Androgen Receptor: A New Marker to Predict Pathological Complete Response in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Trastuzumab Plus Pertuzumab Neoadjuvant Therapy

Androgen receptor: Structure, signaling, function and potential drug discovery biomarker in different breast cancer subtypes

The Androgen Receptor (AR) is emerging as an important factor in the pathogenesis of breast cancer (BC), which is the most common malignancy worldwide. >70 % of AR expression in primary and metastatic breast tumors has been observed which suggests that AR may be a new marker and a potential therapeutic target among AR-positive BC patients. Biological insight into AR-positive breast cancer reveals that AR may cross-talk with several vital signaling pathways, including key molecules and receptors. Downstream signaling of AR might also affect many clinically important pathways that are emerging as clinical targets in BC. AR exhibits different behaviors depending on the breast cancer molecular subtype. Preliminary clinical research using AR-targeted drugs, which have already been FDA-approved for prostate cancer (PC), has given promising results for AR-positive breast cancer patients. However, since AR positivity's prognostic and predictive value remains uncertain, it is difficult to identify and stratify patients who would benefit from AR-targeted therapies alone. Thus, the need of the hour is to target the androgen receptor as a monotherapy or in combination with other conventional therapies which has proven to be an effective clinical strategy for the treatment of prostate cancer patients, and these therapeutic strategies are increasingly being investigated in breast cancer. Therefore, in this manuscript, we review the role of AR in various cellular processes that promote tumorigenesis and aggressiveness, in different subtypes of breast cancer, as well as discuss ongoing efforts to target AR for the more effective treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

Evaluation of predictive and prognostic value of androgen receptor expression in breast cancer subtypes treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for local advanced breast cancer administered to shrink tumors and destroy undetected metastatic cells, thereby facilitating subsequent surgery. Previous studies have shown that AR may be used as a prognostic predictor in breast cancers, but its role in neoadjuvant therapy and the relationship with prognosis of different molecular subtypes of breast cancer need to be further explored.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 1231 breast cancer patients with complete medical records at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between January 2018 to December 2021. All the patients were selected for prognostic analysis. The follow-up time ranged from 12 to 60 months. We first analyzed the AR expression in different subtypes of breast cancer and its correlation with clinicopathological features. Meanwhile, the association of AR expression and pCR of different breast cancer subtypes was investigated. Finally, the effect of AR status on the prognosis of different subtypes of breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy was analyzed.

RESULTS

The positive rates of AR expression in HR + /HER2-, HR + /HER2 +, HR-/HER2 + and TNBC subtypes were 82.5%, 86.9%, 72.2% and 34.6%, respectively. Histological grade III (P = 0.014, OR = 1.862, 95% CI 1.137 to 2.562), ER positive expression (P = 0.002, OR = 0.381, 95% CI 0.102 to 0.754) and HER2 positive expression (P = 0.006, OR = 0.542, 95% CI 0.227 to 0.836) were independent related factors for AR positive expression. AR expression status was associated with pCR rate after neoadjuvant therapy only in subtype of TNBC. AR positive expression was independent protective factor for recurrence and metastasis in HR + /HER2- (P = 0.033, HR = 0.653, 95% CI 0.237 to 0.986) and HR + /HER2 + breast cancer (P = 0.012, HR = 0.803, 95% CI 0.167 to 0.959), but was independent risk factors for recurrence and metastasis in TNBC (P = 0.015, HR = 4.551, 95% CI 2.668 to 8.063). AR positive expression is not an independent predictor of HR-/HER2 + breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

AR expressed the lowest in TNBC, but it could be a potential marker for the prediction of pCR in neoadjuvant therapy. AR negative patients had a higher pCR rate. AR positive expression was an independent risk factor for pCR in TNBC after neoadjuvant therapy (P = 0.017, OR = 2.758, 95% CI 1.564 to 4.013). In HR + /HER2- subtype and in HR + /HER2 + subtype, the DFS rate in AR positive patients and AR negative patients was 96.2% vs 89.0% (P = 0.001, HR = 0.330, 95% CI 0.106 to 1.034) and was 96.0% vs 85.7% (P = 0.002, HR = 0.278, 95% CI 0.082 to 0.940), respectively. However, in HR-/HER2 + and TNBC subtypes, the DFS rate in AR positive patients and AR negative patients was 89.0% vs 95.9% (P = 0.102, HR = 3.211, 95% CI 1.117 to 9.224) and 75.0% vs 93.4% (P < 0.001, HR = 3.706, 95% CI 1.681 to 8.171), respectively. In HR + /HER2- and HR + /HER2 + breast cancer, AR positive patients had a better prognosis, however in TNBC, AR-positive patients have a poor prognosis.

Tumor immune microenvironment components and the other markers can predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Breast cancer is an epithelial malignant tumor that occurs in the terminal ducts of the breast. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is an important part of breast cancer treatment. Its purpose is to use systemic treatment for some locally advanced breast cancer patients, to decrease the tumor size and clinical stage so that non-operable breast cancer patients can have a chance to access surgical treatment, or patients who are not suitable for breast-conserving surgery can get the opportunity of breast-conserving. However, some patients who do not respond to NACT will lead deterioration in their condition. Therefore, prediction of NACT efficacy in breast cancer is vital for precision therapy. The tumor microenvironment (TME) has a crucial role in the carcinogenesis and therapeutic response of breast cancer. In this review, we summarized the immune cells, immune checkpoints, and other biomarkers in the TME that can evaluate the efficacy of NACT in treating breast cancer. We believe that the detection and evaluation of the TME components in breast cancer are helpful to predict the efficacy of NACT, and the prediction methods are in the prospect. In addition, we also summarized other predictive factors of NACT, such as imaging examination, biochemical markers, and multigene/multiprotein profiling.

Novel Therapies and Strategies to Overcome Resistance to Anti-HER2-Targeted Drugs

The prognosis and quality of life of HER2 breast cancer patients have significantly improved due to the crucial clinical benefit of various anti-HER2 targeted therapies. However, HER2 tumors can possess or develop several resistance mechanisms to these treatments, thus leaving patients with a limited set of additional therapeutic options. Fortunately, to overcome this problem, in recent years, multiple different and complementary approaches have been developed (such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)) that are in clinical or preclinical stages. In this review, we focus on emerging strategies other than on ADCs that are either aimed at directly target the HER2 receptor (i.e., novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors) or subsequent intracellular signaling (e.g., PI3K/AKT/mTOR, CDK4/6 inhibitors, etc.), as well as on innovative approaches designed to attack other potential tumor weaknesses (such as immunotherapy, autophagy blockade, or targeting of other genes within the HER2 amplicon). Moreover, relevant technical advances such as anti-HER2 nanotherapies and immunotoxins are also discussed. In brief, this review summarizes the impact of novel therapeutic approaches on current and future clinical management of aggressive HER2 breast tumors.