1
|
Fletcher K, Wydera S, Thorpe N, Radford K, das Nair R, Booth V. A rapid realist review of clinical neuropsychology rehabilitation programmes to improve psychological wellbeing and quality of life for people with acquired brain injuries. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2023:1-36. [PMID: 37975854 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2023.2273580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 20% of acquired brain injury (ABI) survivors experience reduced psychological wellbeing (PWB). Neuropsychological rehabilitation (NPR) is one approach supporting people with ABI to participate meaningfully in activities despite challenges. Although literature supports NPR effectiveness, little is known about change mechanisms. This systematic realist review identifies what NPR programmes have been designed, delivered, and evaluated for people with ABI to improve PWB and/or quality of life (QOL), as well as providing a context-relevant understanding of what NPR includes and how NPR might lead to positive outcomes. A rapid realist review was conducted in three phases: (1) structured retrieval and evidence extraction; (2) stakeholder consultation; (3) analysis and synthesis. Searches were completed, and findings from 35 publications and one stakeholder consultation were synthesized into a refined logic model. Six context-mechanism-outcome chains (CMOCs) were identified. Participants' relationships to internal experiences, and feelings of self-worth, mastery, and connection appeared to be mechanisms that led to improved PWB and QOL. Adaptation and individualized programmes were also key mechanisms to explain successful NPR. Embedding CMOCs into NPR could improve PWB and/or QOL for people with ABI. The logic model will inform ongoing development of a new online, group-based, NPR programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Fletcher
- Division of Rehabilitation & Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, UK
| | | | - N Thorpe
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - K Radford
- Division of Rehabilitation & Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - R das Nair
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
- SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - V Booth
- Division of Rehabilitation & Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davies A, Rogers JM, Baker K, Li L, Llerena J, das Nair R, Wong D. Combined Cognitive and Psychological Interventions Improve Meaningful Outcomes after Acquired Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neuropsychol Rev 2023:10.1007/s11065-023-09625-z. [PMID: 37955821 DOI: 10.1007/s11065-023-09625-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Interventions addressing cognitive and emotional difficulties after acquired brain injury (ABI) often focus on specific impairments in cognition or mood. These interventions can be effective at addressing their specific target, but do not routinely translate to improved activity and participation outcomes. Approaches that combine cognitive and psychological rehabilitation are increasingly popular; however, to date, there have been no systematic evaluations of their efficacy. We conducted a systematic review of five databases, searching for randomised controlled trials of adults with diagnoses of non-progressive ABI at least 1-month post injury, in receipt of interventions that combined cognitive and psychological components compared to any control. Screening and data extraction were evaluated by two independent reviewers using a standardised protocol. Effect sizes were calculated using Hedge's g and estimated using a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the PEDro-P rating system, and quality of evidence evaluated using the grading of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach. Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 684). There was an overall small-to-medium effect (g = 0.42) for combined interventions compared with controls, with gains maintained at 6-month follow-up. Improvements were observed at the level of impairment, activity, participation and quality of life. GRADE ratings and analyses investigating sensitivity, heterogeneity and publication bias indicated that these effects were robust. No a priori variables moderated these effects. Overall, this review provides strong evidence that combined cognitive and psychological interventions create meaningful change in the lives of people with ABI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Davies
- School of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
| | - Jeffrey M Rogers
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Katharine Baker
- School of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
| | - Lily Li
- School of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
| | - Joshua Llerena
- School of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
| | - Roshan das Nair
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
- Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Dept. of Health Research, Torgaarden, P.O. Box 4760, Trondheim, NO-7465, Norway
| | - Dana Wong
- School of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gopi Y, Wilding E, Madan CR. Memory rehabilitation: restorative, specific knowledge acquisition, compensatory, and holistic approaches. Cogn Process 2022; 23:537-557. [PMID: 35790619 PMCID: PMC9553770 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-022-01099-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Memory impairment following an acquired brain injury can negatively impact daily living and quality of life—but can be reduced by memory rehabilitation. Here, we review the literature on four approaches for memory rehabilitation and their associated strategies: (1) the restorative approach, aimed at a return to pre-morbid functioning, (2) the knowledge acquisition approach, involving training on specific information relevant to daily life, (3) the compensatory approach, targeted at improving daily functioning, and (4) the holistic approach, in which social, emotional, and behavioral deficits are addressed alongside cognitive consequences of acquired brain injury. Each memory rehabilitation approach includes specific strategies such as drill and practice (restorative), spaced retrieval (knowledge acquisition), memory aids (compensatory), or a combination of psychotherapy and cognitive strategies (holistic). Past research has demonstrated mixed support for the use of restorative strategies to improve memory function, whereas knowledge acquisition strategies show promising results on trained tasks but little generalization to untrained tasks and activities of daily living. Compensatory strategies remain widely used but require intensive training to be effectively employed. Finally, the holistic approach is becoming more widespread due to improvements in psychosocial wellbeing, yet there are considerable resource and cost requirements. Several factors can influence rehabilitation outcomes including metacognition and emotional disturbances. Considerations for future research to improve the applicability of strategies for memory rehabilitation include assessing memory impairment severity, examining memory needs in daily life, and exploring the long-term effects of memory rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yashoda Gopi
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
| | - Edward Wilding
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Effects of animal-assisted psychotherapy incorporating mindfulness and self-compassion in neurorehabilitation: a randomized controlled feasibility trial. Sci Rep 2022; 12:10898. [PMID: 35764668 PMCID: PMC9240064 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14584-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Transdiagnostic psychotherapeutic approaches are increasingly used in neurorehabilitation to address psychological distress. Animal-assistance is thought to increase efficacy. The present study evaluates a psychotherapeutic mindfulness- and self-compassion-based group intervention (MSCBI) with and without animal-assistance for patients with acquired brain injury. Patients (N = 31) were randomly assigned to the 6-week intervention with (n = 14) or without animal-assistance (n = 17). Primary outcome was psychological distress at post- and follow-up treatment, secondary outcomes were changes within-session of patients’ emotional states, adherence to treatment and attrition. Psychological distress significantly decreased in both groups from pre- to follow-up treatment with no difference between groups. Patients in the animal-assisted MSCBI group reported significantly higher increases in feeling secure, accepted, comforted, grateful, motivated and at ease during the sessions compared to patients in the MSCBI group without animal-assistance. Adherence to sessions was significantly higher in the animal-assisted MSCBI group. Attrition did not significantly differ between groups. Our results show that both MSCBIs with and without animal-assistance are feasible and effective in reducing psychological distress in patients with acquired brain injury. The significant changes within-sessions mainly in relationship-based emotional states and the higher treatment adherence suggest additional effects of animal-assistance. Animal-assistance might increase acceptability and patients’ commitment to psychotherapy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Exner C, Doering BK, Conrad N, Künemund A, Zwick S, Kühl K, Nestler S, Rief W. Integrated neuropsychological and cognitive behavioural therapy after acquired brain injury: A pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2021; 32:1495-1529. [PMID: 33818305 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2021.1908902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
After acquired brain injury (ABI) many patients suffer from persistent cognitive and emotional disturbances. The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment outcome of an integrated intervention, combining neuropsychological and cognitive behavioural therapy (nCBT), against waitlist (WL) in outpatients with ABI. Individuals seeking outpatient treatment for cognitive and emotional problems after ABI were randomly allocated to nCBT (n = 27) or WL (n = 29) and completed assessments at baseline, post-treatment/WL and at six-month follow-up. The primary outcome measures were general psychopathology and functional activity in daily life. The nCBT group showed significant improvement for general psychopathology post-treatment when compared to WL. nCBT was also superior to WL regarding the secondary outcomes, i.e., the reduction of negative affect and the improvement of quality of life. No significant differences for functional activity and community integration were observed. Significant pre-post effect sizes ranged between small for functional activity and medium for quality of life. The positive effects were maintained at follow-up. The majority of patients with cognitive and emotional problems after ABI benefit from an integrated approach that offers cognitive remediation and psychotherapy. However, the heterogeneous sequelae of ABI and the moderate sample sizes in clinical trials present a methodological challenge to ABI research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Exner
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.,Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bettina K Doering
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.,Department of Clinical and Biological Psychology, University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany
| | - Nico Conrad
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Anna Künemund
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Zwick
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Kühl
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Steffen Nestler
- Department of Statistics and Psychological Methods, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Winfried Rief
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|