Identification of Fungi Involved in Onychomycosis in Patients of a Spanish Rural Area

Global prevalence of onychomycosis in general and special populations: An updated perspective

BACKGROUND

Onychomycosis is a chronic nail disorder commonly seen by healthcare providers; toenail involvement in particular presents a treatment challenge.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an updated estimate on the prevalence of toenail onychomycosis.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Studies reporting mycology-confirmed diagnoses were included and stratified into (a) populations-based studies, and studies that included (b) clinically un-suspected and (c) clinically suspected patients.

RESULTS

A total of 108 studies were included. Based on studies that examined clinically un-suspected patients (i.e., with or without clinical features suggestive of onychomycosis), the pooled prevalence rate of toenail onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes was 4% (95% CI: 3-5) among the general population; special populations with a heightened risk include knee osteoarthritis patients (RR: 14.6 [95% CI: 13.0-16.5]), chronic venous disease patients (RR: 5.6 [95% CI: 3.7-8.1]), renal transplant patients (RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 3.3-6.5]), geriatric patients (RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 4.4-4.9]), HIV-positive patients (RR: 3.7 [95% CI: 2.9-4.7]), lupus erythematosus patients (RR: 3.1 [95% CI: 1.2-6.3]), diabetic patients (RR: 2.8 [95% CI: 2.4-3.3]) and hemodialysis patients (RR: 2.8 [95% CI: 1.9-4.0]). The prevalence of onychomycosis in clinically suspected patients was significantly higher likely due to sampling bias. A high degree of variability was found in a limited number of population-based studies indicating that certain pockets of the population may be more predisposed to onychomycosis. The diagnosis of non-dermatophyte mould onychomycosis requires repeat sampling to rule out contaminants or commensal organisms; a significant difference was found between studies that performed single sampling versus repeat sampling. The advent of PCR diagnosis results in improved detection rates for dermatophytes compared to culture.

CONCLUSION

Onychomycosis is an underrecognized healthcare burden. Further population-based studies using standardized PCR methods are warranted.

[Conventional and molecular diagnostics in onychomycosis-part 2 : Molecular identification of causative dermatophytes by polymerase chain reaction and sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA]

Dermatophyte identification using traditional methods such as optics-based direct fluorescence microscopy and culture is nowadays supplemented by molecular biological methods. The validity of dermatophyte DNA detection with direct uniplex-polymerase chain reaction-enzyme immunoassay (PCR-EIA) in nail samples was proven by sequence analysis of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. A total of 108 dermatophytes, isolated from patients with onychomycosis, were positive for Trichophyton rubrum (TR) and Trichophyton interdigitale (TI) in culture and/or uniplex-PCR-EIA. Conventional methods for dermatophyte identification were complemented by direct uniplex-PCR-EIA and sequence analysis of the ribosomal ITS region (18S rRNA, ITS1, 5.8S rRNA, ITS2, 28S rRNA). Of 108 patients (average age 62, median age 73), 56 showed cultural growth with 31 of them being identified as TR and 23 as TI. There was high agreement with the sequence analysis. Surprisingly, the pathogen of a single nail sample was identified as T. quinckeanum (formerly T. mentagrophytes sensu stricto), a rare zoophilic dermatophyte in Germany. A single TI strain turned out to be a misidentified T. tonsurans based on the sequence analysis. In all, 34 of the 52 specimens lacking cultural growth were detected by PCR as TR, and 18 specimens could be identified as TI. The results of dermatophyte identification of culture-negative nail samples were also in agreement with the results of sequence analysis. Molecular biological methods are well applicable, and they show high reliability for direct dermatophyte identification in nail samples without prior cultivation. Especially for nail samples without cultural growth, PCR-based dermatophyte identification was highly specific and sensitive.

A comprehensive review of nondermatophyte mould onychomycosis: Epidemiology, diagnosis and management

Nondermatophyte moulds (NDMs) are widely distributed and can be detected in association with mycotic nails; however, sometimes it can be challenging to establish the role of NDMs in the pathogenesis of onychomycosis (i.e. causative vs. contaminant). In studies where the ongoing invasive presence of NDMs is confirmed through repeat cultures, the global prevalence of NDMs in onychomycosis patients is estimated at 6.9% with the 3 most common genus being: Aspergillus, Scopulariopsis and Fusarium. NDM onychomycosis can, in many cases, appear clinically indistinguishable from dermatophyte onychomycosis. Clinical features suggestive of NDMs include proximal subungual onychomycosis with paronychia associated with Aspergillus spp., Fusarium spp. and Scopulariopsis brevicaulis, as well as superficial white onychomycosis in a deep and diffused pattern associated with Aspergillus and Fusarium. Longitudinal streaks seen in patients with distal and lateral onychomycosis may serve as an additional indicator. For diagnosis, light microscopic examination should demonstrate fungal filaments consistent with an NDM with at least two independent isolations in the absence of a dermatophyte; the advent of molecular testing combined with histological assessment may serve as an alternative with improved sensitivity and turnover time. In most instances, antifungal susceptibility testing has limited value. Information on effective treatments for NDM onychomycosis is relatively scarce, unlike the situation in the study of dermatophyte onychomycosis. Terbinafine and itraconazole therapy (continuous and pulsed) appear effective to varying extents for treating onychomycosis caused by Aspergillus, Fusarium or Scopulariopsis. There is scant literature on oral treatments for Neoscytalidium.

Onychomycosis in Two Populations with Different Socioeconomic Resources in an Urban Nucleus: A Cross-Sectional Study

Onychomycosis is one of the most common foot conditions. Mixed onychomycosis and onychomycosis caused by non-dermatophyte moulds are increasing in incidence, especially in vulnerable populations, hence the importance of this study, which presents the prevalence of onychomycosis in a population of homeless people, comparing the findings with a sample of a well-resourced population. The total sample consisted of 70 participants, divided into two separate groups, a homeless population and a second group in which we included people attending a private clinic. The average age of the sample is [49.19 ± 28.81] with an age range of 18 to 78 years. In the homeless group, the most prevalent infectious agents were non-dermatophyte fungi, with a total of 48%, compared to 28% in the group housed. The most common site of infection in both groups was the nail of the first finger. We, therefore, conclude that there is a difference in the infecting agent in the homeless population and the population with homes.

Evaluation of different DNA extraction methods based on steel-bullet beating for molecular diagnosis of onychomycosis

BACKGROUND

Considering increased trends toward molecular methods for detection/identification of fungi causing onychomycosis, the aim of this study is comparison three DNA extraction methods based on steel-bullet beating to extract DNA from nail.

METHODS

Ex -vivo onychomycosis model was developed using bovine hoof with Candida albicans and Aspergillus flavus. For two models, total DNA was extracted using the three different methods. In method 1, the extraction and purification were performed by steel-bullet beating and phenol chloroform protocol, respectively. In method 2, a freezing step were applied before beating. The purification step in method 3 was carried out using a commercial kit, although DNA extraction was done similarly to method 1 in that approach. To evaluate the efficacy of each method, the extracted genomic DNA was amplified with Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) using Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) regions. Moreover, 50 nail samples were evaluated for onychomycosis using direct microscopy examination as well as PCR in order to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of the optimal DNA extraction method.

RESULTS

Regarding the desirable quality of the extracted DNA, cost effectiveness, and simplicity, method 1 could be used to extract DNA effectively. Additionally, the obtained data showed that PCR had a higher detection rate of fungal agents in the nail samples than direct microscopic examination.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the mechanical disruption of the cell wall by steel-bullet beating is a useful and practical method to improve the quantity and quality of fungal DNA thorough the extraction process.

Assessment of Visual Diagnosis by Podiatrists for HPV and Onychomycosis: The Need for Complementary Tests

Onychomycosis and human papillomavirus (HPV) plantar warts are common in clinical practice. Clinical diagnosis is based on searching for pathognomonic signs and symptoms. However, due to misdiagnosis, podiatrists may unnecessarily prescribe antifungal treatments or burn lesions with chemical agents. The objective of this study was to assess podiatrists’ visual diagnosis of these infections and their willingness to use complementary tests. A 12-item questionnaire was developed to assess visual diagnostic ability. The diagnoses of all lesions were verified before the questionnaire was sent out. The respondents were 415 podiatrists with a range of years of experience. While 86.3% of podiatrists considered complementary tests for onychomycosis necessary, only 21.4% used them regularly. As many as 60.2% would leave a distal subungual onychomycosis untreated based on visual diagnosis. In the case of HPV, only 14.5% of respondents considered complementary tests necessary, although 76.6% would treat a non-HPV lesion with regular chemical agents. Years of experience did not affect the percentage of misdiagnoses. Complementary tests are needed in clinical practice to avoid unnecessary treatments. Podiatrists easily identify clear signs and symptoms but have difficulty making differential diagnoses. Research should focus on ensuring complementary tests are available to health professionals.