Long-Term Morbidity and Mortality after First and Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in the ARTPER Cohort

The CNIC-polypill (acetylsalicylic acid, atorvastatin, and ramipril), an effective and cost-saving secondary prevention strategy compared with other therapeutic options in patients with ischaemic heart disease

Aims

The retrospective NEPTUNO study evaluated the effectiveness of the Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC)-polypill (including acetylsalicylic acid, ramipril, and atorvastatin) vs. other therapeutic approaches in secondary prevention for cardiovascular (CV) disease. In this substudy, the focus was on the subgroup of patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD).

Methods and results

Patients on four strategies: CNIC-polypill, its monocomponents as loose medications, equipotent medications, and other therapies. The primary endpoint was the incidence of recurrent major adverse CV events (MACEs) after 2 years. After matching, 1080 patients were included in each cohort. The CNIC-polypill cohort had a significantly lower incidence of recurrent MACE compared with monocomponents, equipotent drugs, and other therapies cohorts (16.1 vs. 24, 24.4, and 24.3%, respectively; P < 0.001). The hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrent MACE were higher in monocomponents (HR = 1.12; P = 0.042), equipotent drugs (HR = 1.14; P = 0.031), and other therapies cohorts (HR = 1.17; P = 0.016) compared with the CNIC-polypill, with a number needed to treat of 12 patients to prevent a MACE. The CNIC-polypill demonstrated a greater reduction in LDL cholesterol (LDL-c; -56.1 vs. -43.6, -33.3, and -33.2% in the monocomponents, equipotent drugs, and other therapies, respectively; P < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (-13.7 vs. -11.5, -10.6, and -9.1% in the CNIC-polypill, monocomponents, equipotent drugs, and other therapies, respectively; P < 0.001) compared with other cohorts. The CNIC-polypill intervention was less costly and more effective than any other therapeutic option, with €2317-€2407 cost savings per event prevented.

Conclusion

In IHD, the CNIC-polypill exemplifies a guideline-recommended secondary prevention treatment linked to better outcomes and cost saving compared with other therapeutic options.

[Ischemic stroke and vascular risk factors in young and older adults. Community-based retrospective study (2011-2020)]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the presence of vascular risk factors (VRF) among young adult and older adult patients with ischemic stroke, with and without follow-up in primary care after hospital discharge.

DESIGN

Observational, retrospective, multicenter study.

SETTING

Primary care health centers and Hospital Verge de la Cinta, Tortosa, Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with ischemic stroke of two age groups (≤55 and ≥65years) distributed in two groups (GroupA: without follow-up in primary care; and GroupB: with follow-up in primary care), between 2011-2020.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Sociodemographic, clinical, and VRF data coded according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Descriptive, and inferential statistics.

RESULTS

Data from 2054 participants were analyzed. In the young adult group, 94.9% of the participants in groupA had between 1-2VRFs, compared to 60% in groupB. In the older adult group, 84.4% of groupA had between 1-2VRFs, compared to 43,9% of groupB. The most frequent VRFs among younger and older adult patients with ischemic stroke were hypertension and dyslipidemia in both follow-up groups. There were no records of obesity, smoking, or alcohol consumption in groupA. There was a significant association between being followed up in primary care after stroke and being a young adult and presenting between 3-4 VRFs (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results reinforce the need for continuity of care and follow-up in people with acute stroke in primary care and the need to improve the quality of registries.

Aortic calcification index predicts mortality and cardiovascular events in operatively treated patients with peripheral artery disease A prospective PUREASO cohort follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

Present study evaluates the association of aortic calcification to mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and leg events (MACE and MALE) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). The risk for mortality and MACE and MALE events is considered in clinical decision making.

METHODS

This cohort found in 2012 - 2013 consists of 226 symptomatic PAD patients referred to Turku University Hospital for invasive treatment. Follow-up data about mortality and survival without MACEs and MALEs was collected up to 5 years from inclusion date and aortic calcification index (ACI) was measured from patients with available imaging studies (164 of 226). ACIs association with events and mortality was evaluated in Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier and Classification and regression tree analysis.

RESULTS

All-cause mortality at 1, 3 and 5 years was 13.7%, (31), 26.1% (59) and 46.9% (106), respectively. In multivariable Cox regression analysis ACI and ACI>43 were independent risk factors for all-cause mortality (HR 1.13 per 10 units 95%CI, 1.00-1.22 and HR 1.83, 95%CI, 1.01-3.32, respectively) and for MACE (HR 1.10 per 10 units, 95%CI, 1.00-1.22 and HR 3.14, 95%CI, 1.67-5.91, respectively), but not for MALES. Classification and regression tree analysis showed that ACI 43 best divides cohort in relation to mortality. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that ACI>43 is associated with greater mortality and occurrence of MACEs compared to those who have ACI≤43 (log-rank p-value 0.005 and 0.0012, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Risk for mortality and MACEs is associated with high ACI. ACI can expose PAD patients' risk for further cardiovascular events and mortality.