|
1
|
Grauman Å, Ancillotti M, Veldwijk J, Mascalzoni D. Precision cancer medicine and the doctor-patient relationship: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:286. [PMID: 38098034 PMCID: PMC10722840 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02395-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implementation of precision medicine is likely to have a huge impact on clinical cancer care, while the doctor-patient relationship is a crucial aspect of cancer care that needs to be preserved. This systematic review aimed to map out perceptions and concerns regarding how the implementation of precision medicine will impact the doctor-patient relationship in cancer care so that threats against the doctor-patient relationship can be addressed. METHODS Electronic databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Social Science Premium Collection) were searched for articles published from January 2010 to December 2021, including qualitative, quantitative, and theoretical methods. Two reviewers completed title and abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction. Findings were summarized and explained using narrative synthesis. RESULTS Four themes were generated from the included articles (n = 35). Providing information addresses issues of information transmission and needs, and of complex concepts such as genetics and uncertainty. Making decisions in a trustful relationship addresses opacity issues, the role of trust, and and physicians' attitude towards the role of precision medicine tools in decision-making. Managing negative reactions of non-eligible patients addresses patients' unmet expectations of precision medicine. Conflicting roles in the blurry line between clinic and research addresses issues stemming from physicians' double role as doctors and researchers. CONCLUSIONS Many findings have previously been addressed in doctor-patient communication and clinical genetics. However, precision medicine adds complexity to these fields and further emphasizes the importance of clear communication on specific themes like the distinction between genomic and gene expression and patients' expectations about access, eligibility, effectiveness, and side effects of targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Å Grauman
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden.
| | - M Ancillotti
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden
| | - J Veldwijk
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D Mascalzoni
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Grauman Å, Kontro M, Haller K, Nier S, Aakko S, Lang K, Zingaretti C, Meggiolaro E, De Padova S, Marconi G, Martinelli G, Heckman CA, Simonetti G, Bullinger L, Kihlbom U. Personalizing precision medicine: Patients with AML perceptions about treatment decisions. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 115:107883. [PMID: 37421687 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to explore patients' with acute myeloid leukemia perceptions about precision medicine and their preferences for involvement in this new area of shared decision-making. METHODS Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted in Finland, Italy and Germany (n = 16). The study population included patients aged 24-79 years. Interviews were analyzed with thematic content analysis. RESULTS Patient's perceived lack of knowledge as a barrier for their involvement in decision-making. Treatment decisions were often made rapidly based on the patient's intuition and trust for the physician rather than on information, in situations that decrease the patient's decision capacity. The patients emphasized that they are in a desperate situation that makes them willing to accept treatment with low probabilities of being cured. CONCLUSIONS The study raised important issues regarding patients' understanding of precision medicine and challenges concerning how to involve patients in medical decision-making. Although technical advances were viewed positively, the role of the physician as an expert and person-of-trust cannot be replaced. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Regardless of patients' preferences for involvement in decision-making, information plays a crucial role for patients' perceived involvement in their care. The concepts related to precision medicine are complex and will imply challenges to patient education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Åsa Grauman
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Mika Kontro
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Hematology, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland; Foundation for the Finnish Cancer Institute, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Karl Haller
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Sofia Aakko
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Katharina Lang
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chiara Zingaretti
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy
| | - Elena Meggiolaro
- Psycho-oncology Service, Palliative care, Pain therapy and Integrative Medicine Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy
| | - Silvia De Padova
- Psycho-oncology Service, Palliative care, Pain therapy and Integrative Medicine Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy
| | - Giovanni Marconi
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy
| | - Giovanni Martinelli
- Scientific Directorate, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy
| | - Caroline A Heckman
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Giorgia Simonetti
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, FC, Italy
| | - Lars Bullinger
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrik Kihlbom
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Stockholm Centre for Health Care Ethics (CHE), LIME, Karoliniska Institutet, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|