Comparison of 2-Year Outcomes between Intravitreal Ranibizumab and Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema with "Treat-and-Extend" Regimen-Its Usefulness and Problems

Aflibercept or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema

Background

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the primary substance involved in retinal barrier breach. VEGF overexpression may cause diabetic macular edema (DME). Laser photocoagulation of the macula is the standard treatment for DME; however, recently, intravitreal anti-VEGF injections have surpassed laser treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injections of aflibercept or ranibizumab for managing treatment-naive DME.

Methods

This single-center, retrospective, interventional, comparative study included eyes with visual impairment due to treatment-naive DME that underwent intravitreal injection of either aflibercept 2 mg/0.05 mL or ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05 mL at Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Egypt between March 2023 and January 2024. Demographic data and full ophthalmological examination results at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months post-injection were collected, including the best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) notation, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, dilated fundoscopy, and central subfield thickness (CST) measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Results

Overall, the 96 eyes of 96 patients with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 57 (10) (range: 20-74) years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:2.7 were allocated to one of two groups with comparable age, sex, diabetes mellitus duration, and presence of other comorbidities (all P >0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in baseline diabetic retinopathy status or DME type between groups (both P >0.05). In both groups, the median (IQR) BCDVA significantly improved from 0.7 (0.8) logMAR at baseline to 0.4 (0.1) logMAR at 6 months post-injection (both P = 0.001), with no statistically significant difference between groups at all follow-up visits (all P >0.05). The median (IQR) CST significantly decreased in the aflibercept group from 347 (166) µm at baseline to 180 (233) µm at 6 months post-injection, and it decreased in the ranibizumab group from 360 (180) µm at baseline to 190 (224) µm at 6 months post-injection (both P = 0.001), with no statistically significant differences between groups at all follow-up visits (all P >0.05). No serious adverse effects were documented in either group.

Conclusions

Ranibizumab and aflibercept were equally effective in achieving the desired anatomical and functional results in patients with treatment-naïve DME in short-term follow-up without significant differences in injection counts between both drugs. Larger prospective, randomized, double-blinded trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm our preliminary results.

Comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab and aflibercept for the treatment of diabetic macular edema: a real-world study

PURPOSE

To compare the visual and anatomic outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab versus aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in a real-world study.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective comparative study of treatment-naïve patients who received intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept administration for DME for at least 12 months on an as needed regimen following three-monthly loading doses. The primary outcomes of the study were the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and central macular volume (CMV). Factors to potentially affect these parameters were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 100 eyes (66 patients) were included in the study. Fifty two eyes received ranibizumab and 48 eyes in aflibercept injections. At the end of follow-up, the improvement in mean BCVA was similar in both groups (p = 0.38). While the decrease in mean CMT at the 4th-month visit was significantly higher in the aflibercept-treated group than in the ranibizumab-treated group (p = 0.02), there was no difference between the two groups at the end of the 1-year follow-up (p = 0.25). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of change in mean CMV during the follow-up (p = 0.26, p = 0.27 at 4 and 12 months, respectively). The mean number of injections were also similar between groups (4.5 ± 1 vs. 4.6 ± 1.1 respectively, p = 0.63).

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting, ranibizumab and aflibercept were both found to be effective in the first-line treatment of DME. Patients with DME who received fewer injections in the real-world could achieve visual and anatomical results comparable to randomized controlled trials participants.

Lost to follow-up of patients who received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy to treat four different retina disorders in an individual center in Brazil

Objectives

To identify risk factors for loss to follow-up in periodic intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections for the treatment patients with diabetic macular edema, subretinal neovascularization, age-related macular degeneration, and retinal vein occlusion in a single eye center in São Paulo, Brazil.

Methods

This was a retrospective longitudinal study that gathered information from 992 patients who required intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs over 6 months. The authors included age, eye disease, laterality, monthly income, distance, and payment mode as risk factors.

Results

Two hundred and seventy patients (29.93%) were lost to follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed age, monthly income, eye involvement, and type of medical assistance independently associated with loss to follow-up. The odds of loss to follow-up were greater among older patients than those less than 50 years (reference), p < 0.001. The odds of loss to follow-up were greater among patients who received unilateral treatment than those who received bilateral injections (p = 0.013). Concerning gross monthly income, there were no differences in the odds of the four salary strata; the data also indicate an absence of difference in the three strata of patients' distance to the clinic. Considering the diagnosis, only age-related macular degeneration showed greater odds of loss to follow-up (p = 0.016). Finally, the data suggest greater odds of loss to follow-up in private patients than in those on a health care plan (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Loss to follow-up is paramount because many patients may remain unassisted concerning their eye diseases. Identifying the risk factors is crucial to enforcing measures to increase adherence and the long-term success of the treatment.

One Year Results of Faricimab for Aflibercept-Resistant Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

To assess the 12 month outcomes of intravitreal faricimab (IVF) in treatment-resistant diabetic macular edema (DME) recalcitrant to intravitreal aflibercept (IVA).

Methods

This study was undertaken as a retrospective interventional case series of DME subjects receiving care at a single private practice facility. Subjects at baseline had undergone ≥8 IVA injections over the previous 12 months, ≥4 IVA injections over the previous 6 months, had an optical coherence tomography (OCT)-measured central macular thickness (CMT) of ≥320 microns, and had observable edema on OCT. The baseline visit for this study's purpose was considered the examination in which the subject was changed from IVA to IVF. Subjects were managed with a treat-and-extend (TAE) protocol and followed over 12 months from baseline.

Results

A total of 51 eyes of 51 subjects were analyzed. There were 39.2% (20/51) of patients who reached a treatment interval of ≥8 weeks and had a fluid-free macula on OCT at 12 months. The CMT on OCT of the patient population reduced from 400.2 (385.3-415.3) microns at baseline to 340.6 (324.3-356.9) microns at 12 months (p<0.01). There were 21.6% (11/51) of patients who improved ≥3 lines of Snellen visual acuity at 12 months. The visual acuity of the overall study population improved from 0.60 (0.54-0.66) logMAR (Snellen 20/80) at baseline to 0.47 (0.41-0.53) logMAR (Snellen 20/59) at 12 months (p<0.01).

Conclusion

A longer treatment interval and improved functional and anatomical outcomes at 12 months may be attained in a clinically significant minority of aflibercept-resistant DME patients after changing to IVF when a TAE protocol is employed. Specialists may consider IVF whenever resistance to IVA is experienced in this patient population.

Pro re nata Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Cycles of Three Injections of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report the visual and anatomic results at 12 and 24 months using the protocol of 3 monthly pro re nata (PRN) injections for diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of 97 eyes with DME treated with a protocol of cycles consisting of 3 monthly injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs on a PRN basis. Change in visual acuity was the main outcome measure. Macular thickness, number of injections, cycles, and visits in years 1 and 2 of follow-up were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients with a mean age of 60.9 ± 9.96 years were followed for a mean of 22.17 ± 12.30 months. Ninety-two (95.9%), 3 (3%), and 1 (1%) patients were started on bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept, respectively. Of bevacizumab patients, 17 (18.2%) were eventually switched to aflibercept. The mean 12-month improvement (standard deviation [SD]) was + 3.3 (17.4) letters (95% confidence interval [CI] = +0.36-+7.05, P < 0.001) after an average (SD) of 5.97 (2.98) injections over a mean (SD) of 1.7 (1.0) three-injection cycles. The mean 24-month improvement (SD) was + 5.6 (13.0) letters (95% CI: -0.28-11.05, P = 0.0186) after an average (SD) of 8.72 (6.31) injections over a mean (SD) of 2.9 (2.1) three-injection cycles. The mean central macular thickness (SD) at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months was 374 ± 120, 322 ± 88, and 305 ± 70 µm. Optical coherence tomography was fluid free at 12 and 24 months in 27.6% and 46% of eyes, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Comparable to real-world studies, this protocol can stabilize or improve vision in more than 85% of DME patients over 24 months. The most important factor in improvement of vision is increasing number of injections and visits.

Retrospective analysis of the efficacy of early switching from bevacizumab to aflibercept or ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

The study aimed to compare the anatomical and functional gains of switching to ranibizumab or aflibercept in eyes with treatment-naive diabetic macular edema (DME) which has an inadequate response to three consecutive bevacizumab injections.

METHODS

This observational, retrospective, comparative study presented 12-month results of 80 patients with DME. One eye of each patient was enrolled, and bevacizumab was switched as aflibercept (40 eyes) or ranibizumab (40 eyes). DME was diagnosed based on a fundoscopic examination, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), central macular thickness (CMT), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

RESULTS

Forty-one patients (51.2%) were male, and 39 (48.8%) were female, with a mean age of 62.3 ± 6.7 years. At the end of the study, the mean number of intravitreal injections was 8.1 ± 1.8 in the aflibercept group, whereas 8.9 ± 1.4 in the ranibizumab (p = 0.091). The mean CMT decreased from 449.2 ± 69.3 µm to 311.0 ± 48.9 µm in the aflibercept group, and from 444.9 ± 109.2 µm to 316.3 ± 54.5 µm in the ranibizumab group (for both, p < 0.0001). The mean BVCA increased from 49.2 ± 11.1 ETDRS letters to 62.5 ± 9.9 in the aflibercept group (p < 0.0001) and from 49.9 ± 12.0 ETDRS letters to 61.1 ± 9.1 in the ranibizumab group (p < 0.0001). Macular laser treatment was required in 17.5% of the aflibercept group and 22.5% of the ranibizumab group (p = 0.781).

CONCLUSION

Significant improvement was observed with ranibizumab and aflibercept treatments in initial bevacizumab-resistant DME. Early switching therapy may contribute to better visual and anatomical outcomes.

Real-World Evidence in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema with Intravitreal Anti-VEGFs in Asia: A Systematic Literature Review

Purpose

To evaluate the visual outcomes and safety profile of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in real-world studies in Asian countries.

Methods

A systematic review of electronic literature databases (Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 2010, to March 16, 2021) was conducted to identify observational studies that reported clinical and safety outcomes of anti-VEGF treatments for DME in Asia. We analyzed baseline patient characteristics, treatment patterns, mean number of injections, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal thickness, and safety outcomes.

Results

Seventy-one studies were included in this review. Most studies reported treatment of DME with ranibizumab (n = 33), followed by aflibercept (n = 13), bevacizumab (n = 28), and conbercept (n = 9). At 12 months, the cumulative mean number of injections for ranibizumab, aflibercept, and conbercept was 5.2, 4.6, and 6, respectively. At the 12-month follow-up, the cumulative mean BCVA gain was 6.8 letters (ranibizumab), 4.6 letters (aflibercept), 4.9 letters (bevacizumab), and 8.3 letters (conbercept). The cumulative mean reduction in retinal thickness at 12 months was 116.9 μm (ranibizumab), 105.9 μm (aflibercept), 81.7 μm (bevacizumab), and 135.2 μm (conbercept). A strong positive correlation (r = 0.78) was observed between mean number of injections and change in BCVA at 12 months. A moderate positive correlation (r = 0.54) was observed between mean number of injections and mean reduction in retinal thickness at 12 months. A weak positive correlation was observed between baseline retinal thickness and visual acuity at 12 months. Baseline BCVA and mean number of injections were predictors of BCVA at 12 months.

Conclusion

All anti-VEGFs were effective in the treatment of DME in Asia. The data suggest that a greater number of anti-VEGF injections was associated with better improvement in BCVA and moderate reduction in retinal thickness at the 1-year follow-up.

Faricimab for Treatment-Resistant Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

To assess the short-term outcomes in treatment-resistant diabetic macular edema (DME) patients changed from intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) to intravitreal faricimab (IVF).

Methods

A retrospective review was undertaken on DME subjects receiving IVA therapy at a single private practice. Patients were separated into study and control cohorts. Both study and control patients had received more than or equal to six IVA injections during the preceding 12 months, more than or equal to four IVA injections during the preceding 6 months, had a central macular thickness (CMT) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) of ≥300 µm, and had retinal fluid on OCT before cohort assignment. Study patients were switched to IVF and underwent three injections within 4 months, whereas control patients stayed on IVA during the same period and received three injections within 4 months.

Results

There were 51 patients analyzed. There were 37.5% (9/24) in the study group and 3.7% (1/27) in the control group who achieved a CMT of less than 300 µm without retinal fluid on OCT at the end of the 4-month study (p=0.001). There were 41.7% (10/24) in the study group and 11.1% (3/27) in the control group who had gained two or more lines of visual acuity at the end of the 4-month study (p=0.01).

Conclusion

For a significant minority, IVF can improve the short-term visual and anatomic outcomes in treatment-resistant DME patients formerly managed with IVA. Longer follow-up is needed to determine if such improvements can be preserved.

Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema in real-world clinical practice in Japan: 24-month outcomes

Purpose

To report the safety and effectiveness of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) for diabetic macular edema (DME) in the real-world clinical practice setting in Japan.

Methods

In this prospective, multicenter, observational, post-marketing surveillance, patients with DME newly receiving IVT-AFL were enrolled. During a 24-month follow-up, the primary outcome was the occurrence of safety events. Other pre-specified endpoints were effectiveness indicators, such as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness, and injection frequency.

Results

In total, 646 patients administered at least one IVT-AFL injection were included in the safety analysis. During the follow-up period, adverse events occurred in 42 patients (6.50%), whereas adverse drug reactions occurred in 12 (1.86%). In the 12 patients who had adverse drug reactions, seven events occurred in seven patients within the first month of the most recent injection. In addition, 622 patients were included in the effectiveness analysis set. The number of injections over 24 months was 3.6 ± 3.0 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]). BCVA (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) was 0.437 ± 0.362 (mean ± SD) (n = 622) at baseline and 0.321 ± 0.348 (n = 177) after 24 months of treatment with IVT-AFL. Central retinal thickness was 440.8 ± 134.2 μm (mean ± SD) (n = 444) at baseline and 355.5 ± 126.4 μm (n = 140) at 24 months.

Conclusion

Routine administration of IVT-AFL for DME was not associated with new safety concerns, and BCVA outcomes were maintained over 24 months in the real-world setting. Nonetheless, patients in this real-world setting received fewer injections than those in clinical trials, suggesting that a margin for improvement exists in clinical practice.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02425501.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00417-022-05703-9.

Treat-and-Extend Versus Alternate Dosing Strategies with Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor agents to treat Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 2346 Eyes

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (Anti-VEGF) agents are the standard of care for diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) with vision loss. They are commonly administered using several treatment protocols, including fixed, pro re nata (PRN) and treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens. Because of the lack of evidence defining an ideal treatment paradigm, we systematically compared T&E with fixed or PRN regimens. Visual acuity improvement was similar when comparing T&E to fixed or PRN dosing at 12 and 24 months. Regarding anatomic outcomes, no significant difference was found between T&E and fixed regimens for central retinal thickness or central subfoveal thickness at 12 and 24 months. Similarly, no significant difference was found for central retinal thickness at 12 months for T&E versus PRN regimen. Regarding total number of injections, no significant difference existed between T&E versus fixed regimens at 12 months. PRN regimens delivered fewer injections compared to T&E regimens at 12 months. The results of this analysis support that visual acuity and anatomic outcomes at 12 and 24-months are similar between T&E with either fixed or PRN regimens. More head-to-head trials comparing T&E versus fixed and PRN dosing are needed to provide visual and functional outcome data beyond year 2. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021249362.

Two-year outcomes of the treat-and-extend regimen using aflibercept for treating diabetic macular oedema

This study was performed to investigate the efficacy of the treat-and-extend regimen using aflibercept for treating diabetic macular oedema (DME). This prospective, multicentre, interventional, single-arm, 104-week clinical trial included 48 patients with DME visual impairment. The patients’ eyes received five consecutive intravitreal injections (2 mg aflibercept) every four weeks with two-week adjustments based on central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) changes. Injections were deferred when CSMT was stable. The number of injections, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), CSMT, and diabetic retinopathy severity scale scores were analysed. Compared to baseline, BCVA improved by + 9.1 letters at 52 weeks and was maintained with + 9.4-letter gain at 104 weeks (P < 0.001). Between baseline and 104 weeks, CSMT decreased from 489 to 298 μm (P < 0.001) and eyes with vision ≥ 20/40 increased from 17.4 to 43.5% (P = 0.007). The mean number of injections decreased from 8.5 in year one to 3.9 in year two. The injection interval was extended to ≥ 12 weeks in 56.5% of patients. The treat-and-extend regimen of aflibercept in DME showed 2-year efficacy comparable to that of fixed dosing regimens. The flexible dosing of this regimen reduced the number of injections in year two while maintaining efficacy.