Glissonean Pedicle Isolation Focusing on the Laennec's Capsule for Minimally Invasive Anatomical Liver Resection

Laennec's approach for central liver resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis adjacent to the hepatic hilum that occurred 10 years after colectomy: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Colorectal cancer ranks as one of the most common cancer globally. About half of the patients experience a disease recurrence in the form of сolorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) within the first 5 years of the course of the disease. However, there are rare cases of delayed onset of liver metastasis, that occur after cessation of standard follow-up.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 38-year-old woman was referred to our institute with a metastatic liver mass adjacent to the liver hilum. The patient had sigmoid colectomy 10 years ago. After 6 cycles of chemotherapy, she underwent a central liver resection: Sg4, Sg5, Sg8v + middle hepatic vein with surgical skeletonization of 1st and 2nd order hepatic pedicles. The patient was discharged on 5th post-operative day. After 18th month of follow-up, the patient was alive without any signs of recurrence.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The recommended follow-up of colorectal cancer patients is 5 years. However, there are rare instances of late metachronous liver recurrences, that suggest the necessity of more continuous surveillance. For patients with CRLM surgical resection is considered the most radical treatment of choice. The anatomy of Laennec's capsule allows the precise isolation of hepatic pedicles and can facilitate anatomical hepatectomy.

CONCLUSION

We present a rare case report of borderline-resectable CRLM successfully treated with central liver resection with application of Laennec's approach a decade after the resection of a primary colorectal tumor.

Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery on Anatomic Liver Segmentectomy Using the Extrahepatic Glissonean Approach

Accurate minimally invasive anatomic liver (sub)segmentectomy (MIAS) is technically demanding and not yet standardized, and its surgical outcomes are undefined. To study the impact of the minimally invasive approach on perioperative outcomes of anatomic liver (sub)segmentectomy (AS), we retrospectively studied and compared perioperative outcomes of 99 open AS (OAS) and 112 MIAS (laparoscopic 77, robotic 35) cases using the extrahepatic Glissonean approach, based on the 1:1 propensity score matched analyses. After matching (71:71), MIAS was superior to OAS in terms of blood loss (p < 0.0001), maximum postoperative serum total bilirubin (p < 0.0001), C-reactive protein (p = 0.034) levels, R0 resection rate (p = 0.021), bile leak (p = 0.049), and length of hospital stay (p < 0.0001). The matched robotic and laparoscopic AS groups (30:30) had comparable outcomes in terms of operative time, blood loss, transfusion, open conversion, postoperative morbidity and mortality, R0 resection, and hospital stay, although the rate of Pringle maneuver application (p = 0.0002) and the postoperative aspartate aminotransferase level (p = 0.002) were higher in the robotic group. Comparing the matched posterosuperior (sub)segmentectomy cases or unmatched repeat hepatectomy cases between MIAS and OAS, we observed significantly less blood loss and shorter hospital stays in MIAS. Robotic AS yielded comparable outcomes with laparoscopic AS in the posterosuperior (sub)segmentectomy and repeat hepatectomy settings, despite the worse tumor and procedural backgrounds in robotic AS. In conclusion, various types of MIAS standardized by the extrahepatic Glissonean approach were feasible and safe with more favorable perioperative outcomes than those of OAS. Although robotic AS had almost comparable outcomes with laparoscopic AS, robotics may serve to decrease the surgical difficulty of MIAS in selected patients undergoing posterosuperior (sub)segmentectomy and repeat hepatectomy.