Local and Central Evaluation of HER2 Positivity and Clinical Outcome in Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Cancer-Results from the AGMT GASTRIC-5 Registry

HER2-targeted therapies: Unraveling their role in biliary tract cancers

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) constitute a heterogeneous group of malignancies with rising incidence and limited therapeutic options in advanced stages, leading to increased overall mortality. Extensive genomic profiling has identified key oncogenic drivers in BTCs that represent promising therapeutic targets and could change the treatment paradigm. Evidence suggests improved survival outcomes for patients with actionable molecular alterations who received matched targeted therapies. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a receptor tyrosine kinase and proto-oncogene that has been extensively studied as a prognostic biomarker and a therapeutic target in multiple solid organ malignancies. Recent clinical trials on the combination of trastuzumab with tucatinib, FOLFOX, or pertuzumab for previously treated, HER2-positive, advanced BTCs have shown improved outcomes compared to current second-line therapies. Early evidence from observational studies on trastuzumab-containing regimens as first-line suggests promising efficacy. Furthermore, the recent tumor-agnostic approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan for HER2-positive solid tumors has formally introduced HER2-directed agents in the BTC therapeutic arsenal. This review aims to summarize the rapidly evolving landscape of HER2-directed agents for BTCs, highlighting current evidence of survival benefit. Beginning with a concise presentation of the structural and functional aspects of HER2, we detail the frequency and prognostic significance of HER2 alterations in BTCs and discuss all available preclinical and clinical data on anti-HER2 agents tested for BTCs.

HER2 becomes a novel survival biomarker for gastric cancer patients: a pooled analysis

Background

Although anti-HER2 therapies have been widely used against gastric carcinoma, the prognostic significance of HER2 overexpression remains unclear. Previous studies failed to provide convincible evidence due to inconsistent HER2 evaluation criteria and heterogeneous clinical characteristics.

Objectives

To figure out the prognostic significance of HER2 expression in gastric cancer, we rigorously designed and conducted this study.

Design

Meta-analysis.

Data sources and methods

Record retrieval was performed by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, ASCO, and ESMO meeting libraries from inception to November 2022. Cohort studies investigating overall survival comparison between HER2-positive and HER2-negative gastric cancer patients were included. Both resectable and advanced cases were separately collected while HER2 evaluation standards should be consistent across eligible studies. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. Overall survival was the only endpoint and effect size was presented by hazard ratio (HR) with its 95% confidence interval. The pooled calculation was conducted on Review Manager 5.4.

Results

Thirty studies were eligible, including 9945 patients. Eligible studies were mostly high quality (n = 31). Regarding resectable cases (n = 22), HER2-positive groups had significantly worse prognosis than HER2-negative counterparts (HR 1.56, 95%CI 1.32-1.85, p < 0.00001). For HER2-positive patients with advanced gastric cancer (n = 10), HER2 overexpression was also an unfavorable survival indicator (HR 1.70, 95%CI 1.23-2.35, p = 0.001). Potential heterogeneous studies had been eliminated while outcomes remained stable by sensitivity analysis. Subgroup analysis suggested HER2-positive patients had a poorer prognosis in both East Asian (resectable: HR 1.56; advanced: HR 1.32) and non-East Asian countries (HR 1.58; HR 3.27).

Conclusion

As a novel survival biomarker in gastric cancer, HER2 overexpression indicates unfavorable prognosis among both resectable and advanced patients, irrespective of East Asian or non-East Asian populations.

Trial registration

PROSPERO (CRD42020168051).

State of the art and upcoming trends in HER2-directed therapies in gastrointestinal malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review critically evaluates the evolution and current status of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapies in upper gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, a timely and relevant inquiry given the dynamic shifts in therapeutic strategies over the past decade. Initial enthusiasm following the Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer (ToGA) study's demonstration of trastuzumab's efficacy, however, encountered hurdles due to subsequent trials showing limited progress, underscoring the necessity for a reevaluation of therapeutic approaches and the exploration of novel agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

The review highlights significant breakthroughs in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors and innovative therapeutic technologies, which have redefined treatment paradigms and shown promising efficacy in HER2-positive cases. Emerging treatments such as trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), zanidatamab and evorpacept further illustrate the ongoing efforts to leverage unique mechanisms of action for improved HER2-positive antitumor activity.

SUMMARY

The advancements in HER2-directed therapies underscore a pivotal era in the management of upper GI malignancies. These developments not only reflect the profound impact of integrating novel therapeutic combinations but also highlight the critical role of ongoing research in overcoming resistance mechanisms and tailoring treatment to individual disease profiles.

Impact of HER2-Low Status in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Information regarding HER2-low tumors in metastatic gastric cancer is sparse. Our aim here was to determine the frequency of low HER2 expression in metastatic gastric cancer and to compare the clinicopathological characteristics, survival, and treatment response of HER2-low patients with HER2-zero patients.

METHODS

The clinicopathological features, treatment responses, and survival of HER2-low tumors and HER2-zero tumors were compared.

RESULTS

Of 226 patients, 71 (31.4%) had low HER2 expression and 155 (68.6%) had zero HER2 expression. HER2-low tumors were detected more frequently in older patients and in low-grade tumors than HER2-zero tumors (69% vs. 47.7%, p = 0.003, 16.9% vs. 3.8%, p < 0.001). On the contrary, HER2-zero tumors were more likely to be poor grade than HER2-low tumors (47% vs. 22.2%, p < 0.001). All patients received a first-line chemotherapy regimen. The disease control rate was not statistically different between both groups (40% vs. 46.4%, p = 0.11). The median survival was 12.05 (95% CI, 8.09-16.02) months in HER2-low patients and 10.41 (95% CI, 8.52-12.3) months in HER2-zero patients with no statistical difference (p = 0.73).

CONCLUSION

HER2-low metastatic gastric cancer has a higher rate of being low grade than HER2-zero tumors. HER2-low metastatic gastric cancer is similar to HER2 zero in terms of chemotherapy response and survival.

Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX in CLDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized, phase 3 GLOW trial

There is an urgent need for first-line treatment options for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (mG/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Claudin-18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) is expressed in normal gastric cells and maintained in malignant G/GEJ adenocarcinoma cells. GLOW (closed enrollment), a global, double-blind, phase 3 study, examined zolbetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that targets CLDN18.2, plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as first-line treatment for CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Patients (n = 507) were randomized 1:1 (block sizes of two) to zolbetuximab plus CAPOX or placebo plus CAPOX. GLOW met the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (median, 8.21 months versus 6.80 months with zolbetuximab versus placebo; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.687; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.544-0.866; P = 0.0007) and key secondary endpoint of overall survival (median, 14.39 months versus 12.16 months; HR = 0.771; 95% CI, 0.615-0.965; P = 0.0118). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were similar with zolbetuximab (72.8%) and placebo (69.9%). Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX represents a potential new first-line therapy for patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03653507 .

Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, untreated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (SPOTLIGHT): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Zolbetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting claudin-18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2), has shown efficacy in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. We report the results of the SPOTLIGHT trial, which investigated the efficacy and safety of first-line zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 (modified folinic acid [or levofolinate], fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin regimen) versus placebo plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

SPOTLIGHT is a global, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial that enrolled patients from 215 centres in 20 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with CLDN18.2-positive (defined as ≥75% of tumour cells showing moderate-to-strong membranous CLDN18 staining), HER2-negative (based on local or central evaluation), previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, with radiologically evaluable disease (measurable or non-measurable) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1; and adequate organ function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via interactive response technology and stratified according to region, number of organs with metastases, and previous gastrectomy. Patients received zolbetuximab (800 mg/m2 loading dose followed by 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) plus mFOLFOX6 (every 2 weeks) or placebo plus mFOLFOX6. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by independent review committee in all randomly assigned patients. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03504397, and is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS

Between June 21, 2018, and April 1, 2022, 565 patients were randomly assigned to receive either zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 (283 patients; the zolbetuximab group) or placebo plus mFOLFOX6 (282 patients; the placebo group). At least one dose of treatment was administered to 279 (99%) of 283 patients in the zolbetuximab group and 278 (99%) of 282 patients in the placebo group. In the zolbetuximab group, 176 (62%) patients were male and 107 (38%) were female. In the placebo group, 175 (62%) patients were male and 107 (38%) were female. The median follow-up duration for progression-free survival was 12·94 months in the zolbetuximab group versus 12·65 months in the placebo group. Zolbetuximab treatment showed a significant reduction in the risk of disease progression or death compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·75, 95% CI 0·60-0·94; p=0·0066). The median progression-free survival was 10·61 months (95% CI 8·90-12·48) in the zolbetuximab group versus 8·67 months (8·21-10·28) in the placebo group. Zolbetuximab treatment also showed a significant reduction in the risk of death versus placebo (HR 0·75, 95% CI 0·60-0·94; p=0·0053). Treatment-emergent grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 242 (87%) of 279 patients in the zolbetuximab group versus 216 (78%) of 278 patients in the placebo group. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and decreased appetite. Treatment-related deaths occurred in five (2%) patients in the zolbetuximab group versus four (1%) patients in the placebo group. No new safety signals were identified.

INTERPRETATION

Targeting CLDN18.2 with zolbetuximab significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival when combined with mFOLFOX6 versus placebo plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 might represent a new first-line treatment in these patients.

FUNDING

Astellas Pharma, Inc.

Deviating HER2 test results in gastric cancer: analysis from the prospective multicenter VARIANZ study

PURPOSE

The prospective multicenter VARIANZ study aimed to identify resistance biomarkers for HER2-targeted treatment in advanced gastric and esophago-gastric junction cancer (GC, EGJC). HER2 test deviations were found in 90 (22.3%) of 404 cases (central versus local testing) and were associated with negative impact on survival for trastuzumab-treated patients. Here, we investigated methodological and biological variables that may promote deviating HER2 test results.

METHODS

We analyzed HER2 testing procedures and participation in quality assurance programs of 105 participating local pathology laboratories. Furthermore, tumor localization and histological subtypes were compared between patients with centrally confirmed (central HER2 + /local HER2 + , n = 68) and unconfirmed HER2 status (central HER2 -/local HER2 + , n = 68).

RESULTS

For central HER2 testing, concordance between in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) was 98.3%, with IHC sensitivity of 93.3% (84 IHC + of 90 ISH +), specificity of 99.5% (389 IHC- of 391 ISH-), and a positive diagnosis rate of 97.7%. Central confirmation of the local HER2 IHC scores were seen for the majority of locally HER2- IHC 0/1 (172/178; 96.6%), but less frequently for locally IHC3 + (57/124; 46.0%) cases. Deviation rate was not associated with IHC antibody platform used in the local pathology institute neither with participation in quality-assuring tests. Regarding tumor characteristics, deviating test results were more frequently found in GC vs. EGJC (69.1% vs. 39.7%; p = 0.001) and in Laurén diffuse vs. intestinal subtype (23.5% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Tumor localization and histological subtype have an impact on HER2 test deviation rates. Assessment of HER2 remains challenging for GC and EGJC.

Real-world association of HER2/ERBB2 concordance with trastuzumab clinical benefit in advanced esophagogastric cancer

Aim: To assess concordance between HER2 status measured by traditional methods and ERBB2 amplification measured by next-generation sequencing and its association with first-line trastuzumab clinical benefit in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer. Methods: Retrospective analysis of HER2/ERBB2 concordance using a deidentified USA-based clinicogenomic database. Clinical outcomes were assessed for patients with HER2⁺ advanced esophagogastric cancer who received first-line trastuzumab. Results: Overall HER2/ERBB2 concordance was 87.5%. Among patients who received first-line trastuzumab, concordant HER2/ERBB2 was associated with longer time to treatment discontinuation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.43-0.90) and overall survival (aHR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.33-0.79). ERBB2 copy number ≥25 (median) was associated with longer time to treatment discontinuation (aHR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.35-0.88) and overall survival (aHR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30-0.91). Conclusion: HER2/ERBB2 concordance and higher ERBB2 copy number predicted clinical benefit from trastuzumab.