1
|
Lopes GMM, Gimenez LGS, Santana DS, Cardoso RB, Porto BC, Sardenberg RADS, Passerotti CC, Otoch JP, da Cruz JAS. Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Before Versus After Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int Braz J Urol 2025; 51:e20240490. [PMID: 39913090 PMCID: PMC11884636 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2024.0490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2024] [Accepted: 11/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard of care for patients with bladder cancer, and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is a pivotal step that can be carried out either before or after RC. Evidence on the optimal timing for PLND remains limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, Scopus and Google Scholar for studies comparing PLND before versus after RC. Outcomes assessed were total operative time, PLND time, RC time, number of lymph nodes (LN) dissected, and estimated blood loss. Mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was conducted for robot-assisted RC (RARC). RESULTS A total of 801 patients from six studies were included, of whom 360 (44.94%) underwent PLND before RC. There were no significant differences in total operative time (MD -17.49; 95% CI -41.65,6.67; p = 0.16; I2 = 94%), PLND time (MD -14.91; 95% CI -44.91,15.09; p = 0.33; I2 = 96%), LN yielded (MD -1.13; 95% CI -4.81,2.55; p = 0.55; I2 = 83%), and estimated blood loss (MD 0.17; 95% CI -51.33,51.68; p = 0.99; I2 = 81%). However, RC time was significantly reduced (MD -28.89; 95% CI -42.84,-14.93; p < 0.0001; I2 = 75%) when PLND was performed prior to RC. In RARC studies, PLND before RC decreased total operative time, RC time, and estimated blood loss. CONCLUSIONS The timing of lymphadenectomy was not associated with a significant reduction in total operative time, PLND time, LN yield, and estimated blood loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme Melchior Maia Lopes
- Centro Universitário Faculdade de Medicina do ABCSanto AndréSPBrasilCentro Universitário Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC), Santo André, SP, Brasil
| | - Luiz Guilherme Serrão Gimenez
- Universidade de São PauloLaboratório de Técnica Cirúrgica e Cirurgia Experimental Faculdade de MedicinaSão PauloSPBrasilLaboratório de Técnica Cirúrgica e Cirurgia Experimental Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo – USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Diogo Souto Santana
- Universidade de São PauloLaboratório de Técnica Cirúrgica e Cirurgia Experimental Faculdade de MedicinaSão PauloSPBrasilLaboratório de Técnica Cirúrgica e Cirurgia Experimental Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo – USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | - Breno Cordeiro Porto
- Universidade de São PauloLaboratório de Técnica Cirúrgica e Cirurgia Experimental Faculdade de MedicinaSão PauloSPBrasilLaboratório de Técnica Cirúrgica e Cirurgia Experimental Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo – USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Rodrigo Afonso da Silva Sardenberg
- Instituto Internacional de Ensino e PesquisaHapvida NotreDame IntermédicaSão PauloSPBrasilInstituto Internacional de Ensino e Pesquisa - Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Carlo Camargo Passerotti
- Universidade de São PauloLaboratório de Técnica Cirúrgica e Cirurgia Experimental Faculdade de MedicinaSão PauloSPBrasilLaboratório de Técnica Cirúrgica e Cirurgia Experimental Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo – USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - José Pinhata Otoch
- Universidade de São PauloLaboratório de Técnica Cirúrgica e Cirurgia Experimental Faculdade de MedicinaSão PauloSPBrasilLaboratório de Técnica Cirúrgica e Cirurgia Experimental Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo – USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - José Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz
- Universidade de São PauloLaboratório de Técnica Cirúrgica e Cirurgia Experimental Faculdade de MedicinaSão PauloSPBrasilLaboratório de Técnica Cirúrgica e Cirurgia Experimental Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo – USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
- Instituto Internacional de Ensino e PesquisaHapvida NotreDame IntermédicaSão PauloSPBrasilInstituto Internacional de Ensino e Pesquisa - Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Avolio PP, Kool R, Shayegan B, Marcq G, Black PC, Breau RH, Kim M, Busca I, Abdi H, Dawidek M, Uy M, Fervaha G, Cury FL, Sanchez-Salas R, Alimohamed N, Izawa J, Jeldres C, Rendon R, Siemens R, Kulkarni GS, Kassouf W. Effect of Complete Transurethral Resection on Oncologic Outcomes After Radiation Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025; 121:317-324. [PMID: 39186955 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2024] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the oncologic outcomes of patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing complete versus incomplete transurethral tumor resection (TURBT) before radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with nonmetastatic MIBC who underwent curative-intent radiation therapy between 2002 and 2018 at 10 Canadian institutions were retrospectively evaluated. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed using baseline characteristics. Differences in survival outcomes by complete and incomplete TURBT were analyzed. RESULTS Of the 757 patients included, 66% (498) had documentation of a complete and 34% (259) an incomplete TURBT. Before adjustment, 121 (47%) and 45 (9%) patients who underwent incomplete and complete TURBT, respectively, were diagnosed with cT3-4 tumor (P <.001). After weight-adjustment, all baseline cohort characteristics were balanced (absolute standardized differences < 0.1). The adjusted median follow-up was 27 months. Adjusted survival analyses showed no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (48% vs 52%, 1.03 [0.82-1.29]; P = .8), cancer-specific survival (64% vs 61%, 0.93 [0.70-1.25]; P = .7), metastasis-free survival (43% vs 46%, 0.97 [0.79-1.19]; P = .8), and disease-free survival (32% vs 35%, 0.95 [0.79-1.15]; P = .7) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Complete TURBT may be associated with clinical organ-confined disease. Extent of TURBT was not independently associated with oncologic outcomes in patients with MIBC treated with radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pier Paolo Avolio
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Ronald Kool
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Abdominal Surgery, Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner - Cancer Center, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Bobby Shayegan
- Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rodney H Breau
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Kim
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ionut Busca
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Hamidreza Abdi
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Dawidek
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michael Uy
- Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gagan Fervaha
- Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Fabio L Cury
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Nimira Alimohamed
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jonathan Izawa
- Division of Urology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Claudio Jeldres
- Division of Urology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Ricardo Rendon
- Division of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Robert Siemens
- Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mastroianni R, Tuderti G, Ferriero M, Anceschi U, Bove AM, Brassetti A, D'Annunzio S, Misuraca L, Torregiani G, Covotta M, Guaglianone S, Gallucci M, Simone G. Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy with Totally Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: 3-Year Outcomes from a Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur Urol 2024; 85:422-430. [PMID: 38336579 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing open radical cystectomy (ORC) and robot-assisted RC (RARC) have involved an extracorporeal approach for urinary diversion (UD), undermining the potential benefits of a totally robotic procedure. Our objective was to compare 3-yr outcomes from a RCT comparing ORC to RARC with totally intracorporeal UD (iUD). METHODS Patients with cT2-4 N0 M0 or bacillus Calmette-Guérin-failed high-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who were candidates for RC without absolute contraindications to robotic surgery were included. A covariate adaptive randomisation process based on body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, preoperative haemoglobin, type of UD, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and cT stage was used. The primary endpoint was to investigate the superiority of RARC with iUD in terms of a 50% reduction in transfusion rate. Secondary outcomes included adherence to an early recovery after surgery protocol, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, readmission and complication rates, a cost analysis, and functional, oncological, and health-related quality-of-life outcomes. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 116 patients were enrolled. The primary endpoint was confirmed, as the overall perioperative transfusion rate was significantly lower in the RARC cohort, with an absolute risk reduction of 19% (95% confidence interval 2-36%; p = 0.046). No differences in perioperative and postoperative complications and 3-yr oncological outcomes were observed between the groups. Despite the superiority of ORC on quantitative analysis of night-time pad use, there were no differences in the probabilities of recovery of daytime and night-time continence. Body image was significantly better in the RARC cohort. Cost analysis confirmed that RARC is a more expensive surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Our findings support RARC with iUD as a safe surgical option; the transfusion rate was reduced by 50% and the complication rates and 3-yr oncological outcomes were comparable to those with ORC. The minimally invasive nature of RARC was reflected in better body image perception in this cohort. The probabilities of daytime and night-time continence recovery were comparable between the groups. Higher costs remain a drawback of robotic surgery. PATIENT SUMMARY This RCT demonstrated a 50% transfusions rate's reduction compared to ORC. We confirmed safety and feasibility of RARC with i-UD providing comparable peri- and postoperative complication rates, as well as, 3yr oncologic outcomes to those of ORC. Patients receiving either RARC-iUD or ORC had comparable probabilities of urinary continence recovery after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Maria Bove
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone D'Annunzio
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Leonardo Misuraca
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Torregiani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Covotta
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fu H, Davis L, Ramakrishnan V, Barefoot T, Sholtes C, Liang L, Said M, Messer J. Identify risk factors for perioperative outcomes in Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion and Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion with Robotic Cystectomy. Int Braz J Urol 2024; 50:178-191. [PMID: 38386788 PMCID: PMC10953604 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2023.0477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The increasing adoption of robotic-assisted cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD), despite its complexity, prompts a detailed comparison with extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD). Our study at a single institution investigates perioperative outcomes and identifies risk factors impacting the success of these surgical approaches. METHODS In this retrospective analysis, 174 patients who underwent robotic-assisted cystectomy at the University of Louisville from June 2016 to August 2021 were reviewed. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the urinary diversion method: 30 patients underwent ECUD and 144 underwent ICUD. Data on demographics, complication rates, length of hospital stay, and readmission rates were meticulously collected and analyzed. RESULTS Operative times were comparable between the ICUD and ECUD groups. However, the ICUD group had a significantly lower intraoperative transfusion rate (0.5 vs. 1.0, p=0.02) and shorter hospital stay (7.8 vs. 12.3 days, p<0.001). Factors such as male sex, smoking history, diabetes mellitus, intravesical therapy, higher ASA, and ACCI scores were associated with increased Clavien-Dindo Grade 3 or higher complications. Age over 70 was the sole factor linked to a higher 90-day readmission rate, with no specific characteristics influencing the 30-day rate. CONCLUSION Robotic cystectomy with ICUD results in shorter hospitalizations and lower intraoperative transfusion rates compared to ECUD, without differences in operative time, high-grade postoperative complications, or readmission rates. These findings can inform clinical decision-making, highlighting ICUD as a potentially more favorable option in appropriate settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hangcheng Fu
- University of Louisville School of MedicineDepartment of UrologyLouisvilleKYUnited StatesDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States;
| | - Laura Davis
- University of Louisville School of MedicineDepartment of UrologyLouisvilleKYUnited StatesDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States;
- University Hospital Cleveland Medical CenterCase Western Urology InstituteClevelandOHUnited StatesCase Western Urology Institute, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland OH, United States;
| | - Venkat Ramakrishnan
- University of Louisville School of MedicineDepartment of UrologyLouisvilleKYUnited StatesDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States;
- Brigham and Women's HospitalDivision of UrologyBostonMAUSADivision of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston. MA, USA;
| | - Thomas Barefoot
- University of Louisville School of MedicineDepartment of UrologyLouisvilleKYUnited StatesDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States;
| | - Colleen Sholtes
- University of Louisville School of MedicineDepartment of UrologyLouisvilleKYUnited StatesDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States;
- Cleveland Clinic Akron GeneralUrology & Pelvic Health CenterDepartment of UrologyOHUnited StatesDepartment of Urology, Urology & Pelvic Health Center, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, OH, United States;
| | - Lifan Liang
- University of Louisville School of MedicineDepartment of MedicineLouisvilleKYUnited StatesDepartment of Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States
| | - Mohammed Said
- University of Louisville School of MedicineDepartment of UrologyLouisvilleKYUnited StatesDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States;
| | - Jamie Messer
- University of Louisville School of MedicineDepartment of UrologyLouisvilleKYUnited StatesDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hayashi T, Kitano H, Hieda K, Hinata N. First case report of robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion using the hinotori Surgical Robot System. Transl Cancer Res 2024; 13:471-479. [PMID: 38410228 PMCID: PMC10894344 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
Background The field of robotic surgery is still continuously advancing, with several cutting-edge robotic systems currently under development. This study aimed to present the methodology and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) in patient with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) by utilizing the hinotori Surgical Robot System, a recently developed robot-assisted surgical platform. Case Description A 79-year-old man with MIBC, cT2N0M0, received RARC and ICUD after two courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We performed RARC and ICUD using hinotori, with a total operation time of 476 minutes. The insufflation time was 424 minutes, and the console time was 396 minutes. Total blood loss was 562 mL and no blood transfusion was necessary. During the perioperative period, a paralytic ileus occurred, although no severe adverse events were observed. The pathological examination showed ypT0N0M0, and no recurrence was observed by computed tomography scan up to 8 months postoperatively. Conclusions This report demonstrates the successfully implementation of RARC and ICUD using the hinotori system, without perioperative adverse effects. While further exploration is required to assess the long-term and large-scale implications of RARC and ICUD using hinotori on oncologic and functional outcomes, these initial findings suggest that the hinotori Surgical Robot System holds promise as an application for RARC and ICUD in patients with MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsutaro Hayashi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kitano
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Keisuke Hieda
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Hinata
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mastroianni R, Iannuzzi A, Ragusa A, Tuderti G, Ferriero M, Anceschi U, Bove AM, Brassetti A, Misuraca L, D’Annunzio S, Guaglianone S, Papalia R, Simone G. Health Related Quality of Life in Patients with Bladder Cancer Receiving a Radical Cystectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5830. [PMID: 38136375 PMCID: PMC10741964 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Radical Cystectomy (RC) and Urinary Diversion (UD) is a complex surgery associated with a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, HRQoL assessment is too often overlooked, with survival and complications being the most commonly investigated outcomes. This study aimed to identify the most impaired HRQoL features in patients receiving RC, compared to a healthy population (HP) control, as well as patients' recovery after surgery, differentiating between patients receiving ORC and RARC. Patients with Bca, who were candidates for RC with curative intent, were enrolled in the "BCa cohort". HRQoL outcomes were collected with an EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. These were collected at baseline, and then at 6-, 12- and 24 mo after surgery in the BCa cohorts, and at baseline in the HP cohort. A 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM)-analysis, adjusted for age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and smoking history, was performed. Between January 2018 and February 2023, a total of 418 patients were enrolled in the study, 116 and 302 in the BCa and HP cohorts, respectively. After applying the 1:1 propensity scored match (PSM) analysis, two homogeneous cohorts were selected, including 85 patients in each group. Baseline HRQoL assessment showed a significant impairment in terms of emotional and cognitive functioning, appetite loss and financial difficulties for the BCa cohort. Among secondary outcomes, we investigated patients' recovery after RC and UD, comparing HRQoL outcome questionnaires between the HP and BCa cohorts at 6-, 12- and 24 mo after surgery, and a subgroup analysis was performed differentiating between patients receiving ORC and RARC with totally intracorporeal UD. Interestingly, ORC compared to RARC provided a major impact on HRQoL recovery across the early, mid and long term. In particular, the ORC cohort experienced a major impairment in terms of symptoms scales items such as fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain and appetite loss. Consequently, comparing ORC and RARC vs. HP reported a major HRQoL impairment in the ORC cohort, possibly defining a benefit of RARC in early, mid- and long-term recovery. To conclude, this study confirmed the undeniable impact of RC on HRQoL. Interestingly, we highlighted the benefit of RARC in early, mid- and long-term recovery, expressed as less impairment of symptoms scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Andrea Iannuzzi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.I.); (A.R.); (R.P.)
| | - Alberto Ragusa
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.I.); (A.R.); (R.P.)
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Mariaconsiglia Ferriero
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Alfredo Maria Bove
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Leonardo Misuraca
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Simone D’Annunzio
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Salvatore Guaglianone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| | - Rocco Papalia
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.I.); (A.R.); (R.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.T.); (M.F.); (U.A.); (A.M.B.); (A.B.); (L.M.); (S.D.); (S.G.); (G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Katayama S, Mori K, Pradere B, Mostafaei H, Schuettfort VM, Quhal F, Motlagh RS, Laukhtina E, Moschini M, Grossmann NC, Nasu Y, Shariat SF, Fajkovic H. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:1587-1599. [PMID: 34146185 PMCID: PMC8364906 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01972-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
This
systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess and compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of intracorporeal (ICUD) and extracorporeal (ECUD) urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). A systematic literature search of articles was performed in PubMed®, Web of Science®, and Scopus® databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. We included studies that compared patients who underwent RARC with ICUD to those with ECUD. Twelve studies including 3067 patients met the eligibility criteria. There were no significant differences between ICUD and ECUD in overall and major complications, regardless of the period (short-term [≤ 30 days] or mid-term [> 30 days]). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that ICUD performed by high-volume centers exhibited a significantly reduced risk of major complications (short-term: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37–0.86, p = 0.008, mid-term: OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46–0.94, p = 0.02). Patients who underwent ICUD had lower estimated blood loss (MD -102.3 ml, 95% CI − 132.8 to − 71.8, p < 0.00001), less likely to receive blood transfusion rates (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20–0.62, p = 0.00003); and these findings were consistent in subgroup analyses by low-volume centers (MD-121.6 ml, 95% CI − 160.9 to − 82.3, p < 0.00001 and OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20–0.62, p = 0.00003, respectively). ICUD had a higher lymph node yield (MD 3.68, 95% CI 0.80–6.56, p = 0.01). Patients receiving ICUD provided comparable complications, superior perioperative outcomes, and similar oncological outcomes compared with ECUD. Centralization of patients may contribute to a reduction of postoperative complications, while maintaining the advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. .,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Anceschi U, Brassetti A, Tuderti G, Ferriero MC, Costantini M, Bove AM, Calabrò F, Carlini P, Vari S, Mastroianni R, Gallucci M, Simone G. Impact of Clinical Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Era of Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results of a Single-Center Experience. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E2736. [PMID: 32847113 PMCID: PMC7564756 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been proven to be an established prognostic factor after open radical cystectomy (ORC). We evaluated the impact of NACT on survival outcomes of a single-institution robotic radical cystectomy (RARC) series. METHODS From January 2012 to June 2020, 79 patients were identified. Baseline, demographic, perioperative, and pathologic data were described. Kaplan-Meier with the log-rank test was used to compare overall survival (OS) differences between complete, partial, and no-NACT responders, respectively. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of OS. RESULTS Complete, partial, and absent response to NACT were recorded in 43 (54.4%), 21 (19%), and 15 (26.6%) patients, respectively. A complete response to NACT displayed a trend toward significant higher OS (p = 0.03). In univariable analysis, significant predictors of lower OS were hypertension (HR 3.37; CI 95% 1.31-8.62; p = 0.01); advanced nodal involvement (HR 2.41; CI 95% 0.53-10.9; p < 0.001); and incomplete response to NACT (HR 0.41; CI 95% 0.18-0.95; p = 0.039). In multivariable analysis, the only independent predictor of worse OS was advanced pathologic N stages (HR 10.1; CI: 95% CI 2.3-44.3; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Complete response to NACT is associated with increased OS probability, but significant nodal residual disease remains the only independent predictor of OS after RARC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (G.T.); (M.C.F.); (M.C.); (A.M.B.); (G.S.)
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (G.T.); (M.C.F.); (M.C.); (A.M.B.); (G.S.)
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (G.T.); (M.C.F.); (M.C.); (A.M.B.); (G.S.)
| | - Maria Consiglia Ferriero
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (G.T.); (M.C.F.); (M.C.); (A.M.B.); (G.S.)
| | - Manuela Costantini
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (G.T.); (M.C.F.); (M.C.); (A.M.B.); (G.S.)
| | - Alfredo Maria Bove
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (G.T.); (M.C.F.); (M.C.); (A.M.B.); (G.S.)
| | - Fabio Calabrò
- Department of Oncology, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, 00152 Rome, Italy;
| | - Paolo Carlini
- Department of Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (P.C.); (S.V.)
| | - Sabrina Vari
- Department of Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (P.C.); (S.V.)
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, La Sapienza—University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (M.G.)
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, La Sapienza—University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy; (R.M.); (M.G.)
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (G.T.); (M.C.F.); (M.C.); (A.M.B.); (G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moschini M. From Basic Science to Clinical Research to Develop New Solutions to Improve Diagnoses and Treatment of Bladder Cancer Patients. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9082373. [PMID: 32722358 PMCID: PMC7463955 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Urological Research Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
- Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, CH-6000 Luzern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Timing of lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical cystectomy: before or after cystectomy? Fifteen cases with totally intracorporeal urinary diversions. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2020; 15:596-601. [PMID: 33294075 PMCID: PMC7687663 DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.93793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Many publications detail the level and number of lymphadenectomies, whereas the timing of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is infrequently discussed in the robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) series. Aim To determine the effects of performing PLND before or after cystectomy in totally intracorporeal RARC on operative outcomes. Material and methods A total of 15 patients included in the study underwent RARC and intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder. Of these, 8 patients underwent PLND before cystectomy (group 1), whereas 7 underwent PLND after cystectomy (group 2). Demographic information, intraoperative data, and post-operative outcomes were recorded for each patient. Results The mean ± SD age was 61.87 ±6.76 years. Overall mean operation time (OT) was 537.33 ±63.07 min. The mean EBL and hospitalization time were 322.33 ±69.92 ml and 13.87 ±5.2 days. The number of LN removed was 23.75 ±3.454 for group 1 and 13.71 ±6.873 for group 2 (p = 0.007). The postoperative pathological stages were: pT2(5), pT3(2), pT4(1) for group 1, pT2(4), pT3(2), pT4(1) for group 2. Surgical margins were negative in all patient. Overall complications occurred in 7 (46.6%) patients. Only the number of LN removed was statistically significant in favor of group 1 (p = 0.007). Mean follow-up was 15.87 months. Conclusions Our initial experience with performing extended PLND (ePLND) before or after cystectomy in totally intracorporeal RARC appears to be favorable, with similar oncological results and acceptable complication rates. However, although the number of cases is too low for statistical evaluation, it seems to be advantageous to perform ePLND before cystectomy in terms of LN number and operation time.
Collapse
|
11
|
Salih Boğa M, Özsoy Ç, Aktaş Y, Aydın A, Savaş M, Ateş M. Single-center experience of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Turk J Urol 2020; 46:tud.2020.19265. [PMID: 32301693 PMCID: PMC7360165 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.19265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) series for bladder cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between October 2016 and June 2019, overall 57 patients (50 men, 7 women) were included in the study. Patient demographics, operative data, and postoperative pathological outcomes were evaluated. Patients who had a history of pelvic or Professional surgery due to other concurrent malignancy, radiation therapy, or lacked data were excluded from the study. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 64.72±9.09 years. The mean operation time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, and hospitalization time were 418.58±85.66 minutes, 313.00±79.16mL, and 13.44±5.25 days, respectively. The postoperative pathological stages were reported as pT0 (n=8), pTis (n=4), pT1 (n=4), pT2 (n=22), pT3a (n=11), pT3b (n=2), pT4a (n=4), pT4b (n=1), and other (n=1). The mean lymph node (LN) yield was 23.45±9.43. Positive LNs were found in 16 (28.1%) patients. Surgical margins were positive in 3 (5.26%) patients. The mean follow-up period was 15.42±8.31 months. According to the modified Clavien-Dindo system, minor (Clavien 1-2) and major (Clavien 3-5) complications occurred in 18 (31.58%) and 9 (15.78%) patients during the early (0-30 days) period and in 4 (7.02%) and 5 (8.77%) patients in the late (31-90 days) period. CONCLUSION RARC and ePLND are complex but safe procedures with acceptable morbidity and excellent surgical and oncologic outcomes in muscle-invasive or high-risk bladder tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Salih Boğa
- Department of Urology, Health Sciences University, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Çağatay Özsoy
- Department of Urology, Health Sciences University, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Yasin Aktaş
- Department of Urology, Health Sciences University, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Arif Aydın
- Department of Urology, Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram School of Medicine, Konya, Turkey
| | - Murat Savaş
- Private Memorial Antalya Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Mutlu Ateş
- Department of Urology, Health Sciences University, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wenquan L, Yuhua L, Jianxin C, Hongqing X, Kecheng Z, Jiyang L, Yunhe G, Yi L, Wang Z, Shaoqing L, Yixun L, Shen Q, Wanguo X, Zhi Q, Lin C. Tumor deposit serves as a prognostic marker in gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis comparing survival outcomes. Cancer Med 2020; 9:3268-3277. [PMID: 32163670 PMCID: PMC7221304 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2019] [Revised: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer (GC) treatment is determined by accurate tumor staging. The value of tumor deposit (TD) in prognostic prediction staging system is not yet determined. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed clinical information on GC patients who underwent gastrectomy at the Department of General Surgery of the Chinese PLA General Hospital from July 2014 to June 2016. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the possibility of selection bias according to the presence of TD. RESULTS Of the 1034 GC patients, 240 (23.21%) presented with TD, which was associated with younger age and larger tumor size (all P < .05). TD-positive patients had a worse survival than TD-negative patients before (P < .001) and after (P = .017) matching. Multivariable analysis showed that mortality risk of patients with TD increased by 58%, 62%, 37%, and 40% in the crude (HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.32-1.89, P < .001), adjusted I (HR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.35-1.94, P < .001), adjusted II (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.13-1.66, P = .001), and adjusted III (HR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.16-1.68, P < .001) models before matching. Similarly, in the PSM cohort patients with TD had worse prognosis in the crude (HR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.07-1.63, P = .011), adjusted I (HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.67, P = .005), adjusted II (HR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.00-1.58, P = .049), and adjusted III (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.07-1.65, P = .010) models. TD had a similar value range between N1 and N2 stages among different models. CONCLUSIONS Among GC patients, TD is associated with survival and may have a role in the staging of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Wenquan
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.,Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Liu Yuhua
- Institute of Army Hospital Management, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Cui Jianxin
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xi Hongqing
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhang Kecheng
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Li Jiyang
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Gao Yunhe
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.,Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Liu Yi
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.,Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Zhang Wang
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.,Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Li Shaoqing
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.,Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Yixun
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.,Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Qiao Shen
- Medical Big Data Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xue Wanguo
- Medical Big Data Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qiao Zhi
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Lin
- Department of General Surgery & Institute of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|