1
|
Pandrowala S, Patkar S, Goel M, Mirza D, Mathur SK. Surgical resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma and those beyond BCLC: systematic review with proposed management algorithm. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:144. [PMID: 37041364 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02881-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for the sixth most common cancer and ranks third in mortality worldwide with inhomogeneity in terms of resection for advanced-stage disease. METHODS A systematic review of published literature using the PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar databases from 1995 to 2020 was conducted to identify studies that reported outcomes of resection for solitary HCC > 10 cm, BCLC B/C, and multinodular HCC. Our aim was to assess overall survival for resection, identify poor prognostic factors, and to compare it to trans-arterial chemotherapy (TACE) where data was available. RESULTS Eighty-nine articles were included after a complete database search in the systematic review as per our predefined criteria. Analysis revealed a 5-year overall survival of 33.5% for resection of HCC > 10 cm, 41.7% for BCLC B, 23.3% for BCLC C, and 36.6% for multinodular HCC. Peri-operative mortality ranged from 0 to 6.9%. Studies comparing resection versus TACE for BCLC B/C had a survival of 40% versus 17%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our systematic review justifies hepatic resection wherever feasible for hepatocellular carcinomas > 10 cm, BCLC B, BCLC C, and multinodular tumors. In addition, we identified and proposed an algorithm with five poor prognostic criteria in this group of patients who may benefit from adjuvant TACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saneya Pandrowala
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Shraddha Patkar
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Mahesh Goel
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - Darius Mirza
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham and Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - S K Mathur
- Zen Digestive Disease Center, Zen Hospital, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lozanovski VJ, Adigozalov S, Khajeh E, Ghamarnejad O, Aminizadeh E, Schleicher C, Hackert T, Müller-Stich BP, Merle U, Picardi S, Lund F, Chang DH, Mieth M, Fonouni H, Golriz M, Mehrabi A. Declined Organs for Liver Transplantation: A Right Decision or a Missed Opportunity for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1365. [PMID: 36900157 PMCID: PMC10000136 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation is the only promising treatment for end-stage liver disease and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, too many organs are rejected for transplantation. METHODS We analyzed the factors involved in organ allocation in our transplant center and reviewed all livers that were declined for transplantation. Reasons for declining organs for transplantation were categorized as major extended donor criteria (maEDC), size mismatch and vascular problems, medical reasons and risk of disease transmission, and other reasons. The fate of the declined organs was analyzed. RESULTS 1086 declined organs were offered 1200 times. A total of 31% of the livers were declined because of maEDC, 35.5% because of size mismatch and vascular problems, 15.8% because of medical reasons and risk of disease transmission, and 20.7% because of other reasons. A total of 40% of the declined organs were allocated and transplanted. A total of 50% of the organs were completely discarded, and significantly more of these grafts had maEDC than grafts that were eventually allocated (37.5% vs. 17.7%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Most organs were declined because of poor organ quality. Donor-recipient matching at time of allocation and organ preservation must be improved by allocating maEDC grafts using individualized algorithms that avoid high-risk donor-recipient combinations and unnecessary organ declination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir J. Lozanovski
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Said Adigozalov
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Omid Ghamarnejad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ehsan Aminizadeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Schleicher
- German Organ Procurement Organization (Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation, DSO), 60594 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Beat Peter Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uta Merle
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Picardi
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frederike Lund
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - De-Hua Chang
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Mieth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hamidreza Fonouni
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammad Golriz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lozanovski VJ, Unterrainer C, Döhler B, Süsal C, Mehrabi A. Outcome of Extended Right Lobe Liver Transplantations. Liver Transpl 2022; 28:807-818. [PMID: 34806843 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Split-liver transplantation offers a solution to the organ shortage problem. However, the outcomes of extended right lobe liver transplantation (ERLT) and whether it is a suitable alternative to full-size liver transplantation (FSLT) remain controversial. We compared the outcomes of ERLT and FSLT in adult recipients of 43,409 first deceased donor liver transplantations using Cox regression. We also analyzed 612 ERLT and 1224 FSLT 1:2 matched cases to identify factors that affect ERLT outcome. The risk of graft loss was significantly higher following ERLT than following FSLT during the first posttransplantation year in the matched and unmatched collective (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39 and 1.27 and P = 0.01 and 0.006, respectively). Every additional hour of cold ischemia time (CIT) increased the risk of 1-year graft loss by 10% in the ERLT group compared with only 3% in the FSLT group (P = 0.003 and <0.001, respectively). Importantly, the outcome of ERLT and FSLT did not differ significantly if the CIT was below 10 hours (HR, 0.71; P = 0.22). One-year graft and patient survival were lower in high-risk ERLT recipients with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of ≥20 (HR, 1.88; P = 0.03 and HR, 2.03; P = 0.02). In the male recipient-male donor combination, ERLT recipients had a higher risk of 1-year graft loss than FSLT recipients (HR, 2.44; P = 0.006). This was probably because of the significantly higher MELD score in ERLT recipients (P = 0.004). ERLT in adults is an adequate alternative to FSLT and offers an elegant solution to the problem of organ shortage as long as the cold storage is less than 10 hours and the recipient's MELD score is <20.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir J Lozanovski
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Döhler
- Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caner Süsal
- Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lozanovski VJ, Ramouz A, Aminizadeh E, Al-Saegh SAH, Khajeh E, Probst H, Picardi S, Rupp C, Chang DH, Probst P, Mehrabi A. Prognostic role of selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis. BJS Open 2022; 6:6536147. [PMID: 35211739 PMCID: PMC8874238 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are selected for transplantation if they have a low tumour burden and low risk of recurrence. The morphometric Milan criteria have been the cornerstone for patient selection, but dynamic morphological and biological tumour characteristics surfaced as an encouraging tool to refine the selection of patients with HCC and to support the expansion of the Milan criteria. The outcomes of the most prevalent models that select patients with HCC for liver transplantation were analysed in this study, which aimed to identify the selection model that offered the best recurrence-free and overall survival after transplantation. METHODS Studies that compared Milan, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), up-to-seven (UPTS), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and MetroTicket 2.0 (MT2) models were included. One-year, 3-year, and 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates of patients selected for transplantation using different models were analysed. RESULTS A total of 60 850 adult patients with HCC selected for liver transplantation using Milan, UCSF, UPTS, AFP, or MT2 criteria were included. Patients selected for transplantation using the MT2 model had the highest 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival. In addition, patients selected for transplantation using MT2 criteria had the best 1- and 3-year overall survival, whereas patients selected for transplantation using the Milan criteria had the best 5-year overall survival rates. CONCLUSION The MT2 model offered the best post-transplant outcomes in patients with HCC, highlighting the importance of considering tumour morphology and biology when selecting patients with HCC for liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir J Lozanovski
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ali Ramouz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ehsan Aminizadeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sadeq Ali-Hasan Al-Saegh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heike Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Picardi
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Rupp
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - De-Hua Chang
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma using grafts from uncontrolled circulatory death donation. Sci Rep 2021; 11:13520. [PMID: 34188156 PMCID: PMC8241826 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92976-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Controversy exists regarding whether the rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) differs when using livers from donation after controlled circulatory death (DCD) versus livers from donation after brain death (DBD). The aim of this cohort study was to analyze rates of HCC recurrence, patient survival, and graft survival after OLT for HCC, comparing recipients of DBD livers (n = 103) with recipients of uncontrolled DCD livers (uDCD; n = 41). No significant differences in tumor size, tumor number, serum alpha-fetoprotein, proportion of patients within Milan criteria, or pre-OLT bridging therapies were identified between groups, although the waitlist period was significantly shorter in the uDCD group (p = 0.040). HCC recurrence was similar between groups. Patient survival was similar between groups, but graft survival was lower in the uDCD group. Multivariate analysis identified recipient age (p = 0.031), pre-OLT bridging therapy (p = 0.024), and HCC recurrence (p = 0.048) as independent risk factors for patient survival and pre-OLT transarterial chemoembolization (p = 0.045) as the single risk factor for HCC recurrence. In conclusion, similar patient survival and lower graft survival were observed in the uDCD group. However, the use of uDCD livers appears to be justified due to a shorter waitlist time, and lower waitlist dropout and HCC recurrence rates.
Collapse
|
6
|
Cusumano C, De Carlis L, Centonze L, Lesourd R, Levi Sandri GB, Lauterio A, De Carlis R, Ferla F, Di Sandro S, Camus C, Jézéquel C, Bardou-Jacquet E, Rayar M. Advanced donor age does not increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: a retrospective two-centre analysis using competing risk analysis. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1948-1958. [PMID: 34145653 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The impact of donor age on the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation is still debated. Between 2002 and 2014, all patients transplanted for HCC in 2 European liver transplantation tertiary centres were retrospectively reviewed. Risk factors for HCC recurrence were assessed using competing risk analysis, and the impact of donor age < or ≥65 years and < or ≥80 years was specifically evaluated after propensity score matching. 728 patients transplanted with a median follow-up of 86 months were analysed. The 1-, 3- and 5-year recurrence rates were 4.9%, 10.7% and 13.9%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, recipient age (sHR: 0.96 [0.93; 0.98], P < 0.01), number of lesions (sHR: 1.05 [1.04; 1.06], P < 0.001), maximum size of the lesions (sHR: 1.37 [1.27; 1.48], P < 0.01), presence of a hepatocholangiocarcinoma (sHR: 6.47 [2.91; 14.38], P < 0.01) and microvascular invasion (sHR: 3.48 [2.42; 5.02], P < 0.01) were significantly associated with HCC recurrence. After propensity score matching, neither donor age ≥65 (P = 0.29) nor donor age ≥80 (P = 0.84) years increased the risk of HCC recurrence. In conclusion, donor age was not found to be a risk factor for HCC recurrence. Patients listed for HCC can receive a graft from an elderly donor without compromising the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Cusumano
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Digestive, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Centonze
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Romain Lesourd
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Digestive, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.,Faculté de médecine, Université Rennes1, Rennes, France
| | | | - Andrea Lauterio
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Ferla
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Christophe Camus
- Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.,CIC 1414, INSERM, Rennes, France
| | | | - Edouard Bardou-Jacquet
- Faculté de médecine, Université Rennes1, Rennes, France.,Service des Maladies du foie, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Michel Rayar
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Digestive, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.,Faculté de médecine, Université Rennes1, Rennes, France.,CIC 1414, INSERM, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lozanovski VJ, Probst P, Arefidoust A, Ramouz A, Aminizadeh E, Nikdad M, Khajeh E, Ghamarnejad O, Shafiei S, Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh S, Seide SE, Kalkum E, Nickkholgh A, Czigany Z, Lurje G, Mieth M, Mehrabi A. Prognostic role of the Donor Risk Index, the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index, and the Balance of Risk score on graft loss after liver transplantation. Transpl Int 2021; 34:778-800. [PMID: 33728724 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to identify cutoff values for donor risk index (DRI), Eurotransplant (ET)-DRI, and balance of risk (BAR) scores that predict the risk of liver graft loss. MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched systematically and unrestrictedly. Graft loss odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were assessed by meta-analyses using Mantel-Haenszel tests with a random-effects model. Cutoff values for predicting graft loss at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years were analyzed for each of the scores. Measures of calibration and discrimination used in studies validating the DRI and the ET-DRI were summarized. DRI ≥ 1.4 (six studies, n = 35 580 patients) and ET-DRI ≥ 1.4 (four studies, n = 11 666 patients) were associated with the highest risk of graft loss at all time points. BAR > 18 was associated with the highest risk of 3-month and 1-year graft loss (n = 6499 patients). A DRI cutoff of 1.8 and an ET-DRI cutoff of 1.7 were estimated using a summary receiver operator characteristic curve, but the sensitivity and specificity of these cutoff values were low. A DRI and ET-DRI score ≥ 1.4 and a BAR score > 18 have a negative influence on graft survival, but these cutoff values are not well suited for predicting graft loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir J Lozanovski
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alireza Arefidoust
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ali Ramouz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ehsan Aminizadeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammadsadegh Nikdad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Omid Ghamarnejad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Saeed Shafiei
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Svenja E Seide
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Kalkum
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arash Nickkholgh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Zoltan Czigany
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Georg Lurje
- Department of Surgery, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Mieth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lozanovski VJ, Probst P, Ramouz A, Arefidoust A, Ghamarnejad O, Aminizadeh E, Khajeh E, Mehrabi A. Considering extended right lobe grafts as major extended donor criteria in liver transplantation is justified. Transpl Int 2021; 34:622-639. [PMID: 33471399 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The outcomes of split-liver transplantation are controversial. This study compared outcomes and morbidity after extended right lobe liver transplantation (ERLT) and whole liver transplantation (WLT) in adults. MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched systematically and unrestrictedly for studies on ERLT and its impact on graft and patient survival, and postoperative complications. Graft loss and patient mortality odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were assessed by meta-analyses using Mantel-Haenszel tests with a random-effects model. Vascular and biliary complications, primary nonfunction, 3-month, 1-, and 3-year graft and patient survival, and retransplantation after ERLT and WLT were analyzed. The literature search yielded 10 594 articles. After exclusion, 22 studies (n = 75 799 adult transplant patients) were included in the analysis. ERLT was associated with lower 3-month (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.09-1.89, P = 0.01), 1-year (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.08-1.97, P = 0.01), and 3-year (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.01-1.84, P = 0.04) graft survival. WL grafts were less associated with retransplantation (OR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.41-0.80; P < 0.01), vascular complications (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.38-0.74, P < 0.01) and biliary complications (OR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.47-0.95; P = 0.03). Considering ERLT as major Extended Donor Criteria is justified because ERL grafts are associated with vasculobiliary complications and the need for retransplantation, and have a negative influence on graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir J Lozanovski
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ali Ramouz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alireza Arefidoust
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Omid Ghamarnejad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ehsan Aminizadeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lozanovski VJ, Döhler B, Weiss KH, Mehrabi A, Süsal C. The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications-Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report. Front Immunol 2020; 11:892. [PMID: 32477362 PMCID: PMC7235423 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Despite increasing awareness of the negative impact of cold ischemia time (CIT) in liver transplantation, its precise influence in different subgroups of liver transplant recipients has not been analyzed in detail. This study aimed to identify liver transplant recipients with an unfavorable outcome due to prolonged cold ischemia. Methods: 40,288 adult liver transplantations, performed between 1998 and 2017 and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study were analyzed. Results: Prolonged CIT significantly reduced graft and patient survival only during the first post-transplant year. On average, each hour added to the cold ischemia was associated with a 3.4% increase in the risk of graft loss (hazard ratio (HR) 1.034, P < 0.001). The impact of CIT was strongest in patients with hepatitis C-related (HCV) cirrhosis with a 24% higher risk of graft loss already at 8-9 h (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.47, P = 0.011) and 64% higher risk at ≥14 h (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.30-2.09, P < 0.001). In contrast, patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and alcoholic cirrhosis tolerated longer ischemia times up to <10 and <12 h, respectively, without significant impact on graft survival (P = 0.47 and 0.42). In HCC patients with model of end-stage liver disease scores (MELD) <20, graft survival was not significantly impaired in the cases of CIT up to 13 h. Conclusion: The negative influence of CIT on liver transplant outcome depends on the underlying disease, patients with HCV-related cirrhosis being at the highest risk of graft loss due to prolonged cold ischemia. Grafts with longer cold preservation times should preferentially be allocated to recipients with alcoholic cirrhosis and HCC patients with MELD <20, in whom the effect of cold ischemia is less pronounced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir J Lozanovski
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernd Döhler
- Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karl Heinz Weiss
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caner Süsal
- Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|