Smit HPJ, Reinsch T, Swanepoel PA, Loges R, Kluß C, Taube F. Environmental Impact of Rotationally Grazed Pastures at Different Management Intensities in South Africa.
Animals (Basel) 2021;
11:ani11051214. [PMID:
33922387 PMCID:
PMC8146214 DOI:
10.3390/ani11051214]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary
Nitrogen fertilization, irrigation and concentrate feeding are key management factors in grazed dairy-pasture systems. However, the extent to which these management factors affect environmental efficiency is a current debate among scientists. We designed a study to investigate dairy system environmental efficiency through the evaluation of the carbon footprint of milk and the nitrogen-balance as a result of different fertilization rates applied on irrigated dairy-pastures in South Africa. The lowest carbon footprint was observed when low rates of fertilizer were applied. Methane from ruminal digestion and nitrous oxide emissions from grazed pastures were the main contributors affecting the carbon footprint. The application of fertilizer resulted in only small herbage yield differences between treatments. The nitrogen-balance was negative when no nitrogen was applied. This indicates that such an approach will not be sustainable without adapting sward species composition (e.g., introduction of forage legumes), even though nitrogen circulates through animal manure to the pasture. The environmental impact of milk produced from pasture-based dairy farms can be reduced through increased farm nitrogen use-efficiency and improved irrigation systems in South Africa.
Abstract
Nitrogen fertilization, irrigation and concentrate feeding are important factors in rotational pasture management for dairy farms in South Africa. The extent to which these factors affect environmental efficiency is subject to current and intense debate among scientists. A three-year field study was conducted to investigate the yield response of different N-fertilizer treatments (0 (N0), 220 (N20), 440 (N40), 660 (N60) and 880 (N80) kg N ha−1 year−1) on grazed pastures and to calculate the carbon footprint (CF) of milk produced. Excessive N-fertilization (N60 and N80) did not increase herbage dry matter and energy yields from pastures. However, N80 indicated the highest N-yield but at the same time also the highest N surpluses at field level. A maximum fertilizer rate of 220 kg ha−1 year−1 (in addition to excreted N from grazing animals) appears sufficient to ensure adequate herbage yields (~20 t DM ha−1 year−1) with a slightly positive field-N-balance. This amount will prevent the depletion of soil C and N, with low N losses to the environment, where adequate milk yields of ~17 t ECM ha−1 with a low CF (~1.3 kg CO2 kg ECM−1) are reached. Methane from enteric fermentation (~49% ± 3.3) and N2O (~16% ± 3.2) emissions from irrigated pastures were the main contributors to the CF. A further CF reduction can be achieved by improved N-fertilization planning, low emission irrigation techniques and strategies to limit N2O emissions from pasture soils in South Africa.
Collapse