Bilateral Simultaneous Breast Reconstruction with DIEP- and TMG Flaps: Head to Head Comparison, Risk and Complication Analysis

Similarity of Seroma Rate at the Medial Thigh following Free Flap Harvesting or Medial Thigh Lift: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Despite the growing use of autologous breast reconstruction with medial thigh-based free flaps, such as transverse upper gracilis (TMG) or profunda artery perforator (PAP) flaps, these procedures are infrequently performed on patients with obesity. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the frequency of seroma occurrence, a common complication after medial thigh flap surgery. Comparison was performed between TMG and PAP flaps, as well as medial thigh lifts (MTL), a procedure with a similar operative technique but which is typically offered to patients with a higher body mass index (BMI). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we analyzed EMBASE, PUBMED, and MEDLINE data (English/German). The primary outcomes assessed were occurrence of seroma, as well as hematoma and wound dehiscence. Subgroup analyses explored age, BMI, and various surgical factors. This meta-analysis incorporated 28 studies, totaling 1096 patients. MTL patients had significantly higher BMIs, whereas seroma rates were similar among TMG, PAP, and MTL patients. The incidence of hematoma and wound dehiscence was also similar across the groups. In the metaregression analysis, factors such as age and BMI showed no significant correlation with seroma occurrence in all groups. This systematic review and meta-analysis identified comparable rates of seroma formation after TMG flap, PAP flap, and MTL procedures. Considering that this phenomenon occurred despite the elevated BMI of the MTL group, we propose that patients with higher BMI need not be excluded as candidates for autologous medial thigh-based breast reconstruction. Hence, these procedures should not be limited to small- to medium-sized breasts. Large-scale prospective studies are imperative to validate these conclusions and reveal the underlying factors contributing to seroma formation.

Alternatives to the Gold Standard: A Systematic Review of Profunda Artery Perforator and Lumbar Artery Perforator Flaps for Breast Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the current gold-standard autologous option. The profunda artery perforator (PAP) and lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flaps have more recently been described as alternatives for patients who are not candidates for a DIEP flap. The aim of this study was to review the survival and complication rates of PAP and LAP flaps, using the DIEP flap as a benchmark.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Papers were screened by title and abstract, and full texts reviewed by three independent blinded reviewers. Quality was assessed using MINORS criteria.

RESULTS

Sixty-three studies were included, for a total of 745 PAP, 62 stacked PAP, 187 LAP, and 23,748 DIEP flap breast reconstructions. The PAP (98.3%) had comparable success rate to DIEP (98.4%), and the stacked PAP (88.7%) and LAP (92.5%) success rate was significantly lower (P < 0.0001). The PAP and LAP groups both had a low incidence of fat necrosis. However, the revision rate for the LAP group was 16.1% whereas the PAP group was 3.3%. Donor site wound dehiscence rate was 2.9 in the LAP group and 9.1% in the PAP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Profunda artery perforator and DIEP flaps demonstrate very high rates of overall survival. The LAP flap has a lower survival rate. This review highlights the survival and complication rates of these alternative flaps, which may help clinicians in guiding autologous reconstruction technique when a DIEP flap is unavailable.

Management of donor-site complications after breast reconstruction with the transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap: Proposal of a treatment algorithm

BACKGROUND

The transverse myocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap is a popular choice for autologous breast reconstruction due to its consistent anatomy and reliability, especially for slim patients. While the incidence of donor-site morbidity is comparable with other free flaps, there is no literature about the management of donor-site complications available. Our study aims to provide an overview of encountered complications, associated risk factors and their management using a standardized algorithmic approach.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients receiving breast reconstruction with a TMG flap at our institution between September 2010 and May 2021 was performed. Demographic data (age, BMI), comorbidities (diabetes, smoking), complication rates (major, minor) and treatment were evaluated. Medical records were screened for reasons and timing of performed reconstructions. Adapted from the Clavien-Dindo classification system, severity of complication was categorized as either class I-II minor or class IIIa-IIIb major. Data on follow-up procedures was collected. A treatment algorithm for the management of commonly occurring donor-site complications was created, based on our long-running institutional experience.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and twenty-five patients (288 flaps) were included in our retrospective analysis. There were 43 (14.9%) minor and 4 (2.7%) major donor-site complications overall. Minor complications included superficial wound breakdown (26/9%), infection (10 cases, 3.5%) and hematoseroma (7 cases, 2.4%). Hematoseroma (2 cases, 0.7%) and severe wound breakdown (2 cases, 0.7%) needing revision surgery were the most common major complications. Patients with lower BMI (mean 22.9 kg/m2 vs. 24.0 kg/m2 ; p = .047) and active tobacco use (14.1% vs. 6.3%; p = .046; Relative risk = 1.71 95% CI 1.02-2.88) had a higher occurrence of donor-site complications. Age and operating time were not associated with higher complication rates. Four patients (1.4%) received donor-site refinement surgery.

CONCLUSION

The TMG flap provides a reliable and safe alternative for breast reconstruction and most donor-site complications can be managed conservatively. Our proposed treatment algorithm aids with decision making in the management of donor-site complications.

DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: A morbidity study of bilateral versus unilateral reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap is a modality in breast reconstruction of choice. Despite its well-documented benefits and complications, a lack of evidence remains with regards to the risks of performing a bilateral versus a unilateral reconstruction. As such, we sought to compare the rates of adverse outcomes in the perioperative and postoperative periods associated with a unilateral versus a bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 178 consecutive patients undergoing unilateral versus. bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction was performed at our tertiary care center over a 3-year period. Data on demographics, operative time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and surgical re-exploration, were extracted for both groups. Statistical analysis was performed on a per-flap basis.

RESULTS

A total of 157 unilateral and 42 bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps were identified. The rate of intra-operative complications was 12.1% for unilateral versus. 4.8% for bilateral flaps (P=0.26). Total post-operative complications rates were 30.6% for unilateral versus 54.7% for bilateral flaps (P=0.003). Surgical re-exploration was performed in 12.7% of unilateral and 11.9% of bilateral cases (P=0.88). The rate of total flap loss was similar between types of reconstruction, occurring in 2.5% of unilateral vs. 2.4% of bilateral flaps (P=1).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the rate of complications per flap is significantly higher in bilateral versus unilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Bilateral DIEP breast reconstruction should be decided on a case-by-case basis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic/Risk Study, Level II.

"Spin" in Observational Studies in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is widely used in autologous breast reconstruction. However, the technique relies heavily on nonrandomized observational research, which has been found to have high risk of bias. "Spin" can be used to inappropriately present study findings to exaggerate benefits or minimize harms. The primary objective was to assess the prevalence of spin in nonrandomized observational studies on DIEP reconstruction. The secondary objectives were to determine the prevalence of each spin category and strategy.

Methods

MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 2015, to November 15, 2022. Spin was assessed in abstracts and full-texts of included studies according to criteria proposed by Lazarus et al.

Results

There were 77 studies included for review. The overall prevalence of spin was 87.0%. Studies used a median of two spin strategies (interquartile range: 1-3). The most common strategies identified were causal language or claims (n = 41/77, 53.2%), inadequate extrapolation to larger population, intervention, or outcome (n = 27/77, 35.1%), inadequate implication for clinical practice (n = 25/77, 32.5%), use of linguistic spin (n = 22/77, 28.6%), and no consideration of the limitations (n = 21/77, 27.3%). There were no significant associations between selected study characteristics and the presence of spin.

Conclusions

The prevalence of spin is high in nonrandomized observational studies on DIEP reconstruction. Causal language or claims are the most common strategy. Investigators, reviewers, and readers should familiarize themselves with spin strategies to avoid misinterpretation of research in DIEP reconstruction.

The Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy on the Medial Thigh Donor Site in Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis Flap Breast Reconstruction

The objective of this study was to examine the impact of closed incision negative pressure therapy (CINPT) on donor site complications and patient perceptions in transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap breast reconstruction. Our institution conducted a retrospective cohort study, including all patients with TMG flap breast reconstruction from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2021. Patients were grouped according to conventional wound management or CINPT. Outcomes were surgical site complications, fluid drainage, time to drain removal, and in-hospital stay length. A patient survey was created. A total of 56 patients with 83 TMG flaps were included (control group: 35 patients with 53 TMG flaps; CINPT group: 21 patients with 30 TMG flaps). Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. The flap width was significantly larger in the CINPT group (8.0 cm vs. 7.0 cm, p = 0.013). Surgical site complications were reduced in the CINPT group without statistical difference (30.0% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.064). Fluid drainage and time to drain removal were similar in both groups. The average in-hospital stay was significantly shortened in the CINPT group (10.0 days vs. 13.0 days, p = 0.030). The survey excluded pain, skin irritations, and discomfort during sleep and movement in the CINPT group and showed that the patients felt well protected. This study fails to provide compelling evidence for CINPT to enhance incision healing on the donor site in TMG flap breast reconstruction. There was a trend toward reduced surgical site complications on the donor thigh and the in-hospital stay was shortened. Prophylactic CINPT increases patient comfort and provides a feeling of additional wound protection.

Donor Site Morbidity in Unilateral and Bilateral Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis (TMG) Flap Breast Reconstruction: Sensation, Function, Aesthesis and Patient-Reported Outcomes

The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap has become a popular choice for breast reconstruction. This study aimed to compare the donor site morbidity in unilateral and bilateral procedures. Patients receiving a TMG flap (January 2008–October 2019) were invited to a follow-up and grouped according to unilateral (UL group) or bilateral (BL group) breast reconstruction. Outcome criteria included sensation, function and aesthesis of the thighs. Patient-reported outcomes were surveyed using validated questionnaires. The number and kind of refinement procedures for aesthetic purposes on the donor thighs were evaluated. Thirty-eight patients with 59 TMG flaps were included in the study (UL group: n = 17, BL group: n = 21). Normal to slightly diminished superficial skin sensation was maintained in most of the thigh skin (98.4%). Strength and mobility were without impairment in >80% of the thighs in both groups. Thigh symmetry was achieved in both groups. Symmetrisation procedures were significantly more often performed in the UL group (p = 0.005). The total number of refinement procedures was similar in both groups. Patient-reported outcomes were similar with good appearance of the thighs and scars, excellent function and low pain levels. The TMG flap offers excellent function and sensation on the donor thigh. Thigh symmetry and good patient satisfaction may be achieved in both unilateral and bilateral breast reconstructions.

Lessons Learned from 30 Years of Transverse Myocutaneous Gracilis Flap Breast Reconstruction: Historical Appraisal and Review of the Present Literature and 300 Cases

BACKGROUND

Happy 30th birthday to the transverse myocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap. Since 1991 the TMG flap has been used to reconstruct a wide variety of defects and became a workhorse flap and reliable alternative to the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap in many breast reconstruction services worldwide. This manuscript sheds light on the history and success of the TMG flap by critically reviewing the present literature and a series of 300 patients receiving a breast reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present literature and history of the TMG flap was reviewed and a retrospective double center cohort study of 300 free TMG free flaps for autologous breast reconstruction was conducted. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and post-operative complications were recorded and compared with literature findings.

RESULTS

Mean flap weight was 320 g. Mean pedicle length was 70 mm. Complications included 19 (6.3%) flap loss. 10 patients (3.3%) had postoperative cellulitis and 28 (9.3%) wound healing disturbance of the donor site.

CONCLUSION

Recipient and donor site complications were comparable to other free flaps used for breast reconstruction. A low BMI or the lack of an abdominal based donor site do not represent a limitation for breast reconstruction and can be overcome using the TMG flap.

The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap for autologous breast reconstruction: focus on donor site morbidity

Purpose

The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap is as a valuable alternative in autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the donor site morbidity and secondary refinement procedures after TMG flap breast reconstruction.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted, including all patients who received TMG flap breast reconstructions, from January 2012 to August 2019. Primary outcomes were surgical site complications of the donor site and secondary refinement procedures carried out for aesthetic or reconstructive purposes for the medial thigh. Secondary outcomes of interest were lipofilling procedures for optimization of the reconstructed breasts.

Results

Ninety-nine patients received 159 TMG flaps for breast reconstruction. Patients’ mean BMI was 23.5 (15.6–32.5) kg/m². Bilateral breast reconstructions were performed in 60.6%. The mean flap volume was 330 (231–440) g. Surgical site complications occurred in 14.5% of the TMG donor sites and wound dehiscence was the most common complication (9.4%). Lymphedema occurred in 1.8% of the donor thighs. Aesthetic refinement procedures were performed in 25.2% on the donor thigh or contralateral thigh. Secondary lipofilling was performed in 54.1% of the reconstructed breasts and fat was harvested in only 11.9% from the legs.

Conclusion

The TMG flap breast reconstruction combines low donor site morbidity with adequate volume for appealing breast results, particularly in slim-to-normal weight patients. However, patients should be informed about the likelihood of secondary refinement procedures on the donor site and the need of lipofilling to optimize the breast shape and volume.

Safety and donor site morbidity of the transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap in autologous breast reconstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap has gained popularity for breast reconstruction. However, the literature regarding its donor site morbidity is heterogeneous. This systematic review sought to clarify the evidence on donor site morbidity.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted. We included all articles reporting on donor-site morbidity of the TMG flap for breast reconstruction. The results were analyzed in R and its extension meta. A generalized linear mixed model was used to combine proportions and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in a random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles provided an overall sample of 843 TMG flaps. The total flap loss was low at 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%). All patients were normal weight (pooled body mass index 22.75, 95% CI, 21.88-23.63). The incidence of wound dehiscence (8%, 95% CI, 4%-16%), seroma (4%, 95% CI, 2%-7%), hematoma (2%, 95% CI, 1%-4%) and infection (0%-5%) on the TMG donor site was low. Functional impairments included sensory disturbance (0%-74%), motoric deficits (0%-50%), and changes in the genital region (0%-24%), all of which were modest.

CONCLUSIONS

This review confirms the safety and low donor site morbidity of the TMG flap in normal-weight patients, which is comparable to that of other popular free flaps in breast reconstruction.

Uni-vs. bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction - A multicenter outcome analysis

OBJECTIVE

Over the past decade numbers of bilateral mastectomy have increased steadily. As a result, bilateral breast reconstruction is gaining popularity. The presented study compares complications and outcomes of unilateral and bilateral DIEP free-flap breast reconstructions using the largest database available in Europe.

METHODS

Female breast cancer patients (n = 3926) receiving DIEP flap breast reconstructions (n = 4577 free flaps) at 22 different centers were included in this study. Free flaps were stratified into two groups: a unilateral- (UL) and a bilateral- (BL) breast reconstruction group. Groups were compared with regard to surgical complications and free flap outcome.

RESULTS

Mean operative time was significantly longer in the BL group (UL: 285.2 ± 107.7 vs. BL: 399.1 ± 136.8 min; p < 0.001). Mean ischemia time was comparable between groups (p = 0.741). There was no significant difference with regard to total (UL 1.8% vs. BL 2.6%, p = 0.081) or partial flap loss (UL 1.2% vs. BL 0.9%, p = 0.45) between both groups. Rates of venous or arterial thrombosis were comparable between both groups (venous: UL 2.9% vs. BL 2.2%, p = 0.189; arterial: UL 1.8% vs. BL 1.2%, p = 0.182). However, significantly higher rates of hematoma at the donor and recipient site were observed in the UL group (donor site: UL 1.1% vs. BL 0.1%, p = 0.001; recipient site UL 3.9% vs. BL 1.7%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The data underline the feasibility of bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction, when performed in a setting of specialized centers.