1
|
Chukwudile B, Pan D, Silva L, Gogoi M, Al-Oraibi A, Bird P, George N, Thompson HA, Baggaley RF, Hargreaves S, Pareek M, Nellums LB. Antimicrobial resistance among migrants in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis - update from 2017 to 2023. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 75:102801. [PMID: 39296945 PMCID: PMC11408055 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical global health concern. A previous systematic review showed that migrants in Europe are at increased risk of AMR. Since the COVID-19 pandemic there have been rapid changes in patterns of antibiotic use, AMR, and migration. We aimed to present an updated evidence synthesis on the current distribution of AMR among migrants in Europe. Methods We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022343263). We searched databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and Scopus) from 18 January 2017 until 18 January 2023 to identify primary data from observational studies reporting any laboratory-confirmed AMR among migrants in the European Economic Area (EEA) and European Union-15 (EU-15) countries using over 7 key search terms for migrants and over 70 terms for AMR and countries in Europe. Outcomes were infection with, or colonisation of AMR bacteria. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Observational Studies. We meta-analysed the pooled-prevalence of infection and/or colonisation of AMR organisms. Findings Among 630 articles, 21 observational studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The pooled prevalence for any detected AMR was 28.0% (95% CI 18.0%-41.0%, I 2 = 100%) compared to a 25.4% seen in the previous review; gram-negative bacteria 31.0% (95% CI 20.0%-44.0%, I 2 = 100%), and methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus 10.0% (95% CI 5.0%-16.0%, I 2 = 99%). Drug-resistant bacteria were more prevalent in community settings in large migrant populations (pooled prevalence: 41.0%, 95% CI 24.0%-60.0%, I 2 = 99%) than in hospitals (21.0%, 95% CI 12.0%-32.0%, I 2 = 99%). AMR estimates in 'other' migrants were 32.0%, (95% CI 12.0%-57.0%, I 2 = 100%) and 28.0% (95% CI 18.0%-38.0%, I 2 = 100%) in forced migrants. No firm evidence of AMR acquisition with arrival time or length of stay in the host country was found. Interpretation Studies investigating AMR in migrants are highly heterogenous. However, since the COVID-19 pandemic, migrants may be at higher risk of acquiring resistant bacteria, particularly gram-negative bacteria, within community settings such as refugee camps and detention centres in Europe. Our study highlights the importance of infrastructure and hygiene measures within these settings, to mitigate transmission of resistant pathogens. Policy-makers should screen for AMR in migrants prior to departure from countries of origin, where feasible, and upon arrival to a new country to ensure optimal health screening, infection control and effective treatment. Funding There was no funding source for this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget Chukwudile
- Nottingham Centre for Public Health and Epidemiology, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Pan
- Development Centre for Population Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Leicester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Department of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, NHS Trust, United Kingdom
- Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Oxford Big Data Institute, Oxford, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Sing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Luisa Silva
- Nottingham Centre for Public Health and Epidemiology, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Leicester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Mayuri Gogoi
- Development Centre for Population Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Leicester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Amani Al-Oraibi
- Nottingham Centre for Public Health and Epidemiology, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Development Centre for Population Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Bird
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Department of Microbiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Nisha George
- Development Centre for Population Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Leicester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Hayley A Thompson
- Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Global Health Programs Division, PATH, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rebecca F Baggaley
- Development Centre for Population Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Leicester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Sally Hargreaves
- Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Manish Pareek
- Development Centre for Population Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Leicester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, United Kingdom
- Department of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, NHS Trust, United Kingdom
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Laura B Nellums
- Nottingham Centre for Public Health and Epidemiology, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- College of Population Health, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith SI, Yamaoka Y. Antibiotic Resistance and Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1669. [PMID: 38136703 PMCID: PMC10740761 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12121669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Approximately half of the world's population is estimated to be infected with Helicobacter pylori [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stella I. Smith
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos 100001, Nigeria
| | - Yoshio Yamaoka
- Department of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu 879-5593, Japan;
- Department of Medicine-Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jafar M, Sajjad Ahmad Khan M, Salahuddin M, Zahoor S, Mohammed Hesham Slais H, Ibrahim Alalwan L, Radhi Alshaban H. DEVELOPMENT OF APIGENIN LOADED GASTRORETENTIVE MICROSPONGE FOR THE TARGETING OF HELICO BACTER PYLORI. Saudi Pharm J 2023; 31:659-668. [PMID: 37181149 PMCID: PMC10172626 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The goal of the present work was to invent an apigenin-stacked gastroretentive microsponge to target H. pylori. The quasi-emulsion technique was used to prepare microsponges, which were then tested for various physicochemical properties, in-vivo gastric retention, and in-vitro anti-H. pylori study. The microsponge that demonstrated a comparatively good product yield (76.23 ± 0.84), excellent entrapment efficiency (97.84 ± 0.85), sustained in-vitro gastric retention period, and prolonged drug release were chosen for further investigations. The microsponge's SEM analysis showed that it had a spherical form, porous surface, and interconnected spaces. No drug-polymer interactions were detected in the FTIR investigation. Apigenin was found to be dispersed in the microsponge's polymeric matrix according to DSC & XRD investigations. Moreover, the microsponge in the rat's stomach floated for 4 h, according to the ultrasonography. The antibacterial activity of apigenin against H. pylori was nearly two folds more than the pure apigenin and had a more sustained release in the best microsponge, according to the in vitro MIC data, when compared to pure apigenin. To sum up, the developed gastroretentive microsponge with apigenin offers a viable alternative for the efficient targeting of H. pylori. But more preclinical & clinical studies of our best microsponge would yield considerably more fruitful results.
Collapse
|
4
|
Galoș F, Boboc C, Ieșanu MI, Anghel M, Ioan A, Iana E, Coșoreanu MT, Boboc AA. Antibiotic Resistance and Therapeutic Efficacy of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pediatric Patients-A Tertiary Center Experience. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:antibiotics12010146. [PMID: 36671347 PMCID: PMC9854557 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12010146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
One of the most widespread bacterial infections worldwide, Helicobacter pylori is thought to affect almost half of the world's population. Due to rising antibiotic resistance, treatment should be tailored according to antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). This study aims to evaluate Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance and its therapeutic efficacy in children. We conducted a prospective, single-center study, that evaluated 68 children referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) following chronic dyspeptic syndrome. Each patient underwent multiple biopsies to perform bacterial cultures with AST and histopathological examinations for the diagnosis. Patients without antibiotic resistance or negative cultures received a 10-day sequential therapy, while the others had the antibiotic regimen tailored based on AST. Fifty-nine patients with a positive biopsy-based diagnosis (24 males) were finally included. Bacterial cultures with AST were positive for 13 patients (22.03%) and the antibiotic resistance for clarithromycin was 15.38%. Fifty-seven patients were administered sequential therapy with an eradication rate of 94.73%. Clarithromycin-resistant patients were successfully treated with 10-day triple therapy of esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and metronidazole. Although bacterial cultures had a low positivity rate, sequential therapy had a successful eradication rate. Further studies are necessary to better assess Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance to provide tailored treatment and identify children that need closer monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicia Galoș
- Department of Pediatrics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Pediatrics, Marie Curie Emergency Children’s Hospital, 041451 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cătălin Boboc
- Department of Pediatrics, Marie Curie Emergency Children’s Hospital, 041451 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mara-Ioana Ieșanu
- Department of Pediatrics, Marie Curie Emergency Children’s Hospital, 041451 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Functional Sciences, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence:
| | - Mălina Anghel
- Department of Pediatrics, Marie Curie Emergency Children’s Hospital, 041451 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andreea Ioan
- Department of Pediatrics, Marie Curie Emergency Children’s Hospital, 041451 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Elena Iana
- Department of Pediatrics, Marie Curie Emergency Children’s Hospital, 041451 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Maria Teodora Coșoreanu
- Department of Pediatrics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Pediatrics, Marie Curie Emergency Children’s Hospital, 041451 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anca Andreea Boboc
- Department of Pediatrics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Pediatrics, Marie Curie Emergency Children’s Hospital, 041451 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nyssen OP, Espada M, Gisbert JP. Empirical vs. Susceptibility-Guided Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:913436. [PMID: 35774456 PMCID: PMC9237546 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.913436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Treating Helicobacter pylori infection according to antibiotic resistance has been frequently recommended. However, information on its real effectiveness is scarce. Aim The aim of this study is to perform a meta-analysis comparing empirical vs. susceptibility-guided treatment of H. pylori. Methods Selection of studies: Studies comparing empirical versus susceptibility-guided treatment were selected. Search strategy: electronic and manual up to August 2021. Data synthesis: by intention-to-treat (random-effects model). Results Overall, 54 studies were included (6,705 patients in the susceptibility-guided group and 7,895 in the empirical group). H. pylori eradication rate was 86 vs. 76%, respectively (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.08-1.17; I 2: 83%). Similar results were found when only RCTs were evaluated (24 studies; RR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.11-1.22; I 2: 71%) and when susceptibility testing was assessed by culture (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.06-1.18) or PCR (RR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.05-1.23). For first-line treatments (naïve patients; 30 studies), better efficacy results were obtained with the susceptibility-guided strategy (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.11-1.20; I 2: 79%). However, for empirical first-line quadruple regimens, in particular (both with and without bismuth, excluding the suboptimal triple therapies), not based on CYP2C19 gene polymorphism, no differences in efficacy were found compared with the susceptibility-guided group (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.99-1.09); this lack of difference was confirmed in RCTs (RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.99-1.12). For rescue therapies (13 studies, most 2nd-line), similar results were demonstrated for both strategies, including all studies (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.97-1.22; I 2: 82%) and when only RCTs were considered (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.97-1.36). Conclusion The benefit of susceptibility-guided treatment over empirical treatment of H. pylori infection could not be demonstrated, either in first-line (if the most updated quadruple regimens are prescribed) or in rescue therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga P. Nyssen
- Gastroenterology Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
- Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Espada
- Gastroenterology Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
- Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier P. Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
- Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) has become a global threat to public health systems around the world in recent decades. In 2017, Italy was placed among the worst-performing nations in Europe by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, due to worryingly high levels of AMR in Italian hospitals and regions. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the state of the art of research on AMR in Italy over the last five years. The PubMed database was searched to identify studies presenting original data. Forty-three of the 9721 records identified were included. Overall, AMR rates ranged from 3% (in a group of sheep farmers) to 78% (in a hospital setting). The methods used to identify the microorganisms, to test their susceptibility and the criteria adopted for the breakpoint were deficient in 7, 7 and 11 studies, respectively. The main findings of our review were that most studies (79.1%) considered hospitalised patients only, 4 studies (9.3%) analysed non-hospitalised populations only. In addition, only 7 studies were multicentric and no scientific literature on the subject was produced in 7 Italian regions. In order to have a solid basis on the topic for the interventions of public health professionals and other stakeholders, studies analysing the phenomenon should be conducted in a methodologically standardised manner, should include all areas of the country and should also focus on out-of-hospital and community-based care and work settings.
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu C, Wang Y, Shi J, Zhang C, Nie J, Li S, Zheng T. The status and progress of first-line treatment against Helicobacter pylori infection: a review. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2021; 14:1756284821989177. [PMID: 34262609 PMCID: PMC8243100 DOI: 10.1177/1756284821989177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori (HP) is a major causative agent of chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer. HP is also engaged in the development of gastric cancer and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. It is an important pathogenic factor in various other systemic diseases, such as vitamin B12 deficiency, iron deficiency, and idiopathic thrombocytopenia. The current consensus is that unless there is a special reason, eradication therapy should be implemented whenever HP infection is found, and it is ideally successful the first time. International guidelines recommend that under certain conditions, treatment should be personalized based on drug susceptibility testing. However, drug susceptibility testing is often not available because it is expensive, time-consuming, and difficult to obtain living tissue. Each region has separately formulated guidelines or consensuses on empirical therapy. Owing to an increasing drug resistance rate in various places, the eradication rate of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) triple therapy and sequential therapy has been affected. These regimens are rarely used; the PPI triple especially has been abandoned in most areas. Currently, radical treatment regimens for HP involve bismuth-containing quadruple therapy and concomitant therapy. However, quadruple therapy has its own limitations, such as complex drug administration. To improve the effectiveness, safety, and compliance, many clinical studies have proposed useful modified regimens, which mainly include the modified bismuth-containing quadruple regimen, high-dose dual therapy, and vonoprazan-containing regimens. Studies have shown that these emerging regimens have acceptable eradication rates and safety, and are expected to become first-line treatments in empirical therapy. However, the problem of decline in the eradication rate caused by drug resistance has not been fundamentally solved. This review not only summarizes the effectiveness of mainstream regimens in the first-line treatment of HP infection with the currently increasing antibiotic resistance rates, but also summarizes the effectiveness and safety of various emerging treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caiqi Liu
- Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yuan Wang
- Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Jiaqi Shi
- Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | | | | | - Shun Li
- Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Georgopoulos S, Papastergiou V. An update on current and advancing pharmacotherapy options for the treatment of H. pylori infection. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 22:729-741. [PMID: 33131337 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1845649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) becomes more challenging due to increasing antimicrobial resistance. Consequently, the performance of clarithromycin-containing triple therapies is now declining to unacceptable levels and should be abandoned unless a prior susceptibility test precludes clarithromycin resistance.Areas covered: This review summarizes updated evidence concerning new and advancing pharmacotherapy options for H. pylori eradication.Expert opinion: Due to the declining efficacy of legacy triple therapies, most guidelines recommend bismuth quadruple therapy as the best initial empiric treatment. Concomitant, sequential and hybrid therapies are remarkable bismuth-free quadruple options, provided that dual clarithromycin-metronidazole resistance is low. Levofloxacin-, rifabutin-, furazolidone- and sitafloxacin-containing regimens remain useful, particularly as salvage options. To eradicate H. pylori in line with the rules of antibiotic stewardship, susceptibility-guided treatment appears as the ideal approach. However, the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of universal pre-treatment susceptibility testing warrants further evaluation. Molecular testing methods promise convenient characterization of H. pylori antibiotic susceptibility. High-dose dual therapy (proton-pump-inhibitor plus amoxicillin) and vonoprazan, a more potent acid inhibitor that likely enhances the activity of amoxicillin, are promising alternatives that could decrease misuse of antibiotics. Addition of certain probiotics could somewhat increase the performance of H. pylori eradication regimens, while improving tolerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sotirios Georgopoulos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Athens Medical P. Faliron General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Vasilios Papastergiou
- Department of Gastroenterology, "Konstantopoulion-Patision" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|