Molecular Profiling in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: Towards a Switch to Next-Generation Sequencing Reflex Testing

Enhancing Lung Cancer Care in Portugal: Bridging Gaps for Improved Patient Outcomes

Lung cancer has the highest incidence and cancer-related mortality worldwide. In Portugal, it ranks as the fourth most common cancer, with nearly 6000 new cases being diagnosed every year. Lung cancer is the main cause of cancer-related death among males and the third cause of cancer-related death in females. Despite the globally accepted guidelines and recommendations for what would be the ideal path for a lung cancer patient, several challenges occur in real clinical management across the world. The recommendations emphasize the importance of adequate screening of high-risk individuals, a precise tumour biopsy, and an accurate final diagnosis to confirm the neoplastic nature of the nodule. A detailed histological classification of the lung tumour type and a comprehensive molecular characterization are of utmost importance for the selection of an efficacious and patient-directed therapeutic approach. However, in the context of the Portuguese clinical organization and the national healthcare system, there are still several gaps in the ideal pathway for a lung cancer patient, involving aspects ranging from the absence of a national lung cancer screening programme through difficulties in histological diagnosis and molecular characterization to challenges in therapeutic approaches. In this manuscript, we address the most relevant weaknesses, presenting several proposals for potential solutions to improve the management of lung cancer patients, helping to decisively improve their overall survival and quality of life.

Current challenges and practical aspects of molecular pathology for non-small cell lung cancers

The continuing evolution of treatment options in thoracic oncology requires the pathologist to regularly update diagnostic algorithms for management of tumor samples. It is essential to decide on the best way to use tissue biopsies, cytological samples, as well as liquid biopsies to identify the different mandatory predictive biomarkers of lung cancers in a short turnaround time. However, biological resources and laboratory member workforce are limited and may be not sufficient for the increased complexity of molecular pathological analyses and for complementary translational research development. In this context, the surgical pathologist is the only one who makes the decisions whether or not to send specimens to immunohistochemical and molecular pathology platforms. Moreover, the pathologist can rapidly contact the oncologist to obtain a new tissue biopsy and/or a liquid biopsy if he/she considers that the biological material is not sufficient in quantity or quality for assessment of predictive biomarkers. Inadequate control of algorithms and sampling workflow may lead to false negative, inconclusive, and incomplete findings, resulting in inappropriate choice of therapeutic strategy and potentially poor outcome for patients. International guidelines for lung cancer treatment are based on the results of the expression of different proteins and on genomic alterations. These guidelines have been established taking into consideration the best practices to be set up in clinical and molecular pathology laboratories. This review addresses the current predictive biomarkers and algorithms for use in thoracic oncology molecular pathology as well as the central role of the pathologist, notably in the molecular tumor board and her/his participation in the treatment decision-making. The perspectives in this setting will be discussed.

Actionable mutational profiling in solid tumors using hybrid-capture-based next-generation sequencing in a real-world setting in Spain

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the performance of a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel for the detection of precise genomic alterations in cancer in Spanish clinical practice. The impact of tumor characteristics was evaluated on informative NGS and actionable mutation rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital (May 2021-March 2022) where molecular diagnostic of 537 Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) tissue samples of diverse solid tumors (lung, colorectal, melanoma, gastrointestinal stromal, among others) was performed using AVENIO Tumor Tissue Targeted Kit. A descriptive analysis of the features of all samples was carried out. Multivariable logistic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of sample characteristics on NGS performance defined by informative results rate (for all tumors and for lung tumors), and on actionable mutations rate (for lung tumors only).

RESULTS

AVENIO performance rate was 75.2% in all tumor samples and 75.3% in lung cancer samples, and the multivariable analysis showed that surgical specimens are most likely to provide informative results than diagnostic biopsies. Regarding the mutational findings, 727 pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or variant of unknown significance mutations were found in all tumor samples. Single nucleotide variant was the most common genomic alteration, both for all tumor samples (85.3% and 81.9% for all solid tumors and lung samples, respectively). In lung tumors, multivariable analysis showed that it is more likely to find actionable mutations from non-smokers and patients with adenocarcinoma, large cell, or undifferentiated histologies.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest cohort-level study in Spain to profile the analyses of biopsy samples of different tumors using NGS in routine clinical practice. Our findings showed that the use of NGS routinely provides good rates of informative results and can improve tumor characterization and identify a greater number of actionable mutations.

Liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of state-of-the-art and future perspectives

Introduction: To date, tissue biopsy represents the gold standard for characterizing non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, the complex architecture of the disease has introduced the need for new investigative approaches, such as liquid biopsy. Indeed, DNA analyzed in liquid biopsy is much more representative of tumour heterogeneity. Materials and methods: We performed a meta-analysis of 17 selected papers, to attest to the diagnostic performance of liquid biopsy in identifying EGFR mutations in NSCLC. Results: In the overall studies, we found a sensitivity of 0.59, specificity of 0.96 and diagnostic odds ratio of 24,69. Since we noticed a high heterogeneity among different papers, we also performed the meta-analysis in separate subsets of papers, divided by 1) stage of disease, 2) experimental design and 3) method of mutation detection. Liquid biopsy has the highest sensitivity/specificity in high-stage tumours, and prospective studies are more reliable than retrospective ones in terms of sensitivity and specificity, both NGS and PCR-based techniques can be used to detect tumour DNA in liquid biopsy. Discussion: Overall, liquid biopsy has the potential to help the management of NSCLC, but at present the non-homogeneous literature data, lack of optimal detection methods, together with relatively high costs make its applicability in routine diagnostics still challenging.

Matched tissue and liquid biopsies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients A potentially indispensable complementary approach

The introduction of liquid biopsies (LB) has brought forth a number of therapeutic opportunities into the domain of thoracic oncology. Many of which have been adopted for care of patients presenting with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (aNS-NSCLC). For example, one of the most frequent indications to perform a LB in these patients, at least in Europe, is for patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR and ALK genomic alterations when the tumor progresses. A tissue biopsy (TB) must then be taken, ideally from a site of a tumor that progresses, in particular if the LB does not permit detection of a mechanism of resistance to TKI. A LB from a patient with aNS-NSCLC is recommended before first-line therapy if no tissue and/or cytological material is accessible or if the extracted nucleic acid is insufficient in amount and/or of poor quality. At present a LB and a TB are rarely performed simultaneously before treatment and/or on tumor progression. This complementary/matched testing approach is still controversial but needs to be better evaluated to determine the true benefit to care of patients. This review provides an update on the complementarity of the LB and TB method for care of patients presenting with aNS-NSCLC.

A Real-World Experience from a Single Center (LPCE, Nice, France) Highlights the Urgent Need to Abandon Immunohistochemistry for ROS1 Rearrangement Screening of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The detection of ROS1 rearrangements in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (NS-NSCLC) permits administration of efficient targeted therapy. Detection is based on a testing algorithm associated with ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening followed by ROS1 FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) to confirm positivity. However, (i) ROS1 rearrangements are rare (1-2% of NS-NSCLC), (ii) the specificity of ROS1 IHC is not optimal, and (iii) ROS1 FISH is not widely available, making this algorithm challenging to interpret time-consuming. We evaluated RNA NGS, which was used as reflex testing for ROS1 rearrangements in NS-NSCLC with the aim of replacing ROS1 IHC as a screening method. ROS1 IHC and RNA NGS were prospectively performed in 810 NS-NSCLC. Positive results were analyzed by ROS1 FISH. ROS1 IHC was positive in 36/810 (4.4%) cases that showed variable staining intensity while NGS detected ROS1 rearrangements in 16/810 (1.9%) cases. ROS1 FISH was positive in 15/810 (1.8%) of ROS1 IHC positive cases and in all positive ROS1 NGS cases. Obtaining both ROS1 IHC and ROS1 FISH reports took an average of 6 days, while obtaining ROS1 IHC and RNA NGS reports took an average of 3 days. These results showed that systematic screening for the ROS1 status using IHC must be replaced by NGS reflex testing.