1
|
Bentriou M, Letort V, Chounta S, Fresneau B, Do D, Haddy N, Diallo I, Journy N, Zidane M, Charrier T, Aba N, Ducos C, Zossou VS, de Vathaire F, Allodji RS, Lemler S. Combining dosiomics and machine learning methods for predicting severe cardiac diseases in childhood cancer survivors: the French Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1241221. [PMID: 39687880 PMCID: PMC11647004 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1241221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Cardiac disease (CD) is a primary long-term diagnosed pathology among childhood cancer survivors. Dosiomics (radiomics extracted from the dose distribution) have received attention in the past few years to assess better the induced risk of radiotherapy (RT) than standard dosimetric features such as dose-volume indicators. Hence, using the spatial information contained in the dosiomics features with machine learning methods may improve the prediction of CD. Methods We considered the 7670 5-year survivors of the French Childhood Cancer Survivors Study (FCCSS). Dose-volume and dosiomics features are extracted from the radiation dose distribution of 3943 patients treated with RT. Survival analysis is performed considering several groups of features and several models [Cox Proportional Hazard with Lasso penalty, Cox with Bootstrap Lasso selection, Random Survival Forests (RSF)]. We establish the performance of dosiomics compared to baseline models by estimating C-index and Integrated Brier Score (IBS) metrics with 5-fold stratified cross-validation and compare their time-dependent error curves. Results An RSF model adjusted on the first-order dosiomics predictors extracted from the whole heart performed best regarding the C-index (0.792 ± 0.049), and an RSF model adjusted on the first-order dosiomics predictors extracted from the heart's subparts performed best regarding the IBS (0.069 ± 0.05). However, the difference is not statistically significant with the standard models (C-index of Cox PH adjusted on dose-volume indicators: 0.791 ± 0.044; IBS of Cox PH adjusted on the mean dose to the heart: 0.074 ± 0.056). Conclusion In this study, dosiomics models have slightly better performance metrics but they do not outperform the standard models significantly. Quantiles of the dose distribution may contain enough information to estimate the risk of late radio-induced high-grade CD in childhood cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Bentriou
- Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Mathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Véronique Letort
- Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Mathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Stefania Chounta
- Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Mathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles - Saint Quentin en Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Villejuif, France
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Brice Fresneau
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles - Saint Quentin en Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Villejuif, France
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Villejuif, France
| | - Duyen Do
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles - Saint Quentin en Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Villejuif, France
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Nadia Haddy
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles - Saint Quentin en Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Villejuif, France
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Ibrahima Diallo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
- Gustave Roussy, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Neige Journy
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles - Saint Quentin en Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Villejuif, France
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Monia Zidane
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles - Saint Quentin en Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Villejuif, France
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Thibaud Charrier
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles - Saint Quentin en Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Villejuif, France
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), U900, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Naila Aba
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles - Saint Quentin en Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Villejuif, France
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Claire Ducos
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles - Saint Quentin en Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Villejuif, France
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Vincent S. Zossou
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles - Saint Quentin en Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Villejuif, France
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles - Saint Quentin en Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Villejuif, France
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Rodrigue S. Allodji
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles - Saint Quentin en Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Villejuif, France
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), CESP-U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Radiation Epidemiology Team, Villejuif, France
- Polytechnic School of Abomey-Calavi (EPAC), University of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin
| | - Sarah Lemler
- Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Mathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beddok A, Orlhac F, Rozenblum L, Calugaru V, Créhange G, Dercle L, Nioche C, Thariat J, Marin T, El Fakhri G, Buvat I. Radiomics-driven personalized radiotherapy for primary and recurrent tumors: A general review with a focus on reirradiation. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:597-602. [PMID: 39406602 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 11/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This review systematically investigates the role of radiomics in radiotherapy, with a particular emphasis on the use of quantitative imaging biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes, assessing toxicity, and optimizing treatment planning. While the review encompasses various applications of radiomics in radiotherapy, it particularly highlights its potential for guiding reirradiation of recurrent cancers. METHODS A systematic review was conducted based on a Medline search with the search engine PubMed using the keywords "radiomics or radiomic" and "radiotherapy or reirradiation". Out of 189 abstracts reviewed, 147 original articles were included in the analysis. These studies were categorized by tumor localization, imaging modality, study objectives, and performance metrics, with a particular emphasis on the inclusion of external validation and adherence to a standardized radiomics pipeline. RESULTS The review identified 14 tumor localizations, with the majority of studies focusing on lung (33 studies), head and neck (27 studies), and brain (15 studies) cancers. CT was the most frequently employed imaging modality (77 studies) for radiomics, followed by MRI (46 studies) and PET (13 studies). The overall AUC across all studies, primarily focused on predicting the risk of recurrence (94 studies) or toxicity (41 studies), was 0.80 (SD=0.08). However, only 24 studies (16.3%) included external validation, with a slightly lower AUC compared to those without it. For studies using CT versus MRI or PET, both had a median AUC of 0.79, with IQRs of 0.73-0.86 for CT and 0.76-0.855 for MRI/PET, showing no significant differences in performance. Five studies involving reirradiation reported a median AUC of 0.81 (IQR: 0.73-0.825). CONCLUSION Radiomics demonstrates considerable potential in personalizing radiotherapy by improving treatment precision through better outcome prediction and treatment planning. However, its clinical adoption is hindered by the lack of external validation and variability in study designs. Future research should focus on implementing rigorous validation methods and standardizing imaging protocols to enhance the reliability and generalizability of radiomics in clinical radiotherapy, with particular attention to its application in reirradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Beddok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Godinot, Reims, France; Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Crestic, Reims, France; Yale PET Center, Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
| | - Fanny Orlhac
- Institut Curie, université PSL, université Paris Saclay, Inserm Lito U1288, Orsay, France
| | - Laura Rozenblum
- Yale PET Center, Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Nuclear Medicine, hôpitaux universitaires la Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Institut Curie, université PSL, université Paris Saclay, Inserm Lito U1288, Orsay, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Curie, université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Institut Curie, université PSL, université Paris Saclay, Inserm Lito U1288, Orsay, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Curie, université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Laurent Dercle
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA
| | - Christophe Nioche
- Institut Curie, université PSL, université Paris Saclay, Inserm Lito U1288, Orsay, France
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Thibault Marin
- Yale PET Center, Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Georges El Fakhri
- Yale PET Center, Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Irène Buvat
- Institut Curie, université PSL, université Paris Saclay, Inserm Lito U1288, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Avanzo M, Stancanello J, Pirrone G, Drigo A, Retico A. The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: From Computer Science to Machine and Deep Learning. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3702. [PMID: 39518140 PMCID: PMC11545079 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16213702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2024] [Revised: 10/26/2024] [Accepted: 10/29/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), the wide spectrum of technologies aiming to give machines or computers the ability to perform human-like cognitive functions, began in the 1940s with the first abstract models of intelligent machines. Soon after, in the 1950s and 1960s, machine learning algorithms such as neural networks and decision trees ignited significant enthusiasm. More recent advancements include the refinement of learning algorithms, the development of convolutional neural networks to efficiently analyze images, and methods to synthesize new images. This renewed enthusiasm was also due to the increase in computational power with graphical processing units and the availability of large digital databases to be mined by neural networks. AI soon began to be applied in medicine, first through expert systems designed to support the clinician's decision and later with neural networks for the detection, classification, or segmentation of malignant lesions in medical images. A recent prospective clinical trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of AI alone compared with a double reading by two radiologists on screening mammography. Natural language processing, recurrent neural networks, transformers, and generative models have both improved the capabilities of making an automated reading of medical images and moved AI to new domains, including the text analysis of electronic health records, image self-labeling, and self-reporting. The availability of open-source and free libraries, as well as powerful computing resources, has greatly facilitated the adoption of deep learning by researchers and clinicians. Key concerns surrounding AI in healthcare include the need for clinical trials to demonstrate efficacy, the perception of AI tools as 'black boxes' that require greater interpretability and explainability, and ethical issues related to ensuring fairness and trustworthiness in AI systems. Thanks to its versatility and impressive results, AI is one of the most promising resources for frontier research and applications in medicine, in particular for oncological applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Avanzo
- Medical Physics Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (G.P.); (A.D.)
| | | | - Giovanni Pirrone
- Medical Physics Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (G.P.); (A.D.)
| | - Annalisa Drigo
- Medical Physics Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (G.P.); (A.D.)
| | - Alessandra Retico
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN), Pisa Division, 56127 Pisa, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marvaso G, Isaksson LJ, Zaffaroni M, Vincini MG, Summers PE, Pepa M, Corrao G, Mazzola GC, Rotondi M, Mastroleo F, Raimondi S, Alessi S, Pricolo P, Luzzago S, Mistretta FA, Ferro M, Cattani F, Ceci F, Musi G, De Cobelli O, Cremonesi M, Gandini S, La Torre D, Orecchia R, Petralia G, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Can we predict pathology without surgery? Weighing the added value of multiparametric MRI and whole prostate radiomics in integrative machine learning models. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:6241-6253. [PMID: 38507053 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10699-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test the ability of high-performance machine learning (ML) models employing clinical, radiological, and radiomic variables to improve non-invasive prediction of the pathological status of prostate cancer (PCa) in a large, single-institution cohort. METHODS Patients who underwent multiparametric MRI and prostatectomy in our institution in 2015-2018 were considered; a total of 949 patients were included. Gradient-boosted decision tree models were separately trained using clinical features alone and in combination with radiological reporting and/or prostate radiomic features to predict pathological T, pathological N, ISUP score, and their change from preclinical assessment. Model behavior was analyzed in terms of performance, feature importance, Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values, and mean absolute error (MAE). The best model was compared against a naïve model mimicking clinical workflow. RESULTS The model including all variables was the best performing (AUC values ranging from 0.73 to 0.96 for the six endpoints). Radiomic features brought a small yet measurable boost in performance, with the SHAP values indicating that their contribution can be critical to successful prediction of endpoints for individual patients. MAEs were lower for low-risk patients, suggesting that the models find them easier to classify. The best model outperformed (p ≤ 0.0001) clinical baseline, resulting in significantly fewer false negative predictions and overall was less prone to under-staging. CONCLUSIONS Our results highlight the potential benefit of integrative ML models for pathological status prediction in PCa. Additional studies regarding clinical integration of such models can provide valuable information for personalizing therapy offering a tool to improve non-invasive prediction of pathological status. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The best machine learning model was less prone to under-staging of the disease. The improved accuracy of our pathological prediction models could constitute an asset to the clinical workflow by providing clinicians with accurate pathological predictions prior to treatment. KEY POINTS • Currently, the most common strategies for pre-surgical stratification of prostate cancer (PCa) patients have shown to have suboptimal performances. • The addition of radiological features to the clinical features gave a considerable boost in model performance. Our best model outperforms the naïve model, avoiding under-staging and resulting in a critical advantage in the clinic. •Machine learning models incorporating clinical, radiological, and radiomics features significantly improved accuracy of pathological prediction in prostate cancer, possibly constituting an asset to the clinical workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Paul Eugene Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marco Rotondi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Mastroleo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Sara Raimondi
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sarah Alessi
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Pricolo
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Alessandro Mistretta
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Medical Physics Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Cremonesi
- Radiation Research Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide La Torre
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- SKEMA Business School, Université Côte d'Azur, Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mendes B, Domingues I, Santos J. Radiomic Pipelines for Prostate Cancer in External Beam Radiation Therapy: A Review of Methods and Future Directions. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3907. [PMID: 38999473 PMCID: PMC11242211 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Prostate Cancer (PCa) is asymptomatic at an early stage and often painless, requiring only active surveillance. External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) is currently a curative option for localised and locally advanced diseases and a palliative option for metastatic low-volume disease. Although highly effective, especially in a hypofractionation scheme, 17.4% to 39.4% of all patients suffer from cancer recurrence after EBRT. But, radiographic findings also correlate with significant differences in protein expression patterns. In the PCa EBRT workflow, several imaging modalities are available for grading, staging and contouring. Using image data characterisation algorithms (radiomics), one can provide a quantitative analysis of prognostic and predictive treatment outcomes. Methods: This literature review searched for original studies in radiomics for PCa in the context of EBRT. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this review includes 73 new studies and analyses datasets, imaging modality, segmentation technique, feature extraction, selection and model building methods. Results: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the preferred imaging modality for radiomic studies in PCa but Computed Tomography (CT), Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Ultrasound (US) may offer valuable insights on tumour characterisation and treatment response prediction. Conclusions: Most radiomic studies used small, homogeneous and private datasets lacking external validation and variability. Future research should focus on collaborative efforts to create large, multicentric datasets and develop standardised methodologies, ensuring the full potential of radiomics in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Mendes
- Research Center of the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto (CI-IPOP), Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiological Protection Group, R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (I.D.); (J.S.)
- Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto (FEUP), R. Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
| | - Inês Domingues
- Research Center of the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto (CI-IPOP), Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiological Protection Group, R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (I.D.); (J.S.)
- Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute of Engineering, Rua Pedro Nunes-Quinta da Nora, 3030-199 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - João Santos
- Research Center of the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto (CI-IPOP), Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiological Protection Group, R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (I.D.); (J.S.)
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), R. Jorge de Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huma C, Hawon L, Sarisha J, Erdal T, Kevin C, Valentina KA. Advances in the field of developing biomarkers for re-irradiation: a how-to guide to small, powerful data sets and artificial intelligence. EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT 2024; 9:3-16. [PMID: 38550554 PMCID: PMC10972602 DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2024.2325936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Patient selection remains challenging as the clinical use of re-irradiation (re-RT) increases. Re-RT data is limited to retrospective studies and small prospective single-institution reports, resulting in small, heterogenous data sets. Validated prognostic and predictive biomarkers are derived from large-volume studies with long-term follow-up. This review aims to examine existing re-RT publications and available data sets and discuss strategies using artificial intelligence (AI) to approach small data sets to optimize the use of re-RT data. Methods Re-RT publications were identified where associated public data was present. The existing literature on small data sets to identify biomarkers was also explored. Results Publications with associated public data were identified, with glioma and nasopharyngeal cancers emerging as the most common tumor sites where the use of re-RT was the primary management approach. Existing and emerging AI strategies have been used to approach small data sets including data generation, augmentation, discovery, and transfer learning. Conclusions Further data is needed to generate adaptive frameworks, improve the collection of specimens for molecular analysis, and improve the interpretability of results in re-RT data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaudhry Huma
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
| | - Lee Hawon
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
| | - Jagasia Sarisha
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
| | - Tasci Erdal
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
| | - Camphausen Kevin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
| | - Krauze Andra Valentina
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
What We Talk about When We Talk about Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Oncology. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12111834. [PMID: 36579551 PMCID: PMC9694457 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12111834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The constant evolution of technology has dramatically changed the history of radiation oncology, allowing clinicians to deliver increasingly accurate and precise treatments, moving from 2D radiotherapy to 3D conformal radiotherapy, leading to intensity-modulated image-guided (IMRT-IGRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy treatments [...].
Collapse
|