1
|
Viganò A, Sasso D’Elia T, Sava SL, Colosimo A, Di Piero V, Magis D, Schoenen J. Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Quadripulse rTMS over the Visual Cortex: A Proof-of-Concept Study in Healthy Volunteers and Chronic Migraine Patients with Medication Overuse Headache. Biomedicines 2024; 12:288. [PMID: 38397890 PMCID: PMC10886990 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12020288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
In chronic migraine with medication overuse (CM-MOH), sensitization of visual cortices is reflected by (i) increased amplitude of stimulus-evoked responses and (ii) habituation deficit during repetitive stimulation. Both abnormalities might be mitigated by inhibitory transcranial neurostimulation. Here, we tested an inhibitory quadripulse repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS-QPI) protocol to decrease durably visual cortex excitability in healthy subjects (HS) and explored its therapeutic potential in CM-MOH patients. Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (VEP) were used as biomarkers of effect and recorded before (T1), immediately after (T2), and 3 h after stimulation (T3). In HS, rTMS-QPI durably decreased the VEP 1st block amplitude (p < 0.05) and its habituation (p < 0.05). These changes were more pronounced for the P1N2 component that was modified already at T2 up to T3, while for N1P1 they were significant only at T3. An excitatory stimulation protocol (rTMS-QPE) tended to have an opposite effect, restricted to P1N2. In 12 CM-MOH patients, during a four-week treatment (2 sessions/week), rTMS-QPI significantly reduced monthly headache days (p < 0.01). In patients reversing from CM-MOH to episodic migraine (n = 6), VEP habituation significantly improved after treatment (p = 0.005). rTMS-QPI durably decreases visual cortex responsivity in healthy subjects. In a proof-of-concept study of CM-MOH patients, rTMS-QPI also has beneficial clinical and electrophysiological effects, but sham-controlled trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Viganò
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Liège, Citadelle Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| | - Tullia Sasso D’Elia
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Liège, Citadelle Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium
- IRCCS San Raffaele Alla Pisana, 00163 Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Liliana Sava
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Liège, Citadelle Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium
- Headache Clinic of Valdor—ISOSL, 4020 Liège, Belgium
| | - Alfredo Colosimo
- Department of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sapienza, Sapienza—University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Vittorio Di Piero
- Subintensive Neurology & Headache Centre, Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza—University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Delphine Magis
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Liège, Citadelle Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium
- Neurology Department and Pain Clinic (CMTD), CHR East Belgium, 4800 Verviers, Belgium
| | - Jean Schoenen
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Liège, Citadelle Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Chronic migraine (CM) affects a large proportion of the population and is a significant source of disability and lost productivity. Numerous non-pharmacological approaches have been attempted during the past decades. This review discusses the most recent and evidence-based advances in acute and preventive non-pharmacological therapeutic approaches for CM, offering alternatives to drug treatment. RECENT FINDINGS A growing number of non-pharmacological treatment options, including non-invasive or invasive neuromodulation, acupuncture, psychotherapy, and physiotherapy, have shown promising efficacy in CM. There is strong evidence for the effectiveness of non-invasive neuromodulation such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in CM, but less evidence for approaches such as invasive neuromodulation, physical therapy, or dietary approaches. Acupuncture for migraine remains controversial, with the main point of contention still being the placebo effect. Non-pharmacological approaches can be offered as a reliable alternative for patients with CM, and more research is being done to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive neuromodulation with different parameters and the combination of different treatments in CM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xun Han
- Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Shengyuan Yu
- Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wagner Z, Steinberg H. [Using electricity to combat headache : Electrotherapy and tDCS in the 1870s/1880s and today]. Schmerz 2023:10.1007/s00482-023-00746-1. [PMID: 37620679 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-023-00746-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Headache can be a widespread symptom as well as a disorder in itself. Headache syndromes such as migraine cause a lot of distress, disability and overall socioeconomic costs. Pharmacological treatments are often limited in their efficacy as well as due to side effects. The therapeutic application of electricity for this medical indication was a relevant field of research in the 19th century and-in the form of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-is still widely studied today. This paper provides an overview of publications from the late 19th century (as the era of discovery and success of electrotherapy) as well as contemporary studies investigating the usage of weak currents for the treatment or prophylaxis of headache. Our results show a large number of highly favorable reports of treatment successes. However, the number of cases analysed is often rather small and the forms of electric stimulation applied were often highly heterogeneous. In summary, electric stimulation appears to be a promising field of research and a possible therapeutic agent for the treatment of headaches; however, further research is necessary, especially into the details of the stimulation techniques applied and the various indications in which it may be of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenya Wagner
- Forschungsstelle für die Geschichte der Psychiatrie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Leipzig, Semmelweisstr. 10, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Holger Steinberg
- Forschungsstelle für die Geschichte der Psychiatrie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Leipzig, Semmelweisstr. 10, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
O'Hare L, Tarasi L, Asher JM, Hibbard PB, Romei V. Excitation-Inhibition Imbalance in Migraine: From Neurotransmitters to Brain Oscillations. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10093. [PMID: 37373244 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241210093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is among the most common and debilitating neurological disorders typically affecting people of working age. It is characterised by a unilateral, pulsating headache often associated with severe pain. Despite the intensive research, there is still little understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine. At the electrophysiological level, altered oscillatory parameters have been reported within the alpha and gamma bands. At the molecular level, altered glutamate and GABA concentrations have been reported. However, there has been little cross-talk between these lines of research. Thus, the relationship between oscillatory activity and neurotransmitter concentrations remains to be empirically traced. Importantly, how these indices link back to altered sensory processing has to be clearly established as yet. Accordingly, pharmacologic treatments have been mostly symptom-based, and yet sometimes proving ineffective in resolving pain or related issues. This review provides an integrative theoretical framework of excitation-inhibition imbalance for the understanding of current evidence and to address outstanding questions concerning the pathophysiology of migraine. We propose the use of computational modelling for the rigorous formulation of testable hypotheses on mechanisms of homeostatic imbalance and for the development of mechanism-based pharmacological treatments and neurostimulation interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise O'Hare
- Division of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK
| | - Luca Tarasi
- Centro Studi e Ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Dipartimento di Psicologia, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna, Campus di Cesena, Via Rasi e Spinelli, 176, 47521 Cesena, Italy
| | - Jordi M Asher
- Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK
| | - Paul B Hibbard
- Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK
| | - Vincenzo Romei
- Centro Studi e Ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Dipartimento di Psicologia, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna, Campus di Cesena, Via Rasi e Spinelli, 176, 47521 Cesena, Italy
- Facultad de Lenguas y Educación, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, 28015 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Erdoğan ET, Küçük Z, Eskikurt G, Kurt A, Ermutlu N, Karamürsel S. Single Session Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Different Cortical Areas. J PSYCHOPHYSIOL 2022. [DOI: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Abstract. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies in healthy volunteers have shown conflicting results in terms of modulation in pain thresholds. The aim of this study was to investigate how single session anodal tDCS and modulated tDCS (mtDCS) of distinct cortical areas affected pain and perception thresholds in healthy participants. Five different stimulation conditions were applied at different cortical sites to 20 healthy volunteers to investigate the effects of tDCS and mtDCS (20 Hz) on pain and perception thresholds. TDCS over the motor cortex (M1), mtDCS over the motor cortex, tDCS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), mtDCS of the DLPFC, and mtDCS over the occipital cortex were the stimulation conditions. All of the stimulations were anodal. The stimulations were given in a randomized order at 20-minute intervals. For comparison, electrical pain and perception thresholds were obtained from the right middle finger before and during the tDCS. After each measurement, participants were asked to give a score to their pain. In repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) test, the Condition × Time interaction showed no significant influence on changes in pain, perception thresholds, and pain scores ( p = .48, p = .89, and p = .50, respectively). However, regardless of the condition types, there was a significant difference in pain and perceptual thresholds during tDCS ( p = .01, p = .025, respectively). Our findings did not support difference in pain and perception modulation by a single session anodal tDCS over M1 and DLPFC compared to the occipital cortex in healthy volunteers. The increase in all thresholds during tDCS, irrespective of conditions, and peripheral sensations, including an active control group, taken together, suggest a placebo effect of active tDCS. Future studies about pain and perception in healthy subjects should consider the level of experimental pain and a strong placebo effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ezgi Tuna Erdoğan
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Küçük
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Literature, Halic University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gökçer Eskikurt
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Adnan Kurt
- Department of Physiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Numan Ermutlu
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Health and Technology University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sacit Karamürsel
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Coppola G, Magis D, Casillo F, Sebastianelli G, Abagnale C, Cioffi E, Di Lenola D, Di Lorenzo C, Serrao M. Neuromodulation for Chronic Daily Headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:267-278. [PMID: 35129825 PMCID: PMC8927000 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01025-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review We reviewed the literature that explored the use of central and peripheral neuromodulation techniques for chronic daily headache (CDH) treatment. Recent Findings Although the more invasive deep brain stimulation (DBS) is effective in chronic cluster headache (CCH), it should be reserved for extremely difficult-to-treat patients. Percutaneous occipital nerve stimulation has shown similar efficacy to DBS and is less risky in both CCH and chronic migraine (CM). Non-invasive transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation is a promising add-on treatment for CCH but not for CM. Transcutaneous external trigeminal nerve stimulation may be effective in treating CM; however, it has not yet been tested for cluster headache. Transcranial magnetic and electric stimulations have promising preventive effects against CM and CCH. Summary Although the precise mode of action of non-invasive neuromodulation techniques remains largely unknown and there is a paucity of controlled trials, they should be preferred to more invasive techniques for treating CDH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Coppola
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy.
| | - Delphine Magis
- Headache and Pain Multimodal Treatment Centre (CMTCD), Department of Neurology, Neuromodulation Centre, CHR East Belgium, Verviers, Belgium
| | - Francesco Casillo
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sebastianelli
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Chiara Abagnale
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Ettore Cioffi
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Davide Di Lenola
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Cherubino Di Lorenzo
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Mariano Serrao
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Long-term prophylactic efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic migraine. A randomised, patient-assessor blinded, sham-controlled trial. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:441-453. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
|
8
|
Deepak G, Saloni G, Preeti M, Shobit G, Tushar S. Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation on tension-type headache and migraine: A systematic review. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_24_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
9
|
Ornello R, Caponnetto V, Ratti S, D'Aurizio G, Rosignoli C, Pistoia F, Ferrara M, Sacco S, D'Atri A. Which is the best transcranial direct current stimulation protocol for migraine prevention? A systematic review and critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials. J Headache Pain 2021; 22:144. [PMID: 34837963 PMCID: PMC8903540 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01361-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could counteract the pathophysiological triggers of migraine attacks by modulating cortical excitability. Several pilot randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessed the efficacy of tDCS for migraine prevention. We reviewed and summarized the state of the art of tDCS protocols for migraine prevention, discussing study results according to the stimulations parameters and patients' populations. MAIN BODY We combined the keywords 'migraine', 'headache', 'transcranial direct current stimulation', and 'tDCS' and searched Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science, from the beginning of indexing to June 22, 2021. We only included RCTs comparing the efficacy of active tDCS with sham tDCS to decrease migraine frequency, intensity, and/or acute drug utilization. The risk of bias of each RCT was assessed by using the RoB-2 tool (Cochrane Collaboration). Thirteen RCTs (from 2011 to 2021) were included in the review. The included patients ranged from 13 to 135. RCTs included patients with any migraine (n=3), chronic migraine (n=6), episodic migraine (n=3) or menstrual migraine (n=1). Six RCTs used cathodal and five anodal tDCS, while two RCTs compared the efficacy of both cathodal and anodal tDCS with that of sham. In most of the cathodal stimulation trials, the target areas were the occipital regions, with reference on central or supraorbital areas. In anodal RCTs, the anode was usually placed above the motor cortical areas and the cathode on supraorbital areas. All RCTs adopted repeated sessions (from 5 to 28) at variable intervals, while the follow-up length spanned from 1 day up to 12 months. Efficacy results were variable but overall positive. According to the RoB-2 tool, only four of the 13 RCTs had a low risk of bias, while the others presented some concerns. CONCLUSIONS Both anodal and cathodal tDCS are promising for migraine prevention. However, there is a need for larger and rigorous RCTs and standardized procedures. Additionally, the potential benefits and targeted neurostimulation protocols should be assessed for specific subgroups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Ornello
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Valeria Caponnetto
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Susanna Ratti
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giulia D'Aurizio
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Chiara Rosignoli
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesca Pistoia
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Michele Ferrara
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
| | - Aurora D'Atri
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cerrahoğlu Şirin T, Aksu S, Hasirci Bayir BR, Ulukan Ç, Karamürsel S, Kurt A, Baykan B. Is Allodynia a Determinant Factor in the Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Prophylaxis of Migraine? Neuromodulation 2021; 24:899-909. [PMID: 34058041 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Allodynia, the clinical marker of central sensitization, affects even simple daily living activities and increases the tendency for migraine to be more resistant to treatment and have a chronic course. Migraine that impairs quality of life can often be treated with variable pharmaceutical agents, but with various side effects. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a potential alternative treatment for migraine prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventy-seven patients diagnosed with migraine (48 with allodynia and 29 without allodynia) were included in the study. Randomly, 41 of the 77 patients received sham stimulation and 36 patients underwent three sessions of anodal left primary motor cortex stimulation for 2 mA, 20 min. Migraine attack characteristics (frequency, severity, and duration) and analgesic drug use were followed with headache diaries for one month after the stimulation. RESULTS After tDCS, migraine attack frequency (p = 0.021), the number of headache days (p = 0.005), duration of attacks (p = 0.008), and symptomatic analgesic drug use (p = 0.007) decreased in patients receiving active tDCS, compared to the sham group. The therapeutic gain of tDCS was calculated as 44% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22-60%) for headache days and 76% (95% CI: 55-86) for headache duration. Response to tDCS treatment was higher in patients without allodynia (60% vs. 24%; p = 0.028) and allodynia came out as an independent predictor of response to tDCS with logistic regression analysis. Side effects were rare and similar to the sham group. CONCLUSIONS tDCS is a safe, efficacious, and fast method for migraine prophylaxis. However, the administration of tDCS before allodynia occurs, that is, before central sensitization develops, will provide increased responsiveness to the treatment. SIGNIFICANCE tDCS is more effective before the development of allodynia, but it also improves the quality of life even after the development of allodynia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuba Cerrahoğlu Şirin
- Department of Neurology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Serkan Aksu
- Department of Physiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Buse Rahime Hasirci Bayir
- Department of Neurology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Çağrı Ulukan
- Department of Neurology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sacit Karamürsel
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Koc Universitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Adnan Kurt
- Department of Physiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Betül Baykan
- Department of Neurology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hunold A, Ortega D, Schellhorn K, Haueisen J. Novel flexible cap for application of transcranial electrical stimulation: a usability study. Biomed Eng Online 2020; 19:50. [PMID: 32552720 PMCID: PMC7302393 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-020-00792-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Advances in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) are hampered by the conventional rubber electrodes manually attached to the head with rubber bands. This procedure limits montages to a few electrodes, is error prone with respect to electrode configurations and is burdensome for participants and operators. A newly developed flexible cap with integrated textile stimulation electrodes was compared to the conventional setup of rubber electrodes inserted into sponges fixated by rubber bands, with respect to usability and reliability. Two operators applied both setups to 20 healthy volunteers participating in the study. Electrode position and impedance measures as well as subjective evaluations from participants and operators were obtained throughout the stimulation sessions. Results Our results demonstrated the superiority of the flexible cap by means of significantly higher electrode configuration reproducibility and a more efficient application. Both, operators and volunteers evaluated the flexible cap as easier to use and more comfortable to wear when compared to the conventional setup. Conclusion In conclusion, the new cap improves existing and opens new application scenarios for tES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Hunold
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693, Ilmenau, Germany.
| | - Daniela Ortega
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693, Ilmenau, Germany.,Bioinstrumentation and Clinical Engineering Research Group, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, 050010, Colombia
| | | | - Jens Haueisen
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693, Ilmenau, Germany.,Hans Berger Department of Neurology, Biomagnetic Center, University Hospital Jena, 07747, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Migraine-The Beginning of a Long Journey. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9041194. [PMID: 32331266 PMCID: PMC7230683 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9041194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine, a benign yet disturbing condition, is one of the frequent neurological disorders, affecting up to 15-20% of the worldwide population [...].
Collapse
|