Autoantibodies against Protein Phosphatase Magnesium-Dependent 1A as a Biomarker for Predicting Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis Treated with Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents

Anti-protein phosphatase magnesium-dependent 1A-IgM levels in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: a potential biomarker

BACKGROUND

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has been known to have auto-inflammatory nature; hence, the efficacy of autoantibodies is low. However, studies on autoantibodies are ongoing, with some studies showing associations. Previous studies showed that anti-protein phosphatase magnesium-dependent 1A (PPM1A) IgG was increased in patients with AS and associated with radiographic progression. However, the diagnostic usefulness was limited due to relatively low sensitivity and specificity. This pilot study evaluated the diagnostic utility of anti-PPM1A-IgM and anti-PPM1A-IgG in patients with active AS.

METHODS

Serum samples were obtained from the registry cohort of a single tertiary center in Korea. Serum levels of anti-PPM1A-IgG/IgM were measured by direct ELISA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to predict the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of serum anti-PPM1A-IgG/IgM.

RESULTS

Samples were collected from 28 patients with active AS, 16 healthy controls (HCs), and 28 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although total serum IgM was lower in the RA and AS groups than in the HC group, anti-PPM1A-IgM was significantly lower in the AS group than in the other groups. In evaluating the diagnostic utility of anti-PPM1A-IgG/IgM for AS patients compared with HCs, the area under the curve (AUC) of anti-PPM1A-IgM was 0.998 (sensitivity 96.4%, specificity 100.0%). When ROC analysis of anti-PPM1A-IgM for AS patients compared with RA patients was conducted, sensitivity was 78.6% and specificity was 71.4%, with an AUC of 0.839.

CONCLUSION

Decreased anti-PPM1A-IgM levels in AS patients suggests a potential role for anti-PPM1A-IgM in the diagnosis of active AS.

Environmental and Genetic Determinants of Ankylosing Spondylitis

Exposure to heavy metals and lifestyle factors like smoking contribute to the production of free oxygen radicals. This fact, combined with a lowered total antioxidant status, can induce even more damage in the development of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Despite the fact that some researchers are looking for more genetic factors underlying AS, most studies focus on polymorphisms within the genes encoding the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system. The biggest challenge is finding the effective treatment of the disease. Genetic factors and the influence of oxidative stress, mineral metabolism disorders, microbiota, and tobacco smoking seem to be of great importance for the development of AS. The data contained in this review constitute valuable information and encourage the initiation and development of research in this area, showing connections between inflammatory disorders leading to the pathogenesis of AS and selected environmental and genetic factors.

Extracellular PPM1A promotes mineralization of osteoblasts differentiation in ankylosing spondylitis via the FOXO1A-RUNX2 pathway

Protein phosphatase magnesium-dependent 1A (PPM1A), serine/threonine protein phosphatase, in sera level was increased in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Preosteoblasts were differentiated actively to matured osteoblasts by intracellular PPM1A overexpression. However, it was unclear whether extracellular PPM1A contributes to the excessive bone-forming activity in AS. Here, we confirmed that PPM1A and runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) were increased in facet joints of AS. During osteoblasts differentiation, exogenous PPM1A treatment showed increased matrix mineralization in AS-osteoprogenitor cells accompanied by induction of RUNX2 and factor forkhead box O1A (FOXO1A) protein expressions. Moreover, upon growth condition, exogenous PPM1A treatment showed an increase in RUNX2 and FOXO1A protein expression and a decrease in phosphorylation at ser256 of FOXO1A protein in AS-osteoprogenitor cells, and positively regulated promoter activity of RUNX2 protein-binding motif. Mechanically, exogenous PPM1A treatment induced the dephosphorylation of transcription factor FOXO1A protein and translocation of FOXO1A protein into the nucleus for RUNX2 upregulation. Taken together, our results suggest that high PPM1A concentration promotes matrix mineralization in AS via the FOXO1A-RUNX2 pathway.

Emerging Roles of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation, bone erosion, spur formation of the spine and the sacroiliac joints. However, the etiology and molecular pathogenesis of AS remain largely unclear. Recently, a growing number of studies showed that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) played critical roles in the development and progression of autoimmune and orthopedic conditions, including AS. Studies demonstrated that a myriad of lncRNAs (e.g. H19, MEG3, LOC645166) pertinent to regulation of inflammatory signals were deregulated in AS. A number of lncRNAs might also serve as new biomarkers for the diagnosis and predicting the outcomes of AS. In this review, we summarize lncRNA profiling studies on AS and the functional roles and mechanism of key lncRNAs relevant to AS pathogenesis. We also discuss their potential values as biomarkers and druggable targets for this potentially disabling condition.

B Cell Involvement in the Pathogenesis of Ankylosing Spondylitis

Extensive research into ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has suggested the major role of genetics, immune reactions, and the joint-gut axis in its etiology, although an ultimate consensus does not yet exist. The available evidence indicates that both autoinflammation and T-cell-mediated autoimmune processes are actively involved in the disease process of AS. So far, B cells have received relatively little attention in AS pathogenesis; this is largely due to a lack of conventional disease-defining autoantibodies. However, against prevailing dogma, there is a growing body of evidence suggestive of B cell involvement. This is illustrated by disturbances in circulating B cell populations and the formation of auto-reactive and non-autoreactive antibodies, along with B cell infiltrates within the axial skeleton of AS patients. Furthermore, the depletion of B cells, using rituximab, displayed beneficial results in a subgroup of patients with AS. This review provides an overview of our current knowledge of B cells in AS, and discusses their potential role in its pathogenesis. An overarching picture portrays increased B cell activation in AS, although it is unclear whether B cells directly affect pathogenesis, or are merely bystanders in the disease process.

Biomarkers in axial spondyloarthritis and low back pain: a comprehensive review

The spectrum of axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) (including both non-radiographic and radiographic AxSpA), also known as ankylosing spondylitis AS, has achieved growing recognition. With the development of treatments not only effective in controlling disease activity but also in slowing radiographic progression, and given the cost and risk profiles of these novel treatments and the limitations of current clinical criteria, imaging and peripheral blood biomarkers (C-reactive protein, HLA-B27 testing), the need for better biomarkers has never been greater. The purpose of this review is to present up-to-date information on the biomarkers for the diagnosis for assessing disease diagnosis, activity, treatment response, and radiographic progression of AxSpA, and entails multiple search strings used to identify articles of interest published in PubMed and the Cochrane database up to May 1, 2021. We present the current status of research in serologic biomarkers such as cytokines, adipokines, matrix metalloproteinases, calprotectin, CD74, antibodies, bone turnover markers, and circulating protein fragments of cartilage and connective tissue degradation and other biomarkers. Despite a great deal of work, most serologic results have been disappointing and to date none perform better than CRP. Recent promising preliminary data for some has been published, but require further confirmation. Transcriptomic biomarkers such as micro-RNAs and genetic biomarkers also show promise to assist in diagnosis and possibly for radiographic severity, including a recently developed panel of genetic risk markers used in a polygenic risk score instrument in AS diagnosis. These need further confirmation and application in AS as well as in nr-AxSpA.