Thromboprophylaxis for Hospitalized Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Are We There Yet?

Genetic risk stratification of inflammatory bowel disease-associated venous thromboembolism: An Asian perspective

The utilisation of polygenic scoring models may enhance the clinician's ability to risk stratify an inflammatory bowel disease patient's individual risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and guide the appropriate usage of VTE thromboprophylaxis, yet there is a need to validate such models in ethnically diverse populations.

Venous Thromboembolism Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases is Not Related to Increased Thrombophilia: A Case-Control Study

GOAL

The aim was to assess whether thrombophilia significantly contributes to the risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

BACKGROUND

Patients with IBD have a high risk of VTE. The underlying mechanism has been only partially defined.

METHODS

A case-control study in adults with IBD and an episode of VTE (IBD-VTE) were matched and compared with non-IBD patients with a VTE (non-IBD-VTE). The study population was comprised of patients seen in 2 tertiary medical centers in Israel between 2000 and 2013. Characteristics of IBD and risk factors for VTE were retrieved from medical charts, and a comprehensive thrombophilia panel was completed in all patients.

RESULTS

Forty-four IBD-VTE cases (27 Crohn's disease) were matched with 127 non-IBD-VTE controls. The majority of VTE had a clear etiology and were considered provoked events. Provoked and unprovoked VTE rates were not different between the 2 groups. Likewise, thrombophilia rates were similar among patients with IBD-VTE and controls (40.9% vs. 53.5%, respectively, P=0.14). However, among patients with unprovoked VTE, thrombophilia rates were significantly lower in the IBD-VTE group compared with controls (42.1% vs. 70.7%, respectively, P=0.03). Among patients with IBD-VTE, an unprovoked event, and negative thrombophilia, 77% had active inflammation at the time of VTE.

CONCLUSION

Thrombophilia rates are similar among patients with IBD-VTE and controls but are less common among patients with unprovoked IBD-VTE. This finding suggests that either inflammation or other novel pathways drive VTE in patients with IBD.

Bilateral Pulmonary Embolism in a Hospitalized Ulcerative Colitis Patient

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at higher risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), though physicians may be unaware of this risk or hesitant to start pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in the presence of active gastrointestinal bleeding. We report a case of a 38-year-old patient hospitalized with acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC) who was not placed on pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis and developed bilateral pulmonary embolism (PE). The patient's UC did not respond to medical therapy. Due to his PE, the patient’s total proctocolectomy was delayed six months. He also developed a large pelvic hematoma after colectomy requiring further surgical intervention. Hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients require pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis unless they have life-threatening bleeding.

Occurrence of Thromboembolism in Paediatric Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Data From the CEDATA-GPGE Registry

OBJECTIVE

Among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the risk of thromboembolism (TE) is increased, representing a relevant cause of morbidity and mortality. In contrast to other extraintestinal IBD manifestations, TE receives much less attention because of its low incidence, estimated at merely 0.4-0.9% in hospitalised children with IBD.

METHODS

Cases with TE, as documented in the German-Austrian Paediatric IBD registry gesellschaft für pädiatrische gastroenterologie und ernährung - large paediatric patient registry (CEDATA-GPGE), were analyzed retrospectively. For all patients with signs of TE, a questionnaire was filled in by the treating paediatric gastroenterologist.

RESULTS

Over 10 years, 4,153 paediatric patients with IBD (0-18 years) were registered in the registry, and 12 of them identified with TE. Eight patients were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC), three with Crohn's disease (CD), and one with IBD-unclassified. The median age at IBD diagnosis was 10 years and at the manifestation of TE 13 years, respectively, with a median latency to TE of 2 years. Prevalence of TE was 0.3%, with a significantly higher risk for patients with UC than CD (OR 5.9, CI 1.56-22.33, p = 0.008). More girls than boys were affected (f:m = 7:5) without reaching significance. Approximately 90% of patients experienced TE during active disease, with relevant cerebral and limb involvement in 6/12 patients. Various risk factors, e.g., hospitalisation, coagulopathy, or anaemia were identified. TE management included intensive care and surgery. Among the 12 patients, 11 recovered fully, in which one patient has focal epilepsy as a sequela.

CONCLUSION

Paediatric patients with IBD have a substantially increased risk for TE. Risk factors, such as those identified should be considered when managing paediatric IBD and preventive measures for those hospitalised taken routinely. Initiating pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is challenging for the lack of published trials on efficacy and safety in paediatric IBD but should be considered carefully in each case.