Epidemiology of Invasive Fungal Diseases in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients Managed with an Antifungal Diagnostic Driven Approach

An update on pharmacotherapy for fungal infections in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Invasive fungal diseases (IFD) constitute a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients.

AREAS COVERED

We describe epidemiology, causes and risk factors of IFD in allogeneic HSCT discussing prophylaxis and treatment in various HSCT phases. We present the most recent studies on this thematic area, including novel data on currently available antifungals, i.e. formulations, dosing, safety, efficacy and therapeutic drug monitoring. Finally, we present the most recent relevant recommendations published. Literature search included PubMed, Scopus and clinicaltrials.gov between January 2014-April 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

The antifungal agents employed for prophylaxis and therapy should be predicated on local epidemiology of IFD. Fluconazole prophylaxis remains a first-line choice before engraftment when the main pathogen is Candida spp. After engraftment prophylaxis should be with mold-active agents (i.e. triazoles). For candidiasis echinocandins are suggested as first-line treatment, whereas aspergillosis responds well to mold-active azoles and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB). For mucormycosis treatment of choice includes L-AmB and isavuconazole. Choice between fever-driven and diagnostics-driven strategies remains equivocal. Open research topics remain: 1) optimization of tools to ensure prompt and accurate IFD diagnosis to avoid unnecessary exposure to antifungals, drug interactions and cost; 2) refinement of treatment for resistant/refractory strains.

Economic and budgetary impact evaluation of isavuconazole (Cresemba®) versus voriconazole (Vfend®) for the treatment of patients with possible invasive aspergillosis from the perspective of the Brazilian supplementary health system

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the cost-utility and the budgetary impact of isavuconazole compared to voriconazole in patients with suspected invasive aspergillosis (IA) from the perspective of the Brazilian supplementary health system (SHS).

METHODS

In this model, a decision tree was developed and included patients with possible IA. Efficacy parameters were extracted from the clinical studies. Drug acquisition, hospitalization costs and adverse events were also collected. Alternative 3- and 10-year time horizon scenarios were used. In addition, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were simulated. A budget impact analysis of isavuconazole versus voriconazole was performed, assuming a time horizon of 5 years. In addition, sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the model. Results are reported in Brazilian Real (BRL), year values 2022.

RESULTS

The economic analysis of the base case showed that isavuconazole is associated with a saving of 95,174.00 BRL per patient compared to voriconazole. All other simulated scenarios showed that isavuconazole is dominant versus comparators when considering a willingness to pay 40,688.00 BRL/Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY). The results were considered robust by the sensitivity analyses. The budget impact analysis showed that the incorporation of isavuconazole generates savings to the SHS, compared to voriconazole, of approximately 20.5 million BRL in the first year. This reaches about 54 million BRL in the fifth incorporation year, considering the market penetration of 20% in the first year, and 50% in the fifth year.

CONCLUSION

Compared with voriconazole, isavuconazole is regarded as a dominant treatment strategy for patients with suspected IA and generates savings for the SHS.

Antifungal Stewardship in Invasive Fungal Infections, a Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are a group of life-threatening diseases associated with significant morbidity, mortality and high healthcare costs. Some modern management programs known as AFS (antifungal stewardship programs) have now been developed. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the different declinations of antifungal stewardship programs (AFPs).

METHODS

Articles were systematically reviewed using the PRISMA checklist 2020. EMBASE and MEDLINE/PubMED were searched using the term "antifungal stewardship" (2012-2022 data) on 2 January 2023. Eligible studies were those that described an AFS and included an intervention, performance evaluation and outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 22/796 studies were included. Approximately two-thirds (16) were published between 2018 and 2022. 16 (72.7%) stated a minimal complete AFS team. 12 (54.5%) adopted a non-compulsory AFS approach, 6(27.3%) had an Educational AFS and 4(18.2%) a compulsory AFS. Cost analyses of 12 studies showed a decrease for 7 (31.8%) compared to an increase for 5 (22.7%). In terms of outcomes, 18 studies showed a lower (10;45.5%) or the same (8;36.4%) pre-post intervention mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

AFS programs seem to be related to lower costs and better outcomes and should thus be implemented in tandem with antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections in haematological malignances and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Clinical impact of combination therapy in a 10-year Brazilian cohort

Bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI) are a common threat among patients with haematological malignancies (HM) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (HSCT). The purpose of this research was to describe clinical and microbiological aspects of BSI caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKp) and assess risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in a 10-year cohort of haematological patients. A total of 65 CRKp-BSI episodes occurring in HM patients and HSCT recipients and CRKp-BSI between January 2010 and December 2019 were retrospectively studied. Acute leukemias were the most frequently observed underlying disease (87.7%) and 18 patients (27.7%) received HSCT. Mucosal barrier injury in the gastrointestinal tract was the primary cause of bacteremia (86.1%). Also, 14 individuals (21.6%) had an Invasive Fungal Disease (IFD) throughout the episode. Regarding treatment, in 31 patients (47.7%) empirical therapy was deemed appropriate, whereas 33 (50.8%) patients received a combination therapy. Microbiological data revealed that the majority of isolates (53-58%) had the Polymyxin B co-resistance phenotype, while amikacin resistance was less common (16 samples, or 24.7%). The mortality rates at 14 and 30 days were 32.3% and 36.9%, respectively. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, prompt appropriate antibiotic administration within three days was associated with a better outcome (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR]: 0.33; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.14-0.76; p = 0.01), whereas hypotension at presentation (aHR: 3.88; 95% CI: 1.40-10.74; p = 0.01) and concurrent IFD (aHR: 2.97; 95% CI: 1.20-7.37; p = 0.02) were independently associated with death within 30 days. Additionally, a favorable correlation between combination therapy and overall survival was found (aHR: 0.18; 95%CI: 0.06-0.56; p = 0.002). In conclusion, 30-day mortality CRKp-BSI was elevated and most of the isolates were polymyxin B resistant. Early appropriate antimicrobial treatment and the use of combination therapy were linked to a better outcome.

High-Risk Neutropenic Fever and Invasive Fungal Diseases in Patients with Hematological Malignancies

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) still represent a relevant cause of mortality in patients affected by hematological malignancies, especially acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing remission induction chemotherapy, and in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Mold-active antifungal prophylaxis (MAP) has been established as a standard of care. However, breakthrough IFDs (b-IFDs) have emerged as a significant issue, particularly invasive aspergillosis and non-Aspergillus invasive mold diseases. Here, we perform a narrative review, discussing the major advances of the last decade on prophylaxis, the diagnosis of and the treatment of IFDs in patients with high-risk neutropenic fever undergoing remission induction chemotherapy for AML/MDS and allo-HSCT. Then, we present our single-center retrospective experience on b-IFDs in 184 AML/MDS patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy while receiving posaconazole (n = 153 induction treatments, n = 126 consolidation treatments, n = 60 salvage treatments). Six cases of probable/proven b-IFDs were recorded in six patients, with an overall incidence rate of 1.7% (6/339), which is in line with the literature focused on MAP with azoles. The incidence rates (IRs) of b-IFDs (95% confidence interval (95% CI), per 100 person years follow-up (PYFU)) were 5.04 (0.47, 14.45) in induction (n = 2), 3.25 (0.0013, 12.76) in consolidation (n = 1) and 18.38 (3.46, 45.06) in salvage chemotherapy (n = 3). Finally, we highlight the current challenges in the field of b-IFDs; these include the improvement of diagnoses, the expanding treatment landscape of AML with molecular targeted drugs (and related drug-drug interactions with azoles), evolving transplantation techniques (and their related impacts on IFDs' risk stratification), and new antifungals and their features (rezafungin and olorofim).

Invasive fusariosis

Invasive fusariosis is a serious invasive fungal disease, affecting immunocompetent and, more frequently, immunocompromised patients. Localized disease is the typical clinical form in immunocompetent patients. Immunocompromised hosts at elevated risk of developing invasive fusariosis are patients with acute leukemia receiving chemotherapeutic regimens for remission induction, and those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. In this setting, the infection is usually disseminated with positive blood cultures, multiple painful metastatic skin lesions, and lung involvement. Currently available antifungal agents have poor in vitro activity against Fusarium species, but a clear-cut correlation between in vitro activity and clinical effectiveness does not exist. The outcome of invasive fusariosis is largely dependent on the resolution of immunosuppression, especially neutrophil recovery in neutropenic patients.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of isavuconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole for the treatment of invasive mold diseases in hematological patients: initial therapy prior to pathogen differential diagnosis in China

Background

Invasive mold diseases (IMD) is associated with high mortality and a substantial economic burden. For high-risk patients, fever drive or diagnostic drive therapy is usually initiated prior to the differential diagnosis of the pathogen. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of isavuconazole, posaconazole, vs. voriconazole in the treatment of IMD from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, informing healthcare decision-making and resource allocation.

Methods

A decision analytic model was constructed using TreeAge Pro 2011 software to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the entire disease course. We assumed that the prevalence of mucormycosis in the patients entering the model was 7.8%. Efficacy, cost, adverse events, and other data included in the model were mainly derived from clinical studies, published literature, and publicly available databases. The primary outcomes of the model output were total cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), life years (Lys), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The willing-to-pay (WTP) threshold was defined as one to three times China's GDP per capita in 2022. One-way sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis were used to determine the robustness of the model. At the same time, the cost-effectiveness of three triazole antifungal agents under a broader range of mucormycosis prevalence, when voriconazole was covered by medical insurance reimbursement, and after the price reduction of posaconazole was discussed.

Results

Compared with voriconazole, isavuconazole provided an additional 0.38 Lys (9.29 vs. 8.91 LYs) and 0.31 QALYs (7.62 vs. 7.31 QALYs); ICER was $15,702.46/QALY, well-below the WTP threshold ($38,223/QALY). However, posaconazole did not provide a significant economic advantage over voriconazole (9.40 vs. 9.36 Lys; 7.71 vs. 7.68 QALYs; ICER $64,466.57/QALY). One-way sensitivity analysis found that ICER was highly sensitive to the mortality of patients with invasive aspergillus infection. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, when the WTP threshold was $38,223/QALY, the probability of isavuconazole being cost-effective was 72.9%. The scenario analysis results indicated that posaconazole would become cost-effective when the price was reduced by 15% or the prevalence of mucormycosis was 14%.

Conclusions

Isavuconazole represents a cost-effective initial option for treating IMD in high-risk hematological patients prior to the differential diagnosis of pathogens. It will also be economical when a 15% reduction in posaconazole cost is achieved.

Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy on Antifungal Prophylaxis

The landscape of invasive Candida infections in patients with hematologic malignancy has evolved due to the adoption of anti-fungal prophylaxis, advances in oncological therapies, and developments in antifungal therapies and diagnostics. Despite these scientific gains, the morbidity and mortality caused by these infections remain unchanged, highlighting the importance of an updated understanding of its epidemiology. Non-albicans Candida species are now the predominant cause of invasive candidiasis in patients with hematological malignancy. This epidemiological shift from Candida albicans to non-albicans Candida species is partially a consequence of selective pressure from extensive azole use. Further analysis of this trend suggests other contributing factors including immunocompromise caused by the underlying hematologic malignancy and the intensity of its associated treatments, oncological practices, and regional or institution specific variables. This review characterizes the changing distribution of Candida species in patients with hematologic malignancy, describes the causes driving this change, and discusses clinical considerations to optimize management in this high-risk patient population.

Clinical outcomes of aspergillosis among paediatric and adult inpatients: A multicentre study in a Brazilian metropolitan area

BACKGROUND

Invasive Aspergillosis (IA) is a disease of significant clinical relevance, especially among immunosuppressed patients, and is associated with high mortality rates. In this study, we evaluated the epidemiological features and clinical outcomes in children and adults with IA.

METHODS

This was an observational, multicentre, prospective surveillance study of inpatients with IA at two different hospitals in Campinas, Brazil, between 2018 and 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were identified (54.5% males), with a median age of 42 years (interquartile range (IQR):19.25-59 years, varying between 1 and 89 years). The following baseline conditions were identified: 61.4% were oncohaematological patients and 20.5% were solid organ transplant recipients. Among oncohaematological patients, 77.8% exhibited severe or persistent neutropenia. The median time between the onset of neutropenia and the diagnosis of fungal infection was 20 days (IQR: 10.5-26 days; range, 0-68 days). The interval between neutropenia onset and fungal infection was longer in paediatric than in general hospital (average, 29 vs. 13.4 days; median 26 vs 11 days; p=0.010). After the diagnosis of IA, the survival rates were 44.2% and 30.0% at 180 and 360 days, respectively. Survival was greater in patients aged ≤ 21 years (p = 0.040; log-rank test). They observed no difference in IA mortality related to COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

High mortality associated with IA was observed in both hospitals. Individuals over the age of 21 have a lower survival rate than younger patients.

Primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal diseases in patients with haematological malignancies: 2022 update of the recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO)

Patients with haematological malignancies (HM) are at high risk of developing invasive fungal disease (IFD) with high morbidity and attributable mortality. We reviewed data published until September 2021 to update the 2017 antifungal prophylaxis recommendations of the German Society of Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). The strong recommendation to administer antifungal prophylaxis in patients with HM with long-lasting neutropenia, i.e. <500 cells/μL for >7 days remains unchanged. Posaconazole remains the drug of choice for mould-active prophylaxis in these patients. Novel treatment options in HM, such as CAR-T-cell treatment or novel targeted therapies for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) were considered, however, data are insufficient to give general recommendations for routine antifungal prophylaxis in these patients. Major changes regarding specific recommendations compared to the 2017 edition are the now moderate instead of mild support for the recommendations of isavuconazole and voriconazole. Furthermore, published evidence on micafungin allows recommending it at moderate strength for its use in HM. For the first time we included recommendations for non-pharmaceutical measures regarding IFD, comprising the use of high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters, smoking, measures during construction work and neutropenic diets. We reviewed the impact of antifungal prophylaxis with triazoles on drug-drug interactions with novel targeted therapies that are metabolized via cytochrome p450 where triazoles inhibit CYP3A4/5. The working group recommends reducing the dose of venetoclax when used concomitantly with strong CYP3A4 inhibiting antifungals. Furthermore, we reviewed data on the prophylactic use of novel antifungal agents. Currently there is no evidence to support their use in a prophylactic setting in clinical practice.

IFISTRATEGY: Spanish National Survey of Invasive Fungal Infection in Hemato-Oncologic Patients

Recent advances in the treatment of hematologic malignancies have improved the overall survival rate, but the number of patients at risk of developing an invasive fungal infection (IFI) has increased. Invasive infections caused by non-Candida albicans species, non-Aspergillus molds, and azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus have been increasingly reported in recent years. We developed a cross-sectional multicenter survey which involved a total of 55 hematologists and infectious disease specialists from a total of 31 Spanish hospitals, to determine the most frequent strategies used for the management of IFIs. Data collection was undertaken through an online survey which took place in 2022. Regarding key strategies, experts usually prefer early treatment for persistent febrile neutropenia, switching to another broad-spectrum antifungal family if azole-resistant Aspergillus is suspected, broad-spectrum azoles and echinocandins as prophylactic treatment in patients receiving midostaurin or venetoclax, and liposomal amphotericin B for breakthrough IFIs after prophylaxis with echinocandins in patients receiving new targeted therapies. For antifungals failing to reach adequate levels during the first days and suspected invasive aspergillosis, the most appropriate strategy would be to associate an antifungal from another family.

Epidemiology and Factors Associated with Treatment Success of Invasive Fungal Infections Among Newly Hematologic Malignancy Patients Receiving Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Thailand

Purpose

Invasive fungal infection (IFI) causes disability/death in patients with hematologic malignancy (HM) receiving chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). There is limited epidemiological data, treatment outcomes, and factors associated with IFI treatment success in Thailand. This study aimed to identify factors associated with IFI treatment success among new HM patients receiving chemotherapy or HSCT, determine IFI incidence among HM patients receiving chemotherapy or HSCT, and the IFI incidence of a breakthrough in patients receiving primary antifungal prophylaxis, and identify antifungal drugs susceptibility.

Patients and Methods

This study reviewed the charts of patients aged ≥ 15 years with newly HM who received chemotherapy or HSCT between January 2016 and June 2021 at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. The 2020 EORTC/MSG criteria were used to diagnose IFI. IFI treatment success factors were evaluated using logistic regression.

Results

Ninety-two patients with 107 episodes of IFI met the inclusion criteria. IFI incidence on proven and probable cases among newly HM patients receiving chemotherapy or HSCT was 7%. Most infections (38.3%) occurred during the induction-phase chemotherapy. Aspergillosis (35.5%) was the commonest IFI, followed by candidiasis (11.2%), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (8.4%), mucormycosis (3.7%), and others, respectively. The 12-week IFI treatment success rate was 67.3%. It was associated with age < 60 years, absence of coinfection, and the receipt of appropriate empirical therapy on the first day of IFI diagnosis. The incidence of breakthrough IFI from proven and probable cases in patients receiving primary antifungal prophylaxis was 6.1%. Most fungal pathogen isolates were still highly susceptible to antifungal drugs.

Conclusion

The IFI treatment success in patients with HM or HSCT in our study was high. Close monitoring of coinfected patients aged ≥ 60 is recommended. Appropriate antifungal drugs are essential for clinical outcomes.

Invasive Aspergillosis in Patients with Acute Leukemia: Comparison Between Acute Myeloid and Acute Lymphoid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

The epidemiology of invasive aspergillosis (IA) in patients with acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) has not been well characterized.

OBJECTIVES

To identify potential peculiarities in the natural history, treatment response and outcome of IA diagnosed in patients with ALL and AML.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in seven tertiary-care hospitals between 2009 and 2017 of all consecutive episodes of IA occurring in adult patients with acute leukemia. Demographic characteristics, underlying disease and recent treatment, antifungal prophylaxis, neutropenia, receipt of corticosteroids, clinical and radiological findings, mycological results, antifungal therapy, and 6-week and 12-week survival were recorded.

RESULTS

We identified 77 cases of IA in 54 patients with AML and 23 patients with ALL. The majority of patients developed IA in the context of induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed (48.0%) or relapsed (41.6%) leukemia, with no differences between ALL and AML. Lung involvement was more frequent in AML (96.3% vs. 82.6%, p = 0.06) and rhinosinusitis was more common in ALL (43.5% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.09). Galactomannan was the microbiologic documentation of IA in 76.6%, with similar patterns of positivity in AML and ALL. The 6-week survival of IA in patients with AML and ALL was 63.0% and 56.5%, respectively (p = 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

The epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and outcome of IA in ALL patients are similar to patients with AML.

Invasive Fungal Disease in Patients with Myeloid Malignancies: A Retrospective Cohort Study of a Diagnostic-Driven Care Pathway Withholding Mould-Active Prophylaxis

Objectives: Patients receiving remission induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) are at high risk of developing invasive fungal disease (IFD). Newer therapies with targeted antileukemic agents and the emergence of azole resistance pose a challenge to the strategy of primary antifungal prophylaxis. We report the experience of a diagnostic-driven care pathway (DCP) for the management of IFD in these patients, using only culture-directed mould inactive prophylaxis. Methods: Retrospectively, we used a single-centre study of consecutive patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for myeloid malignancies between 2014 and 2021. DCP consisted of serial cultures and serum galactomannan (sGM) screening, CT imaging, and bronchoscopy to direct targeted antifungal treatment. IFD was classified according to the 2020 EORTC/MSGERC criteria. Results: A total of 192 patients with myeloid malignancies received 300 courses of intensive chemotherapy. There were 14 cases of invasive yeast infections and 18 of probable/proven invasive mould disease (IMD). The incidence of probable/proven IMD during the first cycle of remission-induction chemotherapy was 4.6% (n = 9). sGM remained negative in all cases of invasive aspergillosis (IA), with positive mycology findings in bronchoalveolar lavage. All-cause mortality was 9.4% (n = 18) 100 days after starting chemotherapy and was comparable between patients with or without IFD. The fungal-related mortality was 1% (n = 2). Conclusion: Diagnostic-driven based management without universal mould active prophylaxis is a feasible strategy in the management of IFD and limits unnecessary antimould treatment during intensive chemotherapy. The poor performance of serial serum galactomannan screening in detecting IA warrants further investigation.

Invasive Fusariosis in Patients with Hematologic Diseases

Fusarium species are filamentous fungi widely encountered in nature, and may cause invasive disease in patients with hematologic conditions. Patients at higher risk are those with acute leukemia receiving induction remission chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. In these hosts, invasive fusariosis presents typically with disseminated disease, fever, metastatic skin lesions, pneumonia, and positive blood cultures. The prognosis is poor and the outcome is largely dependent on the immune status of the host, with virtually a 100% death rate in persistently neutropenic patients, despite monotherapy or combination antifungal therapy. In this paper, we will review the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management of invasive fusariosis affecting patients with hematologic diseases.