Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Ovarian Cancer: from the Biological Rationale to Current Diagnostic Approaches

Poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer with homologous repair deficiency

Breast cancer (BC) is a highly heterogeneous disease, and the presence of germline breast cancer gene mutation (gBRCAm) is associated with a poor prognosis. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a BC subtype, characterized by the absence of hormone and growth factor receptor expression, making therapeutic decisions difficult. Defects in the DNA damage response pathway due to mutation in breast cancer genes (BRCA 1/2) lead to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). However, in HRD conditions, poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) proteins repair DNA damage and lead to tumor cell survival. Biological understanding of HRD leads to the development of PARP inhibitors (PARPi), which trap PARP proteins and cause genomic instability and tumor cell lysis. HRD assessment can be an important biomarker in identifying gBRCAm patients with BC who could benefit from PARPi therapy. HRD can be identified by homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-based assays, genomic-scarring assays and mutational signatures, transcription and protein expression profiles, and functional assays. However, gold standard methodologies that are robust and reliable to assess HRD are not available currently. Hence, there is a pressing need to develop accurate biomarkers identifying HRD tumors to guide targeted therapies such as PARPi in patients with BC. HRD assessment has shown fruitful outcomes in chemotherapy studies and preliminary evidence on PARPi intervention as monotherapy and combination therapy in HRD-stratified patients. Furthermore, ongoing trials are exploring the potential of PARPi in BC and clinically complex TNBC settings, where HRD testing is used as an adjunct to stratify patients based on BRCA mutations.

Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence Predicts Homologous Recombination Deficiency and Platinum Response From Histologic Slides

PURPOSE

Cancers with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) can benefit from platinum salts and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Standard diagnostic tests for detecting HRD require molecular profiling, which is not universally available.

METHODS

We trained DeepHRD, a deep learning platform for predicting HRD from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained histopathological slides, using primary breast (n = 1,008) and ovarian (n = 459) cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). DeepHRD was compared with four standard HRD molecular tests using breast (n = 349) and ovarian (n = 141) cancers from multiple independent data sets, including platinum-treated clinical cohorts with RECIST progression-free survival (PFS), complete response (CR), and overall survival (OS) endpoints.

RESULTS

DeepHRD predicted HRD from held-out H&E-stained breast cancer slides in TCGA with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.85). This performance was confirmed in two independent primary breast cancer cohorts (AUC, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.71 to 0.82]). In an external platinum-treated metastatic breast cancer cohort, samples predicted as HRD had higher complete CR (AUC, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.93]) with 3.7-fold increase in median PFS (14.4 v 3.9 months; P = .0019) and hazard ratio (HR) of 0.45 (P = .0047). There were no significant differences in nonplatinum treatment outcome by predicted HRD status in three breast cancer cohorts, including CR (AUC, 0.39) and PFS (HR, 0.98, P = .95) in taxane-treated metastatic breast cancer. Through transfer learning to high-grade serous ovarian cancer, DeepHRD-predicted HRD samples had better OS after first-line (HR, 0.46; P = .030) and neoadjuvant (HR, 0.49; P = .015) platinum therapy in two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

DeepHRD can predict HRD in breast and ovarian cancers directly from routine H&E slides across multiple external cohorts, slide scanners, and tissue fixation variables. When compared with molecular testing, DeepHRD classified 1.8- to 3.1-fold more patients with HRD, which exhibited better OS in high-grade serous ovarian cancer and platinum-specific PFS in metastatic breast cancer.

Prediction of homologous recombination deficiency identifies colorectal tumors sensitive to PARP inhibition

The synthetic lethal effect observed with the use of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) with tumors characterized by the loss of key players in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway, commonly referred to as "BRCAness", is maintaining high interest in oncology. While BRCAness is a well-established feature in breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic carcinomas, our recent findings indicate that up to 15% of colorectal cancers (CRC) also harbor defects in the HR pathway, presenting promising opportunities for innovative therapeutic strategies in CRC patients. We developed a new tool called HRDirect, which builds upon the HRDetect algorithm and is able to predict HR deficiency (HRD) from reference-free tumor samples. We validated HRDirect using matched breast cancer and CRC patient samples. Subsequently, we assessed its efficacy in predicting response to the PARP inhibitor olaparib by comparing it with two other commercial assays: AmoyDx HRD by Amoy Diagnostics and the TruSight Oncology 500 HRD (TSO500-HRD) panel by Illumina NGS technology. While all three approaches successfully identified the most PARPi-sensitive CRC models, HRDirect demonstrated superior precision in distinguishing resistant models compared to AmoyDX and TSO500-HRD, which exhibited overlapping scores between sensitive and resistant cells. Furthermore, we propose integrating HRDirect scoring with ATM and RAD51C immunohistochemical analysis as part of our "composite biomarker approach" to enhance the identification of HRD tumors, with an immediate translational and clinical impact for CRC personalized treatment.

Homologous recombination deficiency gene panel analysis results in synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the genetic alterations of tumors within the scope of the homologous recombination deficiency gene panel in patients diagnosed with synchronous endometrial ovarian cancer who have been followed for over 5 years using next-generation sequencing.

METHODS

DNA was isolated from the patient's formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. Next-generation sequencing was performed using the Illumina capture-based sequencing method. Samples were sequenced using the Sophia HR Solution DNA Kit.

RESULTS

Seven patients were included in this study. The ratios of likely pathogenic (LP)/pathogenic (P) somatic mutations in ATM (serine/threonine kinase or Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated gene), BRCA2 (breast cancer type 2 susceptibility gene), BARD1 (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1), TP53 (tumor protein p53), BIRP1 (BRCA1-interacting helicase 1 gene), PALB2 (partner and localizer of BRCA2), and CHECK2 were 21 (48.8%), 8 (18.6%), 5 (11.6%), 3 (6.9%), 2 (4.6%), 2 (4.6%), and 2 (4.6%), respectively, in endometrium, and the ratios of somatic mutations in ATM, BRCA2, TP53, BARD1, RAD54L (DNA repair/recombination protein like), BIRP1, and RAD51D (RAD51 recombinase paralog D) were 24 (60%), 6 (15%), 5 (12.5%), 2 (5%), 2 (5%), 1 (2.5%), and 1 (2.5%), respectively, in ovary. In endometrioid-synchronous endometrial ovarian cancer cases, P/LP mutations were observed in ATM and CHECK2 genes in endometrium and ATM, BRCA2, and TP53 genes in ovary. In two non-endometrioid-synchronous endometrial ovarian cancer cases, CHEK2 (checkpoint kinase 2) mutations were observed in endometrium and ATM and TP53 mutations in ovary, whereas in one case, P/LP mutations in ATM and TP53 genes were common in both tissues.

CONCLUSION

Pathogenic variations confirming the diagnosis of synchronous endometrial ovarian cancer with genetic alterations were identified in all but one case. ATM gene mutation emerged as the most common alteration and has a potential association with a favorable prognosis.

Poly(Adenosine Diphosphate Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitors in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Narrative Review

Poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have appeared as a revolutionary approach to treating advanced ovarian cancer, particularly in patients with breast cancer (BRCA) mutations and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). This narrative review explores PARP inhibitors' clinical efficiency, safety, and changing role in this context. PARP inhibitors, such as olaparib, niraparib, or rucaparib, provide considerable benefits regarding progression-free survival expansion and overall outcomes improvement in first-line maintenance and recurrent settings. The underlying mechanisms, patient selection criteria, and resistance patterns are discussed, alongside insights into combination therapies to overcome resistance and enhance therapeutic efficacy. Ongoing clinical trials and future potential for personalized therapy approaches using PARP inhibitors for advanced ovarian cancer are also highlighted. However, despite these drugs' phenomenal ability to revolutionize treatment protocols for such cancer types, several challenges remain: toxicity management, cost, and development of resistance will require more research to optimize their use or broaden patient populations who can benefit from them.

Current HRD assays in ovarian cancer: differences, pitfalls, limitations, and novel approaches

Ovarian carcinoma (OC) still represents an insidious and fatal malignancy, and few significant results have been obtained in the last two decades to improve patient survival. Novel targeted therapies such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have been successfully introduced in the clinical management of OC, but not all patients will benefit, and drug resistance almost inevitably occurs. The identification of patients who are likely to respond to PARPi-based therapies relies on homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) tests, as this condition is associated with response to these treatments. This review summarizes the genomic and functional HRD assays currently used in clinical practice and those under evaluation, the clinical implications of HRD testing in OC, and their current pitfalls and limitations. Special emphasis will be placed on the functional HRD assays under development and the use of machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies as novel strategies to overcome the current limitations of HRD tests for a better-personalized treatment to improve patient outcomes.

BRCA1 foci test as a predictive biomarker of olaparib response in ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft models

Standard therapy for high-grade ovarian carcinoma includes surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPis). Deficiency in homologous recombination repair (HRD) characterizes almost half of high-grade ovarian carcinomas and is due to genetic and epigenetic alterations in genes involved in HR repair, mainly BRCA1/BRCA2, and predicts response to PARPi. The academic and commercial tests set up to define the HRD status of the tumor rely on DNA sequencing analysis, while functional tests such as the RAD51 foci assay are currently under study, but have not been validated yet and are available for patients. In a well-characterized ovarian carcinoma patient-derived xenograft platform whose response to cisplatin and olaparib, a PARPi, is known, we assessed the association between the BRCA1 foci score, determined in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor slices with an immunofluorescence technique, and other HRD biomarkers and explored the potential of the BRCA1 foci test to predict tumors' response to cisplatin and olaparib. The BRCA1 foci score was associated with both tumors' HRD status and RAD51 foci score. A low BRCA1 foci score predicted response to olaparib and cisplatin, while a high score was associated with resistance to therapy. As we recently published that a low RAD51 foci score predicted olaparib sensitivity in our xenobank, we combined the two scores and showed that the predictive value was better than with the single tests. This study reports for the first time the capacity of the BRCA1 foci test to identify HRD ovarian carcinomas and possibly predict response to olaparib.

Novel frontiers in urogenital cancers: from molecular bases to preclinical models to tailor personalized treatments in ovarian and prostate cancer patients

Over the last few decades, the incidence of urogenital cancers has exhibited diverse trends influenced by screening programs and geographical variations. Among women, there has been a consistent or even increased occurrence of endometrial and ovarian cancers; conversely, prostate cancer remains one of the most diagnosed malignancies, with a rise in reported cases, partly due to enhanced and improved screening efforts.Simultaneously, the landscape of cancer therapeutics has undergone a remarkable evolution, encompassing the introduction of targeted therapies and significant advancements in traditional chemotherapy. Modern targeted treatments aim to selectively address the molecular aberrations driving cancer, minimizing adverse effects on normal cells. However, traditional chemotherapy retains its crucial role, offering a broad-spectrum approach that, despite its wider range of side effects, remains indispensable in the treatment of various cancers, often working synergistically with targeted therapies to enhance overall efficacy.For urogenital cancers, especially ovarian and prostate cancers, DNA damage response inhibitors, such as PARP inhibitors, have emerged as promising therapeutic avenues. In BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer, PARP inhibitors like olaparib and niraparib have demonstrated efficacy, leading to their approval for specific indications. Similarly, patients with DNA damage response mutations have shown sensitivity to these agents in prostate cancer, heralding a new frontier in disease management. Furthermore, the progression of ovarian and prostate cancer is intricately linked to hormonal regulation. Ovarian cancer development has also been associated with prolonged exposure to estrogen, while testosterone and its metabolite dihydrotestosterone, can fuel the growth of prostate cancer cells. Thus, understanding the interplay between hormones, DNA damage and repair mechanisms can hold promise for exploring novel targeted therapies for ovarian and prostate tumors.In addition, it is of primary importance the use of preclinical models that mirror as close as possible the biological and genetic features of patients' tumors in order to effectively translate novel therapeutic findings "from the bench to the bedside".In summary, the complex landscape of urogenital cancers underscores the need for innovative approaches. Targeted therapy tailored to DNA repair mechanisms and hormone regulation might offer promising avenues for improving the management and outcomes for patients affected by ovarian and prostate cancers.

Evaluation of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Ovarian Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is an important biomarker guiding selection of ovarian cancer patients who will derive the most benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). HRD prevents cells from repairing double-stranded DNA damage with high fidelity, PARPis limit single-stranded repair, and together these deficits induce synthetic lethality. Germline or somatic BRCA mutations represent the narrowest definition of HRD, but do not reflect all patients who will have a durable PARPi response. HRD can also be defined by its downstream consequences, which are measured by different metrics depending on the test used. Ideally, all patients will undergo genetic counseling and germline testing shortly after diagnosis and have somatic testing sent once an adequate tumor sample is available. Should barriers to one test be higher, pursuing germline testing with reflex to somatic testing for BRCA wildtype patients or somatic testing first strategies are both evidence-based. Ultimately both tests offer complementary information, germline testing should be pursued for any patient with a history of ovarian cancer, and somatic testing is valuable at recurrence if not performed in the upfront setting. There is a paucity of data to suggest superiority of one germline or somatic assay; therefore, selection should optimize turnaround time, cost to patients, preferred result format, and logistical burden. Each clinic should implement a standard testing strategy for all ovarian cancer patients that ensures HRD status is known at the time of upfront chemotherapy completion to facilitate comprehensive counseling about anticipated maintenance PARPi benefit.

Theranostic biomarkers and PARP-inhibitors effectiveness in patients with non-BRCA associated homologous recombination deficient tumors: Still looking through a dirty glass window?

Breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) and breast cancer susceptibility gene 2 (BRCA2) deleterious variants were the first and, still today, the main biomarkers of poly(ADP)ribose polymerase (PARP)-inhibitors (PARPis) benefit. The recent, increased, numbers of individuals referred for counseling and multigene panel testing, and the remarkable expansion of approved PARPis, not restricted to BRCA1/BRCA2-Pathogenic Variants (PVs), produced a strong clinical need for non-BRCA biomarkers. Significant limitations of the current testing and assays exist. The different approaches that identify the causes of Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD), such as the germline and somatic Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) gene PVs, the testing showing its consequences, such as the genomic scars, or the novel functional assays such as the RAD51 foci testing, are not interchangeable, and should not be considered as substitutes for each other in clinical practice for guiding use of PARPi in non-BRCA, HRD-associated tumors. Today, the deeper knowledge on the significant relationship among all proteins involved in the HRR, not limited to BRCA, expands the possibility of a successful non-BRCA, HRD-PARPi synthetic lethality and, at the same time, reinforces the need for enhanced definition of HRD biomarkers predicting the magnitude of PARPi benefit.

MAGI1 Prevents Senescence and Promotes the DNA Damage Response in ER+ Breast Cancer

MAGI1 acts as a tumor suppressor in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC), and its loss correlates with a more aggressive phenotype. To identify the pathways and events affected by MAGI1 loss, we deleted the MAGI1 gene in the ER+ MCF7 BC cell line and performed RNA sequencing and functional experiments in vitro. Transcriptome analyses revealed gene sets and biological processes related to estrogen signaling, the cell cycle, and DNA damage responses affected by MAGI1 loss. Upon exposure to TNF-α/IFN-γ, MCF7 MAGI1 KO cells entered a deeper level of quiescence/senescence compared with MCF7 control cells and activated the AKT and MAPK signaling pathways. MCF7 MAGI1 KO cells exposed to ionizing radiations or cisplatin had reduced expression of DNA repair proteins and showed increased sensitivity towards PARP1 inhibition using olaparib. Treatment with PI3K and AKT inhibitors (alpelisib and MK-2206) restored the expression of DNA repair proteins and sensitized cells to fulvestrant. An analysis of human BC patients' transcriptomic data revealed that patients with low MAGI1 levels had a higher tumor mutational burden and homologous recombination deficiency. Moreover, MAGI1 expression levels negatively correlated with PI3K/AKT and MAPK signaling, which confirmed our in vitro observations. Pharmacological and genomic evidence indicate HDACs as regulators of MAGI1 expression. Our findings provide a new view on MAGI1 function in cancer and identify potential treatment options to improve the management of ER+ BC patients with low MAGI1 levels.

Development of the NOGGO GIS v1 Assay, a Comprehensive Hybrid-Capture-Based NGS Assay for Therapeutic Stratification of Homologous Repair Deficiency Driven Tumors and Clinical Validation

The worldwide approval of the combination maintenance therapy of olaparib and bevacizumab in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer requires complex molecular diagnostic assays that are sufficiently robust for the routine detection of driver mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes and genomic instability (GI), employing formalin-fixed (FFPE) paraffin-embedded tumor samples without matched normal tissue. We therefore established a DNA-based hybrid capture NGS assay and an associated bioinformatic pipeline that fulfils our institution's specific needs. The assay´s target regions cover the full exonic territory of relevant cancer-related genes and HRR genes and more than 20,000 evenly distributed single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci to allow for the detection of genome-wide allele specific copy number alterations (CNA). To determine GI status, we implemented an %CNA score that is robust across a broad range of tumor cell content (25-85%) often found in routine FFPE samples. The assay was established using high-grade serous ovarian cancer samples for which BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status as well as Myriad MyChoice homologous repair deficiency (HRD) status was known. The NOGGO (Northeastern German Society for Gynecologic Oncology) GIS (GI-Score) v1 assay was clinically validated on more than 400 samples of the ENGOT PAOLA-1 clinical trial as part of the European Network for Gynaecological Oncological Trial groups (ENGOT) HRD European Initiative. The "NOGGO GIS v1 assay" performed using highly robust hazard ratios for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as well a significantly lower dropout rate than the Myriad MyChoice clinical trial assay supporting the clinical utility of the assay. We also provide proof of a modular and scalable routine diagnostic method, that can be flexibly adapted and adjusted to meet future clinical needs, emerging biomarkers, and further tumor entities.

Homologous Recombination Deficiency Score Determined by Genomic Instability in a Romanian Cohort

The Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Score, determined by evaluating genomic instability through the assessment of loss of heterozygosity (LOH), telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI), and large-scale state transitions (LST), serves as a crucial biomarker for identifying patients who might benefit from targeted therapies, such as PARP inhibitors (PARPi). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of HRD testing in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, tubal, and peritoneal cancer patients who are negative for somatic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and to evaluate the impact of HRD status on Bevacizumab and PARPi therapy response. A cohort of 100 Romanian female patients, aged 42-77, was initially selected. Among them, 30 patients had unsuitable samples for HRD testing due to insufficient tumor content or DNA integrity. Using the OncoScan C.N.V. platform, HRD testing was successfully performed on the remaining 70 patients, with 20 testing negative and 50 testing positive for HRD. Among the HRD-positive patients, 35 were eligible for and benefited from PARPi maintenance therapy, resulting in a median progression-free survival (PFS) increase from 4 months to 8.2 months. Our findings support the importance of HRD testing in ovarian cancer patients, demonstrating the potential therapeutic advantage of PARPi therapy in HRD-positive patients without somatic BRCA1/2 mutations.