The Impact of Spinopelvic Mobility on Arthroplasty: Implications for Hip and Spine Surgeons

Mobility of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex (spinopelvic mobility) and sagittal spinal alignment - implications for surgeons performing hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The optimal positioning of the hip prosthesis components is influenced by the mobility and balance of the spine. The present study classifies patients with pathology of the spino-pelvic-hip complex, showing possible methods of preventing hip dislocations after arthroplasty.

HYPOTHESIS

Hip-Spine Classification helps arthroplasty surgeons to implant components in more patient-specific position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The group of 100 patients treated with total hip arthroplasty. Antero-posterior (AP) X-rays of the pelvis in a standing position, lateral spine (standing and sitting) and AP of the pelvis (supine after the procedure) were analyzed. We analyzed a change in sacral tilt value when changing from standing to sitting (∆SS), Pelvic Incidence (PI), Lumbar Lordosis (LL) Mismatch, sagittal lumbar pelvic balance (standing position). Patients were classified according to the Hip-Spine Classification. Postoperatively, the inclination and anteversion of the implanted acetabular component were measured.

RESULTS

In our study 1 A was diagnosed in 61% of all cases, 1B in 18%, 2 A in 16%, 2B in 5%. 50 out of 61 (82%) in group 1 A were placed within the Levinnek "safe zone". In 1B, 2 A, 2B, the position of the acetabular component was influenced by both the spinopelvic mobility and sagittal spinal balance. The mean inclination was 43.35° and the anteversion was 17.4°.

CONCLUSIONS

Categorizing patients according to Hip-Spine Classification one can identify possible consequences the patients at risk. Pathology of the spino-pelvic-hipcomplex can lead to destabilization or dislocation of hip after surgery even though implanted according to Lewinnek's indications. Our findings suggest that Lewinnek safe zone should be abandoned in favor of the concept of functional safe zones.

Effect of spinal fusion on joint space narrowing of the hip: comparison among non-fusion, short fusion, and middle or long fusion

BACKGROUND

Lumbar fusion corrects spinal deformities and improves spinal complications. Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is strongly correlated with spinal mobility, and joint space narrowing of the hip after spinal fusion has gained attention. This study aimed to elucidate the effect of spinal fusion on hip joint space narrowing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined 530 hips of 270 patients who underwent spinal surgery. All the patients underwent whole-spine radiography before and at the final follow-up. Patients were divided into three groups (N group: non-spinal fusion, S group: up to three interbody fusions, and L group: more than four interbody fusions). The rates of joint space narrowing, spinal parameters (sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence), and limb length discrepancy at the final follow-up were compared. A multilinear regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for the rate of joint space narrowing.

RESULTS

The rate of joint space narrowing was significantly higher in the L group than in the N and S groups (P < 0.001). No significant difference in the rate of joint space narrowing was observed between the N and S groups. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the number of fusion levels (p < 0.05) and follow-up period (p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for joint space narrowing. Spinal parameters at the final follow-up were not independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Long spinal fusion (more than four levels) led to significantly greater joint space narrowing of the hip than short (up to three levels) or no fusion. Spinal alignment did not affect joint space narrowing of the hip. Surgeons should be aware that more than four interbody fusions may result in worse joint space narrowing of the hip.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

A review of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful surgical method for hip replacement but still poses challenges and risks. Robotic-assisted THA (rTHA) using new generation robotic systems has emerged to improve surgical precision and outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on rTHA, with a focus on its advantages, such as individualized preoperative planning, intraoperative assistance, and improved accuracy in implantation, especially in complex cases. Additionally, it aims to explore the disadvantages associated with the use of rTHA, including high costs, the learning curve, and prolonged operation time compared to manual THA (mTHA), which are critical drawbacks that require careful consideration and efforts for minimization. Some financial analyses suggest that rTHA may offer cost-effectiveness and reduced postoperative costs compared to mTHA. While technological advancements are expected to reduce technical complications, there are still debates surrounding long-term outcomes. Practical limitations, such as limited availability and accessibility, also warrant attention. Although the development of rTHA shows promise, it is still in its early stages, necessitating critical evaluation and further research to ensure optimal patient benefits.

The Sacro-femoral-pubic Angle Is Unreliable to Estimate Pelvic Tilt: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The accurate measurement of pelvic tilt is critical in hip and spine surgery. A sagittal pelvic radiograph is most often used to measure pelvic tilt, but this radiograph is not always routinely obtained and does not always allow the measurement of pelvic tilt because of problems with image quality or patient characteristics (such as high BMI or the presence of a spinal deformity). Although a number of recent studies have explored the correlation between pelvic tilt and the sacro-femoral-pubic angle using AP radiographs (SFP method), which aimed to estimate pelvic tilt without a sagittal radiograph, disagreement remains about whether the SFP method is sufficiently valid and reproducible for clinical use.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the correlation between SFP and pelvic tilt in the following groups: (1) overall cohort, (2) male and female cohort, and (3) skeletally mature and immature cohorts (young and adult groups, defined as patients older or younger than 20 years). Additionally, we assessed (4) the errors of SFP-estimated pelvic tilt angles and determined (5) measurement reproducibility using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (record ID: CRD42022315673). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were screened in July 2022. The following keywords were used: sacral femoral pubic, sacro femoral pubic, or SFP. The exclusion criteria were nonresearch articles such as commentaries or letters and studies that only investigated relative pelvic tilt rather than absolute pelvic tilt. Although the included studies had different patient recruitment strategies, study quality-wise, they all used an adequate amount of radiographs for landmark annotation and applied a correlation analysis for the relationship between the SFP angle and pelvic tilt. Thus, no risk of bias was found. Participant differences were mitigated via subgroup and sensitivity analyses to remove outliers. Publication bias was assessed using the p value of a two-tailed Egger regression test for the asymmetry of funnel plots, as well as the Duval and Tweedie trim and fill method for potential missing publications to impute true correlations. The extracted correlation coefficients r were pooled using the Fisher Z transformation with a significance level of 0.05. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, totaling 1247 patients. Four studies were used in the sex-controlled subgroup analysis (312 male and 460 female patients), and all nine studies were included in the age-controlled subgroup analysis (627 adults and 620 young patients). Moreover, a sex-controlled subgroup analysis was conducted in two studies with only young cohorts (190 young male patients and 220 young female patients).

RESULTS

The overall pooled correlation coefficient between SFP and pelvic tilt was 0.61, with high interstudy heterogeneity (I 2 = 76%); a correlation coefficient of 0.61 is too low for most clinical applications. The subgroup analysis showed that the female group had a higher correlation coefficient than the male group did (0.72 versus 0.65; p = 0.03), and the adult group had a higher correlation coefficient than the young group (0.70 versus 0.56; p < 0.01). Three studies reported erroneous information about the measured pelvic tilt and calculated pelvic tilt from the SFP angle. The mean absolute error was 4.6° ± 4.5°; in one study, 78% of patients (39 of 50) were within 5° of error, and in another study, the median absolute error was 5.8º, with the highest error at 28.8° (50 female Asian patients). The intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.87 and 0.97 for the SFP angle and between 0.89 and 0.92 for the pelvic tilt angle, and the interrater intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.84 and 1.00 for the SFP angle and 0.76 and 0.98 for the pelvic tilt angle. However, large confidence intervals were identified, suggesting considerable uncertainty in measurement at the individual radiograph level.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis of the best-available evidence on this topic found the SFP method to be unreliable to extrapolate sagittal pelvic tilt in any patient group, and it was especially unreliable in the young male group (defined as patients younger than age 20 years). Correlation coefficients generally were too low for clinical use, but we remind readers that even a high correlation coefficient does not alone justify clinical application of a metric such as this, unless further subgroup analyses find low error and low heterogeneity, which was not the case here. Further ethnicity-segregated subgroup analyses with age, sex, and diagnosis controls could be useful in the future to determine whether there are some subgroups in which the SFP method is useful.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Management of Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement with Concurrent Disorders of Spinopelvic Anatomy: A Narrative Review

Despite the high success rate of primary total hip replacement (THR), a significant early revision rate remains, which is largely attributed to instability and dislocations. Despite the implants being placed according to the safe zone philosophy of Lewinnek, occurrence of THR dislocation is not an uncommon complication. Large diagnostic and computational model studies have shown variability in patients' mobility based on the individual anatomic and functional relationship of the hip-pelvis-spine complex. The absolute and relative position of hip replacement components changes throughout motion of the patient's body. In the case of spinopelvic pathology such as spine stiffness, the system reaches abnormal positional states, as shown with computerized models. The clinical result of such pathologic hip positioning is edge loading, implant impingement, or even joint dislocation. To prevent such complications, surgeons must change the dogma of single correct implant positioning and take into account patients' individualized anatomy and function. It is essential to broaden the standard diagnostics and their anatomical interpretation, and correct the pre-operative surgical planning. The need for correct and personalized implant placement pushes forward the development and adaptation of novel technologies in THR, such as robotics. In this current concepts narrative review, we simplify the spinopelvic biomechanics and pathoanatomy, the relevant anatomical terminology, and the diagnosis and management algorithms most commonly used today.

Impact of previous lumbar spine surgery on total hip arthroplasty and vice versa: How long should we be concerned about mechanical failure?

INTRODUCTION

This registry study aims to assess the prevalence and demographic characteristics of patients with lumbar spine (LS) surgical procedures who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA), to compare the long-term survival and causes of failure of THA in patients who previously underwent LS fusion and non-fusion surgical procedures, and to evaluate the risk of undergoing a revision LS surgery after THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent LS surgery followed by THA were identified by cross-referencing data from the Orthopedic Prosthetic Implants Registry and the Regional Hospital Discharge Database. Three groups of THA patients were identified: patients who underwent previous lumbar surgery with fusion (LS fusion-THA), without fusion (LS non-fusion-THA), and a control group with only THA (No LS surgery-THA). Demographic data, THA survival, number and causes of failure, and data on revision procedures on THA and LS were collected.

RESULTS

Of the total of 79,984 THA, 2.2% of patients had a history of LS procedures. THA only patients showed better results, while patients in the LS fusion-THA group had worse implant survival at 5-year follow-up. In the LS fusion-THA and LS non-fusion-THA, mechanical THA failures were more frequent in the first two years after implantation. There were no differences between groups regarding the risk of undergoing LS revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

LS surgery negatively affects THA survivorship. In patients who previously underwent LS fusion and non-fusion surgical procedures, most THA failure occurs in the first two years after implant. The study contributes to the understanding of the relationship between the hip and the LS and provides useful guidance for clinical practice.

An Analysis of the Preoperative Factors, Spinopelvic Mobility and Sagittal Spinal Alignment in Pre-THA Patients

Hip arthroplasty is a very effective medical procedure. The optimal positioning of the components and the functioning of the endoprosthesis are influenced, among other things, by the mobility and balance of the spine. The aim of the study was to analyze the factors influencing the mobility of the lumbar-pelvic-iliac complex (spinopelvic mobility) together with the assessment of sagittal spinal alignment in patients prior to THA (total hip arthroplasty). Patients who underwent hip replacement surgery due to advanced osteoarthritis of the hip were enrolled in the study (n = 103). The sociodemographic characteristics, BMI, radiological advancement of the degenerative disease, quality of life, and range of joint mobility were completed using a proprietary questionnaire, the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, and a clinical examination. X-ray images were analyzed: AP of the pelvis standing up, lateral of the spine standing and sitting. Key parameters were measured as ∆SS-change in sacrum angle value when changing from standing to sitting position and pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch-sagittal lumbar pelvic balance measured in standing position. The patients were assigned to the appropriate groups according to the Hip-Spine Classification: normal group: 1A (n = 65; 63.1%), abnormal groups: 1B (n = 17; 16.5%), 2A (n = 16; 15.5%), 2B (n = 5; 4.9%). A correlation was shown between the abnormal groups and the individual components of PROMs in the scope of the self-service and normal activities categories (EQ-5D and EQ-VAS). However, the strength of the relationship turned out to be moderate, and the remaining components of the survey were statistically insignificant. The remaining factors analyzed, i.e., age, BMI, the range of hip motion, the presence of contracture in the joint in a clinical examination, and the radiological advancement of osteoarthritis on the Tonnis scale, do not predict abnormal relationships between the spine and the pelvis in our patients waiting for THA. Therefore, further investigations are needed to evaluate the correlation between preoperative factors and the lumbar-pelvic-iliac complex in patients prior to planned hip arthroplasty.

An Analysis of Radiographic Leg Length Discrepancy and Hip Offset in Patients at Risk of Developing Osteoarthritis

Background

Leg length and hip offset are important principles in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients may endorse leg length differences (LLD) postoperatively that may be anatomical or functional. The objective of this study was to determine the normal radiographic variation in leg length and hip offset in a preosteoarthritic population without a THA.

Methods

A retrospective study was completed using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, a prospective longitudinal study. Patients at risk of developing or with early osteoarthritis without inflammatory arthritis or prior THA were included. Measurements were made from full limb length anterior-posterior (AP) radiographs. Multiple linear regression models were employed to predict side-to-side differences in LLD, Δ femoral offset (FO), Δ abductor muscle length (AML), Δ abductor lever arm, and Δ AP pelvic offset.

Results

The mean radiographic LLD was 4.6 mm, with 12 mm within 1 standard deviation. No significant differences were detected between LLD and sex, age, body mass index, or height. The median radiographic differences in FO, AML, abductor lever arm, and AP pelvic offset were 3.2 mm, 4.8 mm, 3.6 mm, and 3.3 mm, respectively. Height was predictive of Δ FO, while both height and age were predictive of Δ AML.

Conclusions

Radiographic leg length variations in a population without symptomatic or radiographic osteoarthritis exist. FO and AML are dependent on patient characteristics. Preoperative radiographic LLD is not predicted by age, gender, body mass index, or height. It should be stressed that anatomic reconstruction is one of the many goals of arthroplasty and can stand in conflict with the priority and primary goals of stability and fixation, which should be prioritized.

Creating Consensus in the Definition of Spinopelvic Mobility

INTRODUCTION

The term "spinopelvic mobility" is most often applied to motion within the spinopelvic segment. It has also been used to describe changes in pelvic tilt between various functional positions, which is influenced by motion at the hip, knee, ankle and spinopelvic segment. In the interest of establishing a consistent language for spinopelvic mobility, we sought to clarify and simplify its definition to create consensus, improve communication, and increase consistency with research into the hip-spine relationship.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the Medline (PubMed) library to identify all existing articles pertaining to spinopelvic mobility. We reported on the varying definitions of spinopelvic mobility including how different radiographic imaging techniques are used to define mobility.

RESULTS

The search term "spinopelvic mobility" returned a total of 72 articles. The frequency and context for the varying definitions of mobility were reported. 41 papers used standing and upright relaxed-seated radiographs without the use of extreme positioning, and 17 papers discussed the use of extreme positioning to define spinopelvic mobility.

DISCUSSION

Our review suggests that the definitions of spinopelvic mobility is not consistent in the majority of published literature. We suggest descriptions of spinopelvic mobility independently consider spinal motion, hip motion, and pelvic position, while recognizing and describing their interdependence.

Evolution of Concepts: Can Personalized Hip Arthroplasty Improve Joint Stability?

Hip arthroplasty procedures are successful and reproducible. However, within the first two post-operative years, hip dislocations are the most common cause for revisions. This is despite the majority of the dislocations having the acetabular component within what is described as the 'safe zone'. The limitations of such boundaries do not take into account the variability of individual hip anatomy and functional pelvic orientation that exist. An alternative concept to address hip instability and improve overall outcomes is functional acetabular orientation. In this review article, we discuss the evolution of concepts, particularly the kinematic alignment technique for hip arthroplasty and the use of large-diameter heads to understand why total hip arthroplasty dislocations occur and how to prevent them.

"Does order of operation matter in patients who have concomitant hip and spine pathology?"

INTRODUCTION

In patients who have coexisting lumbar spine and degenerative hip disease, there remains uncertainty regarding whether hip or spine surgery should be performed first. We hypothesized that undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) would protect against subsequent lumbar spine surgery (LSS) in patients who have 'hip-spine syndrome.'

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed from 2013 to 2021 on patients who had radiographically-confirmed hip osteoarthritis and degenerative lumbar spine pathology, evaluated separately in spine and arthroplasty clinics prior to surgical intervention. Included patients ultimately underwent THA and/or LSS. The primary outcome was survivorship free of LSS or THA after the other was initially performed.

RESULTS

Of 256 patients, 206 (80.5%) underwent THA first. Only 14 of 206 (6.8%) who underwent THA required subsequent LSS, while 31 of 50 (62%) who underwent LSS required subsequent THA, (P<0.001). At 5 years, there was 93.9% survivorship-free of LSS in the THA first group, compared to 44.7% survivorship-free of subsequent THA in the LSS group. Multivariate analyses showed that patients who had THA first had lower odds of undergoing subsequent surgery (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.61, Confidence Interval (CI): 0.52-0.70, P<0.001) compared to those who underwent LSS first. Additionally, those who have higher initial Kellgren Lawrence (KL) grade hip osteoarthritis had lower odds (OR:0.94,CI:0.89-0.99, P=0.04), and those who have progressive neurologic deficits (OR:2.64, CI:1.89-3.7, P<0.001) and neurogenic claudication (OR:1.15, CI:1.06-1.24, P=0.001) had increased odds of undergoing subsequent LSS.

CONCLUSION

'Hip-spine syndrome' patients may receive more initial benefit from undergoing THA, potentially reducing the subsequent need for LSS. The exceptions were those patients who had lower-severity hip osteoarthritis and symptoms of major spinal stenosis.

Functional safe zone for THA considering the patient-specific pelvic tilts: An ultrasound-based approach

The usual Lewinnek orientation for cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty is not suitable for all patients as it does not consider the patient mobility. We propose an ultrasound-based approach to compute a Functional Safe Zone (FSZ) considering daily positions. Our goal was to validate it, and to evaluate how the input parameters impact the FSZ size and barycentre. The accuracy of the FSZ was first assessed by comparing the FSZ computed by the proposed approach and the true FSZ determined by 3D modelling. Then, the input parameters' impact on the FSZ was studied using a principal component analysis. The FSZ was estimated with errors below 0.5° for mean anteversion, mean inclination, and at edges. The pelvic tilts and the neck orientation were found correlated to the FSZ mean orientation, and the target ROM and the prosthesis dimensions to the FSZ size. Integrated into the clinical workflow, this non-ionising approach can be used to easily determine an optimal patient-specific cup orientation minimising the risks of dislocation.

The Top Three Burning Questions in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for end-stage osteoarthritis is one of the most effective surgical treatments in medicine. Impressive outcomes have been well documented in the literature with patients gaining ambulation and recovery of hip joint function. Nevertheless, there are still debatable issues and controversies that the orthopedic community has not been able to provide a definitive answer for. This review is focused on the current three most debatable issues surrounding the THA procedure: (1) new cutting-edge technology, (2) spinopelvic mobility, and (3) fast-track protocols. The scope of the herein narrative review is to analyze the debatable issues surrounding the three aforementioned topics and conclude the best contemporary clinical approaches regarding each issue.

Association of age and spinopelvic function in patients receiving a total hip arthroplasty

Restricted spinopelvic mobility received attention as a contributing factor for total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability. However, it is still unknown, how the spinopelvic function is influenced by age. In identifying the patients at highest risk for altered spinopelvic mechanics the study aimed to determine the association of age on the individual segments of the spinopelvic complex and global spinal sagittal alignment in patients undergoing THA. 197 patients were included in the prospective observational study conducting biplanar stereoradiography (EOS) in standing and sitting position pre-and postoperatively. Two independent investigators assessed C7-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA), cervical lordosis (CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), anterior plane pelvic tilt (APPT), and pelvic femoral angle (PFA). Key segments of the spinopelvic complex are defined as lumbar flexibility (∆ LL = LL_standing - LL_sitting), pelvic mobility (∆ SS = SS_standing - SS_sitting) and hip motion (∆ PFA = PFA_standing - PFA_sitting). Pelvic mobility was further defined based on ∆ SS = SS_standing - SS_sitting as stiff (∆ SS < 10°), normal (∆ SS ≥ 10°-30°) and hypermobile (∆ SS > 30°). The patient collective was classified into three groups: (1) < 60 years (n = 56), (2) ≥ 60-79 years (n = 112) and (3) ≥ 80 years (n = 29). Lumbar flexibility (∆ LL) was decreased with increasing age between all groups (36.1° vs. 23.1° vs. 17.2°/p₁₊₂ < 0.000, p₂₊₃ = 0.020, p₁₊₃ < 0.000) postoperatively. Pelvic mobility (∆ SS) was decreased in the groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (21.0° and 17.9° vs. 27.8°/p₁₊₂ < 0.000, p₂₊₃ = 0.371, p₁₊₃ = 0.001). Pelvic retroversion in standing position (APPT) was higher in group 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (1.9° and - 0.5° vs 6.9°/p₁₊₂ < 0.000, p₂₊₃ = 0.330, p₁₊₃ < 0.000). Global sagittal spinal balance (C7-SVA) showed more imbalance in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (60.4 mm and 71.2 mm vs. 34.5 mm/p₁₊₂ < 0.000, p₂₊₃ = 0.376, p₁₊₃ < 0.000) postoperatively. The preoperative proportion of patients with stiff pelvic mobility in group 1 was distinctly lower than in group 3 (23.2% vs. 35.7%) and declined in group 1 to 1.8% compared to 20.7% in group 3 after THA. Changes after THA were reported for groups 1 and 2 representing spinopelvic complex key parameter lumbar flexibility (∆ LL), pelvic mobility (∆ SS) and hip motion (∆ PFA), but not for group 3. This is the first study to present age-adjusted normative values for spinopelvic mobility. The subgroups with increased age were identified as risk cohort for altered spinopelvic mechanics and enhanced sagittal spinal imbalance and limited capacity for improvement of mobility after THA. This valuable information serves to focus in the preoperative screening on the THA candidates with the highest risk for abnormal spinopelvic function.

Finger-Floor Distance Is Not a Valid Parameter for the Assessment of Lumbar Mobility

Low back pain (LBP) could be associated with a reduced lumbar mobility. For the evaluation of lumbar flexibility, parameters such as finger-floor distance (FFD) are historically established. However, the extent of the correlation of FFD to lumbar flexibility or other involved joint kinematics such as pelvic motion, as well as the influence of LBP, is not yet known. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional observation study with 523 participants included (167 with LBP > 12 weeks, 356 asymptomatic). LBP-participants were matched for sex, age, height, and body-mass-index with an asymptomatic control cohort, resulting in two cohorts with 120 participants each. The FFD in maximal trunk flexion was measured. The Epionics-SPINE measurement-system was used to evaluate the pelvic and lumbar Range-of-Flexion (RoF), and the correlation of FFD to pelvic- and lumbar-RoF was evaluated. In an asymptomatic sub-cohort of 12 participants, we examined the individual correlation of FFD to pelvic- and lumbar-RoF under gradual trunk flexion. Participants with LBP showed a significantly reduced pelvic-RoF (p < 0.001) and lumbar-RoF (p < 0.001) as well as an increased FFD (p < 0.001) compared to the asymptomatic control cohort. Asymptomatic participants exhibited a weak correlation of FFD to pelvic-RoF and lumbar-RoF (r < 0.500). LBP patients revealed a moderate correlation of FFD to pelvic-RoF (male: p < 0.001, r = -0.653, female: p < 0.001, r = -0.649) and sex-dependent to lumbar-RoF (male: p < 0.001, r = -0.604, female: p = 0.012, r = -0.256). In the sub-cohort of 12 participants, gradual trunk flexion showed a strong correlation of FFD to pelvic-RoF (p < 0.001, r = -0.895) but a moderate correlation to lumbar-RoF (p < 0.001, r = -0.602). The differences in FFD in an individual patient, assuming consistent hip function, may be attributed partially to the differences in lumbar flexibility. However, the absolute values of FFD do not qualify as a measure for lumbar mobility. Rather, using validated non-invasive measurement devices should be considered.

Pubic Symphysis to Sacrococcygeal Joint: A Poor Correlate to Other Spinopelvic Measurements

BACKGROUND

The hip-spine relationship is increasingly recognized as critical for optimizing stability following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, these measurements are not routinely obtained during THA workup. It has been suggested that insight can be gained from supine antero-posterior pelvis radiograph, measuring the distance from the superior border of the pubic symphysis to the sacro-coccygeal joint (PSCD). This study assessed the correlation between PSCD and lateral lumbar radiographic metrics in a cohort of preoperative THA patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 250 consecutive patients who underwent THA with preoperative supine antero-posterior pelvis and lateral lumbar radiographs. The mean age was 68 years (range, 42 to 89), 61% were women, and the mean body mass index was 30 kg/m² (range, 19 to 52). Two reviewers measured PSCD, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and lumbar lordosis (LL). Inter-observer reliability was calculated for all measurements, and correlation coefficients were calculated for PSCD with respect to PT, SS, PI, and LL.

RESULTS

Correlations between PSCD and lumbar radiographic metrics were all statistically significant, except for PI in men but graded as "weak" or "very weak" for men and women, respectively, as follows: PT = -0.30 (P < .01) and -0.46 (P < .01); SS = 0.27 (P < .01) and 0.22 (P < .01); PI = -0.04 (P = .70) and -0.19 (P = .02); and LL = 0.45 (P < .01) and 0.30 (P < .01). Inter-observer reliability was graded as "strong" for every metric.

CONCLUSION

The PSCD was weakly correlated with all evaluated lateral lumbar radiographic metrics in both sexes, despite strong inter-observer reliability. Therefore, PSCD cannot reliably serve as a proxy for evaluating the hip-spine relationship.

Functional implant positioning in total hip arthroplasty and the role of robotic-arm assistance

INTRODUCTION

Accurate implant positioning, tailored to the phenotype and unique biomechanics of each patient is the single most important objective in achieving stability in THA and maximise range of motion. The spine-pelvis-hip construct functions as a single unit adapting to postural changes. It is widely accepted in the literature that no universaltarget exists and variations in spinopelvic mobility mandate adjustments to the surgical plan; thus bringing to the fore the concept of personalised, functional component positioning.

METHODS

This manuscript aims to outline the challenges posed by spinopelvic imbalance and present a reproducible, stepwise approach to achieve functional-component positioning. We also present the one-year functional outcomes and Patient Reported Outcome Measures of a prospective cohort operated with this technique.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Robotic-arm assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty has facilitated enhanced planning based on the patient's phenotype and evidence suggests it results in more reproducible and accurate implant positioning. Preservation of offset, avoiding leg-length discrepancy, accurate restoration of the centre of rotation and accomplishing the combinedversion target are very important parameters in Total Hip Arthroplasty that affect post-operative implant longevity, patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes.

Dual-Mobility Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Dual-mobility cups (DMCs) were introduced in France more than 40 years ago and are increasingly used not only in hip revision but also primary hip arthroplasty. Due to a simulated large-head articulation and increased jumping distance, DMCs can contribute to a high range of motion in the hip joint and reduce the risk of instability. Numerous studies have reported low dislocation rates and high survival rates in the mid-term follow-up. Nevertheless, long-term data, especially on primary hip replacement, remain limited, and the effect of recent designs and material innovations is still unclear. Therefore, primary DMCs are mainly proposed in patients at high risk for dislocation (i.e. pelvitrochanteric insufficiency, compromised spinopelvic mobility, neuromuscular disorders, obesity and femoral neck fractures). Based on a review of recently published studies referring to these indications, the current study discusses the advantages and disadvantages of DMCs.

Does fusion length matter? Total hip arthroplasty dislocation after extension of lumbosacral fusion: a case report

CASE

Hip-spine syndrome is a complex challenge for orthopedic surgeons. We present a 60-year-old female with a history of spinal fusion and total hip arthroplasty. The patient underwent extension of the previous fusion with sacropelvic fixation, and 5 months later she presented with left posterior prosthetic hip dislocation which required sedation and closed reduction.

CONCLUSION

Even with no change in lumbar lordosis or pelvic tilt and adequate acetabular cup position, extension of the fusion construct may predispose patients to dislocation. This may be the result of an increased lever arm acting at the hip joint, thereby leading to instability.

Impact of lumbar fusion on spinopelvic sagittal alignment from standing to sitting position: which factor is associated with postoperative functional limitations due to lumbar stiffness?

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of lumbar fusion on spinopelvic sagittal alignment from standing to sitting position and the influencing factors of postoperative functional limitations due to lumbar stiffness.

METHODS

A total of 107 patients who undertook posterior lumbar interbody fusion were included. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (lumbosacral fusion; n = 43) and Group B (floating fusion; n = 64). Spinopelvic parameters in standing and sitting position including pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), fusion segment lordosis (FSL), upper residual lordosis (URL), lower residual lordosis (LRL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and T1 pelvic angle (TPA) were measured before and after lumbar fusion. The Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI) was used to assess functional limitations due to lumbar stiffness.

RESULTS

Accompanied by increased postoperative LSDI, the values of changes from standing to sitting (∆) were reduced in some parameters compared with the preoperative values. ∆PT and ∆SS significantly decreased in both two groups. In Group A, ∆LL significantly decreased with increased ∆URL. In Group B, ∆LL, ∆URL and ∆LRL showed no significant difference before and after surgery. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that age and ∆PT independently influenced the postoperative LSDI in Group A.

CONCLUSION

After lumbar fusion, changes of lumbopelvic sagittal parameters from standing to sitting would be restricted. Adjacent segment lordosis could partially compensate for this restriction. For patients with lumbosacral fusion, postoperative functional limitations due to lumbar stiffness were related to age and the postoperative ∆PT from standing to sitting.

Paraspinal musculature impairment is associated with spinopelvic and spinal malalignment in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The concept of sagittal spinal malalignment is well established in spinal surgery. However, the effect of musculature on its development has not been fully considered and the position of the pelvis is mostly seen as compensatory and not necessarily a possible cause of sagittal imbalance.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the influence of the posterior paraspinal muscles (PPM, erector spinae, and multifidus) and the psoas muscle on spinopelvic and spinal alignment.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion between 2014 and 2021 for degenerative conditions at a tertiary care center, with preoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 12 months prior the surgery and a preoperative whole spine radiograph were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

PPM and psoas muscle measurements including the cross-sectional area (CSA), the functional cross-sectional area (fCSA), the amount of intramuscular fat (FAT), and the percentage of fat infiltration (FI). Spinopelvic measurements including lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA).

METHODS

A T2-weighted MRI-based quantitative assessment of the CSA, the fCSA and the amount FAT was conducted, and FI was further calculated. The regions of interest included the psoas muscle and the PPM on both sides at the L4 level that were summarized and normalized by the patient's height (cm2/m2). LL, PT, SS, PI, and SVA were determined on standing lateral radiographs. Spearman correlation was used to calculate the crude relationship between spinopelvic and muscle parameters. Multiple linear regression models with age, sex, LL, PT, SS, and SVA set as independent variables were established to determine the association with spinal muscle outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients (53.3% female) were included in the final analysis with a median age of 65.6 years and a median BMI of 28.2 kg/m2. Significant positive correlations were observed between PT (ρ=0.327), SVA (ρ=0.256) and PI (ρ=0.202) and the FIPPM. Significant negative correlations were detected for the PT and the fCSAPPM (ρ=-0.202) and PT and the fCSAPsoas (ρ=-0.191). Furthermore, a negative correlation was seen for PI and SVA and FIPsoas. PT (β=0.187; p=.006), SVA (β=0.155; p=.035), age (β=0.468; p<.001) and sex (β=0.235; p<.001) significantly predict FIPPM (corrected R2=0.393) as independent variables.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the potential role of posterior paraspinal muscles and psoas muscle on pelvic retroversion and elucidated the relation to sagittal spinal malalignment. Although we cannot establish causality, we propose that increasing FIPPM, representing loss of muscular strength, may lead to increased pelvic retroversion and thus might be the initiating point for the development of the sagittal imbalance. These findings might challenge the well-known theory of increased pelvic retroversion being a compensatory mechanism for sagittal spinal balance. Thus, muscular weakness might be a factor involved in the development of sagittal spinal malalignment.

Robotics in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Current Concepts

This current concepts article reviews the literature pertaining to the use of robot-assisted systems in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The bulk of the literature is regarding the MAKO (currently the most used system worldwide) and the historic ROBODOC robotic systems. There is a paucity of literature available on other systems, with several still in pilot-phase development. Whilst the evidence shows improved radiological outcomes with robotic THA, functional outcomes are equivocal between conventional and robotic techniques. Acceptance of robotic THA worldwide is limited by its accessibility including cost, and by already exceptional results with the conventional technique. It is, however, a rapidly developing area of orthopaedic surgery. This article discusses the history of robotics in THA, current surgical techniques, functional and radiological outcomes, and ongoing avenues for development.

Relationship Between Sacroiliac Joint-related Pain and Spinopelvic Mobility

STUDY DESIGN

A case-control study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between sacroiliac joint-related pain (SIJ-RP) and spinopelvic mobility.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

No specific radiological findings are available for the diagnosis of SIJ-RP. A previous study reported that a higher pelvic incidence and sacral slope (SS) values were significantly associated with sacroiliac joint pain. The concept of spinopelvic mobility, which is evaluated by the differences between SS in the standing and sitting positions, has been the focus of hip and spine surgeries in recent years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The SIJ-RP group comprised patients diagnosed with SIJ-RP based on physical findings and their response to analgesic injections. No other lumbar or hip joint diseases were observed. The non-SIJ-RP group comprised patients with lower back pain for reasons other than SIJ-RP. Radiographs of the lateral view of the pelvis in the standing and sitting positions were evaluated for all patients. We compared and analyzed the backgrounds, SS in the two positions, and difference in SS between the two positions in both groups.

RESULTS

In total, 245 patients were included in the study, with 49 and 196 patients in the SIJ-RP and non-SIJ-RP groups, respectively. More female patients experienced SIJ-RP than male patients ( P =0.0361). There were significant differences between the groups for SS in standing ( P =0.0076), sitting ( P =0.0005), and those with a difference between sitting and standing of <5° ( P =0.0278) in the univariate analyses. Logistic regression analyses, after adjustment for age and sex, revealed significant differences between the groups with an SS difference <5° ( P =0.0088; 95% confidence interval, 1.280-5.519), with an odds ratio of 2.7.

CONCLUSION

On evaluating spinopelvic mobility, we found that SIJ-RP was related to hypomobility of the sacrum, which could indicate the hypermobility of the sacroiliac joint.

Does surgery change pelvic tilt? : an investigation in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip, dysplasia, and femoroacetabular impingement

AIMS

Pelvic tilt is believed to affect the symptomology of osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip by alterations in joint movement, dysplasia of the hip by modification of acetabular cover, and femoroacetabular impingement by influencing the impingement-free range of motion. While the apparent role of pelvic tilt in hip pathology has been reported, the exact effects of many forms of treatment on pelvic tilt are unknown. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of surgery on pelvic tilt in these three groups of patients.

METHODS

The demographic, radiological, and outcome data for all patients operated on by the senior author between October 2016 and January 2020 were identified from a prospective registry, and all those who underwent surgery with a primary diagnosis of OA, dysplasia, or femoroacetabular impingement were considered for inclusion. Pelvic tilt was assessed on anteroposterior (AP) standing radiographs using the pre- and postoperative pubic symphysis to sacroiliac joint (PS-SI) distance, and the outcomes were assessed with the Hip Outcome Score (HOS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and Harris Hip Score (HHS).

RESULTS

The linear regression model revealed a significant negative predictive association between the standing pre- and postoperative PS-SI distances for all three groups of patients (all p < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in all three outcome measures between the pre- and postoperative values (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is a statistically significant decrease in pelvic tilt after surgery in patients with OA of the hip, dysplasia, and femoroacetabular impingement. These results confirm that surgery significantly alters the pelvic orientation. Pelvic tilt significantly decreased after total hip arthroplasty, periacetabular osteotomy, and arthroscopy/surgical hip dislocation. The impact of surgery on pelvic tilt should be considered within the therapeutic plan in order to optimize pelvic orientation in these patients.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(9):1025-1031.

Effect of Coronal and Sagittal Spinal Malalignment on Spinopelvic Mobility in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement: A Prospective Observational Study

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

This investigation aimed (1) to determine the impact of sagittal spinal alignment with C7-sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and Roussouly classification on individual segments of spinopelvic mobility represented by lumbar flexibility [∆lumbar lordosis (LL)], pelvic mobility [∆pelvic tilt (PT)], and hip motion [∆pelvic femoral angle (PFA)] and (2) to assess the influence of coronal spinal balance on the spinopelvic complex in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) preoperatively and postoperatively.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Restricted spinopelvic mobility gained attention as a contributing factor for THA instability. However, it remains unclear what influence the coronal and sagittal spinal alignment has on spinopelvic mobility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 197 THA patients were included in the investigation conducting biplanar stereoradiography in standing and sitting position preoperatively and postoperatively. Two independent investigators assessed C7-SVA (≤50 mm balanced, >50 mm imbalanced), PI-LL (≤10 degrees balanced, >10 degrees imbalanced), refounded Roussouly classification, coronal spinal balance with C7-central sacral vertical line, LL, pelvic incidence (PI), PT, PFA. Individual segments of spinopelvic mobility based on the change from standing to sitting were defined as ∆LL, ∆PT, and ∆PFA. Unpaired t test or Welch t test for comparison between groups of 2 was applied. Analysis of variance and post hoc analysis according to Bonferroni or Games-Howell was used to determine differences between groups of >2. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the interrater reliability of the radiographic measurements.

RESULTS

Significant differences were demonstrated for ∆LL (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 24.7 degrees/19.1 degrees, P =0.001; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 24.4 degrees/16.4 degrees, P <0.000), PT (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 12.5 degrees/15.2 degrees, P =0.029; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 10.8 degrees/20.5 degrees, P <0.000), PI (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 52.9 degrees/56.9 degrees, P =0.001; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 52.1 degrees/61.0 degrees, P <0.000), LL (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 54.8 degrees/47.8 degrees, P =0.029; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 55.3 degrees/42.6 degrees, P <0.000). The coronal spinal balance (central sacral vertical line) indicated no significant differences regarding spinopelvic mobility between positive, neutral, or negative balanced groups. Significant differences with decreased pelvic mobility (∆PT) and lumbar flexibility (∆LL) in low-grade PI types 1 and 2 compared with high-grade PI type 4 according to the Roussouly classification were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to investigate spinal sagittal alignment using 3 different classifications in association to the spinopelvic complex in THA patients preoperatively and postoperatively. The significantly altered spinopelvic mechanics with decreased lumbar flexibility and increased pelvic retroversion in sagittal imbalanced patients clearly indicate the need for a separate consideration of the global spinal sagittal alignment. Our findings emphasize the importance of risk stratification for THA candidates in terms of sagittal imbalance attempting to mitigate the THA instability risk with accurate preoperative planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The direct anterior approach to the hip: a useful tool in experienced hands or just another approach?

The direct anterior approach (DAA) to the hip was initially described in the nineteenth century and has been used sporadically for total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, recent increased interest in tissue-sparing and small incision arthroplasty has given rise to a sharp increase in the utilization of the DAA. Although some previous studies claimed that this approach results in less muscle damage and pain as well as rapid recovery, a paucity in the literature exists to conclusively support these claims. While the DAA may be comparable to other THA approaches, no evidence to date shows improved long-term outcomes for patients compared to other surgical approaches for THA. However, the advent of new surgical instruments and tables designed specifically for use with the DAA has made the approach more feasible for surgeons. In addition, the capacity to utilize fluoroscopy intraoperatively for component positioning is a valuable asset to the approach and can be of particular benefit for surgeons during their learning curve. An understanding of its limitations and challenges is vital for the safe employment of this technique. This review summarizes the pearls and pitfalls of the DAA for THA in order to improve the understanding of this surgical technique for hip replacement surgeons.

[Lumbo-pelvino-acetabular alignment-basics and clinical consequences]

The spinal shape and the pelvic ante-/retroversion of an individual are determined by its innate, genetically fixed lumbosacral angulation. This can be measured with little effort in the lateral standing radiograph of the patient. In spinal surgery, there are a lot of original papers on the topic. In hip surgery, however, the individual pelvic version and its consequences for the acetabular orientation have not received the same attention so far.This review focuses on previous data on the relationship between lumbosacral angulation and pelvic ante-/retroversion. Four anatomically definable pelvic types can be distinguished; three of those have to be considered as facultatively pathogenetic. Clinical consequences arise for the clinical pictures of spondylolisthesis, non-specific lower back pain, acetabular retroversion and developmental dysplasia of the hip, as well as for acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.

SPINOPELVIC MOBILITY IN PATIENTS WITH HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS AND TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY INDICATION

ABSTRACT Introduction: Reduction of spinopelvic mobility is associated with an increased dislocation of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Objective: To assess 1) spinopelvic mobility in patients with primary hip osteoarthritis and THA indication and 2) the influence of hip flexion contracture on spinopelvic mobility. Methods: Thirty adult patients with primary hip osteoarthritis and THA indication were evaluated using radiographic parameters (pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar flexibility, and spinopelvic mobility). Results: Spinopelvic mobility ranged from 6.90 a 54.50° (mean 32.79 ± 11.42) and the group of patients with hip flexion contracture had higher mobility. Spinopelvic mobility was correlated with pelvic tilt as well as with lumbar flexibility. Conclusion: Around 13.4% of patients had spinopelvic mobility under 20° , indicating reduced spinopelvic mobility and risk of THA dislocation. Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

EFFECTS OF HIP FLEXION CONTRACTURE ON SAGITTAL SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS

Objective:

To assess the influence of hip flexion contracture on lumbar lordosis and spinopelvic parameters and the changes in these parameters after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods:

Twenty adult patients with hip osteoarthritis were divided into two groups (ten patients with hip flexion contracture and ten without contracture). Patients were assessed preoperatively and six months after THA using the radiographic parameters sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and pelvic tilt (PT).

Results:

No statistical difference was found between pre- and postoperative LL values in the groups. After THA, both groups had increased PT and the group without hip flexion contracture had reduced SS.

Conclusion:

Patients with hip osteoarthritis and hip flexion contracture tend to have an increased LL in the orthostatic position compared to patients without contracture, but with no statistical significance. After THA, PT increased in both groups and SS decreased in patients without hip contracture. Studies should further investigate the role of hip flexion contracture on pelvic mobility and spinopelvic parameters to better understand these relations. Level of Evidence III, Case-Control Study.

Automated assessment and classification of spine, hip, and knee pathologies from sit-to-stand movements collected in clinical practice

Efficient, cost-effective methods for quantifying patient biomechanics at the point of care can facilitate faster and more accurate diagnoses. This work presents a new method to diagnose pre-surgical back, hip, and knee patients by analysing their sit-to-stand motion captured by a Kinect camera. Kinematic and dynamic time-series features were extracted from patient movements collected in clinic. These features were used to test a variety of machine learning methods for patient classification. The performance of models trained on time-series features were compared against models trained on domain-knowledge features, highlighting the importance of using time-series data for the classification of human movement. Additionally, the effectiveness of using semi-supervised learning is tested on partially labelled datasets, providing insight on how to boost classification performance in situations where labelled patient data is difficult to obtain. The best semi-supervised model achieves ∼73% accuracy in distinguishing individuals with low-back pain, and hip and knee degeneration from control subjects.

Does obesity affect acetabular cup position, spinopelvic function and sagittal spinal alignment? A prospective investigation with standing and sitting assessment of primary hip arthroplasty patients

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability is influenced by acetabular component positioning, spinopelvic function and sagittal spinal alignment. Obesity is considered as a risk factor of THA instability, but the causal relationship remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the influence of BMI on (1) spinopelvic function (lumbar flexibility, pelvic mobility and hip motion), (2) sagittal spinal alignment pre- and postoperatively and (3) acetabular cup position postoperatively in primary THA patients in a prospective setting.

Methods

One hundred ninety patients receiving primary total hip arthroplasty were enrolled in a prospective cohort study and retrospectively analysed. All patients received stereoradiography (EOS) in standing and relaxed sitting position pre-and postoperatively. C7-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), anterior plane pelvic tilt (APPT), and pelvic femoral angle (PFA) were assessed. Key parameters of the spinopelvic function were defined as lumbar flexibility (∆ LL = LL_standing − LL_sitting), pelvic mobility (∆ PT = PT_standing − PT_sitting) and hip motion (∆ PFA = PFA_standing − PFA_sitting). Pelvic mobility was further defined based on ∆ PT as stiff, normal and hypermobile (∆ PT < 10°; 10°–30°; > 30°). The patients were stratified to BMI according to WHO definition: normal BMI ≥ 18.5–24.9 kg/m² (n = 68), overweight ≥ 25.0–29.9 kg/m² (n = 81) and obese ≥ 30–39.9 kg/m² (n = 41). Post-hoc analysis according to Hochberg's GT2 was applied to determine differences between BMI groups.

Results

Standing cup inclination was significant higher in the obese group compared to the normal BMI group (45.3° vs. 40.1°; p = 0.015) whereas standing cup anteversion was significantly decreased (22.0° vs. 25.3°; p = 0.011). There were no significant differences for spinopelvic function key parameter lumbar flexibility (∆ LL), pelvic mobility (∆ PT) and hip motion (∆ PFA) in relation to BMI stratified groups. The obese group demonstrated significant enhanced pelvic retroversion compared to the normal BMI group (APPT − 1.8° vs. 2.4°; p = 0.028). The preoperative proportion of stiff pelvic mobility was decreased in the obese group (12.2%) compared to normal (25.0%) and overweight (27.2%) groups. Spinal sagittal alignment in C7-SVA and PI-LL mismatch demonstrated significantly greater imbalance in the obese group compared to the normal BMI group (68.6 mm vs. 42.6 mm, p = 0.002 and 7.7° vs. 1.2°, p = 0.032, respectively) The proportion of patients with imbalanced C7-SVA was higher in the obese (58.5%) than in the normal BMI group (44.1%).

Conclusions

The significantly increased spinal sagittal imbalance with altered pelvic mechanics is a potential cause for the reported increased risk of THA dislocations in obese patients. Consequently, the increased spinal sagittal imbalance in combination with normal pelvic mobility need to be taken into account when performing THA in obese patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02716-8.

Importance of Hip-Spine Syndrome in Hip Arthroplasty: Influence on the Outcome and Therapeutic Consequences

Correct interaction between the spine, pelvis, and hip is an essential condition for successful progress after total hip replacement. Spinal pathologies, such as degeneration, fractures, and spinopelvic imbalance with and without lumbar fusions, are closely associated with an increased risk of impingement or even dislocation of the prosthesis. To significantly reduce this risk, various parameters are required to quantify the risk groups. Knowledge on the presence of stiffness of the spine (change in pelvic tilt between standing and sitting at < 10°) and sagittal spinal deformity (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch > 10° or 20°) is essential in identifying patients with corresponding risk. The individual risk profile can be assessed through a specific history and examination. Before total hip arthroplasty, a routine preoperative workup is recommended for high-risk patients: using information from standardised preoperative radiographs while sitting and standing (pelvis, anteroposterior view, lying and standing; spine and pelvis, lateral view, standing and sitting). Important changes can be made during the surgery. If the spine is stiff, attention should be paid to the position of the cup, with increased anteversion, sufficient offset, and larger head that is secure to dislocation - to reduce the risk of dislocation. In the case of a sagittal spinal deformity, the functional coronary pelvic level must be carefully controlled so that it is better to use double mobility cups. Digital systems, such as navigation and robotics, can optimise component positioning although, so far, there is little evidence that the complication rate decreased. Therefore, further studies are warranted.

The Value of the Direct Lateral Hip Radiograph in an Adult Reconstruction Practice

The specialty evaluation of hip pain, stiffness, and/or dysfunction usually includes patient history, physical examination, and radiographic evaluation. Radiographic views of the hip are not standardized, and basic studies may include an anteroposterior pelvis, anteroposterior hip, frog lateral, and direct lateral of the hip. In this article, we discuss the importance of obtaining a direct lateral radiograph of the hip in all patients being evaluated by a specialist for hip pain and its value in hip arthroplasty care.

Letter to the Editor concerning "Impact of spinal alignment and stiffness on impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a radiographic study of pre‑ and post‑operative spinopelvic alignment" by Hagiwara S, et al. (Eur Spine J. 2020; doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06589-z)

PURPOSE

Dislocation is one of the remaining challenges after total hip arthroplasty. The spinopelvic mobility is considered to be the key to solve this problem and is of interest both to arthroplasty and spine surgeons. The purpose of this letter is to discuss the spinopelvic mobility and spinal stiffness described in the paper titled "Impact of spinal alignment and stiffness on impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a radiographic study of pre‑ and post‑operative spinopelvic alignment." by Hagiwara S, et al. METHODS: Examining the consistency between this paper and previously published papers on spinopelvic mobility.

RESULTS

In this article, radiographic clearance of anterior impingement was defined as adding of femoral shaft angle and sacral slope (SS), and that of posterior impingement as adding SS and femoral shaft angle subtracting 90º in the sitting position. The impingement itself and other factors for dislocation including implant design, implant orientation, extra-prosthetic impingement and their mobilities are not considered in this parameter, and it is better if the validity of this parameter is shown. The term "rigid spine" and "spinal stiffness" are used in the manuscript. When THA candidates are evaluated, they are categorized according to the flexibility and/or sagittal balance. It would be better if the definition was described in the text and the clearance for impingement was shown to be affected by spinal stiffness.

CONCLUSION

The conclusions and titles are overstated from the results, but this paper is highly valuable in reminding spinal surgeons of the importance of spinopelvic alignment and mobility in THA.