2
|
Tkachenko AA, Changalidis AI, Maksiutenko EM, Nasykhova YA, Barbitoff YA, Glotov AS. Replication of Known and Identification of Novel Associations in Biobank-Scale Datasets: A Survey Using UK Biobank and FinnGen. Genes (Basel) 2024; 15:931. [PMID: 39062709 PMCID: PMC11275374 DOI: 10.3390/genes15070931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the last two decades, numerous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been performed to unveil the genetic architecture of human complex traits. Despite multiple efforts aimed at the trans-biobank integration of GWAS results, no systematic analysis of the variant-level properties affecting the replication of known associations (or identifying novel ones) in genome-wide meta-analysis has yet been performed using biobank-scale data. To address this issue, we performed a systematic comparison of GWAS summary statistics for 679 complex traits in the UK Biobank (UKB) and FinnGen (FG) cohorts. We identified 37,148 index variants with genome-wide associations with at least one trait in either cohort or in the meta-analysis, only 3528 (9.5%) of which were shared between UKB and FG. Nearly twice as many variants (6577) were replicated in another dataset at the significance level adjusted for the number of variants selected for replication. However, as many as 9230 loci failed to be replicated. Moreover, as many as 5813 loci were observed as significant associations only in meta-analysis results, highlighting the importance of trans-biobank meta-analysis efforts. We showed that variants that failed to replicate in UKB or FG tend to correspond to rare, less pleiotropic variants with lower effect sizes and lower LD score values. Genome-wide associations specific to meta-analysis were also enriched in low-effect variants; however, such variants tended to be more common and have more consistent frequencies between populations. Taken together, our results show a relatively high rate of non-replication of genome-wide associations in the studied cohorts and highlight both widely appreciated and less acknowledged properties of the associations affecting their identification and replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Yury A. Barbitoff
- Department of Genomic Medicine, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; (A.A.T.); (A.I.C.); (E.M.M.); (Y.A.N.); (A.S.G.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akyüz K, Goisauf M, Martin GM, Mayrhofer MT, Antoniou S, Charalambidou G, Deltas C, Malatras A, Papagregoriou G, Stefanou C, Voutounou M. Risk mapping for better governance in biobanking: the case of biobank.cy. Front Genet 2024; 15:1397156. [PMID: 38948356 PMCID: PMC11211562 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1397156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Risk governance is central for the successful and ethical operation of biobanks and the continued social license for being custodians of samples and data. Risks in biobanking are often framed as risks for participants, whereas the biobank's risks are often considered as technical ones. Risk governance relies on identifying, assessing, mitigating and communicating all risks based on technical and standardized procedures. However, within such processes, biobank staff are often involved tangentially. In this study, the aim has been to conduct a risk mapping exercise bringing biobank staff as key actors into the process, making better sense of emerging structure of biobanks. Methods: Based on the qualitative research method of situational analysis as well as the card-based discussion and stakeholder engagement processes, risk mapping was conducted at the biobank setting as an interactive engagement exercise. The analyzed material comprises mainly of moderated group discussions. Results: The findings from the risk mapping activity are framed through an organismic metaphor: the biobank as a growing, living organism in a changing environment, where trust and sustainability are cross-cutting elements in making sense of the risks. Focusing on the situatedness of the dynamics within biobanking activity highlights the importance of prioritizing relations at the core of risk governance and promoting ethicality in the biobanking process by expanding the repertoire of considered risks. Conclusion: With the organismic metaphor, the research brings the diverse group of biobank staff to the central stage for risk governance, highlighting how accounting for such diversity and interdependencies at the biobank setting is a prerequisite for an adaptive risk governance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaya Akyüz
- Department of ELSI Services and Research, BBMRI-ERIC, Graz, Austria
| | - Melanie Goisauf
- Department of ELSI Services and Research, BBMRI-ERIC, Graz, Austria
| | | | | | - Stella Antoniou
- Biobank.cy Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Georgia Charalambidou
- Biobank.cy Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Constantinos Deltas
- Biobank.cy Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, Nicosia, Cyprus
- University of Cyprus Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Apostolos Malatras
- Biobank.cy Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Gregory Papagregoriou
- Biobank.cy Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Charalambos Stefanou
- Biobank.cy Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Mariel Voutounou
- Biobank.cy Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Demircan Çeker D, Baysungur V, Evman S, Kolbaş İ, Gördebil A, Nalbantoğlu SM, Tambağ Y, Kaçar Ö, Midi A, Aslanoğlu H, Kara N, Algan N, Boyacioğlu A, Karademir Yilmaz B, Şahin A, Ülbeği Polat H, Şehitoğullari A, Çibikdiken AO, Büyükyilmaz M, Aydilek İB, Eneş A, Küçüker S, Karakaya F, Boyaci İ, Gümüş M, Şenol O, Öztuğ M, Saban E, Soysal Ö, Büyükpinarbaşili N, Turna A, Günlüoğlu MZ, Çakir A, Tekin Ş, Tazebay U, Karadağ A. LUNGBANK: a novel biorepository strategy tailored for comprehensive multiomics analysis and P-medicine applications in lung cancer. Turk J Biol 2024; 48:203-217. [PMID: 39050710 PMCID: PMC11265891 DOI: 10.55730/1300-0152.2696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/aim LUNGBANK was established as part of Project LUNGMARK, pioneering a biorepository dedicated exclusively to lung cancer research. It employs cutting-edge technologies to streamline the handling of biospecimens, ensuring the acquisition of high-quality samples. This infrastructure is fortified with robust data management capabilities, enabling seamless integration of diverse datasets. LUNGBANK functions not merely as a repository but as a sophisticated platform crucial for advancing lung cancer research, poised to facilitate significant discoveries. Materials and methods LUNGBANK was meticulously designed to optimize every stage of biospecimen handling, from collection and storage to processing. Rigorous standard operating procedures and stringent quality control measures guarantee the integrity of collected biospecimens. Advanced data management protocols facilitate the efficient integration and analysis of various datasets, enhancing the depth and breadth of research possibilities in lung cancer. Results LUNGBANK has amassed a comprehensive collection of biospecimens essential for unraveling the intricate molecular mechanisms of lung cancer. The integration of state-of-the-art technologies ensures the acquisition of top-tier data, fostering breakthroughs in translational and histological research. Moreover, the establishment of patient-derived systems by LUNGBANK underscores its pivotal role in personalized medicine approaches. Conclusion The establishment of LUNGBANK marks a significant milestone in addressing the critical challenges of lung cancer research. By providing researchers with high-quality biospecimens and advanced research tools, LUNGBANK not only supports Project LUNGMARK's objectives but also contributes extensively to the broader landscape of personalized medicine. It promises to enhance our understanding of lung cancer initiation, progression, and therapeutic interventions tailored to individual patient needs, thereby advancing the field towards more effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilek Demircan Çeker
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Medical Biotechnology Research Group, VPLS, TÜBİTAK Marmara Research Center, Kocaeli, Turkiye
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli, Turkiye
| | - Volkan Baysungur
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Turkiye
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Süreyyapaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Serdar Evman
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Süreyyapaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - İlker Kolbaş
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Süreyyapaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Abdurrahim Gördebil
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Süreyyapaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Sinem M Nalbantoğlu
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Medical Biotechnology Research Group, VPLS, TÜBİTAK Marmara Research Center, Kocaeli, Turkiye
| | - Yusuf Tambağ
- Software Technologies Research Institute, TÜBİTAK Informatics and Information Security Research Center, Ankara, Turkiye
| | - Ömer Kaçar
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Medical Biotechnology Research Group, VPLS, TÜBİTAK Marmara Research Center, Kocaeli, Turkiye
| | - Ahmet Midi
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Bahçeşehir University, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Hatice Aslanoğlu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Süreyyapaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Nülüfer Kara
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Süreyyapaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Nilgün Algan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Süreyyapaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Ayberk Boyacioğlu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Süreyyapaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Betül Karademir Yilmaz
- Division of Biochemistry, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkiye
- Genetic and Metabolic Diseases Research and Investigation Center (GEMHAM), Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Ali Şahin
- Division of Biochemistry, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkiye
- Genetic and Metabolic Diseases Research and Investigation Center (GEMHAM), Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Hivda Ülbeği Polat
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Medical Biotechnology Research Group, VPLS, TÜBİTAK Marmara Research Center, Kocaeli, Turkiye
| | - Abidin Şehitoğullari
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkiye
| | - Ali Osman Çibikdiken
- Department of Computer Sciences and Engineering, KTO Karatay University, Konya, Turkiye
| | | | - İbrahim Berkan Aydilek
- Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Turkiye
| | - Abdulkerim Eneş
- Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Turkiye
| | - Sevde Küçüker
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Medical Biotechnology Research Group, VPLS, TÜBİTAK Marmara Research Center, Kocaeli, Turkiye
| | - Fatih Karakaya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Medical Biotechnology Research Group, VPLS, TÜBİTAK Marmara Research Center, Kocaeli, Turkiye
| | - İhsan Boyaci
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Mahmut Gümüş
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul Medeniyet University, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Onur Şenol
- Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkiye
| | - Merve Öztuğ
- TÜBİTAK National Metrology Institute, Kocaeli, Turkiye
| | - Evren Saban
- TÜBİTAK National Metrology Institute, Kocaeli, Turkiye
| | - Ömer Soysal
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakıf University, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Nur Büyükpinarbaşili
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakıf University, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Akif Turna
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Mehmet Zeki Günlüoğlu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Aslı Çakir
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Şaban Tekin
- Division of Medical Biology, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Turkiye
| | - Uygar Tazebay
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli, Turkiye
| | - Abdullah Karadağ
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Medical Biotechnology Research Group, VPLS, TÜBİTAK Marmara Research Center, Kocaeli, Turkiye
- Institute of Biotechnology, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli, Turkiye
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Glotov AS, Chernykh VB, Solovova OA, Polyakov AV, Donnikov MY, Kovalenko LV, Barbitoff YA, Nasykhova YA, Lazareva TE, Glotov OS. Russian Regional Differences in Allele Frequencies of CFTR Gene Variants: Genetic Monitoring of Infertile Couples. Genes (Basel) 2023; 15:45. [PMID: 38254935 PMCID: PMC10815393 DOI: 10.3390/genes15010045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
A male factor, commonly associated with poor semen quality, is revealed in about 50% of infertile couples. CFTR gene (Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conduction Regulator) variants are one of the common genetic causes of azoospermia-related male infertility. Notably, the spectrum and frequency of pathogenic CFTR variants vary between populations and geographical regions. In this work, we made an attempt to evaluate the allele frequency (AF) of 12 common CFTR variants in infertile Russian men and healthy individuals from different districts of Russia. Because of the limited number of population-based studies on Russian individuals, we characterized the population AFs based on data from the Registry of Russian cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. In addition to the CF patient registry, we estimated the local frequencies of the same set of variants based on the results of genotyping of CF patients in local biocollections (from St. Petersburg and Yugra regions). AFs of common CFTR variants calculated based on registry and biocollection data showed good concordance with directly measured population AFs. The estimated region-specific frequencies of CFTR variants allowed us to uncover statistically significant regional differences in the frequencies of the F508del (c.1521_1523del; p.Phe508del) and CFTRdele2,3(21kb) (c.54-5940_273+10250del21kb; p.Ser18ArgfsX) variants. The data from population-based studies confirmed previous observations that F508del, CFTRdele2,3(21kb), and L138ins (c.413_415dup; p.Leu138dup)variants are the most abundant among infertile patients, and their frequencies are significantly lower in healthy individuals and should be taken into account during genetic monitoring of the reproductive health of Russian individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrey S. Glotov
- D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.A.N.); (O.S.G.)
| | | | - Olga A. Solovova
- Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moskvorechie Street 1, 115522 Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Maksim Yu. Donnikov
- Budgetary Institution of Highest Education of KHMAO-Yugra “Surgut State University”, 628400 Surgut, Russia; (M.Y.D.)
| | - Ludmila V. Kovalenko
- Budgetary Institution of Highest Education of KHMAO-Yugra “Surgut State University”, 628400 Surgut, Russia; (M.Y.D.)
| | - Yury A. Barbitoff
- D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.A.N.); (O.S.G.)
| | - Yulia A. Nasykhova
- D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.A.N.); (O.S.G.)
| | - Tatyana E. Lazareva
- D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.A.N.); (O.S.G.)
| | - Oleg S. Glotov
- D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Reproductology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia (Y.A.N.); (O.S.G.)
| |
Collapse
|