Clinical Features of Ocular Motility in Idiopathic Orbital Myositis

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Idiopathic Orbital Myositis

PURPOSE

To characterize the qualitative and quantitative features of idiopathic orbital myositis (IOM) on MRI.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective study of patients with active IOM with MRI. Patients with incomplete clinical records, poor-quality or interval scans without active myositis, and specific orbital myositis (i.e., orbital myositis secondary to an identified condition) were excluded. An enlargement ratio was calculated by dividing the diameters of the affected extraocular muscle (EOM) by the contralateral unaffected EOM.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (mean age: 44.4 ± 17.8 years-old, male: 11) between 2011 and 2022 were included. One case (4.2%) was pediatric (17 years old), and 6 cases presented with recurrence. Active IOM was characterized by fusiform EOM enlargement, high T2 signal, and contrast enhancement. Average maximal EOM diameters ranged from 4.6 to 7.7 mm (enlargement ratio: 1.4-2.2). Eighteen (75%) patients had single EOM involvement, most commonly the medial rectus. Other ipsilateral structures affected included focal orbital fat (16/24, 66.7%) and lacrimal gland (8/24, 33.3%). Contralateral changes in the EOM and/or lacrimal gland were observed in 7 patients (29.2%). Patients presenting with recurrence were likely to develop ongoing recurrent episodes ( p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Various radiological patterns of involvement described including EOM enlargement, contrast enhancement, abnormal signal, and involvement of other orbital structures are indicative of active IOM. IOM remains a heterogeneous spectrum of acute and chronic clinico-radiological presentations. Inflammation may involve other ipsilateral or contralateral orbital structures or may be bilateral despite presenting clinically as unilateral disease. Quantitative measurements may have utility in differentiating IOM from other causes of orbital myositis.

Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Orbital Inflammatory Diseases: Should Steroids Still Be the First Choice?

Objective: To clarify the therapy response in orbital inflammatory diseases (OID), we analyzed the treatment effects of steroid therapy, the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS), and biologicals in our tertiary referral center cohort. Methods: We collected the clinical and demographic data of all patients treated for non-specific orbital inflammation (NSOI) (n = 111) and IgG4-ROD (n = 13), respectively at our center from 2008 to 2020 and analyzed them with descriptive statistics. NSOI were sub-grouped according to the location into either idiopathic dacryoadenitis (DAs) (n = 78) or typical idiopathic orbital myositis (n = 32). Results: Mean age at first clinical manifestation was significantly different between subgroups (IOI: 49.5 ± 18, IgG4-ROD: 63.2 ± 14, p = 0.0171). Among all examined OID, 63 patients (50%) achieved full remission (FR) with corticosteroids (NSOI 53%/IgG4-ROD 31%). In contrast, classic myositis showed a significantly higher response (76%). Disease-modifying drugs (DMARDS) for myositis accomplished only 33% FR (NSOI 57%) and 66% did not respond sufficiently (NSOI 43%). The biologic agent (Rituximab) was significantly more efficient: 19 of 23 patients (82%) achieved full remission and only 4 (17%) did not respond fully and needed orbital irradiation or orbital decompressive surgery.

[Interdisciplinary Management of Orbital Diseases]

Diagnosis and therapy of orbital diseases is an interdisciplinary challenge, in which i.e. otorhinolaryngologists, ophthalmologists, radiologists, radiation therapists, maxillo-facial surgeons, endocrinologists, and pediatricians are involved. This review article describes frequent diseases which both, otolaryngologists and ophthalmologists are concerned with in interdisciplinary settings. In particular the inflammatory diseases of the orbit including orbital complications, autoimmunological diseases of the orbit including Grave´s orbitopathy, and primary and secondary tumors of the orbit are discussed. Beside describing the clinical characteristics and diagnostic steps the article focusses on the interdisciplinary therapy. The review is completed by the presentation of most important surgical approaches to the orbit, their indications and possible complications. The authors tried to highlight the relevant facts despite the shortness of the text.

Lacrimal Neuralgia: A Case Report and Comprehensive Review of the Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lacrimal neuralgia is a rare periorbital neuralgia. To date, only nine cases have been reported in the literature. Herein, we report a case and a comprehensive overview of the entity with a focus on the differential diagnosis of lacrimal neuralgia. Additionally, we propose putative diagnostic criteria for this rare neuralgia based on cases that have been reported.

RECENT FINDINGS

Among the ten cases of lacrimal neuralgia reported (including the one in this review), seven out of ten were idiopathic, and the other three were considered secondary. Most patients reported stabbing and shooting pain that was either paroxysmal or continuous. The most effective therapy was nerve block for seven patients and pregabalin for three patients. The most important clues to differentiate lacrimal neuralgia from other causes of periorbital pain include pain topography and pain with features suggestive of neuralgia. The core feature of lacrimal neuralgia is neuralgic pain located in the area supplied by the lacrimal nerve, and the etiology could be primary or secondary. Responsiveness to anesthetic blockade might better serve as a confirmational, rather than mandatory, criterion for diagnosis.

Recurrent inferior oblique myositis and its outcomes

This report presents a unique case of recurrent idiopathic inferior oblique myositis (IOM) with a focus on clinico-radiological characteristics and histological features. A woman in her early 40s presented with a third episode of IOM following a 12-year period of quiescence. The first two episodes were characterised by unilateral IOM with rapid resolution following oral prednisone treatment. MRI revealed anterior focal enlargement of the left inferior oblique muscle with ipsilateral lacrimal gland enlargement. An inferior oblique muscle and lacrimal gland biopsy demonstrated significant inflammatory infiltrate. An intraorbital injection of triamcinolone acetonide was administered with complete resolution of symptoms within 1 week.

Orbital inflammatory pseudotumor: new advances in diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment

Orbital inflammatory pseudotumor (OIP) is a benign, non-specific inflammatory disorder that commonly occurs in middle-aged adults and is usually unilateral but can occur bilaterally. Its clinical manifestations have tremendous clinical heterogeneity and vary according to the site of infiltration and the degree of lesions, including orbital pain, swelling, diplopia, proptosis, restricted eye movement, and decreased visual acuity. Clinical features, Image characteristics and pathological examinations often need to be evaluated to confirm the diagnosis. Currently, there is no systematic research on the pathogenesis of OIP, which may be related to immunity or infection. The first-line treatment is glucocorticoids. Radiotherapy, immunosuppressants, and biologics can be considered for treatment-resistant, hormone-dependent, or intolerant patients. In this review, we aim to summarize and focus on new insights into OIP, including new diagnostic criteria, pathogenesis, and discoveries in new drugs and treatment strategies. In particular, we highlight the literature and find that T cell-mediated immune responses are closely related to the pathogenesis of OIP. Further exploration of the mechanism and signaling pathway of T cells in the immune process will help to identify their therapeutic targets and carry out targeted therapy to treat refractory OIP and reduce the side effects of traditional treatments.

[Differential diagnosis of IgG4-related disease]

IgG4-related disease is a chronic autoimmune fibro-inflammatory disease characterized by the presence of lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, storiform fibrosis, obliterating phlebitis, increased number of IgG4+ cells in tissue, and, in most cases, an elevated serum IgG4 level. This disease often affects the pancreas, salivary glands and lymph nodes, but can involve almost any tissue. Its etiology is still unclear, the central role in the pathogenesis belongs to B-lymphocytes, T2-helpers, interleukins 1-β, 4, 5, 10, 13 and tumor growth factor 1-β. The ambiguous clinical picture and frequent simultaneous involvement of several organs make it difficult to diagnose, so biopsy plays a leading role in making a diagnosis. The characteristic microscopic picture, the presence of certain populations of lymphocytes are key criteria in establishing the correct diagnosis.

Extraocular muscle enlargement

Extraocular muscle enlargement can occur secondary to a range of orbital and systemic diseases. Although the most common cause of extraocular muscle enlargement is thyroid eye disease, a range of other inflammatory, infective, neoplastic, and vascular conditions can alter the size and shape of the extraocular muscles. Imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging plays an essential role in the workup of these conditions. This article provides an image-rich review of the wide range of pathology that can cause enlargement of the extraocular muscles.

Tolosa-Hunt Syndrome with Multiple Orbital Myositis in a Patient with Crohn’s Disease

Purpose: We report a case of Tolosa-Hunt syndrome with multiple orbital myositis identified via orbital magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with Crohn's disease who developed right eye pain and binocular horizontal diplopia.Case summary: A 46-year-old woman visited our clinic with a 2-month history of right eye pain and migraine, as well as a 3-day history of acute horizontal diplopia. She had previously been diagnosed with Crohn's disease and was taking immunosuppressive drugs. In the eye movement test, esotropia and an abduction limitation of -3.0 in the right eye were observed on the Krimsky test. There were no specific findings in anterior segment and fundus examinations. Orbital magnetic resonance imaging showed multiple extraocular muscle enhancement in the right eye and multiple extraocular muscle hypertrophy in the left eye. The patient was diagnosed with binocular multiple orbital myositis and right Tolosa-Hunt syndrome; she was treated with high-dose steroids for 3 days followed by lower dose oral medications. During the first week of treatment, the right eye pain disappeared and the right eye abduction limitation showed slight improvement. After 3 months of treatment, the right eye abduction limitation and esotropia completely disappeared.Conclusions: Orbital myositis and Tolosa-Hunt syndrome are idiopathic, nonspecific chronic granulomatous diseases with painful ophthalmoplegia. We describe a rare case in which the two diseases appear together.

Etiology and Clinical Features of Diplopia in South China: Analysis of 303 Cases

Purpose

To provide a new classification system for diplopia and evaluate the etiology and clinical features of diplopia subtypes in south China.

Methods

In this retrospective study, all patients presenting with diplopia over the period from 2012 to 2014 in south China were reviewed. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to their extraocular muscle (EOM) dysfunction: single EOM (sEOM), multiple EOMs (mEOMs), and a comitant strabismus group. Clinical data evaluated included age, sex, medical history, etiology and duration of diplopia, ocular alignment, and ocular motility.

Results

A total of 303 patients were enrolled. The most common type of EOM dysfunction was sEOM (158 cases, 52.1%), followed by mEOMs (n = 119, 39.3%), and finally the comitant strabismus group (n = 26, 8.6%). Overall, the most common cause of diplopia involved orbital diseases. Within the sEOM group, microangiopathy (n = 42, 26.6%) and trauma (n = 41, 25.9%) were the major etiologies, with the lateral rectus (LR) (n = 86, 54.4%) being the most frequently involved. There were 12 (4.0%) patients who were considered as nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)-associated diplopia (10 caused by radiation neuropathy following radiation therapy). Thyroid associated ophthalmopathy (TAO, 56 cases, 47.1%) was the predominant etiology found in the mEOMs group. Acute acquired comitant esotropia (AACE, 14 cases, 53.9%) was the most common etiology in the comitant strabismus group.

Conclusions

This new classification system for assessing diplopia as based on EOM dysfunction represents an easy-to-follow approach that can be readily adapted for the clinical use. While microangiopathy and trauma represent common etiologies of diplopia, both orbital diseases and NPC-associated diplopia also warrant special attention when assessing diplopia within patients in south China.

Idiopathic Orbital Myositis Revisited

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review current knowledge regarding idiopathic orbital myositis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent publications have focused on possible causes of orbital myositis and the process to reach a diagnosis of idiopathic orbital myositis. With inflamed and enlarged extraocular muscles, features to distinguish between competing diagnostic possibilities are based on imaging in the context of history and clinical signs. Idiopathic orbital myositis is characterized by the clinical triad of acute onset of orbital pain exacerbated on eye movement, double vision, and redness or swelling of the eyelids or conjunctiva, along with the radiological finding of homogeneous, fusiform enlargement of one or more extraocular muscles. In atypical or inconclusive clinico-radiological findings for a diagnosis of idiopathic orbital myositis, or where the clinical behavior changes or fails to respond to corticosteroid treatment, a systemic and oncologic work-up and muscle biopsy are warranted to exclude specific local or systemic disease as cause of the inflamed and enlarged muscle. As our understanding of idiopathic orbital myositis evolves, the diagnostic focus is shifting toward earlier identification of underlying local or systemic disease through systemic work-up and muscle biopsy.

Orbital Muscle Enlargement: What if It’s Not Graves’ Disease?

Purpose of Review

To provide the radiologist with tools to recognize findings atypical for Graves’ ophthalmopathy and differentiate between the most important and common alternative causes of extraocular muscle enlargement on CT and MR imaging.

Recent findings

We introduce five ‘red flags’ representing features that are atypical for Graves’ ophthalmopathy: unilateral disease, atypical pattern of muscle involvement, adjacent structure involvement, restricted diffusion, and absence of pain.

Summary

About 95% of the cases with extraocular enlargement are due to Graves’ ophthalmopathy, other causes are less well known and recognized. The ‘red flags’ may aid in recognizing and suggesting alternative diagnoses.

A Case of Idiopathic Orbital Inflammation Presenting as Isolated Myositis of the Inferior Oblique Muscle

Purpose: To report a case of idiopathic orbital inflammation presenting with isolated myositis of the inferior oblique muscle. Case summary: A 54‐year‐old man presented with swelling on the left lower lid, pain on superonasal and inferonasal gaze, and binocular diplopia for 2 months. His head was tilted to the right by about 5° and mild conjunctival injection and 3 mm narrowing of palpebral fissure of the left eye compared to the other eye were observed. Eight prism diopter (PD) left hypertropia and 4 PD intermittent esotropia were noted on primary gaze, which worsened on leftward gaze, downward gaze, and left head tilt. Orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed enhanced hypertrophy of the left inferior oblique muscle. Systemic work‐up for possible inflammatory diseases yielded negative results. Therefore, a presumptive diagnosis of idiopathic isolated myositis of the left inferior oblique muscle was made. The patient was treated with 60 mg of oral corticosteroid per day for the first week, and the dose was tapered for 1 month as the symptoms reduced. Two months later, the patient became free from any symptoms and follow-up orbital MRI showed a significant decrease in size of the left inferior oblique muscle. There have been no signs of recurrence for 7 months. Conclusions: A presumptive diagnosis of idiopathic isolated myositis of the inferior oblique muscle was made in a patient with swelling of the left lower lid and binocular diplopia based on orbital MRI and systemic work‐up. Good results were achieved with oral corticosteroid therapy.

Pseudo-Duane retraction syndrome after orbital myositis

Orbital myositis is a rare, commonly idiopathic, inflammatory condition that affects one or more extraocular muscles. We present a case of unilateral orbital myositis affecting the lateral rectus muscle presenting with gaze-evoked amaurosis, pain, and diplopia, with restrictive limitation of adduction. With improvement in adduction after initiating treatment, we noted narrowing of the palpebral fissure on attempted adduction, mimicking Duane retraction syndrome (DRS). Reported cases of "pseudo-DRS" are associated with multiple etiologies and are characterized by retraction on attempted abduction rather than adduction, as occurs in true DRS. In this case, pseudo-DRS occurred in the setting of idiopathic orbital inflammatory syndrome (orbital myositis) with a motility pattern more consistent with true DRS.

Non-specific orbital inflammation: Current understanding and unmet needs

Non-specific orbital inflammation (NSOI) is a noninfectious inflammatory condition of the orbit. Although it is generally considered the most common diagnosis derived from an orbital biopsy, it is a diagnosis of exclusion, meaning that the diagnosis requires exclusion of a systemic process or another identifiable etiology of orbital inflammation. The clinical diagnosis of NSOI is ill-defined, but it is typically characterized by acute orbital signs and symptoms, including pain, proptosis, periorbital edema, chemosis, diplopia, and less commonly visual disturbance. NSOI poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge: The clinical presentations and histological findings are heterogeneous, and there are no specific diagnostic criteria or treatment guidelines. The etiology and pathogenesis of NSOI are poorly understood. Here we recapitulate our current clinical understanding of NSOI, with an emphasis on the most recent findings on clinical characteristics, imaging findings, and treatment outcomes. Furthermore, gene expression profiling of NSOI and its implications are presented and discussed.