Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Treatments for Systemic Sclerosis-Related Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for autoimmune disease-associated interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressants, biologic agents, antifibrotic drugs, and other drugs can be used to treat autoimmune disease-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD), but the preferred treatment is uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple drugs in the treatment of autoimmune disease-associated ILD.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to July 2023. Primary outcomes were percentage of predicted forced vital capacity (FVC% predicted) and discontinuations for adverse events (AEs). We estimated summary mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs) using network meta-analysis with fixed effects.

RESULTS

The analysis is based on 15 RCTs involving 1832 patients. In terms of FVC% predicted, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (MD 1.27, 95 % credible interval [CrI] 0.08 to 2.43), cyclophosphamide (1.89, 0.10 to 3.68), rituximab (9.29, 2.79 to 15.80), tocilizumab (6.30, 3.27 to 9.34), nintedanib (1.71, 0.54 to 2.88), pirfenidone (2.03, 0.65 to 3.40) and nintedanib+MMF (2.43, 0.95 to 3.89) were more effective than placebo. Analysis based on a small sample size showed that riociguat also had good therapeutic potential when compared with placebo. By contrast, bosentan and pomalidomide showed no significant difference compared with placebo. Regarding discontinuations for AEs, nintedanib (OR 2.09, 95 %CrI 1.20 to 3.73) and pirfenidone (3.46, 1.31 to 10.56) were associated with higher dropout rates than placebo, and the combination therapy of nintedanib+MMF did not increase the risk of AEs compared with nintedanib monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

MMF, cyclophosphamide, rituximab, tocilizumab, nintedanib and pirfenidone are effective in the treatment of autoimmune disease-associated ILD. The efficacy of riociguat and the superiority of combination therapy need to be demonstrated in more RCTs. The tolerance of nintedanib and pirfenidone is a concern, but most of their AEs are mild and controllable.

Efficacy of Rituximab Versus Cyclophosphamide and Mycophenolate for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc), contributing to significant morbidity and mortality in affected individuals. The optimal treatment approach for SSc-associated ILD remains uncertain, with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate among potential therapeutic options. This systematic review aims to evaluate and synthesize the existing evidence on the efficacy of rituximab compared to cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate for the treatment of ILD in patients with systemic sclerosis. A comprehensive search of the following electronic databases, PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, has been conducted to identify relevant studies, including randomized controlled trials, systematic review and meta-analysis, prospective cohort studies, and retrospective cohort studies. Data on study characteristics, participant demographics, interventions, outcomes, and key findings have been extracted and synthesized. The risk of bias in the included studies has been assessed using appropriate tools such as the Cochrane Bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials, the New Castle Ottawa tool for cohort studies, and the AMSTAR checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. The research team ultimately selected 15 high-quality studies for review. Rituximab demonstrated similar efficacy to cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate in improving lung function (forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO)), with fewer severe adverse events. Cyclophosphamide, while effective, had higher toxicity, leading to more frequent adverse events such as leukopenia and infections. Mycophenolate showed comparable efficacy to cyclophosphamide but with fewer side effects, making it a well-tolerated alternative. The findings of this systematic review will provide valuable insights into the comparative efficacy of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate in the management of ILD in systemic sclerosis, informing clinical decision-making and guiding future research in this area.

The interplay between rheumatic diseases and pulmonary health

Patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs) are prone to a number of comorbidities, particularly those affecting the respiratory system due to inflammatory and autoimmune mechanisms. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and inflammatory idiopathic myopathies (IIMs) often present with progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD). The prevalence of ILD varies among patients with RDs, with 11% in RA, 47% in SSc, and 41% in IIMs. Some diagnostic markers, including KL-6, cytokines TNF-α and IL-6, and autoantibodies (anti-CCP), play a crucial role in assessing and predicting the course of pulmonary involvement in RDs. Lung fibrosis is a progressive disorder in SSc and RA, limiting the effiency of therapeutic interventions. Re-evaluating treatment approaches with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is crucial for understanding their impact on the risk of lung affections. Despite initial concerns surrounding methotrexate, recent evidence points to its benefits in RA-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). Recognizing the intricate relationship between autoimmune RDs and lung affections is crucial for formulating effective treatment strategies. Emphasis is placed on collaborative efforts of rheumatologists and pulmonologists for early diagnosis, comprehensive care, and optimal patient outcomes in RA-ILD.

Mycophenolate and azathioprine efficacy in interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) are immunomodulatory treatments in interstitial lung disease (ILD). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MMF or AZA on pulmonary function in ILD.

DESIGN

Population included any ILD diagnosis, intervention included MMF or AZA treatment, outcome was delta change from baseline in per cent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) and gas transfer (diffusion lung capacity of carbon monoxide, %DLco). The primary endpoint compared outcomes relative to placebo comparator, the secondary endpoint assessed outcomes in treated groups only.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective observational studies were included. No language restrictions were applied. Retrospective studies and studies with high-dose concomitant steroids were excluded.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The systematic search was performed on 9 May. Meta-analyses according to drug and outcome were specified with random effects, I2 evaluated heterogeneity and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation evaluated certainty of evidence. Primary endpoint analysis was restricted to RCT design, secondary endpoint included subgroup analysis according to prospective observational or RCT design.

RESULTS

A total of 2831 publications were screened, 12 were suitable for quantitative synthesis. Three MMF RCTs were included with no significant effect on the primary endpoints (%FVC 2.94, 95% CI -4.00 to 9.88, I2=79.3%; %DLco -2.03, 95% CI -4.38 to 0.32, I2=0.0%). An overall 2.03% change from baseline in %FVC (95% CI 0.65 to 3.42, I2=0.0%) was observed in MMF, and RCT subgroup summary estimated a 4.42% change from baseline in %DLCO (95% CI 2.05 to 6.79, I2=0.0%). AZA studies were limited. All estimates were considered very low certainty evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

There were limited RCTs of MMF or AZA and their benefit in ILD was of very low certainty. MMF may support preservation of pulmonary function, yet confidence in the effect was weak. To support high certainty evidence, RCTs should be designed to directly assess MMF efficacy in ILD.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023423223.

Efficacy of rituximab on disease activity, severity, and disease-related damage in patients with immunosuppressive-resistant systemic sclerosis

Background/aim

B-cell depletion with rituximab (RTX) is widely used as a rescue therapy in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aim herein was to analyze the progress of disease-related outcomes after RTX therapy in severe SSc patients.

Materials and methods

Included in this study were 27 SSc patients who were followed-up between 2012 and 2020 and received at least 1 cycle of RTX for active disease, despite receiving standard immunosuppressives (ISs). In addition to the European Scleroderma Study Group and European Scleroderma Trials and Research Group activity scores, Medsger's severity, and the recently developed Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Damage Index values were evaluated initially and at 1 year after the first infusion. The progress of individual organ damage was also assessed at the end of the follow-up period (at least 6 months after the last infusion) using the data extracted from the medical records.

Results

Disease activity and severity-improved and disease-related overall damage worsened after the first year of RTX therapy (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, and p = 0.005). Some of the disease-related organ damage had improved at the end of the follow-up period, indicating its reversibility. Overall damage scores ≥11 after the first year of RTX therapy were found to be associated with mortality (p = 0.035).

Conclusion

RTX contributed to reducing the activity and severity in SSc patients with severe disease, nonetheless the efficacy related to the damage was limited. High damage scores in the first year were found to be associated with mortality. Spontaneous progress of manifestations requiring a longer period to improve and irregular consecutive RTX courses might lead to difficulties in differentiation between activity and damage.

Impact of Innovative Treatment Using Biological Drugs for the Modulation of Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

Scleroderma or systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease affecting the connective tissue, characterized by fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. There is currently no curative treatment available, so therapeutic action is aimed at a symptomatic treatment of the affected organs. The development of biotechnology has made it possible to implement certain biological drugs that could represent a window of opportunity to modulate the evolution and symptomatology of scleroderma with greater efficacy and less toxicity than conventional treatments. This study aimed to review the current evidence critically and systematically on the effects of biological drugs on the pulmonary function, skin disease, and health status of patients afflicted by diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). Three electronic databases (Pubmed, Dialnet, and Cochrane Library Plus) were systematically searched until the cut-off date of October 2022. The review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and included original articles in English and Spanish with a controlled trial design, comparing biological drug treatments (tocilizumab, belimumab, riociguat, abatacept, and romilkimab) with a control group. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the McMaster quantitative form and the PEDro scale. A total of 383 studies were identified, 6 of them met the established criteria and were included in the present systematic review. A total of 426 patients treated with tocilizumab, belimumab, riociguat, abatacept, and romilkimab were included. The results showed substantial non-significant (p < 0.05) improvement trends after treatment with the biological drugs included in this review for the modified Rodnan Scale Value, Forced Vital Capacity, and Carbon Monoxide Diffusion Test; however, no benefits were shown on the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index when compared to the control group. Biological drugs, therefore, maybe a new therapeutic strategy for dcSSc and could be recommended as an additional and/or adjunctive treatment that promotes anti-fibrotic activity. This review could further define the clinical rationale for the use of biologics in the treatment of dcSSc and could provide key details on the study protocol, design, and outcome reporting.

Pharmacological treatment for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung involvement: Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most important pulmonary manifestation of connective tissue diseases (CTDs) since it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, there is uncertainty on what constitutes the optimal treatment options from a variety of competing interventions. The aim of the overview is to summarize existing evidence of the effectiveness and harm of pharmacological therapies for adults with CTD-ILD.

METHODS

A literature search will be conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DARE, the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Health Technology Assessment database, Epistemonikos.org, KSR Evidence, and PROSPERO. We will search for systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis that examine pharmacological treatment for CTD-ILD. Updated supplemental search will also be undertaken to identify additional randomized controlled trials. The primary outcomes will be changes in lung function measures and adverse events. The methodological quality of the included reviews will be assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool. The overall quality of the evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE rating. Summarized outcome data extracted from systematic reviews will be described in narrative form or in tables. For each meta-analysis we will estimate the summary effect size by use of random-effects and fixed-effects models with 95% confidence intervals, the between-study heterogeneity expressed by I², and the 95% prediction interval. If feasible, given sufficient data, network meta-analysis will be conducted to combine direct and indirect evidence of class and agent comparisons.

DISCUSSION

While many factors are crucial in selecting an appropriate treatment for patients with CTD-ILD, evidence for the efficacy and safety of a drug is essential in guiding this decision. Thus, this overview will aid clinicians in balancing the risks versus benefits of the available therapies by providing high-quality evidence to support informed decision-making and may contribute to future guideline development.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

MedRxiv: DOI 10.1101/2022.01.25.22269807 PROSPERO: CRD42022303180.

Additional points to consider before incorporating the Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

We congratulate the authors for the excellent review, not only restricted to recently approved therapies, on the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) (1). However, it is our opinion that some aspects that currently affect our medical practice merit further commentary. The pandemic of COVID-19 has generated unique challenges in the therapy of SSc-ILD, especially impacting the decision to start treatment. While there is no evidence suggesting that cyclophosphamide or rituximab can reduce mortality in SSc-ILD (2), these drugs have been associated with higher incidence of serious outcomes and mortality in COVID-19 patients (3, 4).

The safety of nintedanib for the treatment of interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction

Nintedanib can inhibit processes involved in the progression of fibrosis and can reduce the decline in forced vital capacity in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and fibrotic-interstitial lung disease (fibrotic-ILDs). Although the adverse events associated with nintedanib in IPF patients are well known, its safety in other fibrotic-ILD patients remained unclear.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and Cochrane CDSR for randomized controlled studies which compared nintedanib with a placebo in ILD patients. We estimated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for adverse events using the DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model.

Results

Six studies with a total of 2,583 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimates showed that patients treated with nintedanib had a significantly higher likelihood of having any adverse events (OR = 2.39; 95% CI = 1.71–3.36) or adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (OR = 1.73; 95% CI = 1.34–2.25). However, they had trend to lower likelihood of having fatal adverse events (OR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.41–1.14) compared with the placebo group. Use of nintedanib was positively associated with diarrhea (OR = 5.96; 95% CI = 4.35–8.16), nausea (OR = 3.00; 95% CI = 1.93–4.66), vomiting (OR = 3.22; 95% CI = 2.17–4.76) and weight loss (OR = 3.38; 95% CI = 1.1.76–6.47). Whereas, patients treated with nintedanib were less likely to have a cough (OR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.56–0.96) and dyspnea (OR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.53–0.94).

Conclusions

Compared to a placebo, nintedanib was associated with a higher risk of adverse events, especially for diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and weight loss, but it was also associated with a lower risk of cough and dyspnea in IPF and fibrotic-ILD patients.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation restores the suppressive capacity of regulatory B cells in systemic sclerosis patients

OBJECTIVES

The rationale of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for autoimmune diseases is that high-dose immunosuppression eradicates autoreactive T and B cells, and the infused autologous hematopoietic stem cells promote reconstitution of a naive and self-tolerant immune system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reconstitution of different B cell subsets, both quantitatively and functionally, in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients treated with AHSCT.

METHODS

Peripheral blood was harvested from twenty-two SSc patients before transplantation and at 30, 60, 120, 180 and 360 days post-AHSCT. Immunophenotyping of B cell subsets, B cell cytokine production, signaling pathways, and suppressive capacity of regulatory B cells (Bregs) were assessed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Naïve B cell frequencies increased from 60 to 360 days post-AHSCT, compared to pre-transplantation. Conversely, memory B cell frequencies decreased during the same period. Plasma cell frequencies transiently decreased at 60 days post-AHSCT. IL-10-producing Bregs CD19+CD24hiCD38hi and CD19+CD24hiCD27+ frequencies increased at 180 days. Moreover, the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38MAPK proteins increased in B cells reconstituted post-AHSCT. Notably, CD19+CD24hiCD38hi Bregs recovered their ability to suppress production of Th1 cytokines by CD4+ T cells at 360 days post-AHSCT. Finally, IL-6 and TGF-β1-producing B cells decreased following AHSCT.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, these results suggest improvements in immunoregulatory and anti-fibrotic mechanisms after AHSCT for SSc, which may contribute to reestablishment of self-tolerance and clinical remission.

Current therapeutic strategies in connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease: introduction to the special issue

This Editorial introduces the Special Issue on the efficacy and safety of current treatment strategies for patients with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease, including the use of immunosuppressants, such as cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab, and antifibrotic drugs.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of rheumatic disease-related interstitial lung disease: a narrative review

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an antimetabolite with a potent inhibitory effect on proliferation of T and B lymphocytes used since the early 1990s for the prevention of acute allograft rejection after organ transplant. MMF is also widely used for the treatment of a variety of rheumatic diseases (RDs) and their pulmonary involvement. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a heterogeneous group of progressive fibrotic diseases of the lung, which is often secondary to RD and represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality. MMF is considered the main alternative to cyclophosphamide as a first-line agent to treat RD-related ILD or as possible maintenance therapy after cyclophosphamide, with a lower rate of side-effects. However, as for other immunosuppressive agents, the use of MMF in RD-ILD is supported by poor scientific evidence. In this narrative review, we describe the available data and recent advances on the effectiveness and safety of MMF for the treatment of ILD related to RD, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, primary Sjögren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, undifferentiated connective tissue disease, interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in the treatment of connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) represents a severe pulmonary complication of connective tissue diseases, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Treatment of ILD, mainly based on immunosuppression, remains challenging. Rituximab (RTX), a monoclonal antibody binding to CD20, is considered a valuable therapeutic choice in cases of refractory ILD. Here, we review the available efficacy and safety data on the use of RTX in the treatment of rheumatic disease-related ILD. Despite controversial efficacy data, RTX seems to be able to stabilize or improve ILD related to RA and antisynthetase syndrome and in established and severe ILD complicating systemic sclerosis. Fewer data are available regarding ILD related to Sjögren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. To date, few prospective studies are available and randomized trials are still ongoing with the purpose of exploring the role of RTX in this condition, including the supposed relationship between efficacy and ILD radiologic patterns and safety data, up to now derived mainly from RA studies. Despite an overall acceptable safety profile, concerns remain regarding an increased infectious disease risk in patients with ILD as well as possible lung toxicity and the increased rate of immune-mediated reactions in patients with connective tissue diseases. In conclusion, RTX is a relevant therapeutic option for rheumatic disease-related ILD despite the existing uncertainties; ongoing trials are expected to clarify its use.

Antifibrotic drugs in connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD): from mechanistic insights to therapeutic applications

Fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs), which include systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome, idiopathic inflammatory myositis and systemic lupus erythematosus. The treatment of CTD-ILDs is challenging due to the paucity of proven effective treatments. Recently, two antifibrotic drugs conditionally approved for use in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, nintedanib and pirfenidone, have been trialled in CTD-ILDs based on overlapping pathological and clinical features between the two diseases. In this narrative review, we discuss the experimental evidence and clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of antifibrotic drugs in patients with CTD-ILDs and the potential mechanisms of action involved. Results from clinical trials suggest that nintedanib use retards lung function decline in progressive fibrotic CTD-ILDs. By contrast, the evidence for the efficacy of pirfenidone in these groups is not equally compelling. Further, well-designed randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of individual antifibrotic drugs in specific CTD-ILD subgroups.