities and advanced maternal age were frequent indications (55.3% and 39.2%, respectively). Aneuploidy frequencies in DCDA and MCDA pregnancies with advanced maternal age were 10.6% and 4.5%. Cardiac defects and increased nuchal translucency were common anomalies, with higher incidences of chromosomal abnormalities in DCDA (12.5% and 6.9%) and MCDA groups (23.5% and 3.7%). SNP array identified 1.6% clinically significant copy number variants in DCDA fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities, while no significant CNVs were found in MCDA pregnancies. Chromosomal aneuploidies were the primary abnormalities in twin pregnancies, with detectable abnormalities and clinically significant CNVs more likely in DCDA pregnancies, especially those with ultrasound abnormalities.

The importance of pre- and post-test counseling for prenatal cell-free DNA screening for common fetal aneuploidies

INTRODUCTION

Prenatal cell-free DNA screening for common fetal aneuploidies has rapidly changed the paradigm of prenatal care. Despite its advantages compared to conventional screening methods, its unexpectedly rapid implementation in clinical practice has generated several ethical and medical issues and misconceptions. Aggressive commercial marketing of cell-free DNA screening and media dissemination of misleading information have added confusion. Areas covered: This review provides an extensive update and will focus on the importance of pre-and post-test counseling for prenatal cell-free DNA screening not previously discussed extensively in the available literature. Additionally, we report cell-free DNA screening implementation in the largest obstetrical tertiary unit in Finland which is one of few countries that provides all prenatal screening methods free of charge for all women and has a very high uptake of first-trimester screening. This is not a systematical review, but rather a narrative overview which includes the most relevant and recent original publications and reviews covering this issue. Expert opinion: Despite being the most accurate method for screening of common fetal aneuploidies, the knowledge and counseling should be substantially improved. Cell-free DNA screening is not a replacement for diagnostic testing and its use in prenatal testing is complex and limited.

Congenital limb deficiency requiring transfemoral amputation

A healthy female infant was born from a twin pregnancy with an isolated congenital lower extremity malformation. Aside from prenatally diagnosed polyhydramnios, the infant had normal prenatal and postnatal diagnostic workup. She underwent transfemoral amputation and healed uneventfully. Congenital limb anomalies may be the result of an unidentified amniotic band, thromboembolic event or twin-twin transfusion syndrome, though in this case, prenatal screening did not indicate any evidence of a limb anomaly and postnatal workup was negative.