Pain in High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The clinical value of ultrasound-guided sacral anesthesia in Intracavitary and/or interstitial brachytherapy for cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided sacral anesthesia in intracavitary and/or interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a total of 1039 intracavitary and/or interstitial brachytherapy involving 220 patients in our department from December 7, 2020 to March 21, 2024. The study assessed the satisfaction with anesthesia, changes in vital signs, onset time of anesthesia, dosage of anesthetic drugs, duration of anesthesia, and incidence of adverse reactions.

RESULT

The rate of satisfaction with anesthesia was 73.8 %. There were no significant differences in patients' heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), or oxygen saturation (SaO2) before and after anesthesia (P > 0.05). The onset time of anesthesia ranged from 20 to 35 min, the average dosage of anesthetic was 20 ml, and the duration of anesthesia lasted from 30 to 120 min. Serious adverse reactions included 2 cases of post-anesthesia syncope (associated with sacral cysts). The incidence of nausea was 2.2 %, and the total incidence of other adverse reactions, such as vomiting, urinary retention, bradycardia, anal discomfort, and dizziness, was less than 1 %.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound guided sacral anesthesia demonstrates significant advantages, including effective anesthesia, minimal impact on vital signs, rapid onset, prolonged maintenance, and a low incidence of adverse reactions. It is recommended for widespread application in intracavitary and/or interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients.

Pain Prevalence and Satisfaction with Pain Management in Inpatients: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Pain in hospitalized adults is underestimated and undervalued. The aim of this study was to evaluate pain prevalence and satisfaction with the hospital's pain management among patients attending a tertiary university hospital. Predictor factors of pain were also studied.

METHODS

A prospective, cross-sectional study was carried out through a structured questionnaire given on one day to all hospitalized patients in a university hospital. Clinical data, such as personal history and analgesic treatment, were collected from medical records. Other variables related to pain (including intensity rated by the visual analogue scale as well as location and patient satisfaction measured by the numerical rating scale) were also obtained.

RESULTS

Of the 274 surveyed patients, pain prevalence was 52.9%, with an average intensity of 5.3 ± 2.8 according to VAS. The overall satisfaction was 87.2%, and 72.6% had already been prescribed at least one analgesic. Patients receiving analgesics showed higher pain intensity (VAS 3.6 ± 3.4) than those without treatment (VAS 1.1 ± 2.1) (p < 0.001). However, patients with treatment showed more satisfaction (NRS 7.8 ± 2 vs. 5.3 ± 1.4, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of pain in hospitalized patients was high, despite the fact that patient satisfaction was also very high.

"Emerging Topics in Pain Medicine": Advancing Research and Patient-Centered Health Strategies

Pain, in all its various forms and manifestations, impacts the lives of millions worldwide [...].