Low Pre-Treatment Count of Circulating Endothelial Progenitors as a Prognostic Biomarker of the High Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence

Cooperation between Angiogenesis, Vasculogenesis, Chemotaxis, and Coagulation in Breast Cancer Metastases Development: Pathophysiological Point of View

Simple Summary

Breast cancer is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in women. Early breast cancer has a relatively good prognosis, in contrast to metastatic disease with rather poor outcomes. Metastasis formation in distant organs is a complex process requiring cooperation of numerous cells, growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines. Tumor growth, invasion, and finally systemic spread are driven by processes of angiogenesis, vasculogenesis, chemotaxis, and coagulation. This review summarizes their role in development of distant metastases in breast cancer, as well as explains the essential processes occurring throughout these actions.

Abstract

With almost 2.3 million new cases and 685 thousand fatal events in 2020 alone, breast cancer remains one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in women worldwide. Despite the increasing prevalence of the disease in recent years, the number of deaths has dropped—this is mostly the result of better diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities, allowing to recognize and treat breast cancer earlier and more efficiently. However, metastatic disease still remains a therapeutic challenge. As mechanisms of tumor spread are being explored, new drugs can be implemented in clinical practice, improving the outcomes in patients with advanced disease. Formation of metastases is a complex process, which involves activation of angiogenesis, vasculogenesis, chemotaxis, and coagulation. The actions, which occur during metastatic spread are interrelated and complementary. This review summarizes their importance and mutual connections in formation of secondary tumors in breast cancer.

Stromal Cell-Derived Factor 1α (SDF-1α) in Invasive Breast Cancer: Associations with Vasculo-Angiogenic Factors and Prognostic Significance

(1) Background: Tumour angiogenesis is critical for the progression of neoplasms. A prospective study was designed to examine the utility of stromal cell-derived factor 1α (SDF-1α) and selected vasculo-angiogenic parameters for estimating the probability of disease relapse in 84 primary, operable invasive breast cancer (IBrC) patients (40 (48%) with stage IA and 44 (52%) with stage IIA and IIB). (2) Methods: We explored the prognostic value of the plasma levels of SDF-1α, vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), the soluble forms of VEGF receptors type 1 and 2, and the number of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (circulating EPCs) in breast cancer patients. The median follow-up duration was 58 months, with complete follow-up for the first event. (3) Results: According to ROC curve analysis, the optimal cut-off point for SDF-1α (for discriminating between patients at high and low risk of relapse) was 42 pg/mL, providing 57% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Kaplan-Meier curves for disease-free survival (DFS) showed that concentrations of SDF-1α lower than 42 pg/dL together with a VEGFR1 lower than 29.86 pg/mL were significantly associated with shorter DFS in IBrC patients (p = 0.0381). Patients with both SDF-1α lower than 42 pg/dL and a number of circulating EPCs lower than 9.68 cells/µL had significantly shorter DFS (p = 0.0138). (4) Conclusions: Our results imply the clinical usefulness of SDF-1α, sVEGFR1 and the number of circulating EPCs as prognostic markers for breast cancer in clinical settings.

Divergent Impact of Breast Cancer Laterality on Clinicopathological, Angiogenic, and Hemostatic Profiles: A Potential Role of Tumor Localization in Future Outcomes

To date, lateral differences of invasive breast cancer (IBrC) with respect to the angiogenic and hemostatic profiles were never studied. Here, we aimed to determine the relationship of tumor laterality with various clinical and pathological parameters including angiogenic and hemostatic profiles. A total of 92 women that were initially non-metastatic and treated by surgery were included in this single-center prospective study. Patients were grouped according to tumor localization. A four-year follow-up was accomplished in all patients with a 15.22% recurrence rate. An immunoassay of selected angiogenic and hemostatic parameters, as well as immunohistochemistry of estrogen and progesterone receptors, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67, was comparatively performed in groups with right- and left-sided IBrC. The same analysis was carried out in a subgroup of patients with luminal A molecular subtype of cancer. Patients with right-sided tumors free of nodal involvement had a significantly longer overall survival compared to their left-sided counterparts (p = 0.0491). Additionally, right-sided tumors had a higher predisposition to be a luminal-A subtype of IBrC (p = 0.0016). Furthermore, 10% of left-sided tumors exhibited an overexpression of HER2, while only 2% patients suffering right-sided tumors displayed a positive score (p = 0.0357). Our findings revealed a significantly higher concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A (p = 0.0136), lower anti-angiogenic ratios (sVEGFR1/VEGF-A (p = 0.0208) and sVEGFR2/VEGF-A (p = 0.0068)), and elevated plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) (p = 0.0229) in patients with breast cancer localized in the left breast, regardless of the molecular subtype of IBrC. Our study showed that left-sided breast tumors without lymph node metastases demonstrate worse overall survival. Laterality of IBrC is associated with pro-angiogenic and pro-thrombotic conditions. We propose to consider laterality as a prognostic factor of IBrC.