Therapeutic Effect and Optimal Electrode Placement of Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Impact of Varying Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation Pulse Frequency on Swallow Timing Measures in Healthy Adults

The impaired swallow timing subsequent to dysphagia or aging can potentially endanger swallowing safety and efficiency. Preliminary evidence has suggested that transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) may have the potential to affect swallow timing. However, limited knowledge exists regarding which TES parameters can optimize swallow timing. Pulse frequency is one of the primary TES parameters that can affect the quality of muscle contraction. Yet, no clear information exists regarding how changing pulse frequency impacts the timing of swallowing events. This study aimed to investigate the varying effects of submental TES pulse frequency on swallowing events during and post-15-min TES administration. Twenty-six healthy individuals between the ages of 20 and 54 participated in this study and were assigned to high pulse frequency (HPF) (80 Hz) or low pulse frequency (LPF) (30 Hz) groups. Videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) was used to record swallowing. Three trials of 10 mL pureed mixed with barium sulfate were presented under three different conditions, including pre-TES, during TES, and post-TES, in which measures were taken following 15 min of TES delivery. The swallow timing events that were measured in each condition were time to maximum hyoid elevation, time to maximum laryngeal elevation, laryngeal vestibule closure reaction time (LVCrt), laryngeal vestibule closure duration (LVCd), time to maximum pharyngeal constriction, and pharyngoesophageal segment (PES) opening duration. No significant pulse frequency effect was found on any swallow timing measures during or after 15 min of TES. Both protocols decreased the duration of some swallowing events during TES including time to maximum hyoid elevation [p < 0.017, ηp2 = 0.185], LVCrt [p < 0.032, ηp2 = 0.158], and time to maximum pharyngeal constriction [p < 0.034, ηp2 = 0.155]. None of the significant TES effects were continued when TES ceased after 15 min. Overall, both protocols have comparable immediate effects on shortening the duration of some swallowing events during TES. Future clinical trials should examine whether these physiologic timing changes can lead to safer and more efficient swallows in patients with dysphagia.

Effectiveness of Conventional Dysphagia Therapy (CDT), Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES), and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Acute Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Comparative Evaluation

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of conventional dysphagia therapy (CDT), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of post-stroke dysphagia. A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with 40 acute stroke patients - 18 females and 22 males with a mean age of 65.8 ± 11.9. The subjects were grouped into 4, with 10 individuals in each. The procedures administered to groups were as follows: the first group, sham tDCS and sham NMES; the second group, tDCS and sham NMES; the third group, NMES and sham tDCS; and the fourth group, all therapy procedures. CDT was applied to all groups either as a standalone procedure or combined with one or two of the instrumental techniques. Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) and Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) were employed to determine the severity of dysphagia and the effectiveness of treatment modalities. Additionally, the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS), Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), and Dysphagia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS) were administered to interpret VFSS data. Pre- and post-treatment comparisons of all groups have revealed a statistically significant difference for all parameters except for the PAS scores at International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI)-Level 4 consistencies. However, the differences between pre- and post-treatment scores of the fourth group across all parameters were significant - GUSS (p = 0.005), FOIS (p = 0.004), DSRS (p = 0.005), PAS IDDSI-4 (p = 0.027), PAS IDDSI-0 (p = 0.004). Inter-group comparisons, on the other hand, pointed out that the difference between pre- and post-treatment GUSS, FOIS, DSRS, and PAS scores at IDDSI Level-0 consistencies was statistically significant for all groups - GUSS (p = 0,009), FOIS (p = 0,004), DSRS (p = 0,002), PAS IDDSI-0 (p = 0,049). Closer examination of treatment groups indicated that the tDCS + CDT group, the NMES + CDT group, and the group that underwent the combination of three modalities made better progress than the one that was treated with only CDT. Though not statistically significant, the NMES + CDT group achieved better improvement than the tDCS + CDT group. This study has yielded that the group in which NMES, tDCS, and CDT were applied in combination has achieved better results than all the other groups. All treatment modalities applied to accelerate the general recovery process in acute stroke patients with dysphagia were found to be effective for the treatment of post-stroke swallowing disorders. The use of instrumental treatments such as NMES and tDCS enhanced the effectiveness of the treatment and provided more significant progress. Furthermore, combining treatment modalities such as NMES and tDCS was more effective when compared to using only conventional therapy. As a result, the most effective treatment outcomes were obtained by the group receiving CDT, NMES, and tDCS in combination. Therefore, the use of combined approaches has been recommended in appropriate patients; yet the provisional results should be tested in randomized trials with more participants.

Research hotspots and trends in post-stroke dysphagia: a bibliometric analysis

Background

Dysphagia represents one of the common complications following a stroke, and post-stroke dysphagia (PSD) can lead to aspiration, pneumonia, and malnutrition, thus prolonging hospital stay, escalating medical expenditures, and imposing a substantial economic strain on both patients and society. The utilization of bibliometric analysis offers a quantitative approach for investigating the existing literature and recognizes the current status of the research. However, bibliometric analysis on the subject of PSD remains absent. Consequently, we carried out this study to provide researchers with insights, facilitating their further exploration of PSD.

Methods

Conducting a bibliometric analysis of articles pertaining to PSD retrieved over the past two decades enables us to acquire the research hotspots and trends in this area. The publications concerning PSD were searched from the Core Collection of Web of Science, spanning the period ranging from 2003 to 2023. Articles or reviews published in English were included in this study. Subsequently, we employed CiteSpace and VOSviewer software to visualize the retrieved articles, thereby identifying the cooperative relationships of authors, institutions, and countries, as well as relevant information about journals and references.

Results

This study comprised 866 papers in total, and the number of articles published each year shows an overall growth trend. As for the analysis of the authors, Dziewas R. was the most prolific author with 21 articles. The most frequently published institutions, countries, and journals were the University of Manchester, China, and Dysphagia, with 28, 254, and 75 publications, respectively. And the co-cited authors and journals with the highest counts were Martino R and Stroke. According to the analysis of keywords and references, dysphagia screening and assessment, prevention of pneumonia, rehabilitation approaches, and nutritional management of PSD are considered research hotpots. Additionally, future research may focus on the topics of systematic review and meta-analysis, noninvasive brain stimulation, and lesion location.

Conclusion

Through the bibliometrics analysis of PSD, we can capture the research hotspots and frontiers of PSD, thereby providing inspiration and reference for subsequent studies in this field.

Effects of transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Dysphagia is one of the common complications after stroke. It is closely related to lung infection and malnutrition. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is widely used in the treatment of post-stroke dysphagia, but the evidence-based medical evidence of NMES is limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of NMES in patients with post-stroke dysphagia by systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched the CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of NMES in the treatment of post-stroke dysphagia from the establishment of the database to 9 June 2022. The risk of bias assessment tool recommended by Cochrane and the GRADE method was used to assess the risk of bias and the quality of evidence. RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analysis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the intervention effect more specifically.

Results

A total of 46 RCTs and 3,346 patients with post-stroke dysphagia were included in this study. Our meta-analysis showed that NMES combined with routine swallowing therapy (ST) could effectively improve swallowing function in Penetration-Aspiration Scale (MD = -0.63, 95% CI [-1.15, -0.12], P = 0.01), Functional Oral Intake Scale (MD = 1.32, 95% CI [0.81, 1.83], P < 0.00001), Functional Dysphagia Scale (MD = - 8.81, 95% CI [-16.48, -1.15], P = 0.02), the Standardized Swallowing Assessment (MD = -6.39, 95% CI [-6.56, -6.22], P < 0.00001), the Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study (MD = 1.42, 95% CI [1.28, 1.57], P < 0.00001) and the Water swallow test (MD = -0.78, 95% CI [-0.84, -0.73], P < 0.00001). Furthermore, it could improve the quality of life (MD = 11.90, 95% CI [11.10, 12.70], P < 0.00001), increase the upward movement distance of hyoid bone (MD = 2.84, 95% CI [2.28, 3.40], P < 0.00001) and the forward movement distance of hyoid bone (MD = 4.28, 95% CI [3.93, 4.64], P < 0.00001), reduce the rate of complications (OR = 0.37, 95%CI [0.24, 0.57], P < 0.00001). Subgroup analyses showed that NMES+ST was more effective at 25 Hz, 7 mA or 0-15 mA, and at courses ( ≤ 4 weeks). Moreover, patients with an onset of fewer than 20 days and those older than 60 years appear to have more positive effects after treatment.

Conclusion

NMES combined with ST could effectively increase the forward and upward movement distance of the hyoid bone, improve the quality of life, reduce the rate of complications, and improve the swallowing function of patients with post-stroke dysphagia. However, its safety needs to be further confirmed.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42022368416.

Assessment and treatment of neurogenic dysphagia in stroke and Parkinson's disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neurogenic dysphagia worsens quality of life and prognosis of patients with different neurological disorders. Management of neurogenic dysphagia can be challenging. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current evidence on screening, diagnosis, and treatment of neurogenic dysphagia in stroke and Parkinson's disease, suggesting clues for clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

The pros and cons of diagnostic techniques are discussed in the light of updated evidence. Findings from recent meta-analyses of different treatment approaches, including traditional dysphagia therapy, peripheral and central neurostimulation techniques, and treatment with botulinum toxin, are critically discussed, emphasizing inconsistencies and controversial issues.

SUMMARY

Screening tests and clinical swallow examination should be routinely performed in neurological patients at risk for dysphagia. In patients testing positive for dysphagia, first-line instrumental investigations, represented by fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing or videofluoroscopic swallow study, should be performed to confirm the presence of dysphagia, to assess its severity, and to inform the treatment. Second-line and third-line instrumental methods can be used in selected patients to clarify specific pathophysiological aspects of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Treatment strategies should be personalized, and combination of traditional dysphagia therapy with innovative treatment approaches may increase the chance of restoring effective and safe swallowing.