|
1
|
Carciotto G, Costa F, Garcia-Ruiz V, Galli M, Soraci E, Magliarditi A, Teresi L, Nasso E, Carerj S, Di Bella G, Micari A, De Luca G. Individualization of Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Coronary Stenting: A Comprehensive, Evidence-Based Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7144. [PMID: 38002756 PMCID: PMC10672070 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), comprising aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is the cornerstone of post-percutaneous coronary intervention treatment to prevent stent thrombosis and reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The selection of an optimal DAPT regimen, considering the interplay of various antiplatelet agents, patient profiles, and procedural characteristics, remains an evolving challenge. Traditionally, a standard duration of 12 months has been recommended for DAPT in most patients. While contemporary guidelines provide general frameworks, DAPT modulation with longer or shorter treatment courses followed by aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy are evolving towards an individualized strategy to optimize the balance between efficacy and safety. This review comprehensively examines the current landscape of DAPT strategies after coronary stenting, with a focus on emerging evidence for treatment individualization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Carciotto
- Division of Cardiology, Policlinico G Martino, 98125 Messina, Italy; (G.C.); (L.T.)
| | - Francesco Costa
- BIOMORF Department, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (F.C.); (A.M.)
| | | | - Mattia Galli
- Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 48033 Cotignola, Italy;
| | - Emmanuele Soraci
- U.O.S. Emodinamica, Department of Medicine, Ospedale Barone Romeo di Patti, 98066 Messina, Italy; (E.S.); (A.M.)
| | - Alberto Magliarditi
- U.O.S. Emodinamica, Department of Medicine, Ospedale Barone Romeo di Patti, 98066 Messina, Italy; (E.S.); (A.M.)
| | - Lucio Teresi
- Division of Cardiology, Policlinico G Martino, 98125 Messina, Italy; (G.C.); (L.T.)
| | - Enrica Nasso
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (E.N.); (S.C.); (G.D.B.)
| | - Scipione Carerj
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (E.N.); (S.C.); (G.D.B.)
| | - Gianluca Di Bella
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (E.N.); (S.C.); (G.D.B.)
| | - Antonio Micari
- BIOMORF Department, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (F.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Giuseppe De Luca
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (E.N.); (S.C.); (G.D.B.)
- Division of Cardiology, IRCCS Hospital Galeazzi-Sant’Ambrogio, 20157 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Optimizing the Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11092380. [PMID: 35566504 PMCID: PMC9100167 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most common procedures performed in medicine. However, its net benefit among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is less well established than in the general population. The prevalence of patients suffering from both CAD and CKD is high, and is likely to increase in the coming years. Planning the adequate management of this group of patients is crucial to improve their outcome after PCI. This starts with proper preparation before the procedure, the use of all available means to reduce contrast during the procedure, and the implementation of modern strategies such as radial access and drug-eluting stents. At the end of the procedure, personalized antithrombotic therapy for the patient’s specific characteristics is advisable to account for the elevated ischemic and bleeding risk of these patients.
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Abstract
Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) presenting with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing coronary stenting are indicated to treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combining aspirin with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. The management of patients with CAD who present with a complex clinical profile due to multiple comorbidities, and/or undergoing complex interventional procedures, remains challenging as a high risk for both ischemic and bleeding events is often present; hence, the risk-benefit balance on the optimal DAPT duration is difficult to evaluate. The complexity of antiplatelet therapy in CAD patients is due to the fact that this complexity embraces several aspects: the coronary anatomy, the number of vascular districts at risk for atherothrombosis, and patient comorbidities, including global frailty. Recent randomized and epidemiological studies have highlighted subgroups that could benefit from prolonged antithrombotic treatment, as well as frail patients, who may be better suited to a shorter course of therapy. We provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding treatment with DAPT, along with suggestions on its management.
Collapse
|