1
|
Khawaja M, Virk HUH, Bandyopadhyay D, Rodriguez M, Escobar J, Alam M, Jneid H, Krittanawong C. Aortic Stenosis Phenotypes and Precision Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2023; 10:265. [PMID: 37504521 PMCID: PMC10380398 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10070265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with a clinical indication for aortic valve replacement can either undergo surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). There are many different factors that go into determining which type of replacement to undergo, including age, life expectancy, comorbidities, frailty, and patient preference. While both options offer significant benefits to patients in terms of clinical outcomes and quality of life, there is growing interest in expanding the indications for TAVI due to its minimally invasive approach. However, it is worth noting that there are several discrepancies in TAVI outcomes in regards to various endpoints, including death, stroke, and major cardiovascular events. It is unclear why these discrepancies exist, but potential explanations include the diversity of etiologies for aortic stenosis, complex patient comorbidities, and ongoing advancements in both medical therapies and devices. Of these possibilities, we propose that phenotypic variation of aortic stenosis has the most significant impact on post-TAVI clinical outcomes. Such variability in phenotypes is often due to a complex interplay between underlying comorbidities and environmental and inherent patient risk factors. However, there is growing evidence to suggest that patient genetics may also play a role in aortic stenosis pathology. As such, we propose that the selection and management of TAVI patients should emphasize a precision medicine approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muzamil Khawaja
- Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk
- Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Dhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay
- Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Centre, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
| | - Mario Rodriguez
- Division of Cardiology, Barnes-Jewish Hospital at Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Johao Escobar
- Division of Cardiology, Harlem Cardiology, New York, NY 10035, USA
| | - Mahboob Alam
- Division of Cardiology, The Texas Heart Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Hani Jneid
- Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chayakrit Krittanawong
- Cardiology Division, NYU Langone Health and NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Matsushita K, Morel O, Ohlmann P. Contemporary issues and lifetime management in patients underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2023:10.1007/s12928-023-00924-z. [PMID: 36943655 DOI: 10.1007/s12928-023-00924-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
Latest clinical trials have indicated favorable outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in low surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, there are unanswered questions particularly in younger patients with longer life expectancy. While current evidence are limited to short duration of clinical follow-up, there are certain factors which may impair patients clinical outcomes and quality-of-life at long-term. Contemporary issues in the current TAVR era include prosthesis-patient mismatch, heart failure hospitalization, subclinical thrombosis, future coronary access, and valve durability. In this review, the authors review available evidence and discuss each remaining issues and theoretical treatment strategies in lifetime management of TAVR patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kensuke Matsushita
- Université de Strasbourg, Pôle d'Activité Médico-Chirurgicale Cardio-Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 1 Place de L'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.
- UMR1260 INSERM, Nanomédecine Régénérative, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Olivier Morel
- Université de Strasbourg, Pôle d'Activité Médico-Chirurgicale Cardio-Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 1 Place de L'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France
- UMR1260 INSERM, Nanomédecine Régénérative, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Patrick Ohlmann
- Université de Strasbourg, Pôle d'Activité Médico-Chirurgicale Cardio-Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 1 Place de L'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Panagides V, Alperi A, Mesnier J, Philippon F, Bernier M, Rodes-Cabau J. Heart failure following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2021; 19:695-709. [PMID: 34227916 DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2021.1949987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Over the past decade, the number of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures has increased exponentially. Despite major improvements in both device and successes, the rate of hospital readmission after TAVR remains high, with heart failure (HF) decompensation being one of the most important causes.Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the current status of HF following TAVR, including details about its incidence, clinical impact, contributing factors, and current and future treatment perspectives.Expert opinion: HF decompensation has been identified as the most common cause of rehospitalization following TAVR, and it has been associated with a negative prognosis. Multiple preexisting factors including low flow status, cardiac amyloidosis, myocardial fibrosis, multivalvular disease, pulmonary hypertension, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillation have been associated with an increased risk of HF events. Also, multiple post-procedural factors like the occurrence of significant paravalvular leaks, severe prosthesis-patient mismatch, and conduction disturbances have also contributed to increase this risk . Thus, reducing HF events in TAVR recipients would require a multifactorial and multidisciplinary effort including the optimization of the medical treatment and close follow-up and treatment of residual or concomitant valvular disease and conduction disturbance issues. Future studies in this challenging group of patients are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vassili Panagides
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alberto Alperi
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jules Mesnier
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Francois Philippon
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mathieu Bernier
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Josep Rodes-Cabau
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|