1
|
Martinov Nestorov J, Sokic-Milutinovic A, Pavlovic Markovic A, Krstic M. Could Capsule Endoscopy Be Useful in Detection of Suspected Small Bowel Bleeding and IBD-10 Years of Single Center Experience. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:862. [PMID: 38732278 PMCID: PMC11083052 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14090862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
A retrospective study in patients who underwent video capsule endoscopy (VCE) between 2006 and 2016 was conducted in the Clinic for gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinical Center of Serbia. A total of 245 patients underwent VCE. In 198 patients the indication was obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), with 92 patients having overt and the other 106 occult bleeding. The remaining 47 patients underwent VCE due to suspected small bowel (SB) disease (i.e., Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, Peutz Jeghers syndrome, Crohn's disease, prolonged diarrhea, abdominal pain, congenital lymphangiectasia, protein-losing enteropathy, tumors, refractory celiac disease, etc.). VCE identified a source of bleeding in 38.9% of patients (in the obscure overt group in 48.9% of patients, and in the obscure occult group in 30.2% of patients). The most common findings were angiodysplasias, tumors, Meckel's diverticulum and Crohn's disease. In the smaller group of patients with an indication other than OGIB, 38.3% of patients had positive VCE findings. The most common indication is OGIB, and the best candidates are patients with overt bleeding; patients with IBD should be evaluated in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelena Martinov Nestorov
- School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (A.S.-M.); (A.P.M.); (M.K.)
- Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Aleksandra Sokic-Milutinovic
- School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (A.S.-M.); (A.P.M.); (M.K.)
- Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Aleksandra Pavlovic Markovic
- School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (A.S.-M.); (A.P.M.); (M.K.)
- Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Miodrag Krstic
- School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (A.S.-M.); (A.P.M.); (M.K.)
- Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vlachou E, Koffas A, Toumpanakis C, Keuchel M. Updates in the diagnosis and management of small-bowel tumors. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 64-65:101860. [PMID: 37652650 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Small-bowel tumors represent a rare entity comprising 0.6% of all new cancer cases in the US, and only 3% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms. They are a heterogenous group of neoplasms comprising of about forty different histological subtypes with the most common being adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, stromal tumors and lymphomas. Their incidence has been reportedly increasing over recent years, partly owing to the advances and developments in the diagnostic modalities. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy, device assisted enteroscopy and dedicated small-bowel cross-sectional imaging are complimentary tools, supplementing each other in the diagnostic process. Therapeutic management of small-bowel tumors largely depends on the histological type and staging at diagnosis. The aim of the present review article is to discuss relevant advances in the diagnosis and management of small-bowel tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erasmia Vlachou
- Evgenidion Clinic Agia Trias SA, Papadiamantopoulou 20, Athens, 11528, Greece.
| | - Apostolos Koffas
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Services, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Rd, London, E1 1FR, UK.
| | - Christos Toumpanakis
- Centre for Gastroenterology, Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, Pond St, London, NW3 2QG, UK.
| | - Martin Keuchel
- Clinic for Internal Medicine, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Glindersweg 80, 21029, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sorge A, Elli L, Rondonotti E, Pennazio M, Spada C, Cadoni S, Cannizzaro R, Calabrese C, de Franchis R, Girelli CM, Marmo R, Riccioni ME, Marmo C, Oliva S, Scarpulla G, Soncini M, Vecchi M, Tontini GE. Enteroscopy in diagnosis and treatment of small bowel bleeding: A Delphi expert consensus. Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:29-39. [PMID: 36100515 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enteroscopy plays an important role in the management of small bowel bleeding. However, current guidelines are not specifically designed for small bowel bleeding and recommendations from different international societies do not always align. Consequently, there is heterogeneity in the definitions of clinical entities, clinical practice policies, and adherence to guidelines among clinicians. This represents an obstacle to providing the best patient care and to obtain homogeneous data for clinical research. AIMS The aims of the study were to establish a consensus on the definitions of bleeding entities and on the role of enteroscopy in the management of small bowel bleeding using a Delphi process. METHODS A core group of eight experts in enteroscopy identified five main topics of small bowel bleeding management and drafted statements on each topic. An expert panel of nine gastroenterologists participated in three rounds of the Delphi process, together with the core group. RESULTS A total of 33 statements were approved after three rounds of Delphi voting. CONCLUSION This Delphi consensus proposes clear definitions and a unifying strategy to standardize the management of small bowel bleeding. Furthermore, it provides a useful guide in daily practice for both clinical and technical issues of enteroscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Sorge
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Luca Elli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, City of Health and Science University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sergio Cadoni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico, Iglesias, Italy
| | - Renato Cannizzaro
- Experimental Oncological Gastroenterology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Carlo Calabrese
- University of Bologna Alma Mater - School of Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - Regional Referral Center for IBD, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Maria Elena Riccioni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Clelia Marmo
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Oliva
- Gastroenterology and Paeditric Hepatology Unit, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marco Soncini
- Department of Internal Medicine, "A. Manzoni" Hospital, ASST Lecco, Italy
| | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gian Eugenio Tontini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Noujaim MG, Dorsey C, Parish A, Raines D, Boudreaux L, Hanscom M, Cave D, Niedzwiecki D, Wild D. Clinical Features and Management of Small Bowel Masses Detected During Device-Assisted Enteroscopy: A Multi-Center Experience. Gastroenterology Res 2022; 15:353-363. [PMID: 36660469 PMCID: PMC9822661 DOI: 10.14740/gr1586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Small bowel mass lesions (SBMLs) are rare, span a range of different histologies and phenotypes, and our understanding of them is limited. Some lesions occur in patients with recognized polyposis syndromes and others arise sporadically. The current literature regarding SBMLs is limited to small retrospective studies, case reports, and small case series. This large multi-center study aims to understand the various clinical presentations, histologies and management options for SBMLs. Methods After obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, electronic records were used to identify all device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) performed for luminal small bowel evaluation in adult patients at three US referral centers (Duke, LSU and UMass) from January 1, 2014, to October 1, 2020. We identified all patients within this cohort in whom a SBML was detected. Using a focused electronic medical record chart review, we collected patient, procedure, and lesion-related data and used descriptive statistics to explore relationships between these data and outcomes. Results A total of 218 patients (49 at Duke, 148 at LSU, and 21 at UMass) in this cohort had at least one SBML found on DAE. The most common presenting symptoms were iron-deficiency anemia/bleeding (73.3%) and abnormal imaging (33.6%). Thirty-five percent of patients had symptoms for more than a year prior to their diagnosis. Most patients (71.6%) underwent video capsule endoscopy (VCE) prior to DAE and 84% of these exams showed the lesion. The lesion was seen less frequently (48.9%) on computed tomography (CT) scan performed prior to DAE. The majority of lesions were found on antegrade (56%) or retrograde (29.8%) double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE). The most common lesion phenotypes were submucosal (41.3%) and pedunculated (33%) with a much smaller number being sessile (14.7%) or obstructing/invasive (11%). They were found equally as commonly in the jejunum (46.3%) and ileum (49.5%). Most lesions were 10 - 20 mm in size (47%) but 22.1% were larger than 20 mm. The most common histologies were neuroendocrine tumors (NETs, 20.6%) and hamartomas (20.6%). Primary adenocarcinoma of the small bowel was rare, constituting only 5% of lesions. The majority of polyps (78.4%) were sporadic, compared to 21.7% associated with a polyposis or hereditary cancer syndrome, most commonly Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (18.3%). After DAE, 37.6% were advised to undergo surgical resection and 48% were advised to undergo endoscopic surveillance or no further management because of benign histology or successful endoscopic resection. Conclusions In this multi-center retrospective study we found that SBMLs are more likely to be sporadic than syndromic, medium in size and either pedunculated or submucosal. NETs and hamartomas predominated and symptoms, most commonly anemia, can be present for more than a year prior to diagnosis. Close to one half of lesions required either no further intervention or only endoscopic surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G. Noujaim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA,Corresponding Author: Michael G. Noujaim, Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Claire Dorsey
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alice Parish
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Raines
- Division of Gastroenterology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Lara Boudreaux
- Division of Gastroenterology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Mark Hanscom
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - David Cave
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Wild
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sciberras M, Conti K, Elli L, Scaramella L, Riccioni ME, Marmo C, Cadoni S, McAlindon M, Sidhu R, O'hara F, McNamara D, Rondonotti E, Piccirelli S, Spada C, Bruno M, Keuchel M, Baltes P, Calleja N, Valdivia PC, de'Angelis GL, Margalit-Yehuda R, Koulaouzidis A, Dray X, Ellul P. Score reproducibility and reliability in differentiating small bowel subepithelial masses from innocent bulges. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:1403-1409. [PMID: 35934647 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The primary aim of this study was to assess the reliability, intra- and inter-observer variation of the SPICE, Mucosal protrusion angle (MPA) and SHYUNG scores in differentiating a subepithelial mass (SEM) from a bulge. METHODS This retrospective multicentre study analysed the 3 scores, radiological studies, enteroscopy and/or surgical findings. RESULTS 100 patients with a potential SEM (mean age 57.6years) were recruited with 75 patients having pathology. In patients with a SEM the mean SPICE score was 2.04 (95% CI 1.82-2.26) as compared to 1.16 (95% CI 0.81-1.51) without any pathology (AUC 0.74, p<0.001), with a fair intra-observer agreement (Kappa 0.3, p<0.001) and slight inter-observer agreement (Kappa 0.14, p<0.05). SPICE had a 37.3% sensitivity and 92.0% specificity in distinguishing between a SEM and bulge, whereas MPA<90˚ had 58.7% and 76.0% respectively, with poor intra-observer(p = 0.05) and interobserver agreement (p = 0.64). The SHYUNG demonstrated a moderate intra-observer (Kappa 0.44, p<0.001) and slight inter-observer reliability (Kappa 0.18, p<0.001). The sensitivity of an elevated SHYUNG score (≥4) in identifying a SEM was 18.7% with a specificity of 92.0% (AUC 0.71, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Though these scores are easy to use, they have, at best, slight to moderate intra and inter-observer agreement. Their overall diagnostic performances are limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kelly Conti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Malta
| | - Luca Elli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Lucia Scaramella
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Maria Elena Riccioni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Clelia Marmo
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Sergio Cadoni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, CTO Hospital, Iglesias (Carbonia-Iglesias), Italy
| | - Mark McAlindon
- Academic Unit of gastroenterology, Sheffield teaching hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Unit of gastroenterology, Sheffield teaching hospitals NHS Trust; Dept of Infection, Immunity and cardiovascular diseases, University of Sheffield
| | - Fintan O'hara
- TAGG Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deirdre McNamara
- TAGG Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Stefania Piccirelli
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Bruno
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Martin Keuchel
- Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Baltes
- Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Neville Calleja
- Head, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine & Surgery, University of Malta
| | - Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Gian Luigi de'Angelis
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Anastasios Koulaouzidis
- Department of Medicine, OUH Svendborg Sygehus, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), 5230 Odense, Denmark.; Surgical Research Unit, OUH, 5000 Odense, Denmark; Pomeranian Medical University, Poland
| | - Xavier Dray
- Sorbonne Université, Centre d'Endoscopie Digestive, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Ellul
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Malta
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Development of a Deep Learning Model for Malignant Small Bowel Tumors Survival: A SEER-Based Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12051247. [PMID: 35626403 PMCID: PMC9141623 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aims to explore a deep learning (DL) algorithm for developing a prognostic model and perform survival analyses in SBT patients. Methods The demographic and clinical features of patients with SBTs were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. We randomly split the samples into the training set and the validation set at 7:3. Cox proportional hazards (Cox-PH) analysis and the DeepSurv algorithm were used to develop models. The performance of the Cox-PH and DeepSurv models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, C-statistics and decision-curve analysis (DCA). A Kaplan−Meier (K−M) survival analysis was performed for further explanation on prognostic effect of the Cox-PH model. Results The multivariate analysis demonstrated that seven variables were associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) (all p < 0.05). The DeepSurv model showed better performance than the Cox-PH model (C-index: 0.871 vs. 0.866). The calibration curves and DCA revealed that the two models had good discrimination and calibration. Moreover, patients with ileac malignancy and N2 stage disease were not responding to surgery according to the K−M analysis. Conclusions This study reported a DeepSurv model that performed well in CSS in SBT patients. It might offer insights into future research to explore more DL algorithms in cohort studies.
Collapse
|
7
|
Noujaim MG, Parish A, Raines D, Gross SA, Cave D, Vance I, Beyer D, Liu D, Hoffman B, Lawrence Z, Castillo G, Pavri T, Niedzwiecki D, Wild D. Use, Yield, and Risk of Device-assisted Enteroscopy in the United States: Results From a Large Retrospective Multicenter Cohort. J Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 55:792-797. [PMID: 32947375 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since 2001, device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) has revolutionized the diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities for managing small bowel pathology. Though commonly performed, there have been no recent large studies to assess the use, yield, and risks of DAE and none that include all 3 DAE modalities. We hypothesized that DAE is safe with high diagnostic and therapeutic yields achieved within reasonable procedure duration and here we present a large retrospective multicenter US study evaluating the use, yield, and complications of DAE. METHODS After obtaining institutional review board approval, electronic records were used to identify all DAE's performed for luminal small bowel evaluation in adult patients at 4 US referral centers (Duke University Medical Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, and University of Massachusetts Medical Center) from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2019. Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect and analyze a variety of procedure-related outcomes. Using the data pooled across centers, descriptive statistics were generated for the patient and procedure-related characteristics and outcomes; relationships between characteristics and outcomes were explored. RESULTS A total of 1787 DAE's were performed over this 5-year period (392 at Duke University Medical Center, 887 at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 312 at New York University Langone Medical Center, and 195 at University of Massachusetts Medical Center). Of these, there were 1017 (57%) double-balloon, 391 (29%) single-balloon, and 378 (21%) spiral enteroscopies. The mean age of patients undergoing DAE was 66 years and 53% of examinations were performed on women; 18% of patients in the cohort underwent >1 DAE over this time span. A total of 53% of examinations were performed for suspected small bowel bleeding, 31% were directly guided by video capsule endoscopy findings and 8% were performed for abnormal imaging. A total of 85% of examinations used an antegrade approach and DAE took a mean of 45 minutes to complete; 76% of examinations revealed abnormal findings, with vascular, inflammatory, and neoplastic findings seen in 49%, 17%, and 15% of the cohort, respectively. Older age was significantly associated with any abnormal finding, including arteriovenous malformations (P<0.0001); 50% of examinations included a therapeutic maneuver, most commonly argon plasma coagulation/cautery (43%). There were complications in 16 examinations (0.9%) including 2 perforations (0.1%), 6 cases with bleeding (0.3%) and 1 episode of pancreatitis (0.1%). CONCLUSIONS DAE is most commonly performed to evaluate suspected small bowel bleeding and is commonly directed by video capsule findings. DAE is safe, has a high diagnostic yield, with 76% of examinations showing abnormal findings, and frequently features therapeutic maneuvers. Advancing age is associated with abnormal findings on DAE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alice Parish
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Daniel Raines
- Division of Gastroenterology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Seth A Gross
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - David Cave
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Iris Vance
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center
| | - David Beyer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Diana Liu
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Benjamin Hoffman
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Zoe Lawrence
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Gabriel Castillo
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Tanya Pavri
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Daniel Wild
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Afecto E, Pinho R, Gomes C, Correia JP, Estevinho M, Ponte A, Rodrigues A, Carvalho J. Evaluation of a new composite score combining SPICE and Protrusion Angle scores to distinguish submucosal lesions from innocent bulges. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2021; 114:151-155. [PMID: 34254521 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8080/2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Introduction/Aims In capsule endoscopy (CE), small bowel subepithelial lesions (SBSL) are difficult to distinguishing from innocent mucosal protrusions. The SPICE score (smooth, protruding lesions index on CE) and a score that assesses the SBSL protrusion angle were developed. We intend to determine if a composite score is superior to the proposed models. Methods All CE between 01/2010 and 12/2020 were included if a smooth, round protruding lesion was identified. Both scores and a composite score (SPICE>2 and Angle<90º) were calculated after video review. Mucosal protrusions were defined as SBSL if they had a histological/imaging diagnosis and innocent protrusions if otherwise. All patients without at least one appointment and an additional diagnostic exam after CE were excluded. Results A total of 34 CE included, 64.7% men, age 65.4±14.7 years. The most common indication for CE was anemia (52.9%). SBSL were identified in 17 cases, with lipomas (14.7%) being the most frequent diagnosis. Both the SPICE (AUROC 0.90, p<0.001) and protrusion angle scores (AUROC 0.74, p=0.019) accurately distinguished SBSL from innocent protrusions. Applying a 90º cut-off, the protrusion angle has a sensitivity of 52.9% and specificity of 88.2%. Applying a cut-off of >2 points, the SPICE score has a sensitivity of 64.7% and specificity of 94.2%. The composite score had a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 47.0%, 100%, 100% and 65.4%. Conclusion We propose that in cases where both a SPICE>2 and angle of <90º are obtained, additional follow-up investigation should always be undertaken, as the likelihood of SBSL is high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgar Afecto
- Gastrenterology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
| | - Rolando Pinho
- Gastrenterology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho
| | - Catarina Gomes
- Gastrenterology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
| | - João Paulo Correia
- Gastrenterology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia / Espinho, Portugal
| | | | - Ana Ponte
- Gastrenterology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho
| | - Adélia Rodrigues
- Gastrenterology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
| | - João Carvalho
- Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia / Espinho, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rosa B, Margalit-Yehuda R, Gatt K, Sciberras M, Girelli C, Saurin JC, Cortegoso Valdivia P, Cotter J, Eliakim R, Caprioli F, Baatrup G, Keuchel M, Ellul P, Toth E, Koulaouzidis A. Scoring systems in clinical small-bowel capsule endoscopy: all you need to know! Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E802-E823. [PMID: 34079861 PMCID: PMC8159625 DOI: 10.1055/a-1372-4051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
AbstractCapsule endoscopy (CE) emerged out of the pressing clinical need to image the small bowel (SB) in cases of midgut bleeding and provide an overall comfortable and reliable gastrointestinal (GI) diagnosis 1. Since its wider adoption in clinical practice, significant progress has been made in several areas including software development, hardware features and clinical indications, while innovative applications of CE never cease to appear 2
3. Currently, several manufacturers provide endoscopic capsules with more or less similar technological features 4. Although there is engaging and continuous academic and industry-fueled R&D, promising furtherment of CE technology 4
5, the current status of clinical CE remains that of by and large an imaging modality. Clinical relevance of CE images is cornerstone in the decision-making process for medical management. In one of the larger to date SB CE studies, 4,206 abnormal images were detected in 3,280 patients 6. Thus, CE leads to the identification of a large amount of potential pathology, some of which are pertinent (or relevant) while some (probably the majority) are not.Soon artificial intelligence (AI) is likely to carry out several roles currently performed by humans; in fact, we are witnessing only the first stages of a transition in the clinical adoption of AI-based solutions in several aspects of gastroenterology including CE 7. Until then though, human-based decision-making profoundly impacts patient care and – although not suggested in the updated European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) European curriculum 8
9 – it should be an integral part of CE training. Frequently, interpretation of CE images by experts or at least experienced readers differs. In a tandem CE reading study, expert review of discordant cases revealed a 50 % (13/25 discordant results) error rate by experienced readers, corresponding (in 5/13 cases) to ‘over-classification’ of an irrelevant abnormality 10. Another comparative study showed an ‘over-classification’ of such irrelevant abnormalities in ~10 % of CE readings 11. One thing which has been for a while on the table – in relation to optimizing and/or standardizing CE reporting and subsequent decision-making – is the need for reproducible scoring systems and for a reliable common language among clinicians responsible for further patient’s management.Over the years, several of these scoring systems were developed while others appear in the wake of software and hardware improvements aiming to replace and/or complement their predecessors. This review presents a comprehensive account of the currently available classification/scoring systems in clinical CE spanning from predicting the bleeding potential of identified SB lesions (with emphasis on vascular lesions), and the individual rebleeding risk; scoring systems for the prediction of SB lesions in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGlB), having the potential to improve patient selection and rationalize the use of enteroscopy, with better allocation of resources, optimized diagnostic workflow and tailored treatment. This review also includes scores for reporting the inflammatory burden, the cleansing level that underscores confidence in CE reporting and the mass or bulge question in CE. Essentially, the aim is to become a main text for reference when scoring is required and facilitate the inclusion of -through readiness of access- one of the other in the final report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Rosa
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho-Braga. Portugal
- ICVS/3B’s, PT Government Associate Laboratory – Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.
| | - Reuma Margalit-Yehuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Kelly Gatt
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | | | - Carlo Girelli
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Digestive Endoscopy, Hospital of Busto Arsizio, Italy
| | - Jean-Christophe Saurin
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Service d'Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie et d'Endoscopie Digestive, Lyon, France
| | - Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- Gastroenterology & Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Jose Cotter
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho-Braga. Portugal
- ICVS/3B’s, PT Government Associate Laboratory – Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.
| | - Rami Eliakim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Flavio Caprioli
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gunnar Baatrup
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Martin Keuchel
- Clinic for Internal Medicine, Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pierre Ellul
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Ervin Toth
- Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anastasios Koulaouzidis
- Endoscopy Unit, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
- Department of Social Medicine & Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Small Bowel-Key Player in Health and Disease. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8101748. [PMID: 31640212 PMCID: PMC6832358 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8101748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|