Inter-Hospital Transfer after Return of Spontaneous Circulation Shows no Correlation with Neurological Outcomes in Cardiac Arrest Patients Undergoing Targeted Temperature Management in Cardiac Arrest Centers

Targeted Temperature Management: A Program Evaluation

In the United States, more than 350 000 cardiac arrests occur annually. The survival rate after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains low. The majority of patients who have return of spontaneous circulation will die of complications of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Targeted temperature management is the only recommended neuroprotective measure for those who do not regain consciousness after return of spontaneous circulation. Despite current practices, a review of the literature revealed that evidence on the ideal time to achieve target temperature after return of spontaneous circulation remains equivocal. A program evaluation of a targeted temperature management program at an academic center was performed; the focus was on timing components of targeted temperature management. The program evaluation revealed that nurse-driven, evidence-based protocols can lead to optimal patient outcomes in this low-frequency, high-impact therapy.

Effect of Prehospital Epinephrine Use on Survival from Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and on Emergency Medical Services

This study was to identify the effect of epinephrine on the survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients and changes in prehospital emergency medical services (EMSs) after the introduction of prehospital epinephrine use by EMS providers. This was a retrospective observational study comparing two groups (epinephrine group and norepinephrine group). We used propensity score matching of the two groups and identified the association between outcome variables regarding survival and epinephrine use, controlling for confounding factors. The epinephrine group was 339 patients of a total 1943 study population. The survival-to-discharge rate and OR (95% CI) of the epinephrine group were 5.0% (p = 0.215) and 0.72 (0.43–1.21) in the total patient population and 4.7% (p = 0.699) and 1.15 (0.55–2.43) in the 1:1 propensity-matched population. The epinephrine group received more mechanical chest compression and had longer EMS response times and scene times than the norepinephrine group. Mechanical chest compression was a negative prognostic factor for survival to discharge and favorable neurological outcomes in the epinephrine group. The introduction of prehospital epinephrine use in OHCA patients yielded no evidence of improvement in survival to discharge and favorable neurological outcomes and adversely affected the practice of EMS providers, exacerbating the factors negatively associated with survival from OHCA.