Failure of Achieving Tacrolimus Target Blood Concentration Might Be Avoided by a Wide Genotyping of Transplanted Patients: Evidence from a Retrospective Study

Use of Pharmacogenetics to Optimize Immunosuppressant Therapy in Kidney-Transplanted Patients

Immunosuppressant drugs (ISDs) are routinely used in clinical practice to maintain organ transplant survival. However, these drugs are characterized by a restricted therapeutic index, a high inter- and intra-individual pharmacokinetic variability, and a series of severe adverse effects. In particular, genetic factors have been estimated to play a role in this variability because of polymorphisms regarding genes encoding for enzymes and transporters involved in the ISDs pharmacokinetic. Several studies showed important correlations between genetic polymorphisms and ISDs blood levels in transplanted patients; therefore, this review aims to summarize the pharmacogenetics of approved ISDs. We used PubMed database to search papers on pharmacogenetics of ISDs in adults or pediatric patients of any gender and ethnicity receiving immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. We utilized as search term: “cyclosporine or tacrolimus or mycophenolic acid or sirolimus or everolimus and polymorphism and transplant”. Our data showed that polymorphisms in CYP3A5, CYP3A4, ABCB1, and UGT1A9 genes could modify the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressants, suggesting that patient genotyping could be a helpful strategy to select the ideal ISDs dose for each patient.

The influence of recipient SLCO1B1 rs2291075 polymorphism on tacrolimus dose-corrected trough concentration in the early period after liver transplantation

Purpose

To explore the relationship between rs2291075 polymorphism in SLCO1B1 gene, which encodes an influx transmembrane protein transporter, and tacrolimus dose–corrected trough concentration (C/D, ng ml⁻¹ mg⁻¹ kg⁻¹) in the early period after liver transplantation.

Methods

CYP3A5 rs776746 and SLCO1B1 rs2291075 polymorphisms of 210 liver transplantation patients and their corresponding donor livers were assessed by PCR amplification and DNA sequencing. The influence of gene polymorphisms on C/D values of tacrolimus was analyzed. The early postoperative period after liver transplantation was divided into the convalescence phase (1–14 days) and stationary phase (15–28 days) according to the change of liver function and tacrolimus C/D values.

Results

The combined analysis of donor and recipient CYP3A5 rs776746 could distinguish the metabolic phenotype of tacrolimus into three groups: fast elimination (FE), intermediate elimination (IE), and slow elimination (SE), which was entitled the FIS classification system. Tacrolimus C/D ratios of recipient SLCO1B1 rs2291075 CT and TT carriers were very close and were significantly lower than those of recipient SLCO1B1 rs2291075 CC genotype carriers in convalescence phase (p = 0.0195) and in stationary phase (p = 0.0152). There were no statistically significant differences between tacrolimus C/D ratios of patients carried with SLCO1B1 rs2291075 CT, TT genotype donors, and those carried with SLCO1B1 rs2291075 CC genotype donors. A model consisting of tacrolimus daily dose, total bilirubin, FIS classification, and recipient SLCO1B1 rs2291075 could predict tacrolimus C/D ratios in the convalescence phase by multivariate analysis. However, recipient SLCO1B1 rs2291075 genotype failed to enter forecast model for C/D ratios in stationary phase. Recipient SLCO1B1 rs2291075 genotype had significant effect on tacrolimus C/D ratios in convalescence phase (p = 0.0300) and stationary phase (p = 0.0400) in subgroup, which excluded the interference come from donor and recipient CYP3A5 rs776746.

Conclusion

SLCO1B1 rs2291075 could be a novel genetic locus associated with tacrolimus metabolism. The combined analysis of donor and recipient CYP3A5 rs776746, recipient SLCO1B1 rs2291075 genotypes, could be helpful to guide the personalized administration of tacrolimus in early period after liver transplantation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-020-03058-w.