Predictors and Biomarkers of Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Prediction model for leaflet thrombosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the EFFORT study

BACKGROUND

Leaflet thrombosis (LT) is a multifaceted and underexplored condition that can manifest following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The objective of this study was to formulate a prediction model based on laboratory assessments and clinical parameters, providing additional guidance and insight into this relatively unexplored aspect of post-TAVI complications.

METHODS

The present study was an observational prospective hypothesis-generating study, including 101 patients who underwent TAVI and a screening for LT (the primary endpoint) by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). All images were acquired on a third-generation dual-source CT system. Levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF) activity, hemoglobin (Hb), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were measured among other parameters. A predictive score utilizing binary logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was established.

RESULTS

LT (11 subclinical and 2 clinical) was detected in 13 of 101 patients (13%) after a median time to screening by MDCT of 105 days (IQR, 98-129 days). Elevated levels of vWF activity (> 188%) pre-TAVI, decreased Hb values (< 11.9 g/dL), as well as increased levels of LDH (> 312 U/L) post-TAVI and absence of oral anticoagulation (OAC) were found in patients with subsequent LT formation as compared to patients without LT. The established EFFORT score ranged from - 1 to 3 points, with an increased probability for LT development in patients with ≥ 2 points (85.7% of LT cases) vs < 2 points (14.3% of LT cases; p < 0.001). Achieving an EFFORT score of ≥ 2 points was found to be significantly associated with a 10.8 times higher likelihood of developing an LT (p = 0.001). The EFFORT score has an excellent c-statistic (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.89; 95% CI 0.74-1.00; p = 0.001) and a high negative predictive value (98%).

CONCLUSION

An EFFORT score might be a helpful tool to predict LT development and could be used in risk assessment, if validated in confirmatory studies. Therefore, the score has the potential to guide the stratification of individuals for the planning of subsequent MDCT screenings.

Thrombosis of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve: Is the Entire Arsenal Deployed?

The proliferation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation has alerted clinicians to a specific type of prosthetic degeneration represented by thrombosis. The pathogenesis of this clinical or subclinical phenomenon, which can occur in up to 15% of both surgical and percutaneous procedures, is poorly understood, as is its potential impact on patient prognosis and long-term bioprosthesis durability. Based on this lack of knowledge about the real meaning and importance of bioprosthetic valve thrombosis, the aim of the present review is to draw the clinicians' attention to its existence, starting from the description of predisposing factors that may require a closer follow-up in such categories of patients, to an in-depth overview of all available imaging modalities with their respective pros and cons. Finally, a glimpse into the future of technology and biomarker development is presented. The hope is to increase the rate of bioprosthetic diagnosis, especially of the subclinical one, in order to understand (thanks to a strict and prolonged follow-up) if it can only be considered as an incidental tomographic entity without significant clinical consequences, or, on the contrary, if it is associated with neurological events or accelerated bioprosthetic degeneration. Nevertheless, despite the technical advances of echocardiography and cardiac tomography in terms of accurate bioprosthesis thrombosis detection, several diagnostic and therapeutic issues remain unresolved, including possible prevention strategies, tailored treatment protocols, and follow-up modalities.

Early 6 months usage of single anTiplAtelet OR anTicoAgulant followed by single antiplatelet after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: protocol for a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

The strategy for initiating antithrombotic therapy to prevent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis (BPVT) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains uncertain. There is still lacking evidence on the efficacy and safety of early 6 months usage of single-antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or oral anticoagulant (OAC) after TAVR in patients without anticoagulant indications.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a multicentre, randomised controlled, open-label trial, and 650 patients undergoing TAVR from 13 top TAVR centres in China will be recruited. Each eligible participant will be randomly assigned to two groups (1:1 ratio) as (1) SAPT (aspirin 75-100 mg for 6 months) group or (2) OAC group (warfarin, therapeutic international normalised ratio at 1.8-2.5 for 6 months), both followed by sequential aspirin 75-100 mg for 6 months. Participants in both groups will be invited for three follow-up visits of 1, 6 and 12 months after discharge. We will use both the net clinical benefit endpoint (composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attacks, peripheral artery thrombosis, intracardiac thrombosis and major bleeding and disabling or life-threatening bleeding) and the BPVT endpoint evaluated by four-dimensional CT as our primary endpoints. P value of <0.05 of two-sided test will be considered statistically significant.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases of China (Approval No. 2023-1947). All patients will be informed of the details of the study and will sign an informed consent prior to inclusion in the study. Results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05375474.

Circulating Monocyte Subsets and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), as an alternative to open heart surgery, has revolutionized the treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis (AVS), the most common valvular disorder in the elderly. AVS is now considered a form of atherosclerosis and, like the latter, partly of inflammatory origin. Patients with high-grade AVS have a highly disturbed blood flow associated with high levels of shear stress. The immediate reopening of the valve during TAVR leads to a sudden restoration of a normal blood flow hemodynamic. Despite its good prognosis for patients, TAVR remains associated with bleeding or thrombotic postprocedural complications, involving mechanisms that are still poorly understood. Many studies report the close link between blood coagulation and inflammation, termed thromboinflammation, including monocytes as a major actor. The TAVR procedure represents a unique opportunity to study the influence of shear stress on human monocytes, key mediators of inflammation and hemostasis processes. The purpose of this study was to conduct a review of the literature to provide a comprehensive overview of the impact of TAVR on monocyte phenotype and subset repartition and the association of these parameters with the clinical outcomes of patients with severe AVS who underwent TAVR.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Subclinical and Clinical Leaflet Thrombosis: Multimodality Imaging for Diagnosis and Risk Stratification

In recent years, the phenomenon of subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) in patients who have undergone transcatheter aortic valve implantation has become increasingly relevant. Hypo-attenuating leaflet thickening and hypo-attenuation affecting motion diagnosed by CT are the hallmarks of SLT, and their incidence varies depending on the intensity of screening. Whether these phenomena are a surrogate for leaflet thrombosis reducing valve durability and increasing the risk of stroke is still a matter of debate. Uncertainty remains over the optimal antithrombotic therapy after TAVI and the best treatment strategy is still not confirmed. Ongoing and future trials will provide more evidence about the best strategy for the prevention and treatment of SLT.