Effect of Le Fort I Maxillary Advancement and Clockwise Rotation on the Anteromedial Cheek Soft Tissue Change in Patients with Skeletal Class III Pattern and Midface Deficiency: A 3D Imaging-Based Prediction Study

Clockwise versus counterclockwise rotation in bimaxillary surgery: 3D analysis of facial soft tissue outcomes

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare facial 3D soft tissue changes in subjects with Class III deformities who underwent bimaxillary clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) rotational orthognathic surgery.

METHODS

Asian Class III subjects who completed bimaxillary surgical orthodontic treatments were enrolled and categorized into CW and CCW groups based on maxillary occlusal plane alterations. Preoperative and 9-month follow-up cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 3D stereophotogrammetry were obtained, superimposed, and quantified for skeletal movements and soft tissue changes in six facial regions. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven subjects were included (CW group, n = 20; CCW group, n = 17). Postsurgical chin volume significantly reduced in the CW group compared to the CCW group (mean difference 6362 mm3; p = 0.037), and intergonial width significantly decreased in the CW group (mean difference 6.2 mm; p = 0.005). The postoperative alar width increased by 1.04 mm and 1.22 mm in the CW and CCW groups, respectively (p = 0.70). However, these changes were not significantly correlated to the direction of MMC pitch.

CONCLUSION

Clockwise rotation of the bimaxillary complex demonstrated a significant advantage in reducing chin volume and intergonial width compared to counterclockwise rotation, leading to a reduced frontal lower face width among Asian Class III subjects.

Comparison between one-jaw and two-jaw designs in virtual surgery planning for patients with class III malocclusion

Orthognathic surgery is highly effective for treating maxillomandibular discrepancies in patients with class III malocclusion. However, whether one- or two-jaw surgery should be selected remains controversial. Our study aimed to evaluate quantitative differences between one-jaw and two-jaw surgical designs. In total, 100 consecutive patients with skeletal class III malocclusion who underwent orthognathic surgery with preoperative three-dimensional simulation between August 2016 and November 2021 were recruited. Based on the same final occlusal setup, a two-jaw surgery design and two types of one-jaw design were created. In total, 400 image sets, including preoperative images and three types of surgical simulation, were measured and compared. The one-jaw mandibular setback design led to improvement in most cephalometric measurements and facial symmetry. Although the one-jaw maxillary advancement design improved the ANB angle and facial convexity, it induced maxillary protrusion and reduced facial symmetry. Compared with the other designs, the two-jaw design provided significantly closer cephalometric measurements to the normative values, better symmetry, and less occlusal cant. Overall, the two-jaw design provided a quantitatively better facial appearance in terms of symmetry, proportion, and profile. Although an optimal surgical design necessitates thorough preoperative evaluation and a shared decision-making process, two-jaw surgery can be considered for improving overall facial esthetics and harmony.

3-dimensional analysis of nasal soft tissue alterations following maxillary Lefort I advancement with and without impaction using 3D photogrammetry scanner

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the changes in nasal soft tissue following maxillary Lefort I advancement with and without impaction in subjects presenting a skeletal class III malocclusion, using a 3D photogrammetry scanner.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with class III malocclusion undergoing Lefort I advancement with and without impaction and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with the standard technique were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: maxillary Lefort I advancement alone (group 1) and combined with impaction (group 2). Facial soft tissue landmarks of the nose including nasal height (NH), nasal length (NL), nasal tip projection (NTP), alar width (AW), alar base width (ABW), subalar width (Sbal), nasolabial angle (NLA), nasofrontal angle (NFA), and columella inclination (CI) before and at least 4 months after surgery were obtained by a 3D scanner.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included in this study (Group 1: 11 and Group 2: 10). NH, NTP, and NL decreased significantly in both groups following surgery. In addition, Sbal decreased only in group 2. On the other hand, NLA and CI increased significantly in group 2. The inter-group comparison revealed a statistically significant difference in the alterations in NH, NL, and CI between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Changes in the nose soft tissue occurred after both surgeries, but their type and extent were different. Actions taken to reduce unwanted changes need to be further investigated. To evaluate the changes, 3D photogrammetry scan is a feasible imaging technique that can be used, providing numerous benefits.

Average Three-Dimensional Skeletofacial Model as a Template for Bone Repositioning during Virtual Orthognathic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Virtual planning has revolutionized orthognathic surgery. This study presents a computer-assisted method for constructing average three-dimensional skeletofacial models that can be applied as templates for surgical planning for maxillomandibular repositioning.

METHODS

The authors used the images of 60 individuals (30 women and 30 men) who had never undergone orthognathic surgery to construct an average three-dimensional skeletofacial model for male participants and one for female participants. The authors validated the accuracy of the newly developed skeletofacial models by comparing their images with 30 surgical simulation images (ie, skulls) that had been created using three-dimensional cephalometric normative data. The comparison was conducted by superimposing surgical simulation images created using the authors' models with the previously created images to analyze their differences, particularly differences in the jawbone position.

RESULTS

For all participants, the authors compared the jaw position in the surgical simulation images created using the authors' average three-dimensional skeletofacial models with that in the images created using three-dimensional cephalometric normative data. The results revealed that the planned maxillary and mandibular positions were similar in both images and that the differences between all facial landmarks were less than 1 mm, except for one dental position. Most studies have reported less than 2 mm to be the success criterion for the distance difference between planned and outcome images; thus, the authors' data indicate high consistency between the images in terms of jawbone position.

CONCLUSION

The authors' average three-dimensional skeletofacial models provide an innovative template-assisted orthognathic surgery planning modality that can enhance the fully digital workflow for virtual orthognathic surgical planning.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.

Characterization of labiomandibular movements induced after isolated LeFort I osteotomy in the surgical management of class III malocclusion

INTRODUCTION

Maxillary surgery alone can be proposed for the surgical management of class III malocclusion, but anticipating outcomes for the labiomental muscle complex is challenging due to the mandibular autorotation phenomenon. The objective of this study was to quantify the mandibular and labiomental movements induced by maxillary osteotomy alone in the management of class III malocclusion according to different clinical and surgical variables.

METHODS

The post-operative changes in mandibular and labiomental shapes were studied by geometric morphometry from the pre- and post-operative lateral cephalometric radiograph of 25 patients. The explanatory variables tested were maxillary advancement, maxillary rotation, and divergence.

RESULTS

Soft tissues repositioning are different from postoperative mandibular repositioning after maxillary osteotomy. Neuromuscular adjustments of mandible depend on divergence and the maxillary rotation. Labiomental response only depends on divergence.

CONCLUSION

The surgical procedure does not have the same bone-related and musculocutaneous effects on patients with the same class III malocclusion. It is therefore essential for surgeons to understand the effects of their procedure on musculocutaneous tissues in order to best anticipate post-operative outcomes.

Comparison of regional soft tissue changes after bimaxillary rotational surgery between class III deformity with overbite and open bite: A 3D imaging analysis

BACKGROUND

This prospective study aimed to compare regional soft tissue changes between patients with class III overbite and open bite deformities treated with bimaxillary surgery involving clockwise and counter-clockwise mandibular setback, respectively.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Class III deformity adults receiving Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies were grouped according to the incisal occlusion: overbite (n = 30) and open bite (n = 30). Combined cone-beam CT scans and 3D facial photographs preoperative and at least 1-year postoperative were taken to assess the soft tissue changes.

RESULTS

Postoperative changes for the overbite and open bite groups included anterior repositioning of nose (-0.8 ± 1.2 mm and -1.1 ± 1.1 mm, respectively) and cheek (-1.9 ± 1.3 mm and -1.7 ± 2.6 mm, respectively), posterior repositioning of chin (5.2 ± 4.0 mm and 4.9 ± 3.2 mm, respectively), and medial (-1.7 ± 2.0 mm and -1.9 ± 2.1 mm, respectively) and posterior (2.7 ± 1.4 mm and 2.8 ± 2.3 mm, respectively) repositioning of bilateral angles. Posterior (1.2 ± 2.0 mm and 5.1 ± 3.3 mm) and inferior (-1.4 ± 2.2 mm and -2.4 ± 2.7 mm) repositioning of upper lip and lower lip occurred in overbite group. Inferior (-2.3 ± 2.4 mm) and superior (3.7 ± 3.4 mm) repositioning of chin occurred in the overbite and open bite groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of class III overbite and open bite deformities with bimaxillary rotational surgery resulted in comparable regional soft tissue changes, except for upper lip, lower lip and chin.

Applications of three-dimensional imaging techniques in craniomaxillofacial surgery: A literature review

Three-dimensional (3D) imaging technologies are increasingly used in craniomaxillofacial (CMF) surgery, especially to enable clinicians to get an effective approach and obtain better treatment results during different preoperative and postoperative phases, namely during image acquisition and diagnosis, virtual surgical planning (VSP), actual surgery, and treatment outcome assessment. The article presents an overview of 3D imaging technologies used in the aforementioned phases of the most common CMF surgery. We searched for relevant studies on 3D imaging applications in CMF surgery published over the past 10 years in the PubMed, ProQuest (Medline), Web of Science, Science Direct, Clinical Key, and Embase databases. A total of 2094 articles were found, of which 712 were relevant. An additional 26 manually searched articles were included in the analysis. The findings of the review demonstrated that 3D imaging technology is becoming increasingly popular in clinical practice and an essential tool for plastic surgeons. This review provides information that will help researchers and clinicians consider the use of 3D imaging techniques in CMF surgery to improve the quality of surgical procedures and achieve satisfactory treatment outcomes.

The Midfacial Soft Tissue Changes After Anterior Maxillary Segmental Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients With Cleft: A 3-Dimensional Volumetric-Based Subunit Analysis

BACKGROUND

Maxillary hypoplasia is common in patients with cleft lip and palate. In this study, the authors investigated the soft tissue changes in midfacial regions after anterior maxillary segmental distraction osteogenesis (AMSDO) in patients with cleft.

METHODS

Eight patients with cleft lip and palate who underwent AMSDO were enrolled in this study. Spiral computed tomographic images were taken before surgery and 6-12 months after surgery to evaluate soft tissue changes after AMSDO. The midfacial area was divided into 6 regions of interest according to anatomical subunits. The average movements of each region were calculated using volumetric changes and preoperative region surface areas.

RESULTS

The upper lip on both sides has the most anterior movement (5.22±0.86 and 5.14±0.84 mm), supracommissural regions have a little less movement (4.11±0.55 and 3.81±0.67 mm), paranasal regions have the least movement (3.37±0.47 and 3.15±0.36 mm). The corresponding regions of interest showed no significant difference on the cleft side versus the noncleft side.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior maxillary segmental distraction osteogenesis can improve the soft tissue profile in patients with cleft, and there was no significant difference in soft tissue changes between the cleft side and the noncleft side.

Outcome of full digital workflow for orthognathic surgery planning in the treatment of asymmetric skeletal class III deformity

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Studies have reported the advantages of digital imaging-assisted orthognathic surgery planning, but there is scarce information about a full digital planning modality. This study evaluated the 3D cephalometric-based and patient-reported outcomes of a full digital workflow for orthognathic surgery planning in the treatment of asymmetric maxillomandibular disharmony.

METHODS

A postoperative 3D image dataset of 30 Taiwanese Chinese patients with asymmetric skeletal Class III deformities who underwent full digital planning for two-jaw surgery were retrieved from the authors' database. The 3D cephalometric data (dental, skeletal, and soft tissue evaluations) were compared to the ethnicity-matched 3D cephalometric normative values. Patient-reported outcome measure tools regarding postoperative overall appearance and satisfaction with facial areas (ranging from 0 to 100 and 0 to 10, respectively) were administered. The number of needed or requested revisionary surgery was collected.

RESULTS

No difference (all p > 0.05) was observed between the orthognathic-surgery-treated patients and the normative value for most of the tested 3D cephalometric parameters, with the exception (p < 0.05) of three mandible and occlusal-plane-related parameters. Both patient-reported outcome measure tools showed that patients' satisfaction with their postoperative appearance was high for overall face (89.7 ± 4.5) and specific facial regions (nose, 7.1 ± 1.3; lip, 8.3 ± 1.6; upper gum, 8.5 ± 1.2; cheek, 8.8 ± 1.1; chin, 9.2 ± 1.2; and teeth, 9.3 ± 0.8), with no need for revisionary surgery.

CONCLUSION

The patients treated with a full 3D digital planning-assisted two-jaw surgery had a similar 3D dental relation, facial convexity, and symmetry compared to healthy ethnicity-matched individuals, and they reported higher satisfaction levels with their postoperative facial appearance results.

Cheek soft tissue prediction in cleft orthognathic surgery: A 3D computer-assisted investigation with comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

The Le Fort I maxillary advancement and rotational movement have been adopted to treat patients with cleft-related skeletal Class III pattern and anteromedial cheek soft tissue deficiency, but cleft-specific cheek soft tissue prediction data are insufficient. This 3D imaging-based study addressed the issue.

METHODS

3D craniofacial soft tissue and bone models were created from 32 consecutive patients who received computer-aided two-jaw orthognathic surgery for the correction of cleft-related Class III deformity and cheek soft tissue deficiency. Using superimposed 3D models, the cheek volumetric change, the cheek sagittal movement, and the 3D cheek mass position were calculated. 3D data from orthognathic surgery-treated patients with no cleft (noncleft cohort) and individuals with no facial deformity (3D norm value) were retrieved for comparative analysis.

RESULTS

Surgical maxillary advancement (p < 0.001) but not maxillary clockwise rotation (p > 0.05) had a significant impact on the cheek soft tissue change, with prediction models showing that maxillary advancement elucidated 77 and 79% of this change on the cleft and noncleft sides, respectively. Cleft cohort (0.46±0.12) had a significantly (p < 0.001) smaller cheek soft-to-hard tissue ratio than that of the noncleft cohort (0.73±0.13). Cleft maxillary advancements >4 mm resulted in a 3D cheek mass position (2.1±1.1 mm) similar (p > 0.05) to the 3D norm value (2.2±1.2 mm), but different (p = 0.037) from the noncleft cohort (2.38±0.7 mm).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that maxillary advancement but not the maxillary rotation affects the cheek soft tissue change, and the predictive values and comparative data could assist the orthodontist-surgeon interaction during preoperative planning and patient counseling.

Three-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Hybrid Versus Full Digital Planning Models

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional (3D) computer-aided planning has truly revolutionized orthognathic surgery (OGS) treatment, but no study has compared the traditional hybrid and full 3D digital planning models. This study compared these virtual planning models in the treatment of asymmetric maxillomandibular disharmony.

METHODS

Young adult patients with an asymmetric skeletal class III deformity who underwent 3D computer-aided 2-jaw OGS using hybrid (alginate dental impression, 2D cephalometric tracings, manual-guided stone model surgery, occlusion setup, and splint fabrication; n = 30) or full digital (laser-scanned dentition, 3D cephalometric tracings, virtual-based occlusion setup and surgery, and computer-generated surgical splint; n = 30) planning models were consecutively recruited. Preoperative and postoperative 3D cephalometric analyses (dental relation, skeletal assessments based on sagittal and frontal views, and soft tissue evaluations) were adopted for intragroup and intergroup comparisons. Postoperative patient-perceived satisfaction with facial appearance was also recorded.

RESULTS

Both hybrid and full digital planning groups had significant (all P < 0.05) improvements after surgery with respect to facial convexity, incisor overjet, and frontal symmetry parameters. The full 3D digital planning-based OGS treatment had similar (all P > 0.05) 3D cephalometric-derived outcomes (preoperative, postoperative, and treatment-induced change data) and patient-perceived outcomes compared with the traditional hybrid 3D planning method.

CONCLUSIONS

For the decision-making process in selecting the planning model, multidisciplinary teams could consider additional parameters such as patient comfort, storage needs, convenience for data reuse, overall planning time, availability, and costs.