Head-to-Head Comparison of FDG and Radiolabeled FAPI PET: A Systematic Review of the Literature

[FAPI-PET-CT for quantification of the tissue response in rheumatic diseases]

Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is mainly found on the surface of activated fibroblasts but is not expressed on the surface of inactive fibroblasts. Selective FAP inhibitors (FAPI), which are coupled to a radioactive tracer, can be used to quantify profibrotic and proinflammatory fibroblasts in patients using FAPI positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT). Following initial applications in neoplastic diseases, FAPI-PET/CT is also increasingly being applied in rheumatological diseases. The first studies have shown that in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) FAPI accumulates in actively fibrotically remodeled pulmonary and myocardial areas, that a high FAPI accumulation is associated with the risk of short-term progression and that this accumulation in the lungs regresses after successful treatment. In cases of immunoglobulin 4 (IgG4)-associated diseases (IgG4 rheumatic disease, RD), the FAPI signal correlates with the histological accumulation of activated fibroblasts and a poorer response to treatment to inhibit inflammation. Fibroblasts in chronically inflamed tissue, such as patients with inflammatory joint diseases, vasculitis or myositis, also express FAP and can be quantified by FAPI-PET/CT. The treatment-induced change of the phenotype from a destructive IL-6+/MMP3+THY1+ fibroblast subtype to an inflammation inhibiting CD200+DKK3+ subtype can be mechanistically demonstrated using FAPI-PET/CT. These studies provide indications that FAPI-PET/CT enables quantification of the tissue response in patients with fibrosing and chronic inflammatory diseases and can be used for patient stratification; however, further studies are essential for validation of the use of FAPI-PET/CT as a molecular imaging marker.

Tailoring Fibroblast-Activation Protein Targeting for Theranostics: A Comparative Preclinical Evaluation of the 68Ga- and 177Lu-Labeled Monomeric and Dimeric Fibroblast-Activation Protein Inhibitors DOTA.SA.FAPi and DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)2

BACKGROUND

FAP radiopharmaceuticals show promise for cancer diagnosis; however, their limited tumor residency hinders treatment. This study compared two FAPi derivatives, DOTA.SA.FAPi and DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)2, labeled with gallium-68 and lutetium-177, aiming to determine an optimum combination for creating theranostic pairs.

METHODS

The radiotracers were studied for lipophilicity, binding to human serum proteins, and binding to human cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in vitro, including saturation and internalization/externalization studies. PET/SPECT/CT and biodistribution studies were conducted in PC3 and U87MG xenografts for [68Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi and [68Ga]Ga-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)2. [177Lu]Lu-DOTA.SA.FAPi and [177Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)2, were evaluated in PC3 xenografts. Biodistribution studies of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi were performed in healthy male and female mice.

RESULTS

All radiotracers exhibited strong binding to FAP. Their internalization rate was fast while only [177Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)2 was retained longer in CAFs. [68Ga]Ga-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)2 and [177Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)2 displayed elevated lipophilicity and affinity for human serum proteins compared to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA.SA.FAPi. In vivo studies revealed slower washout of [68Ga]Ga-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)2 within 3 h compared to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi. The tumor-to-tissue ratios of [68Ga]Ga-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)2 versus [68Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi did not exhibit any significant differences. [177Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)2 maintained a significant tumor uptake even after 96 h p.i. compared to [177Lu]Lu-DOTA.SA.FAPi.

CONCLUSIONS

Dimeric compounds hold promise for therapy, while monomers are better suited for diagnostics. Finding the right combination is essential for effective disease management.

Head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of tonsil cancer and lymph node metastases: a single-centre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging for primary lesions and metastatic lymph nodes in patients with tonsil cancer.

METHOD

Twenty-one tonsil cancer patients who underwent [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT scans within two weeks in our centre were retrospectively enrolled. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of the two tracers were compared by using the Mann‒Whitney U test. In addition, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the two methods for diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes were analysed.

RESULTS

In detecting primary lesions, the efficiency was higher for [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT (20/22) than for [18F]FDG PET/CT (9/22). Although [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 uptake (SUVmax, 5.03 ± 4.06) was lower than [18F]FDG uptake (SUVmax, 7.90 ± 4.84, P = 0.006), [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 improved the distinction between the primary tumor and contralateral normal tonsillar tissue. The TBR was significantly higher for [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT (3.19 ± 2.06) than for [18F]FDG PET/CT (1.89 ± 1.80) (p < 0.001). In lymph node analysis, SUVmax and TBR were not significantly different between [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT (7.67 ± 5.88 vs. 8.36 ± 6.15, P = 0.498 and 5.56 ± 4.02 vs. 4.26 ± 3.16, P = 0.123, respectively). The specificity and accuracy of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT were higher than those of [18F]FDG PET/CT in diagnosing metastatic cervical lymph nodes (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The availability of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 complements the diagnostic results of [18F]FDG by improving the detection rate of primary lesions and the diagnostic accuracy of cervical metastatic lymph nodes in tonsil cancer compared to [18F]FDG.

Prognostic significance of 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT in patients with bone metastases in various cancers

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare 18FDGPET/CT in patients who develop bone metastases due to various cancers and to investigate the prognostic significance of the 68FAPI-PET/CT SUVmax value for survival.

METHODS

Patients with bone metastases who underwent both 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT and 18FDGPET/CT within a 1 week period were included in this retrospective study. The effect of the SUVmax value of bone lesions on overall survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 75 eligible patients with 139 bone lesions were included in this study. The median age of the patients was 55 (30-83) and 48(64%) patients were newly diagnosed. The primary lesion median 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT SUVmax value was higher than the median 18FDGPET/CT SUVmax (10.75 versus 6.7). Bone lesions 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT SUVmax median (IQR) were 7.8 (4.6-13.2), and 18FDGPET/CT SUVmax of bone lesions were 5.9 (3.8-8.2). More bone lesions were detected on 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT than on 18FDGPET/CT(median IQR 4 [1-9] versus 2 [1-6] (p = 0.014). The extra lesions observed on 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT were mostly sclerotic bone lesions (p = 0.001).68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT SUVmax was significantly higher in vertebra and thorax lesions (p = 0.011 and p = 0.018, respectively). While the bone lesion 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT SUVmax affected the OS, the 18FDGPET/CT SUVmax value did not affect the OS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.079, respectively). In ROC analysis, a cut-off-off value of 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT SUVmax > 7.7 was found for OS (AUC: 0.619). The median OS in the group above the cut-off value was worse than that in the group below the cut-off value (32 versus 45) months (p = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis for OS, the 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT SUVmax of bone lesions was an important parameter, as well as cancer subtype, ALP level, and disease occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT detected more bone lesions and higher SUVmax values than 18FDGPET/CT in various cancers. The prognostic value of the SUVmax value of 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT bone lesions was observed regardless of disease subtype.