The Prognostic Impact of Comorbidities in Patients with De-Novo Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with R-CHOP Immunochemotherapy in Curative Intent

Skeletal muscle index impacts the treatment outcome of elderly patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Sarcopenia is a crucial factor in the physical fitness of elderly individuals. This study investigated the prognostic values of multiple parameters of sarcopenia in association with established prognostic factors in elderly Japanese patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). As candidate indicators for sarcopenia, the skeletal muscle index (SMI) (cm2 /m2 ), the psoas muscle index, the erector spinae muscle index, the visceral fat index, the subcutaneous fat index, and the visceral to subcutaneous fat area ratio at the third lumbar level were assessed by computed tomography at their initial diagnosis in 102 patients with DLBCL over 75 years old those were diagnosed and treated in our institute from 2007 to 2020. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The median age of patients analyzed was 80 years at diagnosis. The sex-specific cut-offs for the indices adopted two approaches: (i) the historical cut-off values established in the previous study for healthy Japanese individuals (Hamaguchi Y. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018), and (ii) each sex-specific lowest quartile in our cohort. As the results, SMI evaluated by the historical cut-off and sex-specific lowest quartile was identified as the most influential independent prognostic factor for both OS and PFS among various parameters for sarcopenia. Furthermore, we developed an elderly sarcopenia prognostic index (ESPI). ESPI, which combines SMI evaluated by the historical cut-off and LDH > ULN, demonstrated statistically significant prognostic impacts on OS and PFS. Moreover, compared to the R-IPI, ESPI showed the ability to identify intermediate-risk groups and indicated a trend toward improved predictive accuracy. Our study revealed that SMI is the most appropriate assessment method for evaluating sarcopenia and the critical prognostic factor in OS and PFS of elderly patients with DLBCL.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Associated Costs of German Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Retrospective Health Claims Data Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with increasing prevalence. Although the disease burden associated with DLBCL is high, only limited data on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs of German patients with DLBCL is available.

METHODS

Using a large claims database of the German statutory health insurance with 6.7 million enrollees, we identified patients who were newly diagnosed with DLBCL between 2011 and 2018 (index date). Treatment lines were identified based on a predefined set of medication. HCRU and related costs were collected for the entire post index period and per treatment line.

RESULTS

A total of 2495 incident DLBCL patients were eligible for the analysis. The average follow-up time after index was 41.7 months. During follow-up, 1991 patients started a first-line treatment, 868 a second-line treatment, and 354 a third-line treatment. Overall, patients spent on average (SD) 5.24 (6.17) days per month in hospital after index. While on anti-cancer treatment, this number increased to nine (10.9) in first-line, 8.7 (13.7) in second-line, and 9.4 (15.8) in third-line treatments. Overall costs per patient per month (PPPM) increased from €421 (875.70) before to €3695 (4652) after index. While on a treatment line, PPPM costs were €17,170 (10,246) in first-line, €13,362 (12,685) in second-line, and €12,112 (16,173) in third-line treatments. Time-unadjusted absolute costs sum up to €59,868 (43,331), €35,870 (37,387), and €28,832 (40,540) during first-line, second-line, and third-line treatments, respectively. The main cost drivers were hospitalizations (71% of total costs) and drug acquisition costs (18% of total costs).

CONCLUSIONS

The financial burden of DLBCL in Germany is high, mainly due to hospitalization and drug costs. Therefore, there is a high medical need for new cost-effective therapeutic options that can lower the disease burden and remain financially viable to support the growing number of patients with this aggressive disease.

Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: A New Approach in a Multicenter Study

Purpose

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of adult lymphomas. The incidence of DLBCL increases with age and has a fairly rapid fatal course without treatment. Patients often have difficulty tolerating standard chemotherapy regimens due to their comorbidities. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), which is calculated by considering 19 different comorbidities, was developed in 1987 and is widely used for mortality prediction in cancer patients. Literature data on CCI and hematological malignancies are limited. Main aim in this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of CCI and compare to the International Prognostic Index (IPI) scoring system in the DLBCL patient group.

Methods

A total of 170 patients diagnosed with DLBCL between 1.1.2002- 1.12.2020 were included in the study. Statistical analyzes were performed among patients whose IPI and CCI scores were recorded by considering baseline data.

Results

The median age of patients was 58 (range: 17–84). Thirty-five (20.6%) patients had stage III and 76 (44.7%) had stage IV disease. When the CCI, IPI and ECOG scores were compared with the mortality status of the patients as a reference, AUCs were resulted as 0.628 (95% CI: 0.506–0.749), 0.563 (95% CI: 0.484–0.639) and 0.672 (95% CI: 0.596–0.743), respectively. There was no significant difference between the ROC curves of CCI, IPI and ECOG scores. Patients with a CCI score of ≥ 4 had shorter OS comperad to those with a score of < 4.

Conclusion

Rather than claiming that CCI is superior to IPI, ECOG or another scoring system in a single-center patient population, it should be stated that CCI is also an effective scoring system in patients diagnosed with DLBCL.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-022-01567-5.