1
|
Zhang W, Xiong K, Li Y, Song S, Xiang S. Improving grassland ecosystem services for human wellbeing in the karst desertification control area: Anthropogenic factors become more important. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 946:174199. [PMID: 38925385 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Elucidating the spatial and temporal patterns of grassland ecosystem service value (ESV) changes under different karst geomorphic types (KGTs) is crucial for promoting regional sustainable development and enhancing human well-being. Karst ecosystems are characterized by high spatial heterogeneity. However, analyses of the drivers of spatial and temporal changes in ESV in karst grasslands at multiple scales are lacking. In this study, the South China Karst (SCK) region was selected as the focus area, the gross ecosystem product (GEP) accounting method was used to quantify the grassland ESV from 2000 to 2020, and the GeoDetector model was used to elucidate the spatial and temporal evolution of the GEP, the drivers, and their interactions in different KGTs. The results indicate the following: (1) Over the past 20 years, the grassland GEP of SCK has increased from ¥ 14,844.24 × 108 in 2000 to ¥ 17,174.90 × 108 in 2020. Among the various KGTs, the karst gorge exhibited the fastest GEP increase (24.93 %) and karst hilly depressions the slowest (6.22 %). (2) The karst grassland GEP showed a strong positive spatial correlation with significant clustering characteristics (p < 0.05). (3) There are significant differences in the factors influencing the GEP of grasslands with different KGT values, and although they are generally influenced by factors such as NPP, precipitation, and population density, anthropogenic factors are becoming increasingly important. In addition, the multifactor interaction explained GEP better than the single factor. Based on our findings, we propose targeted grassland ESV restoration approaches and management recommendations for various KGTs dominated by distinct factors. Our results provide a scientific basis for decision-making regarding karst ecosystem service enhancement and value realization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenfang Zhang
- School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550001, China; State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang, Guizhou 550001, China
| | - Kangning Xiong
- School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550001, China; State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang, Guizhou 550001, China.
| | - Yongyao Li
- School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550001, China; State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang, Guizhou 550001, China; Bijie Institute of Science and Technology information research, Science and Technology Bureau of Bijie, Bijie 551700, China
| | - Shuzhen Song
- School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550001, China; State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang, Guizhou 550001, China
| | - Shuai Xiang
- School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550001, China; State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang, Guizhou 550001, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fan Y, Zheng Y, Jia C, Song Y. The impact of China's urbanization on ecosystem service value from the perspective of gross ecosystem product: a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Sci Rep 2024; 14:15954. [PMID: 38987301 PMCID: PMC11237103 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64655-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Gross ecosystem product (GEP) is an aggregate measure of the monetary value of final ecosystem services, or the direct benefits that people derive from nature. GEP can provide decision makers with clear and competing evidence of the monetary value of ecosystem services. However, the relationship between GEP and urbanization has not been clarified which is not conducive to the decision-making role of GEP in the process of urban sustainable development. This work focused on the 'Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei' (BTH) urban agglomeration as a case study of the dynamics of ecological production amidst rapid economic and urban development, and coupled a spatial-temporal analysis of regional ecological change based on GIS (Geographic Information System) with economic valuation methods using official statistics and survey data. Results showed that from 2000 to 2020, the GEP increased from 1.55 trillion to 2.36 trillion, the value of provisioning services and cultural services increased from 0.51 to 0.71 trillion to 0.10-0.65 trillion. The value of regulation services showed an upward and downward trend (0.94-1.03-0.98) due to the rapid economic development in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. There were obvious spatial differences in the distribution of the GEP, in which Beijing, Tianjin, Tangshan, Cangzhou GEP accounted for 15%, 14%, 16% and 11%, respectively. During 2000-2020, there is a significant correlation between urbanization index (UI) and GEP in BTH, but the correlation between GEP and UI shows a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. The correlation between UI and EPS and ERS gradually decreases, and the impact of UI on ETS shows a significant positive correlation. In the future, it can be foreseen that urbanization will suppress the increase of GEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Fan
- College of Environment, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China.
| | - Yun Zheng
- College of Environment, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China
| | - Changgeng Jia
- College of Environment, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China
| | - Youtao Song
- College of Environment, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China.
- Institute for Finance Research, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
- College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang W, Xu C, Li Y. Priority areas and benefits of ecosystem restoration in Beijing. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2023; 30:83600-83614. [PMID: 37344716 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-28255-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
Ecological restoration can significantly improve ecosystem services and human well-being and provide a basis for regional coordinated development and ecological security. To guide restoration efforts, information on the potential benefits of restoration was required to efficiently target investments. Although the number of studies focusing on ecosystem restoration has increased in recent decades, priority areas that integrate ecological and economic benefits have yet to be identified. We developed and applied a prioritization approach to identify potential priority sites in Beijing. We used the historical environmental data on Beijing to identify areas of degradation and to assess the feasibility of restoration. Ecosystem service and quality degradation, low ecosystem quality, and soil erosion were integrated into one index to indicate the restoration importance. Potential restoration benefits were mapped using the monetary value of six ecosystem services. Based on the importance and benefits of restoration, three scenarios were developed to identify priority restoration areas. In Beijing, restoring 30% of the degraded area (1531 km2) in priority areas by 2050 could increase the annual ecological benefit by more than 5 billion yuan, or approximately 787 million USD, and could decrease the ecological degradation index by 50%. By integrating explicit spatial information on restoration importance and restoration benefits, this methodology provides a feasible way to identify restoration priority areas and assess restoration benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjing Wang
- China Urban Construction Design & Research Institute Co. Ltd, Beijing, 100120, China
| | - Chao Xu
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Future Urban Design, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing, 100044, China.
| | - Yuanzheng Li
- School of Resources and Environment, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou, 450046, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shi J, Li D, Shen C, Yang J, Wu F. A new pattern to quantitatively evaluate the value of ecosystem services in the large-scale open-pit coal mining area. Front Ecol Evol 2023. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1127028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionOpen-pit coal mining could disrupt the ecosystem and lead to the loss of service values for the ecosystem through direct occupation or indirect impacts on adjacent ecosystems.MethodsIn this research, we combined a new accounting system, gross ecosystem product (GEP), with spatial–temporal analyses to quantify the ecological variation and explore its driving factors in Pingshuo, a large-scale open-pit coal mining area in China. GEP is an aggregate accounting system that can summarize the value of provisioning, regulating, and cultural ecosystem services (ES) in a single monetary metric. The spatial–temporal approaches used in our study were known as exploratory spatial data analyses and interpretable models in machine learning. Both spatial and non-spatial data, including remote sensing images, meteorological data, and official statistics, were applied in the research.ResultsThe results indicated the following: (i) From 1990 to 2020, the annual average growth rates of GEP decreased from 30.78 to 9.1%. Furthermore, the classified results of GEP revealed that the regions with rich ES quality rapidly reduced from 51.90 to 32.18%. (ii) Spatial correlation of GEP was significant, and the degree of spatial clustering was relatively high in the mining areas. Moreover, the mining areas also continually presented concentrated high-density and hot spot areas of GEP changes. (iii) The spatial–temporal effects were notable in the relationship between GEP and three socioeconomic factors, i.e., the mining effects, human activity intensity, and gross domestic product (GDP). (iv) The win–win development for both the economy and ecological environment in Pingshuo could be realized by restricting the annual growth rate of mining areas to between 4.56 and 5.03%.DiscussionThe accounting results and spatial–temporal analyses of GEP will contribute to the future regional sustainable development and ecosystem management in Pingshuo.
Collapse
|