Steps towards a Multiple Myeloma Cure?

The Effect of Age and Other Patient Characteristics on Outcomes Among Nontransplanted Patients Who Were Treated With First-Line Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone: Results From the ConnectⓇ MM Registry

BACKGROUND

Lenalidomide (R), bortezomib (V), and dexamethasone (d) is a standard-of-care regimen in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM); however, characteristics and outcomes for nontransplanted patients receiving frontline RVd are not well understood.

PATIENTS

The ConnectⓇ MM Registry is a large, US, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of NDMM patients.

METHODS

This analysis investigated characteristics and outcomes of patients who received RVd alone or followed by Rd or R (RVd ± Rd/R) who did not undergo frontline autologous stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS

As of August 2021, 314 of 1979 nontransplanted patients received RVd ± Rd/R as initial therapy. Of these, 135 were aged ≤ 65 years and 179 were > 65 years. 108 patients had time to relapse (TTR) of ≤ 12 months and 182 had TTR > 12 months. Baseline characteristics were comparable regardless of TTR and age group except renal function, which was more commonly impaired in older patients. Among patients aged ≤ 65 and > 65 years, median duration of first-line treatment was 6.3 and 9.0 months, median time to next line for those who received second-line therapy was 15.5 and 15.2 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.3 and 23.0 months, and median overall survival was 60.0 and 59.1 months, respectively. High-risk disease (per IMWG criteria) and high serum calcium were associated with higher hazard of progression or death; the adjusted PFS hazard ratio with respect to age (≤ 65 vs. > 65 years) based on multivariable analysis was 1.18 (0.89-1.57; P = .25).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate RVd is active across age groups and provide a better understanding of outcomes with RVd in NDMM.

Does the Simultaneous Introduction of Several Pharmaceuticals in the Post-Lenalidomide Era Translate to Better Outcomes in Relapse Refractory Multiple Myeloma? Findings from the Real-World Innovation in Multiple Myeloma (REAL IMM) Study

Newer methodologies are needed to assess the real-world comparative effectiveness of a "generation" of pharmaceutical innovation versus the prior standard of care. This chart review study aimed to first evaluate the cumulative clinical benefits of pharmaceutical innovation in everyday relapse/refractory multiple myeloma before analyzing findings in the context of respective real-world outcomes from the bortezomib/lenalidomide era. Study endpoints included the 52-week PFS rate in second and third line of therapy (LOT), mPFS-2 across the first and second LOT, the ORR, reasons for discontinuation, and the treatment duration per therapeutic algorithm. Data from 107 patients were collected. The median follow-up was 2.0 years. Of the subjects who met the selection criteria for the second LOT, 72.2% maintained the PFS at 52 weeks. In the third-line setting, the PFS rate at 52 weeks was 63.5%. The mPFS across the first and second, the second, and the third LOTs were 26, 17, and 15 months, respectively. The ORR was 76.1% in the second and 69.7% in the third LOT. After non-response or progression, the main reason for drug discontinuation was treatment intolerability. The second-line ORR and the 52-week PFS rate were similar to previous real-world findings from the bortezomib/lenalidomide era. The cumulative mPFS across the second and third LOTs was higher than the respective mPFS across the first and second LOTs. Despite its limitations, the methodology and findings from this study may be used in future clinical and economic evaluations across all hematological malignancies.

Characteristics and Risk Factors of Ultra-High-Risk Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors of ultra-high-risk (UHR) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM).

METHODS

We screened UHR patients with a survival of less than 24 months and we selected patients with a concurrent survival of more than 24 months as a control group. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics of UHR patients with newly diagnosed MM and screened related risk factors.

RESULTS

In total we analyzed 477 patients, which included 121 (25.4%) UHR patients and 356 (74.6%) control patients. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of UHR patients was 10.5 months (7.5-13.5 months) and 6.3 months (5.4-7.2 months), respectively. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that age > 65 years, hemoglobin (HGB) < 100 g/L, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > 250 U/L, serum creatinine (SCr) > 2 mg/dL, corrected serum calcium (CsCa) > 2.75 mmol/L, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal prohormone BNP (NT-proBNP) > 2 upper limit of normal (ULN), high-risk cytogenetics, Barthel index score, and International Staging System (ISS) stage III were associated with UHR MM. In a multivariate analysis, age > 65 years, LDH > 250 U/L, CsCa > 2.75 mmol/L, BNP or NT-proBNP > 2 ULN, high-risk cytogenetics, and Barthel index score were independent risk factors for UHR MM. Moreover, UHR patients had a worse response rate than control patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlighted the characteristics of UHR MM patients and suggested that the combination of organ insufficiency and highly malignant myeloma cells resulted in poor outcomes of patients with UHR MM.

"Friends and foes" of multiple myeloma measurable/minimal residual disease evaluation by next generation flow

Next Generation Flow (NGF) represents a gold standard for the evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients at any stage of treatment. Although the assessment of MRD is still not universally employed in clinical practice, numerous studies have demonstrated the strength of MRD as a reliable predictor of long-term outcome, and its potential to supersede the prognostic value of CR. The possibility to acquire millions of events, in combination with the use of standard reagents and a good expertise in the analysis of rare populations, led to high chance of success and a sensitivity of 10-6 that is superimposable to the one of Next Generation Sequencing molecular techniques. Some minor bias, correlated to the protocols applied, to the quality of samples and to the high heterogeneity of plasma cells phenotype, may be overcome using standard protocols and having at disposition personnel expertise for MRD analysis. With the use of NGF we can today enter a new phase of the quantification of residual disease, switching from the definition of "minimal" residual disease to "measurable" residual disease. This review takes account of the principle "friends and foes" of Myeloma "Measurable" Residual Disease evaluation by NGF, to give insights into the potentiality of this technique. The optimization of the quality of BM samples and the analytic expertise that permits to discriminate properly the rare pathologic clones, are the keys for obtaining results with a high clinical value that could be of great impact and relevance in the future.