Impact of Rehabilitation on Outcomes after TAVI: A Preliminary Study

Comprehensive geriatric assessment, and related interventions, to improve outcomes for older patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a treatment for people with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, particularly those living with frailty. Increasing frailty is associated with poorer outcomes post-TAVI. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) has been shown in other settings to improve outcomes in those with frailty, including perioperatively. This systematic review aims to determine whether CGA, or interventions targeting its components, improves outcomes for older people undergoing TAVI.

METHODS

EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on 09/01/23 and then the search was rerun on the 16/04/24. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022299955). Included studies had to evaluate either CGA, or a single- or multi-domain intervention targeting components of CGA, in those aged ≥ 65.

RESULTS

From 4091 papers, 24 met the inclusion criteria. Two studies assessed CGA pre-TAVI and reported mixed improvements in functional independence but no change in length of stay or post-operative delirium, although both studies had a serious risk of bias. Fifteen papers described an exercise-based intervention, and 1 paper detailed a Cognitive Behavioural Therapy-based intervention. Seven studies evaluated a multi-component intervention. There were conflicting results reported for the multi-component and single-component interventions. All studies had at least a moderate risk of bias.

CONCLUSION(S)

There is a lack of evidence to determine whether CGA, or related interventions, improve outcomes for older adults undergoing-TAVI. The evidence for perioperative CGA, and the results of this review, support the need for well-designed trials evaluating whether CGA improves outcomes post-TAVI for older adults living with frailty.

Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Nonhome Discharge Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Multicenter Australian Experience-The NHD TAVI Study

Patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) commonly experience nonhome discharge (NHD), a phenomenon associated with increased health care expenditure and possibly poorer outcomes. Despite its clinical relevance in TAVI, the incidence and predictors of NHD and its impact on the quality of life remain poorly characterized. Also unknown is the proportion of patients who undergo TAVI that require long-term residential care after initial NHD. Therefore, we aimed to address these questions using a large, multicenter Australian cohort. A total of 2,229 patients who underwent TAVI from 2010 to 2023 included in the Alfred-Cabrini-Epworth TAVI Registry were analyzed. The median age was 82 (interquartile range 78 to 86) years and 41% were women. A total of 257 patients (12%) were not discharged home after TAVI, with the incidence falling over time (R2 = 0.636, p <0.001). A multivariable logistic regression model for NHD prediction was developed with excellent calibration and discrimination (C-statistic = 0.835). The independent predictors of NHD were postprocedural stroke (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 11.05), procedure at a private hospital (aOR 3.01), living alone (aOR 2.35), vascular access site complications (aOR 2.09), frailty (aOR 1.89), age >80 years (aOR 1.82), hypoalbuminemia (aOR 1.76), New York Heart Association III to IV (aOR 1.74), and hospital length of stay (aOR 1.13) (all p <0.05). NHD was not associated with mortality at 30 days and <1% of all patients required longer-term residential care. In conclusion, although common after TAVI, NHD does not predict short-term mortality, most patients successfully return home within 30 days, and when used appropriately, NHD may serve as a brief and effective method of optimizing functional status without compromising long-term independence.

Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on pre- and post-operative transcatheter aortic valve replacement prognoses

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a relatively new treatment method for aortic stenosis (AS) and has been demonstrated to be suitable for patients with varying risk levels. Indeed, among high-risk patients, TAVR outcomes are comparable to, or even better, than that of the traditional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) method. TAVR outcomes, with respect to post-surgical functional capacity and quality of life, have also been found to be improved, especially when combined with cardiac rehabilitation (CR). CR is a multidisciplinary system, which integrates cardiology with other medical disciplines, such as sports, nutritional, mind-body, and behavioral medicine. It entails the development of appropriate medication, exercise, and diet prescriptions, along with providing psychological support, ensuring the cessation of smoking, and developing risk factor management strategies for cardiovascular disease patients. However, even with CR being able to improve TAVR outcomes and reduce post-surgical mortality rates, it still has largely been underutilized in clinical settings. This article reviews the usage of CR during both pre-and postoperative periods for valvular diseases, and the factors involved in influencing subsequent patient prognoses, thereby providing a direction for subsequent research and clinical applications.

Exercise-based real-time telerehabilitation for older patients recently discharged after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: An extended feasibility study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the extended feasibility of a telerehabilitation program and its effects on physical performance in older adults who have recently undergone transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

METHODS

In this single-center feasibility study, patients underwent an eight-week telerehabilitation program, involving web-based home exercise training twice weekly, an activity tracker, access to an informative website, and one online session with a nurse, starting one-week postoperative. Data collection was performed before surgery and three months postoperative. The feasibility of the intervention was based on recruitment and adherence to the program. As a secondary outcome, we evaluated the change in six-minute walk distance from before surgery to three months postoperative.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients scheduled for TAVI were assessed for eligibility; 15 patients (37%) were enrolled. Of these, eight were excluded after surgery due to tiredness (n = 2), non-cardiac related hospital readmission (n = 2), fluctuating health (n = 1), death during hospital stay (n = 1), and reduced cognition (n = 2). Seven patients completed the eight-week web-based intervention and were evaluated three months postoperative. Their median (IQR) age was 83 [81, 87] years, and the sample comprised three men and four women. Their walked distance improved from median (IQR) 262 [199, 463] before surgery, to 381 [267, 521] meters three months postoperative. No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Web-based telerehabilitation, including supervised exercise training, in older adults who have recently undergone TAVI was feasible for a small number of patients who completed the eight-week intervention. This was reflected in an improvement in their walked distance three months after the surgery. However, the low recruitment and retention rates do question the overall feasibility of this intervention in a frail, older population of post-TAVI patients.

The Effects of Exercise Training on Exercise Capacity and Vascular Function after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation-A Pilot Study

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) improves event-free survival in patients with severe aortic stenosis, but patients' exercise capacity remains poor after the procedure. Therefore, we sought to compare the effects of a supervised center-based exercise training program and unsupervised exercise routine on exercise capacity and vascular function in patients after TAVI. Patients were randomized to either center-based exercise training (12-24 sessions of combined aerobic and low-weight resistance training twice weekly for 8-12 weeks) or an unsupervised home-based exercise routine (initial appraisal with detailed recommendations and monthly follow-up). Exercise capacity (cardiopulmonary testing) and vascular function (ultrasonographic measurement of flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) and arterial stiffness) were assessed at the baseline and after the study period. We included 23 patients (mean age of 81 years, 61% women), with higher-than-expected drop-out rates (41%) because of the coronavirus-19 pandemic outbreak. Exercise capacity improved over time, irrespective of the intervention group: 0.09 mL/min/kg increase in peak oxygen uptake (95% CI [0.01-0.16]; p = 0.02), 8.2 Watts increase in workload (95% CI [0.6-15.8]; p = 0.034), and 47 s increase in cumulative exercise time (95% CI [5.0-89.6]; p = 0.029). A between-group difference in change over time (treatment effect) was detected only for FMD (4.49%; 95% CI [2.35; 6.63], p < 0.001), but not for other outcome variables. Both supervised and unsupervised exercise training improve exercise capacity and vascular function in patients after TAVI, with supervised exercise training possibly yielding larger improvements in vascular function, as determined by FMD.

Improved Peak Oxygen Uptake Reduces Cardiac Events After 3 Weeks of Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation for Chronic Heart Failure Patients

Background: The incidence of heart failure (HF) is increasing, and the mortality from HF remains high in an aging society. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs (CRP) increase oxygen uptake (V̇O₂) and reduce HF rehospitalization and mortality. Therefore, CR is recommended for every HF patient. However, the number of outpatients undergoing CR remains low, with insufficient attendance at CRP sessions. In this study we evaluated the outcomes of 3 weeks of inpatient CRP (3w In-CRP) for HF patients. Methods and Results: This study enrolled 93 HF patients after acute-phase hospitalization between 2019 and 2022. Patients participated in 30 sessions of 3w In-CRP (30 min aerobic exercise twice daily, 5 days/week). Before and after 3w In-CRP, patients underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test, and cardiovascular (CV) events (mortality, HF rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular disease) after discharge were evaluated. After 3w In-CPR, mean (±SD) peak V̇O₂ increased from 11.8±3.2 to 13.7±4.1 mL/min/kg (116.5±22.1%). During the follow-up period (357±292 days after discharge), 20 patients were rehospitalized for HF, 1 had a stroke, and 8 died for any reasons. Proportional hazard and Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated that CV events were reduced among patients with a 6.1% improvement in peak V̇O₂ than in patients without any improvement in peak V̇O₂. Conclusions: 3w In-CRP for HF patients improved peak V̇O₂ and reduced CV events in HF patients with a 6.1% improvement in peak V̇O₂.

Three Weeks of Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation Improves Metabolic Exercise Data Combined With Cardiac and Kidney Indexes Scores for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has a high mortality rate, and cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRP) reduce HFrEF rehospitalization and mortality rates. Some countries attempt 3 weeks of inpatient CRP (3w In-CRP) for cardiac diseases. However, whether 3w In-CRP reduces the prognostic parameter of the Metabolic Exercise data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score is unknown. Therefore, we investigated whether 3w In-CRP improves MECKI scores in patients with HFrEF. Methods and Results: This study enrolled 53 patients with HFrEF who participated in 30 inpatient CRP sessions, consisting of 30 min of aerobic exercise twice daily, 5 days a week for 3 weeks, between 2019 and 2022. Cardiopulmonary exercise tests and transthoracic echocardiography were performed, and blood samples were collected, before and after 3w In-CRP. MECKI scores and cardiovascular (CV) events (heart failure rehospitalization or death) were evaluated. The MECKI score improved from a median 23.34% (interquartile range [IQR] 10.21-53.14%) before 3w In-CRP to 18.66% (IQR 6.54-39.94%; P<0.01) after 3w In-CRP because of improved left ventricular ejection fraction and percentage peak oxygen uptake. Patients' improved MECKI scores corresponded with reduced CV events. However, patients who experienced CV events did not have improved MECKI scores. Conclusions: In this study, 3w In-CRP improved MECKI scores and reduced CV events for patients with HFrEF. However, patients whose MECKI scores did not improve despite 3w In-CRP require careful heart failure management.

Efficacy and Safety of Home-Based Cardiac Telemonitoring Rehabilitation in Patients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Single-Center Usability and Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists on the efficacy of home-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients who have undergone transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Additionally, there are no reports on home-based cardiac telemonitoring rehabilitation (HBTR) in patients after TAVI.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the efficacy of HBTR in patients who have undergone TAVI.

METHODS

This single-center preliminary study introduced HBTR to patients after TAVI, and the efficacy outcomes of the rehabilitation method were compared to that of a historical control cohort. The historical control cohort (control group) consisted of 6 consecutive patients who underwent ordinary outpatient CR after TAVI from February 2016 to March 2020. Patients who participated in the HBTR program were only recruited after the TAVI procedure and before discharge between April 2021 and May 2022. In the first 2 weeks after TAVI, patients underwent outpatient CR and were trained using telemonitoring rehabilitation systems. Thereafter, patients underwent HBTR twice a week for 12 weeks. The control group performed standard outpatient CR at least once a week for 12 to 16 weeks. Efficacy was assessed using peak oxygen uptake (VO₂) prior to and after CR.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were included in the HBTR group. All patients underwent 24 HBTR sessions during the 12-week training period, and no adverse events were observed. The control group participants performed 19 (SD 7) sessions during the training period, and no adverse events were observed. Participants in the HBTR and control groups had a mean age of 80.4 (SD 6.0) years and 79.0 (SD 3.9) years, respectively. In the HBTR group, preintervention and postintervention peak VO₂ values were 12.0 (SD 1.7) mL/min/kg and 14.3 (SD 2.7) mL/min/kg (P=.03), respectively. The peak VO₂ changes in the HBTR and control groups were 2.4 (SD 1.4) mL/min/kg and 1.3 (SD 5.0) mL/min/kg (P=.64), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Home-based CR using a telemonitoring system is a safe outpatient rehabilitation method. Its efficacy is not inferior to that of standard CR in patients who have undergone TAVI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs032200122; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs032200122.

Kardiologische Rehabilitation als effektive Sekundärprävention

Ziele der kardiologischen Rehabilitation (kurz: KardReha) sind die Wiederherstellung der individuell bestmöglichen physischen und psychischen Gesundheit kardiovaskulär erkrankter Patienten durch die Therapie in einem multidisziplinären Team, diese nachhaltig zu stabilisieren und die berufliche und soziale Re-Integration zu ermöglichen. Auf der Basis einer S3-Leitlinie zur KardReha im deutschsprachigen Raum Europas führt die Teilnahme an einer KardReha bei Patienten nach akutem Koronarsyndrom und nach Bypass-Operation zu einer signifikanten Reduktion der Gesamtmortalität. Bei Patienten mit systolischer Herzinsuffizienz werden die körperliche Belastbarkeit und die Lebensqualität signifikant verbessert. Nach operativer oder interventioneller Herzklappenkorrektur werden die körperliche Belastbarkeit sowie die Lebensqualität gesteigert, und in ersten Studien zeigen sich Signale für eine Mortalitätsreduktion. Daher sollte die KardReha ein integraler Bestandteil einer am langfristigen Erfolg orientierten Behandlung sein.

Cost-Effectiveness of SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in German Severe Aortic Stenosis Patients at Low Surgical Mortality Risk

INTRODUCTION

In the randomized PARTNER 3 trial, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the SAPIEN 3 device significantly reduced a composite of all-cause death, stroke, and rehospitalization, compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and low risk of surgical mortality. Furthermore, TAVI has been shown to be cost-effective in low-risk patients, compared with SAVR, in a number of countries. This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of TAVI with SAPIEN 3 versus SAVR in Germany.

METHODS

A previously published two-stage Markov-based model that captured clinical outcomes from the PARTNER 3 trial was adapted for the German context using the German Statutory Health Insurance perspective. The model had a lifetime horizon. The cost-utility analysis estimated changes in direct healthcare costs as well as survival and health-related quality of life using TAVI with SAPIEN 3 compared with SAVR.

RESULTS

TAVI with SAPIEN 3 increased quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by + 0.72 at an increased cost of €8664 per patient. The incremental cost-effectiveness/QALY ratio was €12,037, which fell below that of other cardiovascular interventions in use in Germany. The cost-effectiveness of TAVI over SAVR remained robust across multiple challenging scenarios and was driven by lower longer-term management costs compared with SAVR.

CONCLUSIONS

TAVI with SAPIEN 3 appears to be a clinically meaningful, cost-effective treatment option over SAVR for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and low risk for surgical mortality in Germany.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier: NCT02675114.

Kardiologische Rehabilitation

A scientific guideline has been developed to update and harmonize exercise based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in German speaking countries of Europe. It addresses all aspects of CR including indications, contents and delivery. Four meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic effect of CR after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), after coronary bypass grafting (CABG), in patients with systolic heart failure (HFrEF), and to define the effect of psychological interventions during CR. Other indications for CR were based on a predefined semi-structured literature search and recommendations were established by a formal consenting process. CR is associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality in patients after ACS and CABG, whereas HFrEF-patients benefit in terms of exercise capacity and health-related quality of life. Patients with other cardiovascular diseases such as heart valve surgery or intervention, adults with congenital heart disease and peripheral arterial disease also benefit from CR-participation, but the scientific evidence is less clear. There is increasing evidence that the beneficial effect of CR strongly depends on “treatment intensity” including medical supervision, modulation of cardiovascular risk factors, information and education, and a minimum of individually adapted exercise volume. Additional psychologic interventions (PI) should be performed on the basis of individual needs. There was a trend towards reduction of depressive symptoms for “distress management” and “lifestyle changes” for PI. Patient education is able to increase patients` knowledge and motivation as well as behavior changes regarding physical activity, dietary habits and smoking cessation. Diversity-sensitive structures should be established to interact with the needs of special patient groups and gender issues. This guideline reinforces the substantial benefit of CR in specific cardiac indications, and it points out the minimal therapeutic needs in CR-delivery.

Exercise-Based Real-time Telerehabilitation for Older Adult Patients Recently Discharged After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

The use of telehealth technology to improve functional recovery following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has not been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to examine the feasibility of exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation after TAVI.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective, nonrandomized study using a mixed methods approach. Data collection included testing, researchers' observations, logbooks, and individual patient interviews, which were analyzed using a content analysis approach. The intervention lasted 3 weeks and consisted of home-based web-based exercise training, an activity tracker, a TAVI information website, and 1 web-based session with a nurse.

RESULTS

Of the initially included 13 patients, 5 (40%) completed the study and were interviewed; the median age was 82 (range 74-84) years, and the sample comprised 3 men and 2 women. Easy access to supervised exercise training at home with real-time feedback and use of the activity tracker to count daily steps were emphasized by the patients who completed the intervention. Reasons for patients not completing the program included poor data coverage, participants' limited information technology skills, and a lack of functionality in the systems used. No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise-based telerehabilitation for older people after TAVI, in the population as included in this study, and delivered as a web-based intervention, does not seem feasible, as 60% (8/13) of patients did not complete the study. Those completing the intervention highly appreciated the real-time feedback during the web-based training sessions. Future studies should address aspects that support retention rates and enhance patients' information technology skills.

Interventional Treatment of Access Site Complications During Transfemoral TAVI: A Single Center Experience

Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has rapidly developed over the last decade and is nowadays the treatment of choice in the elderly patients irrespective of surgical risk. The outcome of these patients is mainly determined not only by the interventional procedure itself, but also by its complications. Material and Methods: We analyzed the outcome and procedural events of transfemoral TAVI procedures performed per year at our institution. The mean age of these patients is 79.2 years and 49% are female. All the patients underwent duplex ultrasonography of the iliac arteries and inguinal vessels before the procedure and CT of the aorta and iliac arteries. Results: Transfemoral access route is associated with a number of challenges and complications, especially in the patients suffering from peripheral artery disease (PAD). The rate of vascular complications at our center was 2.76% (19/689). Typical vascular complications (VC) include bleeding and pseudoaneurysms at the puncture site, acute or subacute occlusion of the access vessel, and dissection or perforation of the iliac vessels. In addition, there is the need for primary PTA of the access pathway in the presence of additional PAD of the common femoral artery (CFA) and iliac vessels. Balloon angioplasty, implantation of covered and uncovered stents, lithoplasty, and ultrasound-guided thrombin injection are available to treat the described issues. Conclusion: Interventional therapy of access vessels can preoperatively enable the transfemoral approach and successfully treat post-operative VC in most of the cases. Training the heart team to address these issues is a key focus, and an interventional vascular specialist should be part of this team.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: The New Challenges of Cardiac Rehabilitation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an increasingly widespread percutaneous intervention of aortic valve replacement (AVR). The target population for TAVI is mainly composed of elderly, frail patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), multiple comorbidities, and high perioperative mortality risk for surgical AVR (sAVR). These vulnerable patients could benefit from cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs after percutaneous intervention. To date, no major guidelines currently recommend CR after TAVI. However, emerging scientific evidence shows that CR in patients undergoing TAVI is safe, and improves exercise tolerance and quality of life. Moreover, preliminary data prove that a CR program after TAVI has the potential to reduce mortality during follow-up, even if randomized clinical trials are needed for confirmation. The present review article provides an overview of all scientific evidence concerning the potential beneficial effects of CR after TAVI, and suggests possible fields of research to improve cardiac care after TAVI.

[Postacute care after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)]

With increasing age valvular heart disease is among the most frequent diseases of the heart. Relevant valvular disease impairs not only the long-term prognosis but also physical resilience, activities of daily living and the quality of life. In cases of middle to high-grade symptomatic cardiac defects, valve replacement or valve reconstruction is still the surgical procedure of choice; however, in recent years the transcatheter percutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVI) procedure has become more prominent for the most frequent defect, aortic valve stenosis. This article provides an overview of the aftercare and rehabilitation of patients following a TAVI intervention.

Geriatric or cardiac rehabilitation? Predictors of treatment pathways in advanced age patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Background

Aim of the study was to find predictors of allocating patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to geriatric (GR) or cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and describe this new patient group based on a differentiated characterization.

Methods

From 10/2013 to 07/2015, 344 patients with an elective TAVI were consecutively enrolled in this prospective multicentric cohort study. Before intervention, sociodemographic parameters, echocardiographic data, comorbidities, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), quality of life and frailty (score indexing activities of daily living [ADL], cognition, nutrition and mobility) were documented. Out of these, predictors for assignment to CR or GR after TAVI were identified using a multivariable regression model.

Results

After TAVI, 249 patients (80.7 ± 5.1 years, 59.0% female) underwent CR (n = 198) or GR (n = 51). GR patients were older, less physically active and more often had a level of care, peripheral artery disease as well as a lower left ventricular ejection fraction. The groups also varied in 6MWD. Furthermore, individual components of frailty revealed prognostic impact: higher values in instrumental ADL reduced the probability for referral to GR (OR:0.49, p <  0.001), while an impaired mobility was positively associated with referral to GR (OR:3.97, p = 0.046). Clinical parameters like stroke (OR:0.19 of GR, p = 0.038) and the EuroSCORE (OR:1.04 of GR, p = 0.026) were also predictive.

Conclusion

Advanced age patients after TAVI referred to CR or GR differ in several parameters and seem to be different patient groups with specific needs, e.g. regarding activities of daily living and mobility. Thus, our data prove the eligibility of both CR and GR settings.

Predictors of survival in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

AIMS

Cardiac rehabilitation may improve physical and functional recovery after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), but outcome predictors in TAVI patients are usually based on assessments made before or at the time of TAVI without regard to cardiac rehabilitation referral. We aimed to assess exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation-derived parameters that may predict 3-year outcome in TAVI patients undergoing residential cardiac rehabilitation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 95 consecutive TAVI patients (82.7 ± 4.9 years, 65% women) who underwent a 3-week cardiac rehabilitation program, at 3-year follow-up 35 deaths occurred. Compared with survivors, nonsurvivors had longer stay in cardiac rehabilitation (29.5 ± 12.3 vs. 21.6 ± 7.5 days, P = 0.0001), worse serum creatinine at admission/discharge (1.59 ± 0.86 vs. 1.26 ± 0.43 mg/dl, P = 0.0164; 1.52 ± 0.61 vs. 1.23 ± 0.44 mg/dl, P = 0.011), higher Cumulative Illness Rated State Comorbidity Index (5.4 ± 1.5 vs. 4.6 ± 1.8, P = 0.036) and Barthel Index at admission/discharge (51.8 ± 24.5 vs. 68.1 ± 23.2, P = 0.0016; 73.5 ± 27.2 vs. 88.6 ± 15.3, P = 0.0007), higher Morse Fall Risk score (35.6 ± 24 vs. 24.3 ± 14.1, P = 0.0056), and were less likely to train above the median exercise workload (fit) (11 vs. 35%, P = 0.008) or perform the 6-min walk test (6MWT) at admission/discharge (NO-6MWT: 34 vs. 12%, P = 0.008) and walked less distance on admission (6MWT: 129.6 ± 88.3 vs. 193.3 ± 69.8 m, P = 0.008). Univariate predictors of 3-year survival were cardiac rehabilitation duration, serum creatinine, Cumulative Illness Rated State Comorbidity Index, Barthel Index and NO-6MWT at admission/discharge, 6MWT at admission, Morse Fall Risk score at discharge and fit. Multivariate analysis confirmed exercise tolerance, Barthel Index and sCr at discharge as predictors.

CONCLUSION

In TAVI patients who undergo cardiac rehabilitation, lower exercise tolerance, higher Barthel Index and sCr at discharge may predict 3-year mortality.