1
|
Pradhan TN, Viswanathan VK, Badge R, Pradhan N. Single-stage revision in the management of prosthetic joint infections after total knee arthroplasty - A review of current concepts. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2024; 52:102431. [PMID: 38854773 PMCID: PMC11153906 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA); and the gold standard surgical approach involves a two-staged, revision TKA (TSR). Owing to the newer, emerging evidence on this subject, there has been gradual shift towards a single-stage revision approach (SSR), with the purported benefits of mitigated patient morbidity, decreased complications and reduced costs. However, there is still substantial lacuna in the evidence regarding the safety and outcome of the two approaches in chronic PJI. This study aimed to comprehensively review of the literature on SSR; and evaluate its role within Revision TKA post PJI. Methods The narrative review involved a comprehensive search of the databases (Embase, Medline and Pubmed), conducted on 20th of January 2024 using specific key words. All the manuscripts discussing the use of SSR for the management of PJI after TKA were considered for the review. Among the screened manuscripts, opinion articles, letters to the editor and non-English manuscripts were excluded. Results The literature search yielded a total 232 studies. Following a detailed scrutiny of these manuscripts, 26 articles were finally selected. The overall success rate following SSR is reported to range from 73 % to 100 % (and is comparable to TSR). SSR is performed in PJI patients with bacteriologically-proven infection, adequate soft tissue cover, immuno-competent host and excellent tolerance to antibiotics. The main difference between SSR and TSR is that the interval between the 2 stages is only a few minutes instead of 6 weeks. Appropriate topical, intraoperative antibiotic therapy, followed by adequate postoperative systemic antibiotic cover are necessary to ascertain good outcome. Some of the major benefits of SSR over TSR include reduced morbidity, decreased complications (such as arthrofibrosis or anesthesia-associated adverse events), meliorated extremity function, earlier return to activities, mitigated mechanical (prosthesis-associated) complications and enhanced patient satisfaction. Conclusion SSR is a reliable approach for the management of chronic PJI. Based on our comprehensive review of the literature, it may be concluded that the right selection of patients, extensive debridement, sophisticated reconstruction strategy, identification of the pathogenic organism, initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy and ensuring adequate follow-up are the key determinants of successful outcome. To achieve this will undoubtedly require an MDT approach to be taken on a case-by-case basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tej Nikhil Pradhan
- University College London, London, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Ravi Badge
- Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Warrington, UK
- Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
- Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK
- Diploma in Sports Medicine (International Olympic Committee), UK
| | - Nikhil Pradhan
- Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Warrington, UK
- Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
- University of Chester, Chester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kheir M, Anderson C, Chiu YF, Carli A. Do one-stage indications predict success following two-stage arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic joint infection? J Bone Jt Infect 2024; 9:75-85. [PMID: 38600996 PMCID: PMC11002939 DOI: 10.5194/jbji-9-75-2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) proposed criteria for one-stage exchange arthroplasty in treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Our study aimed to determine what proportion of PJI patients met the 2018 ICM criteria and how this affected infection-free survivorship for patients. Methods: All chronic PJI patients treated with two-stage exchange within our institution between 2017-2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Included cases met 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for PJI and had a 2-year minimum follow-up. Treatment success was defined as Tier 1A in the 2019 MSIS working group definition. ICM one-stage criteria included non-immunocompromised host, absence of sepsis, adequate soft tissue for closure, known preoperative pathogen, and susceptibility. Immunocompromised host was analyzed as two separate definitions. Kaplan-Meier survivorship, Cox regression, and univariate analyses were performed. Results: A total of 293 chronic PJI patients were included. Overall, treatment failure occurred in 64 / 293 (21.8 %) patients. Only 13 % (n = 37 ) met ICM criteria definition no. 1 for one-stage exchange; 12 % (n = 33 ) met definition no. 2. In both definitions, infection-free survivorship at 2 years did not differ between patients who met and did not meet criteria (p > 0.05 ). Cox proportional hazard regression analyses demonstrated that the only variable predicting treatment failure was knee joint involvement (p = 0.01 ). Conclusions: We found that a very limited number of chronic PJI patients were suitable for a one-stage exchange. Furthermore, the supposition that healthier hosts with known pathogens (the basis of the ICM criteria) yield better PJI treatment outcomes was not observed. These results justify the ongoing multicenter randomized control trial comparing one-stage versus two-stage treatment for chronic PJI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M. Kheir
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Christopher G. Anderson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Yu-Fen Chiu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alberto V. Carli
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Danoff JR, Heimroth J, Willinger M, Trout S, Sodhi N. Surgical Technique: Robotic-Assisted 1.5-Stage Exchange Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Arthroplast Today 2023; 21:101126. [PMID: 37234598 PMCID: PMC10205596 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
A 1.5-stage exchange total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection has been described; however, achieving a balanced and well-aligned construct can sometimes be difficult given the bony defects often encountered in these cases. The use of robotic navigation technologies allows for accurate and precise implant placement. This technique report details the utilization of robotic navigation in a 1.5-stage exchange total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection and describes the outcome of 6 patients. This technique guide highlights how robotic technology can account for many commonly encountered bone voids, joint line identification, and component orientation, while achieving a balanced and well-aligned knee.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan R. Danoff
- Corresponding author: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health, North Shore University Hospital, 611 Northern Blvd, Suite 200 Great Neck, NY 11021, USA. Tel.: +1 516 325 7013.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:829-838. [PMID: 34595545 PMCID: PMC9925475 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04190-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Revisions for periprosthetic joint infection of knee and hip arthroplasty can be performed following one- or two-stage treatment protocols. Current literature is inconclusive whether one protocol is superior to the other, as prior literature reported similar reinfection rates for both treatment options. We aimed to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature on septic arthroplasty revisions. METHODS Between April 2015 and December 2020, Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting reinfection outcomes in patients treated with one-stage and two-stage knee or hip revision arthroplasty. Two reviewers independently extracted data and disagreements were resolved by a third investigator. We utilized a double arcsine transformation, prior to pooling using a random-effects model. RESULTS For hip revision arthroplasty, we identified 14 one-stage studies (n = 1237) with a pooled reinfection rate of 5.7% (95% CI 3.7-8.1%), and 46 two-stage studies (n = 5009) with a reinfection rate of 8.4% (95% CI 6.9-9.9%). For knee revision arthroplasty, 6 one-stage studies (n = 527) and 48 two-stage studies (n = 4344) were identified with reinfection rates of 12.7% (7.0-19.7%) and 16.2% (13.7-19.0%), respectively. Overall, reinfection rates did not vary substantially after subgroup analysis. Limitations of our study are the limited amount of one-stage studies that introduce a potential bias. CONCLUSION The reinfection rates following one- and two-stage hip and knee arthroplasty revisions were similar. Knee reinfection rates have increased compared to the previous analysis. Individual patient characteristics and adequate treatment algorithms are needed for a more individual selection approach, until a randomized trial is performed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Vasso M, Capasso L, Corona K, Pola E, Toro G, Schiavone Panni A. Periprosthetic knee infection: treatment options. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2022; 14:37537. [PMID: 36349351 PMCID: PMC9635989 DOI: 10.52965/001c.37537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Infection is one of the most catastrophic complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and represents the second most common cause of TKA failure. Treatment of a patient with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) could require often costly and prolonged hospital stays, weeks or months of antibiotic therapy, and multiple surgical procedures. The best management is still highly debating, whereas many treatment options are available. These include suppressive antibiotics, arthroscopic irrigation and debridement, open debridement with insert exchange, single-stage reimplantation and two-stage reimplantation. The choice of the treatment depends on many variables, including integrity of implant, timing of the infection, host factors (age, health, immunologic status), virulence of the infecting organism and wishes of the patient. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive understaning of the different options for knee PJIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Vasso
- Multidisciplinary Department of Medicine for Surgery and Orthodontics, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" - Naples (Italy)
| | - Luigi Capasso
- San Giovanni Calibita "Fatebenefratelli - Isola Tiberina" Hospital - Rome (Italy)
| | - Katia Corona
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso (Italy)
| | - Enrico Pola
- Multidisciplinary Department of Medicine for Surgery and Orthodontics, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" - Naples (Italy)
| | - Giuseppe Toro
- Multidisciplinary Department of Medicine for Surgery and Orthodontics, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" - Naples (Italy)
| | - Alfredo Schiavone Panni
- Multidisciplinary Department of Medicine for Surgery and Orthodontics, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" - Naples (Italy)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brunt ACC, Gillespie M, Holland G, Brenkel I, Walmsley P. Results of 'two-in-one' single-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for infection with associated bone loss : prospective five-year follow up. Bone Jt Open 2022; 3:107-113. [PMID: 35109666 PMCID: PMC8886320 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.32.bjo-2021-0148.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) occurs in approximately 1% to 2% of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) presenting multiple challenges, such as difficulty in diagnosis, technical complexity, and financial costs. Two-stage exchange is the gold standard for treating PJI but emerging evidence suggests 'two-in-one' single-stage revision as an alternative, delivering comparable outcomes, reduced morbidity, and cost-effectiveness. This study investigates five-year results of modified single-stage revision for treatment of PJI following TKA with bone loss. Methods Patients were identified from prospective data on all TKA patients with PJI following the primary procedure. Inclusion criteria were: revision for PJI with bone loss requiring reconstruction, and a minimum five years’ follow-up. Patients were followed up for recurrent infection and assessment of function. Tools used to assess function were Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and American Knee Society Score (AKSS). Results A total of 24 patients were included with a mean age of 72.7 years (SD 7.6), mean BMI of 33.3 kg/m2 (SD 5.7), and median ASA grade of 2 (interquartile range 2 to 4). Mean time from primary to revision was 3.0 years (10 months to 8.3 years). At revision, six patients had discharging sinus and three patients had negative cultures from tissue samples or aspirates. Two patients developed recurrence of infection: one was treated successfully with antibiotic suppression and one underwent debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention. Mean AKSS scores at two years showed significant improvement from baseline (27.1 (SD 10.2 ) vs 80.3 (SD 14.8); p < 0.001). There was no significant change in mean AKSS scores between two and five years (80.3 (SD 14.8 ) vs 74.1 (SD 19.8); p = 0.109). Five-year OKS scores were not significantly different compared to two-year scores (36.17 (SD 3.7) vs 33.0 (SD 8.5); p = 0.081). Conclusion ‘Two-in-one’ single-stage revision is effective for treating PJI following TKA with bone loss, providing patients with sustained improvements in outcomes and infection clearance up to five years post-procedure. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(2):107–113.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew C C Brunt
- Department of Orthpaedic Surgery, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, Kirkcaldy, UK
| | - Matthew Gillespie
- Department of Orthpaedic Surgery, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, Kirkcaldy, UK
| | - George Holland
- Department of Orthpaedic Surgery, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, Kirkcaldy, UK
| | - Ivan Brenkel
- Department of Orthpaedic Surgery, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, Kirkcaldy, UK
| | - Phil Walmsley
- Department of Orthpaedic Surgery, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, Kirkcaldy, UK.,School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Middleton R, Price A, Alvand A. Contemporary outcomes of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention in knee arthroplasty. ANNALS OF JOINT 2022; 7:9. [PMID: 38529130 PMCID: PMC10929323 DOI: 10.21037/aoj-20-76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a major complication after knee arthroplasty, with approximately a quarter of knee arthroplasty revisions citing PJI as an indication. With the demand for knee arthroplasty predicted to increase, coupled with a lack of evidence for decreasing PJI risk, an appreciation of the burdens of PJI on both patients and health care systems is vital. Patients with PJI can experience a reduced quality of life as well as increased morbidity, whilst the management of PJI has significant economic implications. Surgical options include debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR), single-stage revision, two-stage revision and salvage procedures. DAIR involves the systematic debridement of all infected and unhealthy tissues coupled with directed antibiotic therapy, with definitive infection clearance the objective. In contrast to single- and two-stage revision procedures for PJI, DAIR does not involve the removal of fixed implants, with only modular components exchanged. Potential benefits of DAIR include reduced tissue destruction, reduced morbidity and reduced healthcare burdens, but with a higher reinfection risk compared to staged revision techniques, and utility largely restricted to acute bacterial PJI. A review of contemporary DAIR outcomes is of value given advances in the understanding of PJI biology; the development of consensus-based definitions for PJI diagnosis and treatment outcomes; and evolution of DAIR indications and technique. This review discusses outcomes of DAIR for knee PJI, published over the last two decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Middleton
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Price
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Abtin Alvand
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Experiences during Switching from Two-Stage to One-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Chronic Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10:antibiotics10121436. [PMID: 34943648 PMCID: PMC8698198 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10121436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate our preliminary results after changing our surgical strategy from 2-stage revision arthroplasty to 1-stage revision arthroplasty for patients with chronic knee periprosthetic joint infection. We conducted a prospective study of knee arthroplasty patients that had been diagnosed with chronic infection and treated using a 1-stage revision regardless of the traditional criteria applied for indication thereof. We evaluated two main variables: infection control and economic costs. The definitive diagnosis of infection of the revision was determined by using the criteria proposed by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. The costs were calculated as average costs in USD, as described by Srivastava (2019), for 1-stage or 2-stage revisions. Eighteen patients were included in the study, and infection was controlled in 17 patients. The total economic savings for our hospital from these 18 patients amounted to USD 291,152. This clinical success has led to major changes in how our hospital approaches the treatment of chronically infected knee replacements, in addition to substantial economic advantages for the hospital.
Collapse
|
9
|
Karachalios T, Komnos GA. Management strategies for prosthetic joint infection: long-term infection control rates, overall survival rates, functional and quality of life outcomes. EFORT Open Rev 2021; 6:727-734. [PMID: 34667643 PMCID: PMC8489477 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention), one-stage and two-stage revision surgery are the most common management strategies for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) management. Our knowledge concerning their efficacy is based on short to medium-term low-quality studies. Most studies report infection recurrence rates or infection-free time intervals. However, long-term survival rates of the infection-free joints, functional and quality of life outcome data are of paramount importance. DAIR, one-stage and two-stage revision strategies are not unique surgical techniques, presenting several variables. Infection control rates for the above strategies vary from 75% to 90%, but comparisons are difficult because different indications and patient selection criteria are used in each strategy. Recent outcome data show that DAIR and one-stage revision in selected patients (based on host, bacteriological, soft tissue and type of infection criteria) may present improved functional and quality of life outcomes and reduced costs for health systems as compared to those of two-stage revision. It is expected that health system administrators and providers will apply pressure on surgeons and departments towards the wider use of DAIR and one-stage revision strategies. It is the orthopaedic surgeon’s responsibility to conduct quality studies in order to fully clarify the indications and outcomes of the different revision strategies.
Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:727-734. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210008
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theofilos Karachalios
- Department of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Trauma, University General Hospital of Larissa, Greece.,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessalia, Larissa, Greece
| | - George A Komnos
- Department of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Trauma, University General Hospital of Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tuecking LR, Silligmann J, Savov P, Omar M, Windhagen H, Ettinger M. Detailed Revision Risk Analysis after Single- vs. Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Retrospective Tertiary Center Analysis. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10:antibiotics10101177. [PMID: 34680758 PMCID: PMC8533002 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10101177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains one of the most common causes of revision knee arthroplasty. Controversy continues to surround the proper operative technique of PJI in knee arthroplasty with single- or two-stage replacement. Significant variations are seen in the eradication rates of PJI and in implant survival rates. This detailed retrospective analysis of a single tertiary center is intended to provide further data and insight comparing single- and two-stage revision surgery. A retrospective analysis of all revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgeries from 2013 to 2019 was performed and screened with respect to single- or two-stage TKA revisions. Single- and two-stage revisions were analyzed with regard to implant survival, revision rate, microbiological spectrum, and other typical demographic characteristics. A total of 63 patients were included, with 15 patients undergoing single-stage revision and 48 patients undergoing two-stage revision. The mean follow-up time was 40.7 to 43.7 months. Statistically, no difference was found between both groups in overall survival (54.4% vs. 70.1%, p = 0.68) and implant survival with respect to reinfection (71.4% vs. 82.4%, p = 0.48). Further, high reinfection rates were found for patients with difficult-to-treat organisms and low- to semi-constrained implant types, in comparison to constrained implant types. A statistically comparable revision rate for recurrence of infection could be shown for both groups, although a tendency to higher reinfection rate for single-stage change was evident. The revision rate in this single-center study was comparably high, which could be caused by the high comorbidity and high proportion of difficult-to-treat bacteria in patients at a tertiary center. In this patient population, the expectation of implant survival should be critically discussed with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars-Rene Tuecking
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Diakovere Annastift, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (L.-R.T.); (J.S.); (P.S.); (H.W.)
| | - Julia Silligmann
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Diakovere Annastift, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (L.-R.T.); (J.S.); (P.S.); (H.W.)
| | - Peter Savov
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Diakovere Annastift, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (L.-R.T.); (J.S.); (P.S.); (H.W.)
| | - Mohamed Omar
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625 Hanover, Germany;
| | - Henning Windhagen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Diakovere Annastift, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (L.-R.T.); (J.S.); (P.S.); (H.W.)
| | - Max Ettinger
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Diakovere Annastift, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (L.-R.T.); (J.S.); (P.S.); (H.W.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-511-5354-0
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Superinfection with Difficult-to-Treat Pathogens Significantly Reduces the Outcome of Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10:antibiotics10101145. [PMID: 34680726 PMCID: PMC8532792 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10101145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty. In the course of a PJI, superinfections with pathogens that do not match the primary infecting micro-organism may occur. To our knowledge, there are no published data on the outcome of such infections in the literature. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of PJI with superinfections with a difficult-to-treat (DTT) pathogen. Data of 169 consecutive patients with PJI were retrospectively analyzed in this single-center study. Cases were categorized into: Group 1 including non-DTT-PJI without superinfection, Group 2 DTT-PJI without superinfection, Group 3 non-DTT-PJI with DTT superinfection, and Group 4 non-DTT-PJI with non-DTT superinfection. Group 3 comprised 24 patients and showed, after a mean follow-up of 13.5 ± 10.8 months, the worst outcome with infection resolution in 17.4% of cases (p = 0.0001), PJI-related mortality of 8.7% (p = 0.0001), mean revision rate of 6 ± 3.6 (p < 0.0001), and duration of antibiotic treatment of 71.2 ± 45.2 days (p = 0.0023). PJI caused initially by a non-DTT pathogen with a superinfection with a DTT pathogen is significantly associated with the worst outcome in comparison to non-DTT-PJI, PJI caused initially by a DTT pathogen, and to non-DTT-PJI with a non-DTT superinfection.
Collapse
|
12
|
Genomic Analysis of Cutibacterium acnes Strains Isolated from Prosthetic Joint Infections. Microorganisms 2021; 9:microorganisms9071500. [PMID: 34361935 PMCID: PMC8307888 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9071500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Cutibacterium acnes is a common cause of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). The C. acnes population can be divided into six main phylotypes (IA1, IA2, IB, IC, II and III) that are associated with different clinical conditions and normal skin. A single-locus sequence typing (SLST) scheme can distinguish ten main SLST types: A-E (all IA1), F (IA2), G (IC), H (IB), K (II), L (III). We genome-sequenced and compared 16 strains of C. acnes isolated from healthy skin (n = 4) and PJIs (n = 12), including six PJI cases with a good outcome (four shoulder PJIs, one hip PJI, one knee PJI) and six with infection relapse (three shoulder PJIs, three hip PJIs). The sequenced strains belonged to four different phylotypes (IA1, IA2, IB and II) and seven different SLST types. All five type IB strains (all SLST type H1) were PJI isolates (three hip PJIs, two shoulder PJIs), and four of these caused infection relapse (three hip PJIs, one shoulder PJI). Isolates from PJI cases with a good outcome belonged to three different phylotypes (IA, IB, II). Interestingly, four strains (three strains from PJI cases with good outcome and one strain from healthy skin) contained a linear plasmid; these strains belonged to different SLST types (A1, C1, F4, H1) and were isolated in three different hospitals. This study suggests that type IB strains have the potential to cause infection relapse, in particular regarding hip PJIs. Moreover, our study revealed that strains belonging to the same SLST type can differ in their accessory genome in different geographic locations, indicative of microevolution.
Collapse
|
13
|
Welsh CR, Baumann PA. Two-Stage Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision With Extended Antibiotic Spacer Use. Cureus 2021; 13:e14854. [PMID: 34104596 PMCID: PMC8174400 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the many benefits of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the treatment of degenerative arthritis, infection of the total knee prosthesis presents a dangerous post-operative complication affecting 0.5-1.9% of all cases. Infection after the first three post-operative weeks is treated with either one or two-stage revision operations involving the removal of all prosthetic components. Two-stage revision operations are more commonly used and involve the removal of prosthetic components followed by the implantation of a cement mold infused with antibiotics (antibiotic spacer) as well as systemic antibiotic treatment for four to six weeks before prosthetic reimplantation. This case report details a TKA revision in a patient with osteoarthritis of the knee. The patient presented with an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and white blood cell count nearly two years after the primary operation and was found to have an infected total knee prosthetic. A two-stage revision was planned but due to scheduling disruption by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the second stage of the operation was delayed until 12 months after the stage one operation. The patient ambulated without pain on an antibiotic spacer for 12 months, providing information about the long-term use of spacers. This case also offers a look at a potential benefit to one-stage operations, which have been shown in the literature to have similar outcomes as two-stage operations. The patient had a medical history of psoriasis and immunosuppressive treatment with methotrexate, two risk factors for prosthetic joint infection, and may have benefited from prophylactic antibiotic therapy extending beyond the perioperative period. The goal of this case report is to detail the prolonged use of an antibiotic spacer, examine the risks and benefits of one and two-stage total knee revisions, and discuss prophylactic antibiotic use in high-risk patients following TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patricia A Baumann
- Orthopaedic Surgery, C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Saint Petersburg, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Randsborg PH. Is It Time to Consider Single-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Total Knee Replacement?: Commentary on an article by Louis Dagneaux, MD, et al.: "Acute Kidney Injury When Treating Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Total Knee Arthroplasties with Antibiotic-Loaded Spacers. Incidence, Risks, and Outcomes ". J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103:e37. [PMID: 33913922 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.00111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Per-Henrik Randsborg
- Sport Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Razii N, Clutton JM, Kakar R, Morgan-Jones R. Single-stage revision for the infected total knee arthroplasty : the Cardiff experience. Bone Jt Open 2021; 2:305-313. [PMID: 34003026 PMCID: PMC8168544 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.25.bjo-2020-0185.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Two-stage revision has traditionally been considered the gold standard of treatment for established infection, but increasing evidence is emerging in support of one-stage exchange for selected patients. The objective of this study was to determine the outcomes of single-stage revision TKA for PJI, with mid-term follow-up. Methods A total of 84 patients, with a mean age of 68 years (36 to 92), underwent single-stage revision TKA for confirmed PJI at a single institution between 2006 and 2016. In all, 37 patients (44%) were treated for an infected primary TKA, while the majority presented with infected revisions: 31 had undergone one previous revision (36.9%) and 16 had multiple prior revisions (19.1%). Contraindications to single-stage exchange included systemic sepsis, extensive bone or soft-tissue loss, extensor mechanism failure, or if primary wound closure was unlikely to be achievable. Patients were not excluded for culture-negative PJI or the presence of a sinus. Results Overall, 76 patients (90.5%) were infection-free at a mean follow-up of seven years, with eight reinfections (9.5%). Culture-negative PJI was not associated with a higher reinfection rate (p = 0.343). However, there was a significantly higher rate of recurrence in patients with polymicrobial infections (p = 0.003). The mean Oxford Knee Score (OKS) improved from 18.7 (SD 8.7) preoperatively to 33.8 (SD 9.7) at six months postoperatively (p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier implant survival rate for all causes of reoperation, including reinfection and aseptic failure, was 95.2% at one year (95% confidence interval (CI) 87.7 to 98.2), 83.5% at five years (95% CI 73.2 to 90.3), and 78.9% at 12 years (95% CI 66.8 to 87.2). Conclusion One-stage exchange, using a strict debridement protocol and multidisciplinary input, is an effective treatment option for the infected TKA. This is the largest single-surgeon series of consecutive cases reported to date, with broad inclusion criteria. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(5):305–313.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Razii
- Cardiff and Vale Orthopaedic Centre, University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff, UK.,Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Juliet M Clutton
- Cardiff and Vale Orthopaedic Centre, University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff, UK
| | - Rahul Kakar
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fuchs M, Pumberger M, Hommel H, Perka C, von Roth P, Thiele K. Bacterial Colonization of Irrigation Fluid during Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9092746. [PMID: 32854365 PMCID: PMC7565972 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgical risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are the subjects of ongoing research. It is unclear if there are specific locations of the surgical area that might act as a pathogen source. Due to the fact that bacterial replication occurs preferably under humid conditions, it was our aim to investigate if irrigation fluid reservoirs on the surgical covers are subject to bacterial colonization. We prospectively observed 40 patients with scheduled aseptic 1-stage TKA revision. At time intervals of 30 min, irrigation samples were tested for microbiological colonization. Additionally, the suction tip was investigated at the end of surgery. Overall, a bacterial detection rate of 25% was found (57/232 samples). Analysis for any positive microbial detection revealed pathogen findings of irrigation fluid in 41.7% of samples after 30 min with a constant increase up to 77.8% after 90 min. Twenty-three percent of suction tips showed bacterial colonization. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, accounting for the majority of PJI, were the predominant pathogens. After an average follow-up of 17 months, no PJI was confirmed. Despite the substantial bacterial load of irrigation fluid, PJI rates were not elevated. Nevertheless, we recommend that irrigation fluid reservoirs should be prevented and not withdrawn by suction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Fuchs
- RKU University Department of Orthopaedics, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Matthias Pumberger
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, University Department of Orthopaedics, Charité–University Medicine, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.P.); (C.P.); (K.T.)
| | - Hagen Hommel
- Department of Orthopaedics, Märkisch-Oderland Hospital, 16269 Wriezen, Germany;
| | - Carsten Perka
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, University Department of Orthopaedics, Charité–University Medicine, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.P.); (C.P.); (K.T.)
| | - Philipp von Roth
- Sporthopaedicum Regensburg and Straubing, 93053 Regensburg, Germany;
| | - Kathi Thiele
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, University Department of Orthopaedics, Charité–University Medicine, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.P.); (C.P.); (K.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ohlmeier M, Filitarin S, Delgado G, Frings J, Abdelaziz H, Salber J, Frommelt L, Gehrke T, Citak M. Improved treatment strategies can result in better outcomes following one-stage exchange surgery for MRSA periprosthetic joint infection. J Med Microbiol 2020; 69:1100-1104. [PMID: 32639225 DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.001229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Periprosthetic joint infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-PJIs) are rare, with only a few studies reporting the treatment outcomes and even fewer reporting outcomes with one-stage exchange.Aim. This study aims to analyse the outcomes of one-stage exchange in the management of MRSA-PJIs.Methodology. Patients with MRSA-PJI of the hip and knee, who were treated with a one-stage exchange between 2001 and 2018 were enrolled in this study. The final cohort comprised of 29 patients, which included 23 hips and six knees. The mean follow-up was 5.3 years (1-9 years). Reinfection and complications rates after the one-stage exchange were analysed.Results. Overall infection control could be achieved in 93.1 % (27 out of 29 patients). The overall revision rate was 31.0% (9 patients), with three patients requiring an in-hospital revision (10.3 %). Six patients had to be revised after hospital discharge (20.7 %). Of the two reinfections, one had a growth of MRSA while the other was of methicillin-sensitive Staphyloccocus epidermidis.Conclusion. One-stage exchange surgery using current techniques could improve surgical outcomes with excellent results in the management of MRSA-PJIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malte Ohlmeier
- Department of Joint Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstrasse 2, 22767 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sergei Filitarin
- Department of Joint Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstrasse 2, 22767 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giorgio Delgado
- Department of Orthopedics, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Taft Avenue, Manila 1000, Philippines
| | - Jannik Frings
- Department of Joint Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstrasse 2, 22767 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hussein Abdelaziz
- Department of Joint Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstrasse 2, 22767 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jochen Salber
- Department of Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | - Lars Frommelt
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Clinical Microbiology and Infection Control, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstrasse 2, 22767 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Gehrke
- Department of Joint Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstrasse 2, 22767 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mustafa Citak
- Department of Joint Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstrasse 2, 22767 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Complications in Total Joint Arthroplasties. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8111891. [PMID: 31698808 PMCID: PMC6912594 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8111891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
|
19
|
Twenty common errors in the diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2019; 44:3-14. [PMID: 31641803 PMCID: PMC6938795 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-019-04426-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Misconceptions and errors in the management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can compromise the treatment success. The goal of this paper is to systematically describe twenty common mistakes in the diagnosis and management of PJI, to help surgeons avoid these pitfalls. Materials and methods Common diagnostic and treatment errors are described, analyzed and interpreted. Results Diagnostic errors include the use of serum inflammatory biomarkers (such as C-reactive protein) to rule out PJI, incomplete evaluation of joint aspirate, and suboptimal microbiological procedures (such as using swabs or collection of insufficient number of periprosthetic samples). Further errors are missing possible sources of distant infection in hematogenous PJI or overreliance on suboptimal diagnostic criteria which can hinder or delay the diagnosis of PJI or mislabel infections as aseptic failure. Insufficient surgical treatment or inadequate antibiotic treatment are further reasons for treatment failure and emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Finally, wrong surgical indication, both underdebridement and overdebridement or failure to individualize treatment can jeopardize surgical results. Conclusion Multidisciplinary teamwork with infectious disease specialists and microbiologists in collaboration with orthopedic surgeons have a synergistic effect on the management of PJI. An awareness of the possible pitfalls can improve diagnosis and treatment results.
Collapse
|
20
|
Jie K, Deng P, Cao H, Feng W, Chen J, Zeng Y. Prosthesis design of animal models of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0223402. [PMID: 31581252 PMCID: PMC6776332 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing annually. Animal models have been used to clarify their clinical characteristics and the infection mechanism of pathogenic bacteria, However, since the prosthesis design of animal models is not uniform, it is difficult to simulate the environment of clinical PJI. OBJECTIVES To retrospect the progress on the prosthesis design of animal models of PJI after TKA and to summarize the criteria for evaluating a clinically representative model of PJI. METHODS This systematic review was reported on the basis of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA). Pubmed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang Data and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were researched for animal models of PJI after TKA from database establishment to April 2019 according to Chinese and English retrieval words, including "periprosthetic joint infections and total knee arthroplasty," "periprosthetic joint infections and model," "periprosthetic joint infections and biofilm," and "total knee arthroplasty and model." RESULTS A total of 12 quantitative studies were enrolled in our study finally: 8 representative studies described prosthesis designs used in PJI animal models, 4 studies described prosthesis designs in non-infected animal models which were suitable for infection models. The major problems need to be dealed with were prosthesis, installation location, material, the function of separating the articular and medullary cavity, fixation manner, and the procedure of preserving the posterior cruciate ligament. CONCLUSION A highly representative design of the animal prosthesis of PJI should meet the following criteria: the surface of the prosthesis is smooth with the formation of biofilm, composed of titanium-6Al-4V or cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy; prosthesis can bear weight and is highly stable; and it can connect the joint cavity and medullary cavity simultaneously. To reach a more reliable conclusion, further experiments and improvements are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Jie
- The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Peng Deng
- The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
- The Third Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Houran Cao
- The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Wenjun Feng
- The Third Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jinlun Chen
- The Third Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yirong Zeng
- The Third Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|