Treatment-Related Adverse Events with PD-1 or PD-L1 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Peptide-based inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis: potential immunotherapeutics for cancer

The PD-1/PD-L1 complex belongs to the group of inhibitory immune checkpoints and plays a critical role in immune regulation. The PD-1/PD-L1 axis is also responsible for immune evasion of cancer cells, and this complex is one of the main targets of immunotherapies used in oncology. Treatment using immune checkpoint inhibitors is mainly based on antibodies. This approach has great therapeutic potential; however, it also has major drawbacks and can induce immune-related adverse events. Thus, there is a strong need for alternative, non-antibody-based therapies using small molecules, peptides, or peptidomimetics. In the present study, we designed, synthesized, and evaluated a set of PD-1-targeting peptides based on the sequence and structure of PD-L1. The binding of these peptides to PD-1 was investigated using SPR and ELISA. We also assessed their ability to compete with PD-L1 for binding to PD-1 and their inhibitory properties against the PD-1/PD-L1 complex at the cellular level. The best results were obtained for the peptide PD-L1(111-127)(Y112C-I126C), named (L11), which displaced PD-L1 from binding to PD-1 in the competitive assay and inhibited the formation of the PD-1/PD-L1 complex. The (L11) peptide also exhibited strong affinity for PD-1. NMR studies revealed that (L11) does not form a well-defined secondary structure; however, MD simulation indicated that (L11) binds to PD-1 at the same place as PD-L1. After further optimization of the structure, the peptide inhibitor obtained in this study could also be used as a potential therapeutic compound targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis.

Thyroid dysfunction (TD) induced by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced lung cancer

Background

Thyroid Dysfunction (TD) is a common immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in the treatment of advanced lung cancer with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death 1 ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors, with incidence accounting for 6-8% of all irAEs. The incidence of TD is receiving increasing attention from clinicians, given its potential impact on clinical efficacy. However, the molecular mechanisms, biomarkers, and clinical impact of TD resulting from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment in advanced lung cancer are unclear.

Objective

To present a comprehensive review of current advancements in research about the molecular mechanisms, influential factors, and clinical manifestations in the treatment of advanced lung cancer with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, as well as the correlation between TD and the efficacy of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase and Google Scholar databases, with the keywords including thyroid dysfunction, efficacy, mechanisms, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, and advanced lung cancer.

Results

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors can induce T cell-mediated destructive thyroiditis, thyroid autoantibody-mediated autoimmunity, and a decrease in the number of immunosuppressive monocytes (circulating cluster of differentiation (CD)14+ human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRlow/negatives monocytes, CD14+ HLA-DR + lo/neg), leading to TD. Several factors, including peripheral blood inflammatory markers, body mass index (BMI), baseline thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level, gender, smoking history, hypertension, and previous opioid use, may also contribute to the development of TD. However, there is currently a lack of reliable predictive biomarkers for TD, although anti-thyroid antibodies, TSH levels, and peripheral blood inflammatory markers are expected to be predictive.Interestingly, some studies suggested a positive correlation between TD and clinical efficacy, i.e., patients experiencing TD showed better outcomes in objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), compared with those without TD. However, most of these studies were single-center and had small sample sizes, so more multi-center studies are needed to provide further data support.

Conclusion

TD resulting from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment in advanced lung cancer may be associated with good clinical outcomes. The clarification of the molecular mechanisms underlying TD and the identification of reliable predictive biomarkers will guide clinicians in managing TD in this patient population.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge After Prior Immune Toxicity

OPINION STATEMENT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become an essential part of treatment for many cancer types. These monoclonal antibodies remove a critical negative regulatory signal that allows the immune system to recognize and destroy malignant cells that were previously undetectable. Unfortunately, their use has ushered in a whole new form of drug toxicity whereby the immune system attacks normal tissues in the body, referred to hereafter as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). irAEs are common and can result in treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, and death. When alternative modes of treatment are limited, or considered less efficacious, there may be a desire to resume treatment with ICIs after an irAE. Rechallenge with ICIs carries with it a heightened risk of subsequent toxicity, but with careful consideration and appropriate patient selection, this can be considered a reasonable approach.

Dezocine Has the Potential to Regulate the Clinical and Biological Features of Tumors

Cancer is the second leading cause of death following ischemic heart disease in the world and the primary clinical, social and economic burden. Surgical resection is the main measure for the treatment of the vast majority of solid tumors. However, the recurrence and metastasis of tumors occur at different periods after surgery in many cases undergoing radical tumor surgery, which is the main cause of death of tumor patients. Moreover, tumor patients are prone to suffer from mental depression, which may increase the morbidity and mortality of tumors. Tumors have a series of clinical biological signs with the following five main features: postoperative pain and cancerous pain; suppression of antitumor immunity; angiogenesis in tumors; proliferation, growth and metastasis of tumors; and mental depression. Surgery is the first treatment in the majority of cancer patients with solid tumors. Opioids are required for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. For cancerous pain control, patients undergo surgery, and their quality of life of is improved. However, traditional opioids, such as morphine, may inhibit antitumor immunity, induce vascular growth of tumors and promote the proliferation, invasion and migration of cancer cells, and traditional opioids can induce a risk of somatic dependence. However, studies have found that not all opioids share the effects of immunosuppression, tumor proliferation promotion and angiogenesis induction. Dezocine, a novel opioid with specific pharmacological mechanisms, has been demonstrated to regulate the five clinical and biological features of tumors. We reviewed the preclinical and clinical studies of dezocine on postoperative pain and cancer pain in tumor patients as well as the immune system, tumor angiogenesis, tumor proliferation, tumor growth, tumor metastasis and mental depression. We proposed that dezocine may be the best choice of opioids for anesthesia and analgesia in cancer patients.