A Review on the Efficacy and Safety of Nab-Paclitaxel with Gemcitabine in Combination with Other Therapeutic Agents as New Treatment Strategies in Pancreatic Cancer

Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1b/2 Trial of Nabpaclitaxel + Gemcitabine ± Olaratumab in Treatment-Naïve Participants with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

The efficacy and safety of olaratumab plus nabpaclitaxel and gemcitabine in treatment-naïve participants with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was evaluated. An initial phase 1b dose-escalation trial was conducted to determine the olaratumab dose for the phase 2 trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare overall survival (OS) in the olaratumab arm vs. placebo arms. In phase 1b, 22 participants received olaratumab at doses of 15 and 20 mg/kg with a fixed dose of nabpaclitaxel and gemcitabine. In phase 2, 159 participants were randomized to receive olaratumab 20 mg/kg in cycle 1 followed by 15 mg/kg in the subsequent cycles (n = 81) or the placebo (n = 78) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, plus nabpaclitaxel and gemcitabine. The primary objective of the trial was not met, with a median OS of 9.1 vs. 10.8 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.728, 1.527; p = 0.79) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 vs. 6.4 months (HR = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.806, 1.764; p = 0.38), in the olaratumab vs. placebo arms, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event of any grade across both arms was fatigue. Olaratumab plus chemotherapy failed to improve the OS or PFS in participants with metastatic PDAC. There were no new safety signals.

TTC22 as a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer: Insights into immune infiltration and epithelial‑mesenchymal transition

The mortality rate of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is high, and the effect of traditional treatment is unsatisfactory, thus novel biomarkers are required. Although the important role of tetratricopeptide repeat domain 22 (TTC22) in colon cancer is well established, its precise role in pancreatic cancer remains unclear and requires further investigation. Pan-cancer analysis and single-cell sequencing revealed TTC22 was differentially expressed in various tumors, especially in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Additionally, clinical data for pancreatic cancer showed a negative association between TTC22 expression and clinical parameters, including survival prognosis. The correlation between TTC22 and immune infiltration in pancreatic cancer was validated by functional enrichment analysis. ESTIMATE and single sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis algorithms were used to further analyze immune infiltration of TTC22 in pancreatic cancer, and the results suggested that TTC22 inhibited tumor immunity and was negatively correlated with plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR further confirmed the differential expression of TTC22 in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Wound healing, Transwell and colony formation assays showed that TTC22 affected the migration and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells. These findings demonstrate that TTC22 may serve as a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target for the management of pancreatic cancer.

Efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Background: Nab-paclitaxel is formulated to address several limitations of paclitaxel. Methods: A systematic review was done of several databases and a meta-analysis with a random-effects model was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC). Results: Included studies revealed that nab-paclitaxel provides a 30.4% overall response rate and 65.7% disease control rate in MGC patients. The overall survival was 9.65 months and progression-free survival was 4.48 months, associated with the treatment line and regimen. The highest incidence of grade 3 and higher treatment-related adverse events was for neutropenia (29.9%). Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel provides better disease response and longer survival with manageable side effects in MGC compared with paclitaxel.

Novel DZ-SIM Conjugate Targets Cancer Mitochondria and Prolongs Survival in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a disease with no effective therapeutics. We have developed a novel targeted therapy drug consisting of a tumor-targeting ligand, near-infrared (NIR) organic heptamethine carbocyanine dye (HMCD), and HMG-CoA inhibitor simvastatin (SIM), and assessed its efficacy in PDAC. PDAC cell specific targeting of DZ-SIM was measured by determining the fluorescence in cells and animals. Mitochondrial bioenergetics and functions were measured by Seahorse and flow cytometry, respectively. Apoptosis was assessed by DNA fragmentation, AnnexinV/Propidium Iodide staining, and TUNEL. Markers of cell invasion, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and cancer stemness were measured. The effect of DZ-SIM on survival, tumor growth and metastasis was measured in the Krasþ/LSLG12D;Trp53þ/LSLR172H;Pdx-1-Cre (KPC) transgenic mice and in syngeneic and subcutaneous PDAC models. NIR fluorescence imaging showed specific localization of DZ-SIM to cancer, but not to normal cells and tissues. DZ-SIM significantly inhibited tumor growth and re-sensitized therapeutically resistant PDAC cells to conventional therapies. DZ-SIM killed cancer cells through unique pathways involving decreasing mitochondrial bioenergetics, including oxygen consumption and ATP production, and increasing ROS production. Mitochondrial depletion prevented the effect of DZ-SIM. Administration of DZ-SIM in 3 PDAC animal models resulted in a marked increase in survival and a decrease in tumor growth and metastasis.

Role of drug catabolism, modulation of oncogenic signaling and tumor microenvironment in microbe-mediated pancreatic cancer chemoresistance

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has one of the highest incidence/death ratios among all neoplasms due to its late diagnosis and dominant chemoresistance. Most PDAC patients present with an advanced disease characterized by a multifactorial, inherent and acquired resistance to current anticancer treatments. This remarkable chemoresistance has been ascribed to several PDAC features including the genetic landscape, metabolic alterations, and a heterogeneous tumor microenvironment that is characterized by dense fibrosis, and a cellular contexture including functionally distinct subclasses of cancer-associated fibroblasts, immune suppressive cells, but also a number of bacteria, shaping a specific tumor microbiome microenvironment. Thus, recent studies prompted the emergence of a new research avenue, by describing the role of the microbiome in gemcitabine resistance, while next-generation-sequencing analyses identified a specific microbiome in different tumors, including PDAC. Functionally, the contribution of these microbes to PDAC chemoresistance is only beginning to be explored. Here we provide an overview of the studies demonstrating that bacteria have the capacity to metabolically transform and hence inactivate anticancer drugs, as exemplified by the inhibition of the efficacy of 10 out of 30 chemotherapeutics by Escherichia coli. Moreover, a number of bacteria modulate specific oncogenic pathways, such as Fusobacterium nucleatum, affecting autophagy and apoptosis induction by 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin. We hypothesize that improved understanding of how chemoresistance is driven by bacteria could enhance the efficacy of current treatments, and discuss the potential of microbiome modulation and targeted therapeutic approaches as well as the need for more reliable models and biomarkers to translate the findings of preclinical/translational research to the clinical setting, and ultimately overcome PDAC chemoresistance, hence improving clinical outcome.