Treatment Expectations, Convenience, and Satisfaction with Anticoagulant Treatment: Perceptions of Patients in South-East Queensland, Australia

The Influence of Frailty Syndrome and Dementia on the Convenience and Satisfaction with Oral Anticoagulation Treatment in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Background: The impact of frailty syndrome (FS) and dementia on the convenience and satisfaction with oral anticoagulation (OAC) treatment in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is not well-known. Aim: Assessment the impact of FS and dementia on the convenience and satisfaction with OAC treatment in 116 elderly (mean age 75.2, SD = 8.2) patients with AF. Methodology: A self-administered questionnaire was used in the study to collect basic socio-demographic and clinical data. Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) questionnaire was used to assess the presence of FS, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) to assess cognitive impairment (CI), The Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire Part 2 (PACT-Q2) to assess convenience and satisfaction with OAC treatment, and the Arrhythmia-Specific Questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmia (ASTA) to assess quality of life (QoL). Results: Multivariable analysis as a significant, negative predictor of the convenience and satisfaction domain showed the occurrence of dementia (β = −0.34; p < 0.001, β = −0.41; p < 0.001, respectively) and prior major bleeding (β = −0.30; p < 0.001, β = −0.33; p < 0.001, respectively). Analysis showed a significant relationship between convenience and satisfaction and the overall result of the ASTA (r = −0.329; p < 0.001, r = −0.372; p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Elements of geriatric syndrome, such as FS and dementia, adversely affect treatment convenience and satisfaction with OAC treatment in AF. It has been shown that better convenience and satisfaction with OAC treatment translates into better QoL. There were no differences between satisfaction and convenience and the type of OAC treatment (vitamin K antagonists (VKA) vs. novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC).

Satisfaction With Oral Anticoagulants Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Observational Study

Background

Satisfaction with treatment has been identified as an important contributing factor to adherence with oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to evaluate the satisfaction level of patients with AF regarding OAC use over time, using validated patient-reported outcome instruments, and to identify associated patient characteristics.

Methods

Participants were recruited from specialized AF clinics in Canada. Eligible AF patients who were prescribed OACs were followed for up to 2 years. Participants were interviewed via telephone every 3-4 months using a structured survey. The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM II) and the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) were used to measure satisfaction over time.

Results

Among the 306 participants, satisfaction scores on the TSQM II and ACTS instruments were high. Unadjusted analyses showed significantly greater satisfaction with the burden of therapy with direct OACs (DOACs) compared to that with warfarin (small-magnitude effect) and greater satisfaction with the convenience of rivaroxaban, compared with that of all other OACs (moderate-magnitude effect). After adjustment for all other variables, vitamin K antagonist therapy was associated with greater global satisfaction than was DOAC treatment. Satisfaction with benefit and burden as measured by the ACTS scale, and global satisfaction on the TSQM II scale, tended to increase over time. Patient factors that were somewhat consistently associated with greater satisfaction were female sex and younger age.

Conclusions

Patients with AF were highly satisfied with their therapy, with few differences among OAC classes and individual OACs. Individual patients may or may not be more satisfied with DOAC than VKA therapy, and regardless of the OAC prescribed, the may require significant support to maintain therapy adherence.

Patient satisfaction with dabigatrean and warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Taiwan PASSION study

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction with oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy is an important metric of care quality and has been associated with higher medication persistence. Among OACs, dabigatran has been shown to be non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) with increased ease of use for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In this study, we sought to evaluate the expectations, convenience, and satisfaction of Taiwanese AF patients on dabigatran and VKA therapies as well as associated clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with AF (paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent) receiving OAC medication from outpatient facilities were enrolled in 24 hospitals across Taiwan. Cohort A consisted of 139 patients switched from VKA to dabigatran, while cohort B was comprised of 1113 patients on newly initiated OAC therapy (VKA, 54). The Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire was distributed, and responses on a five-point Likert scale were aggregated and analyzed across demographic groups.

RESULTS

In cohort A, convenience and satisfaction scores continued to increase at follow-up and significantly higher, compared to baseline, but both treatments scored similarly in cohort B. In cohort B, the two highest expectation scores were that the OAC would be "easy to take" and could be "taken independently." On the other hand, the patients were relatively less concerned about the side effects and cost of therapy before taking the OAC. For dabigatran-receiving patients, there were 1.1 stroke-related events per 100 patient-years and 3.0 bleeding-related events per 100 patient-years.

CONCLUSION

In Taiwanese patients with AF and initially treated with VKA, switched to dabigatran resulted in higher convenience and treatment satisfaction. For those patients on newly initiated OAC treatment, VKA and dabigatran convenience and satisfaction scores were similar.