Percutaneous Computed Tomography-Guided Coaxial Core Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Tumors

Percutaneous Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Coaxial Cutting Needle Biopsy of Pancreatic Lesions: Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety

PURPOSE

To appraise the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging-guided percutaneous coaxial cutting needle biopsy of pancreatic lesions using a 0.4-T open magnetic resonance imaging scanner with optical tracking navigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 158 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging-guided pancreatic lesion biopsy procedures from May 2019 to December 2020. Two to four specimens were collected from each patient. Pathological diagnosis and clinical follow-ups were conducted to establish the final diagnosis. The procedures were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic accuracy, and complications. The Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe guidelines were used to classify complications.

RESULTS

Biopsy pathology revealed 139 pancreatic tumor malignancies and 19 benign pancreatic lesions. Finally, 151 patients were diagnosed with pancreatic malignancy and 7 with benign disease confirmed by surgery, re-biopsy, and clinical follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy for diagnosis of pancreatic diseases were 92.1%, 100%, 100%, 36.8%, and 92.4%, respectively. The biopsy accuracy was significantly related to the size (≤ 2 cm, 76.2%; 2-4 cm, 94.0%; > 4 cm, 96.2%, P = .02) and not the lesion's location (head of pancreas, 90.7%; neck of pancreas, 88.9%; body of pancreas, 94.3%; tail of pancreas, 96.7%, P = .73). Minor complications included two patients experiencing mild abdominal pain and two with a minor occurrence of hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous magnetic resonance imaging-guided pancreatic lesion biopsy combined with optical navigation has high diagnostic accuracy and is safe for clinical practice. Level of Evidence Level 4, Case-series.

The experience of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer: a cross sectional study

BACKGROUND

Upfront resection (UR) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer. There is increasing evidence suggesting favourable outcomes toward neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery.

METHODS

All clinical staging with resectable pancreatic cancer patients treated at a tertiary medical centre from 2013 to 2020 were identified. The baseline characteristics, treatment course, surgery outcome and survival results of UR or NAC were compared.

RESULTS

Finally, in 159 resectable patients, 46 patients (29%) underwent NAC and 113 patients (71%) received UR. In NAC, 11 patients (24%) did not receive resection, 4 (36.4%) for comorbidity, 2 (18.2%) for patient refusal and 2 (18.2%) for disease progression. In UR, 13 patients (12%) were unresectable intraoperatively; 6 (46.2%) for locally advanced and 5 (38.5%) for distant metastasis. Overall, 97% of patients in NAC and 58% of patients in UR completed adjuvant chemotherapy. As of data cut-off, 24 patients (69%) in NAC and 42 patients (29%) in UR were still tumour free. The median recurrence-free survival in NAC, UR with adjuvant chemotherapy and without adjuvant chemotherapy were 31.3 months (95% CI, 14.4-not estimable), 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.0-14.3) and 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.8-11.8), P =0.036; and the median overall survival in each group were not reached (95% CI, 29.7-not estimable), 25.9 months (95% CI, 21.1-40.5) and 21.7 months (12.0-32.8), P =0.0053. Based on initial clinical staging, the median overall survival of NAC was not significantly different from UR with a tumour less than or equal to 2 cm, P =0.29. NAC patients had a higher R0 resection rate (83% versus 53%), lower recurrence rate (31% versus 71%) and harvested median number lymph node (23 versus 15).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that NAC is superior to UR in resectable pancreatic cancer with better survival.

Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Method in Biopsies of Pancreatic Lesions

ABSTRACT

In this study, it was aimed to contribute to the selection of the method to perform pancreatic lesion biopsies.Data of patients, who had undergone a percutaneous biopsy because of pancreatic masses in our institution in the period between January 2015 and November 2019, were evaluated retrospectively. The percutaneous biopsy method, the type of needle used in the procedure, and periprocedural complications were listed. Pathology and cytology reports in the archive were reviewed, and biopsy results were divided into 3 groups as benign, malignant, and inadequate. Of 308 patients included in the study, the diagnostic accuracy was verified in 124 patients through the assessment of surgical outcomes, results of biopsies from metastatic lesions, or follow-up findings. The verified results were classified as true-positives and true-negatives.Of a total of 308 patients included in the study, 23 underwent a fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and 285 underwent a core needle biopsy (CNB). No statistical differences were observed in sample acquisition success and complications between the groups.Of the lesions with a confirmed pathological diagnosis, 67.74% were malignant and 32.26% were benign. The diagnosis was correct in 107 of 112 CNB patients (95.54%) and 9 of 12 FNAB patients (75.00%). When the success of the 2 methods was compared, it was found that outcomes of CNB were statistically more successful compared with those of FNAB.A transabdominal ultrasound-guided percutaneous CNB is a safe method with a high diagnostic yield to perform a biopsy of the pancreas.

Image-guided biopsy in the age of personalised medicine: strategies for success and safety

Oncology has progressed into an era of personalised medicine, whereby the therapeutic regimen is tailored to the molecular profile of the patient's cancer. Determining personalised therapeutic options is achieved by using tumour genomics and proteomics to identify the specific molecular targets against which candidate drugs can interact. Several dozen targeted drugs, many for multiple cancer types are already widely in clinical use. Molecular profiling of tumours is contingent on high-quality biopsy specimens and the most common method of tissue sampling is image-guided biopsy. Thus, for radiologists performing these biopsies, the paradigm has now shifted away from obtaining specimens simply for histopathological diagnosis to acquiring larger amounts of viable tumour cells for DNA, RNA, or protein analysis. These developments have highlighted the central role now played by radiologists in the delivery of personalised cancer care. This review describes the principles of molecular profiling assays and biopsy techniques for optimising yield, and describes a scoring system to assist in patient selection for percutaneous biopsy.